Marty Peretz: A Jew Hater In The White House Is Leading Obama Astray
Check out Matt Yglesias' takedown of the increasingly nutty Marty Peretz.
Peretz writes that "there is someone in [Obama's] entourage who is leading him astray, gravely astray. And that someone has it in for Israel and for American Jews, too."
This is scary. I'm not scared because I think that Reggie Love is an anti-semite (you know he's at the top of MP's list).
I'm scared because this month is my birthday and, like most people, I'm getting older. Soon (not too soon) I could be a crazy old geezer like Marty Peretz. I mean he wasn't always a bigot and a paranoid. In 1968, he backed Gene McCarthy and never talked about the anti-semites at all. He actually liked Martin Luther King!
But then time passed and he became the alta kocker at the Dunkin Donuts muttering about the "goyim" and those other ones likes Henry Louis Gates.
It could happen to me. I think I'm starting to develop a Yiddish accent (strange for a third generation American) and I keep playing Al Jolson records. Is this how it started for Marty?

















MJ, check this out:
http://menassat.com/?q=en/news-articles/7025-bingo-u-s-donors-fund-illegal-jewish-settlements
About Peretz: is he nuts of dishonest?
August 6, 2009 1:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
I am absolutely sure that you're not goin' there.
But... Let's talk about it once every ten years. So long as I'm right, you can buy me a martini. Soon as I'm wrong, I walk out.
:)
August 6, 2009 1:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, this is good news. Marty doesn't think that Obama is the Jew Hater in Chief, even if he might be a foreign born Muslim with terrorist connections.
Super broadminded!
August 6, 2009 1:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not anti-semetic. I'm just anti-throwing-Palestinian-families-out-of-their-homes.
August 6, 2009 4:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
IMHO for those like Taitz, Peretz and followers, to be a Zionist with a rabidity that is all-consuming, covers either a desperate unhappiness or a just as desperate need to be recognized by their peers in order to hide a personal inadequacy. This is illustrated graphically in this week's hilarious but pathetic TV interview where Taitz simmered and boiled over because nobody acknowledged how important she was! It applies equally to many on both sides of the anti-Semitic divide. Too much time, too little education, probably divorced parents and a history of being bullied at school - and a sick cat.
August 6, 2009 4:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Is there an equivalent pathology for those who are consumed with the moral failures of Israel?
August 6, 2009 8:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think my "obsession" will end when the Occupation does.
But there are moral voices in Zion. See http://mondoweiss.net/2009/08/of-course-its-about-racism.html
August 6, 2009 10:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
AG - I have observed Yom Kippur in Israel for each of the last 17 years. It has been many years since I heard any cries for atonement of Jewish sins. The entire time seems to be devoted to a recitation of Palestinian and arab sins.
When will Israelis in general and the government acknowledge the terrible suffering they have inflicted on the Palestinians? When they admit to the terrible things I've seen with my own eyes, I will stop listing Jewish sins in forums like this. When I no longer hear on our most Holy day that more Deir Yassin's are needed, will I quiet my voice.
There is evil in Israel today. It has by no means infected the majority of Israelis yet. However, I have watched it grow year by year like a cancer destroying the Israel I love. How can any Jew not raise their voice in alarm at such a threat? This has nothing to do with arabs or Palestinians - this is a direct threat to my people, my family.
August 6, 2009 11:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
thanks for useful information!
Best regards, Mary, CEO of youtube download
December 16, 2010 8:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Al Jolson records? The original 'Jolie'? He's a fount of all this crazy BS? Naw... Peretz and the boys author this hysterical gibberish - sounding for all the world like they expect zombie Hamans to pop out of their overnight bags - not because they believe this stuff, but because accusations of anti-Semitism have always been effective in shutting down all debate. Gentiles squelch even legitimate criticism and differences rather than get tagged with that canard. But this acquiescence by intimidation is ebbing; the ploy has been employed too cheaply, too often. This new arrangement will be a good thing, not a bad thing. Silence has made any issue regarding Israel wildly one-sided. And it's helped create the monster that is the Mideast today.
August 6, 2009 7:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, the Jews have famously throughout history bludgeoned their opponents into silence through unwarranted charges of antisemitism. Who exactly are those cowering gentiles? I'm so relieved they've been liberated!
