TPMCafe
« Obama's Fatal Error | Home | The Death Of Why? »

Make Health, Not War

user-pic

Afghanistan needs more sociologists, not more troops. Sociologists would point out that Americans tend to see this country as one nation, with a central government and national security forces. But it actually is a collection of tribes--(including Tajik, Uzbek and Hazara). The first loyalty of most members of these tribes is to their own kind, not to the national government. Most Afghans correctly perceive the national government as corrupt to the core, in cahoots with drug lords, promoted by foreign powers, and the beneficiary of fraudulent elections.

We have been trying for eight years to straighten out this government, to no avail. We should now work with the local tribes and their natural leaders, rather than seek to impose a false national order on them.We should let the people of Afghanistan duke it out with the Taliban, to determine how much of a sharia regime they are willing to tolerate. However, we should not allow our young people to be killed for rights most Afghans do not want. Surely, they show no sign that they are willing to die for them.

We should make it clear that if the Afghans ever again allow their turf to be used as a base for terrorists, we shall bomb the daylights out of them. However, we need not be in Afghanistan to do this.Finally, we should not lump the Taliban--keen to run their own country-- in with Al Qaeda, which seeks to harm us. True, these two are now allies, but this is the case at least in part because we treat them as if they were of one kind.

President Obama conducted a strategic review of Afghanistan. It concluded that we should seek "to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat Al Qaeda in Pakistan and Afghanistan and to prevent their return to either country in the future." This is a precise and narrow goal that can be achieved, as long as we understand that we cannot get there by nation building--a task which is simply beyond our reach. Let the Afghan people form the local governments they favor, and let these form inter-regional alliances, and let us leave them be. Most of the Afghans will be happy in return to let us be.

A someone who was around during the Vietnam War, I predict that whatever number of troops President Obama will now agree to add to the war in Afghanistan, the generals will come back and ask for more. If those are not sent, critics will attribute to this "failure"--the reason Afghanistan will not be stabilized. Best to get off this bloody escalator now.

Amitai Etzioni is Professor of International Relations at The George Washington University. For more discussion, see his book: Security First (Yale, 2007), or http://www.gwu.edu/~ccps/securityfirst.html. email: icps@gwu.edu


4 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

"However, we should not allow our young people to be killed for rights most Afghans do not want. Surely, they show no sign that they are willing to die for them."

I agree with the sentiment -- I don't think our troops should be dying over there for any reason -- but I question your willingness or ability to know what Afghanis are thinking or what they want.

I also don't think that cozying up to people you call tribal leaders but are as likely warlords and wannabe dictators is the answer.

Still, I could be persuaded to support a "pull our troops out and isolate the place" strategy.

user-pic

The professor of International Relations writes:"we shall bomb the daylights out of them". Some relations.

user-pic

There are young girls risking death to go to school.

user-pic

Could agree more with this assessment. This is the kind of assessment we needed BEFORE we ever committed troops to this inevitable failure.

Honestly, there were only 3 reasons we went to Afghanistan, and of those only one good reason.

1. To dismantle al Qaieda
2. To get revenge for 9/11/01
3. To reinstate a pipeline deal for Central Asian resources

Of course, we never really got any closure as a country because we never got Bin Laden--as if one person's death could make us actually feel better. But nonetheless, it never happened.

The dispersement of al Qaieda happened, but since they're not a national entity, this is hardly a "cure" to future attacks.

And whatever's happening with the energy deals of Central Asia, you can bet that it will come back to haunt the American people. Chalmers Johnson wrote the bible on this phenomenon aptly titled "Blowback".

The fact is that the Taliban did one thing well: they eliminated 95% (by UN stats) of poppy cultivation under their rule. As soon as they left power, poppy cultivation exceeded its previous highs. If anyone doesn't realize it, opium production (estimated by the UN) accounts for the MAJORITY of the Afghan GDP. We--the US military, DOD agencies and PMC's (Private Military Contractors) have an active (and likely profitable) hand in the delivery of opium to Turkey and on to Europe for consumption.

Basically, we are not helping the situation by being there. We are just allowing hand-picked warlords to control a massive, nearly exclusive drug trade.

People are just starting to question the wisdom of a long-term ground war in Afghanistan. Fucking idiots.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address