Gov. Patrick: Appoint Mrs. Kennedy
There is only one person who can carry the torch for Ted Kennedy. It is his widow, Victoria Reggie Kennedy.
She;s qualified. She's been a very successful lawyer and was a political activist before marrying Kennedy.
But, of course, the main reason she is the only one who can do the job is that she was Teddy's spouse and partner. Her presence in the Senate -- fighting for Kennedy's lifelong dream -- would have a powerful effect starting with shaming the Republicans into some semblance of civility.
Can they really bellow about death panels in front of Victoria Kennedy? Can they really keep lying about socialism and the rest?
I suppose they can but it will be harder.
Additionally, she knows the issue backwards and forwards.
There is no other possible choice for the seat. Anyone else -- Barney Frank, Ed Markey, whoever -- can run for the full term. But the one person who can make a difference on health reform this session is Mrs. Kennedy. She has to accept the appointment.




















Dukakis!
Come on, lets break the family lineage to that Senate seat. It's better for everyone. Dukakis would do a good job.
August 31, 2009 10:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Or Joe.
August 31, 2009 11:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
It is my understanding, and everybody here knows I could be wrong, is that Vicki Kennedy does not want the seat.
August 31, 2009 11:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Can they bellow? Of course they can. And they will. They've taken it too far already. Victoria Kennedy's presence wouldn't do anything to abate it.
August 31, 2009 11:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Can't argue with her creds, but if she doesn't want it, how about a liberal Massachusetts Democrat who is also a practicing medical doctor?
Someone who can speak from experience about the healthcare issues?
Just a thought...
August 31, 2009 11:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
What's wrong with having a special election? That seems like the democratic thing to do.
August 31, 2009 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why stop here? I would support a constitutional amendment to reserve 50 seats in the senate to scions of wealthy families. It's the American way. Only commies are against that.
On second thoughts. Why bother with a constitutional amendment?
August 31, 2009 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
They will hold the special election in any case. Vickie Kennedy, or whoever is appointed, would not be able to run. She would be fine in the interim, IMO. And Joe could run in the special election. But who am I, or any of us who do not live in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to dream of an ideal successor to Teddy's seat?
Al Franken, we never needed your intelligence and heart more than we do now. Please get on with it, Senator.
August 31, 2009 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I watched a lot of the eulogy material. The worst performer I saw was Joe, and it wasn't close. Really may made me wonder. Bad hair, very bad speech, bad glasses, bad nose, bad skin, disorganized, amateurish...
Also he seemed to know Ted Kennedy only as the guy who always remembered his birthday and who used to take him on family trips. Like we were listening to 13-year old.
Of course, maybe he had a bad day. Ted Kennedy junior was brilliant BTW. Just observations...
August 31, 2009 1:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not able to run? Whats to stop them?
August 31, 2009 3:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
MJ. Did you really need to write this post? I mean for real?
there is no other possible choice...out of a highly educated state of 6.5 million?
Quit wasting valuable cafe space with crap like this.
August 31, 2009 12:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Appointing a spouse, close relative, or close associate of a deceased office-holder to serve for the remainder of their term is a long-time, and very logical, American tradition. It's been practiced as high as the Senate (e.g., Muriel Humphrey) and even more often in town and county positions, especially in the days when the (typically male) office-holder was the only one in the family to have a salary. It provides for continuity of philosophy and procedures -- the closest that is possible to giving the voters the representation they voted for, continuity of staffing and staff practices, and continuity of constituent services. And, since the relative most often does not choose to run for the office on their own, it provides for a level playing field for those who want to compete for the nominations and the position in the next election. Obviously the person needs to be competent to carry out the duties of the position (which Vicki clearly is and certainly Mrs. Humphrey was).
The biggest advantage, to my mind, is that it is a practice that would benefit, equally, any political party or political philosophy: there would be no sudden shift in position from that of the person who was most recently voted into power by the people, whether that person was liberal, moderate or conservative.
August 31, 2009 12:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Respectfully suggest you stick to Israel and US policy toward Israel.
August 31, 2009 12:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think Mrs. Kennedy would be a bad choice. I do, however, think it pretty extreme to say there is "no other possible" choice. That's obviously not true. I cannot think of another state with as many people who are incredibly well qualified than Massachusetts and I'm not just talking about the politicians salivating at the prospect either. There are literally dozens of people in Massachusetts who could step into that position and do a marvelous job. As just one example outside of the predictable list of politicians how about Lawrence Tribe? There are many, many others.
August 31, 2009 1:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
For what it's worth, Random House, publisher of a recent Ted biography, just sent out this note:
"According to celebrated Kennedy biographer Edward Klein, Ted Kennedy's dying wish was to see his wife Vicki fill his Senate seat.