Almost as good as yesterday's gem: exposing the myth of Israel's "peril" while pointing out that it is an "historic anachronism" that will someday disappear.
August 6, 2009 8:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ah. Yes. When all else fails, throw in history. And I suppose your own reality is tormented and delimited by antagonists - everywhere. Now. Today.
Or not.
There comes a point where even the most beleagured victims must prove their victimizers' currency.
Now. Today.
August 6, 2009 8:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
ARMCHAIR G
Yes! They are those who remember the joyous exhilaration at the UN Resolution that established a Jewish state in Palestine, in 1948. They felt they lived at the beginning of a new age in which Jews from around the world and, in particular, from war-torn Europe would find, at last, a sanctuary and peace. They assumed that the new state would honour the specific requirement in the Balfour Declaration not to damage or harm the existing indigenous peoples of Palestine – the Muslim Arabs who had lived there continuously for over a thousand years. Instead, the new state became an arrogant caricature of a Jewish homeland that exists in co-operation with its neighbors. These are they who are consumed with the moral failures of Herzl's once proud vision. They are both angry and bitterly ashamed at the war crimes of the Likud government.
August 6, 2009 8:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't you want to connect this somehow to Orly Taitz & the Birthers? Here's your chance.
August 6, 2009 9:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Happy Birthday, and don't worry. Every geezer doesn't become paranoid. I'm a geezer and I'm not paranoid. Everyone really is out to get me. (Except Marty Peretz--he doesn't know I exist, so please don't tell him).
August 6, 2009 9:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
I've been reading the New Republic for forty years. I didn't renew my subscription this year as I was tired of helping fund Peretz's ranting irrationality. Pity...I'll miss Stanley Kauffman's film reviews.
August 6, 2009 12:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
There comes a point where even the most beleagured victims must prove their victimizers' currency.
the holocaust get-out-of-jail-card is expiring sooner than expected due to israel's bellicosity, intransigency, and mega-steroid-chutzpah.
August 6, 2009 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey Carroll. Have at it.
August 6, 2009 11:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Takedown from Matt Yglesias?
Here's what Yglesias wrote:
That's, er, it.
Rarely does one witness such a thorough dismembering of another person's argument. It'll be amazing if Peretz ever shows his face in public again.
Sarcasm aside, notice how, as usual, MJ Rosenberg, like Yglesias, doesn't actually argue anything himself.
Whether or not Obama has being "led astray" by someone in the White House (and I tend to think not - he knows exactly what he's doing), this bit of hyperbole on the part of Peretz is obscuring a larger, more important debate, which is whether the treatment of Israel by the Obama Administration is productive towards the promotion of peace. I think there is a serious argument to be had about that, especially the question of whether the outreach to the Muslim world (which so far has yielded very little - but of course its early days) should be accompanied by an equivalent outreach to Israel, for the purposes of making an argument to Israelis on why a settlement freeze is a good idea and in their interest.
As for the fooferaw over Mary Robinson's Medal of Freedom, I agree with Peretz that her involvement with that disgusting UN conference on racism alone should disqualify her from such an honor. Whether it's worth making a stink about is another matter. But the important thing is that it is an unnecessary distraction.
August 6, 2009 1:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nice try a-hole
August 6, 2009 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, there are real, substantial questions that could be debated with respect to Obama's Middle-East policies and the responses from Israel and the Arab nations. But apart from the occasional posts by Avishai and Mort, you won't find that debate here at TPM, which seems devoted to predictable demonization from the of self-proclaimed anti-Zionists Weiss and Co. As for MJ, he's more interested in who is saying what than the substance - as long as it implicates Israel in some way.
And speaking of takedowns, I thought artappraiser did a pretty good job on MJ yesterday. http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/08/04/robert_kaplan_former_neocon_former_idf_soldiers_wa/#comment-3550546
August 6, 2009 2:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm so glad you, artappraiser and Bar Kafka have convinced yourselves that you are right. Maybe you could carpool.
August 6, 2009 3:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
"for the purposes of making an argument to Israelis on why a settlement freeze is a good idea and in their interest."
Here's one argument--if Israelis are allowed to settle on the West Bank, then why can't Palestinians settle inside Israel? What sort of semi-permeable membrane allows one ethnic group free passage both ways, but filters out Arabs?
If the Israelis insist on settling the West Bank, then eventually Palestinians are going to start chanting "one man, one vote".
