Two Lions: When Ted Kennedy Privately Honored Yitzhak Rabin
It is a small part of his great legacy but it should not go unmentioned that Ted Kennedy was one of the few senators who rarely, if ever, yielded to the pressure to join the Israel-is-always-right caucus. The mindless jingoism of his colleagues was not his way (nor is it John Kerry's) and when he addressed the Israeli-Palestinian issue, he was compassionate and even-handed. He was not your standard "liberal on everything but Israel" type.
Professor Leonard Fein from Boston (of Americans for Peace Now) -- who has spent a lifetime struggling for Middle East peace -- offers this beautiful remembrance of Ted Kennedy today. He describes a small incident in Kennedy's long life but one that tells us a lot about the man.
"On the morning of the day before the funeral of Yitzhak Rabin, Senator Ted Kennedy called the White House to inquire if it was appropriate to bring to the burial some earth from Arlington National Cemetery. The answer was essentially a shrug: Who knows? Unadvised, the senator carried a shopping bag onto the plane, filled with earth he had himself dug the afternoon before from the graves of his two murdered brothers. And at Mount Herzl in Jerusalem, after waiting for the crowd and the cameras to disperse, he dropped to his hands and knees, and gently placed that earth on the grave of the murdered prime minister.
No spin, no photo op; a man unreasonably familiar with bidding farewell to slain heroes, a man in mourning, quietly making tangible a miserable connection."
Miserable it is. But how much more miserable it would be if we never had these heroes at all?





















That's very moving. Thanks for sharing it.
August 26, 2009 3:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Surely something the vitriolic Right-wing will forget to mention when savaging the reputation of this great leader.
August 26, 2009 3:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lovely anecdote, very typical. Can just imagine the Murdoch press, Rush and that gang all demonizing him vs. the truth of a story like this one.
August 26, 2009 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
:)
August 26, 2009 3:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Another reminder that the Senate seems to be a far less *human* place than it used to be...
August 26, 2009 4:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
You do know that Jesse Helms used to be in the Senate.....
August 26, 2009 6:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
I had never heard that story. Thank you for sharing that with us. It really moved me.
August 26, 2009 4:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ditto!
August 26, 2009 5:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
What a truly beautiful story.
August 26, 2009 5:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ted Kennedy was one of the few senators who rarely, if ever, yielded to the pressure to join the Israel-is-always-right caucus.
August 26, 2009 7:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
“Iran has had closer ties to terrorism than Iraq,” he said on Sept, 26, 2002. “Iran has a nuclear weapons development program, and it already has a missile that can reach Israel.”
Israel did not agitate for the attack on Iraq. Sharon was agnostic and did cooperate with US up to a point in regards to military assets and exaggerated WMD (bio/chem & missiles) intelligence estimates for American consumers. For whatever reasons, the Israelis refused to cobble up linkages between Saddam to AQ.
Given that Kennedy's statement about Iran of 9/2002 perfectly echoed the sentiments of the Israeli government @ the time, the institutional belief in the Iranian "exisential threat" to Israel mythology embedded in our political superstructure is truly bi-partisan. Israelis had stopped worrying about Iraq and Saddam long ago; their focus shifted to Iran ca. 1993.
Let's hope that Obama doesn't think that attacking Iran would be a "smart war".
August 26, 2009 9:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
FWIW, here is the "viciously anti-Israel" resolution McHenry voted for, mistakenly according to subsequent apologies from the Carter administration, and which apparently caused such an uproar during the New York primary:
http://domino.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0a2a053971ccb56885256cef0073c6d4/5aa254a1c8f8b1cb852560e50075d7d5
The resolution calls on Israel to stop building settlements in Jerusalem and the occupied territories, and to dismantle its existing settlements. There is, in fact, nothing vicious about the resolution at all. It is filled with common sense.
Perhaps the key paragraph is this one:
5. Determines that all measures taken by Israel to change the physical character, demographic composition, institutional structure or status of the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since 1967, including Jerusalem, or any part thereof, have no legal validity and that Israel's policy and practices of settling parts of its population and new immigrants in those territories constitute a flagrant violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War and also constitute a serious obstruction to achieving a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East;
Here the authors of the resolution took a "vicious" stand for international law, and against colonialism and the acquisition of territory by force.
The population of the Israeli colonies in the occupied territories was in 1980 only about 1/20th of what it is today, and so the settlement issue was much more tractable. If people like Kennedy had managed to avoid playing domestic politics with the Israeli colonization of Palestine back in 1980, perhaps we would have found a way out of that mess by now, and prevented three more decades of violence.
Perhaps emboldened by their success in influencing the US presidential race and administration, Israel passed the Jerusalem Law in July, 1980, declaring Jerusalem, "complete and united", the capital of Israel.
Kennedy has a long record of progressive legislative accomplishments that needs no repeating, but he was as much in the tank for Israel as anyone.
August 27, 2009 8:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
From an Arab commenter on Helena Cobban's Syria vs Maliki et al thread, another memory about the youthful Ted Kennedy relayed to the author in 1987:
August 26, 2009 9:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Support for Israel has become almost a necessity in American politics and I'm sure if you check the record closely, Teddy was guilty of it (albeit to a lesser degree) like most politicians. But, I do get your point that he did not wear it on his sleeve, or visably trade on the association like so many politicians.
August 27, 2009 11:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey MJ, Haaretz is quoting this blog:
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1110799.html
They screwed up the attribution for some reason. Sloppy.
August 28, 2009 1:27 PM | Reply | Permalink