Says Klein: "His two best friends, Senators Christopher Dodd and Orrin Hatch, would not have come out and publicly endorsed Vicki the day after Ted Kennedy was buried unless Senator Kennedy had indicated to them that his widow was his choice as his replacement."
"What makes this story so intriguing," Klein continues, "is that there is long-standing friction between Vicki and the late Senator's children and his nieces and nephews. As I wrote in my book, TED KENNEDY: The Dream That Never Died, I think we're in for a battle royal within the Kennedy family over the succession to Ted Kennedy."
August 31, 2009 1:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't mean to sound callous here, but Ted Kennedy is gone. The Senate seat should be about the people of Massachusetts, and who they want to represent them in the Senate. It is illogical to think that this seat should be held hostage to the wishes of a dead man.
Whenever a seats opens up in the House, a special election is held. Why can't the same be true for a Senate seat?
August 31, 2009 2:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're not being callous, you're being entirely sensible.
August 31, 2009 2:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Whenever a seats opens up in the House, a special election is held. Why can't the same be true for a Senate seat?"
It was that way until six months ago. Then the Democrats, unhappy over Bacevich in Illinois, decided to change things to suit their immediate political needs. Now they want to change it back, again to suit their immediate needs. Basically, the Democrats no longer stand for anything at all, except political expediency. They certainly couldn't care less about democracy. Just about maintaining their wealth and power, and promoting corporate interests. It's the elitist Kennedy legacy. Ted and his brothers are gone, but the extraordinary damage they've done to American democracy will be with us for quite a while.
August 31, 2009 2:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
mikep,
what "extraordinary damage"?
August 31, 2009 3:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
1. Did no one notice that mipep confused "Bacevich" with "Blagojevich"? One is a respected professor, the other.....
2. The "extraordinary damage" would certainly be championing the rights of working people. Nothing says "I hate America" like trying to improve the lives of actual Americans. (Maybe mipep should watch some programs besides "Hannity" and "Glen Beck.")
August 31, 2009 4:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Um, wealth, Mikep?
Democrats legislating to keep their wealth? Ah, are you (and I shouldn't be glib because many of your party leaders are) totally fucking crazy?
As to them elections, I respectfully offer,
Overreach THIS!!
August 31, 2009 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
>>>Then the Democrats, unhappy over Bacevich in Illinois, decided to change things to suit their immediate political needs.
What precisely is it that the Mass. Dems supposedly did because of their unhappiness over the actions of Bacevich (I assume you mean Blagojevich) in Illinois?? You've totally lost me on that one. I'm also curious what "corporate interests" the Kennedys - any of them -- spent great effort protecting. Can you provide some specifics?
August 31, 2009 4:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, like most states, the Senate seat was filled by the governor of MA by special appointment until the Dems were afraid that if they lost Kerry to White House that the Republican governor at the time (everyone's fav) Mitt Romney would get to do the appointing. The Dems changed the rules to block Mitt and made it go to special elections.
August 31, 2009 4:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, not every Democrat is enamored with the Kennedys. My grandfather supported Lyndon Johnson in 1960.
August 31, 2009 6:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ted Kennedy is gone, but he continues to be the last person that the Mass. voters chose to represent them in the Senate. Vicki (or perhaps Joe II) is the person most likely to carry on the policies and programs of that most-recently-elected person. I agree that it shouldn't be *his* wishes that control - it should be the wishes of the voters of Mass. See my post above. ---- It's a way of dealing with this sort of situation that doesn't favor one party over another: *whoever* the officeholder was, they would be replaced - at least until the next election - by someone who would continue on their policies. The voters aren't deprived of a voice, and they don't have their most recent decision ignored.
August 31, 2009 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Uh, if his publisher just sent out a "note" to this effect, you might even get the impression (and far be it from me) that this was pre-coordinated with Ted. ....Who, just by the way of saying, didn't get denied all that often, especially in his "waning" years.
Sorry, but Joe's a shmoe. He could take the holdover seat for the few months, who cares?
Vicki Kennedy is the soon-to-be junior Senator from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. And thanks, Destor, for the good tip...
August 31, 2009 3:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
There is nothing on God's green Earth that will lead the GOP to obtaining any semblance of civility. Where have you been these past 9 years?
August 31, 2009 3:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
So!
We have Overreached out and learned the following:
Some Trusted Transitional will be named Senator until the Special Election. The Democratic nominee at the Special Election will have a leg up due to her Catholic ties, her close association with the former Senatorial leadership, her good looks in middle age, and her recent successful marriage to the Lion of the Senate. Given her relative inexperience, it will be a real challenge for her (hee-hee-hee!), but she'll have a shot at being Senator and not just for one term.
And all you buffoons who declared the Kennedy legacy dead, you can go regroup and reformat and reconsider... And pleasant dreams to all...
August 31, 2009 4:17 PM | Reply | Permalink