Israelis know all this perfectly well--they just refuse to do anything about it, apparently figuring that they've gotten away with it so far. So maybe the argument should be that they can't expect any further support for apartheid-like policies and it would be in their interest to understand this.
August 6, 2009 11:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Archbishop Tutu is an anti-Semite, then so am I
Peretz is going to define the Jewish people into a very lonely corner
August 6, 2009 1:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
For the Zionist nutbags, the world is becoming a very small place indeed
They're going after Jews - again
First they came for Tutu but I wasn't Anglican....
August 6, 2009 3:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm confused.
Wasn't it the GOPers who said, "If you're not for us, you're against us" ?
August 6, 2009 8:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wonder if Josh is aware of the anti-Israel ragtag follower that follow MJ like groupies?
Josh, who has noted the fact that the birther mentality is a stalking horse for unstated racist attitudes, surely understands that many of the unbalanced, virulently anti-Israel comments on this thread (and many other MJ threads) are motivated by anti-Semitism.
MJ has effectively (and correctly) policed out the anti-Arab racists, but for some reason tolerates the anti-Israel anti-Semites. This reflects badly on TPM, which should not be tainted in this way.
Josh - is there anything you can do - maybe have a water-cooler discussion with MJ? I'm assuming you care about the integrity of the project you are developing, and that if there were an uncontrolled, ragtag group of commenters that constantly said that Africa was evil or that China was evil, you would see it as veiled racism. This is no different.
August 7, 2009 5:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
TO PC, you say "if there were an uncontrolled, ragtag group of commenters that constantly said that Africa was evil or that China was evil, you would see it as veiled racism."
No, racism is when you say Chinese people are evil. Or Africans are morons. Criticism, including strong criticism, of any country is not hate speech. Including Israel.
There is (was) one anti-semite around here, always going on about the Jews. I don't want to mention his name because I don't want him back!
Show me anti-semitism ("the Jews control the banks," the "Jews are pornographers") and I'll make sure they are gone. (Josh is way too busy to patrol the site although he follows it closely and weighs in where necessary).
One last example. Mythbuster hates Israeli policies. He does not hate Israelis or Jews. Bar Kafka (aka Zionista) is invariably against the Palestinian side but expresses no hate of Arabs or Palestinians per se.
So they are okay. You show me racism (not despising a foreign country) and I'll take care of it.
August 7, 2009 9:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Happy birthday MJ!
Could the 'astray' culprit be Rahm Emmanuel? Then he would occupy that bizarre category of "self hating" Jew! Funny that the 'self hating' meme is rarely if ever used with any other group - like no priest would call me a "self hating Catholic" nor would I be called a "self hating Welshman" by Tom Jones.
Sometimes you just gotta smile and shake your head.
August 7, 2009 2:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually... some of my best friends are self-hating Cornishmen.
August 7, 2009 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, KE.
The whole self-hating thing is dumb. A Catholic can be a "lapsed: or "fallen" or "ex" Catholic but no one assumes that means he or she hates his or her SELF.
As I often say to those who call me an SHJ, "No, I definitely don't hate myself. It's you I don't like."
August 7, 2009 6:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, the parallel to a so-called "self-hating Jew" is an Uncle Tom. They used to be called Uncle Jakes, actually.
August 7, 2009 10:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
MJ: "Mythbuster hates Israeli policies. He does not hate Israelis or Jews."
So true. And the day, I start hating Jews--or even Israelis (although I already hate the IDF because of Gaza)--is the day that My Dream for Palestine dies. If all this turns into is a grubby land fight between bigoted peoples, then that cause is finished. I just want my wife's Palestinian Christian family to be able to travel from Bethlehem to Ramallah and onto Amman without having to ask permission from some IDF nitwit with a Russian accent. Is that so terrible?
P.S. Note how TPC's last redoubt is guilt, not logic. He/she will hate the rest of the 21st Century.
August 7, 2009 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is rich. I'd really love for someone here to provide me with a little bit of history of the Palestinians prior to 1919, if you can.
Additionally, if Palestinians were forcibly removed from their homes, why is it that Israel has a very large Arab Israeli population of free citizens who vote, own property, own businesses, and have the same rights and freedoms that every Israeli has?
January 29, 2010 2:07 PM | Reply | Permalink