White Residential Enclaves, White Nationalism and the Re-articulation of Racism in the 21st Century
The morning news carries a story, the essence of which, is a sadly recurring piece of American life. A summer day camp in Philadelphia paid almost $2,000 so that its black and Latino children could go swimming one day a week at a privately-owned (white) pool club in the suburbs. After one visit, the children were met with a hostile reception by the pool's white patrons, the day camp's money was quickly refunded and the children told not to come back.
Incredibly, the pool club president told the Associated Press that the members of the club were not motivated by race when denying the children entrance after their camp had paid the requisite fee, but that "a lot of kids would change the complexion--and the atmosphere of the club."
Huntington Valley is an upper-middle class overwhelmingly white community with a total population of 20,917. Of those numbers, 158 are black, another 242 are Hispanic and 804 are Asian-American. There are many such residential enclaves in the United States of America. And they form the hard pit of reality inside the white nationalist phantasmagoria. At the end of my book, Blood and Politics: The History of the White Nationalist Movement from the Margins to the Mainstream, you will read the words of one of the recurring characters: white people will "pay $300,000 for a $75,000 home, just so they can live with other white people."
You do not have to worry about David Duke becoming president to understand that the "mainstream" character of the white nationalist movement today is rooted in actually existing social relations. There is a difference, however, between the white nationalists who populate my book and the president of the swim club. The latter denies that he is motivated by racism, while the former asserts that racism is a natural and positive value. The latter lives in a world with Latino gardeners and roofers and black garbage collectors and subway drivers. The former wants to live in a society where everyone meets his definition of whiteness.
The white nationalists would tell pool club members that they have a racial claim on that concrete tub of water. That they "earned" the right to that pool. The white-ist would further argue that the presence of black children at that pool is an act which dispossesses white people---turns them into victims. And so emerges from the heart of white nationalism the notion of the white "victim," just one of the many ways that this movement is rearticulating the ideas and practices of racism in the 21st century.






















Another writer tries to ride the racism train...
Perhaps the woman who was "overhead" should have been more politically correct and instead of "these kids" say "unfamiliar faces" to mean kids she hasn't seen in that pool before.
Nevermind, the festival has started, so who cares about what really happened. Bill Clinton and South Carolina all over again...
Except this time, the shocking racist pool owner is an ardent Obama supporter and a member of Organizing for America.
Ooooops!
July 10, 2009 11:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
July 10, 2009 11:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
I see the usual racism apologists have emerged from their wormy woodwork.
July 10, 2009 12:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Grouch I respect your writing. I think we should hold our fire until this story unfolds completely. My rational is in my comments here;
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/cjames/2009/07/why-guilty-white-liberals-feel.php#comment-3523495
July 10, 2009 1:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Grouch, I see it too.
July 11, 2009 6:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
What is a "white nationalist phantasmagoria," let alone a "hard pit of reality"? Do you mean "pit" as in "cherry pit" rather than a hollowed-out ditch? If so, you seem to be saying such residential enclaves are a cherry-pit-sized nugget of reality within the phantasmagoria—do I have that right? No? Because that's what you said.
What the hell are you saying? Did you read what you wrote before you posted?
I think we should rescind your pool privileges.
July 10, 2009 1:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
The former wants to live in a society where everyone meets his definition of whiteness.
Translation: They want to live amongst people who share their bourgeois lifestyle, standard of living, and social values.
Why is this such a terrible thing? People from different cultures may have different values and different things that they want out of society. To the extent that people of different ethnic/racial backgrounds want similar things, or want things that complement each other, integration is sensible. But to the extent that their social values would entail living in neighborhoods with extremely different social structures, segregation is going to occur naturally.
I have no problem with middle-class blacks moving inot my neighborhood. I would have a very difficult time with lots of poor single welfare mothers or "gangstas" moving into my neighborhood. If this means that I prefer blacks who "act white," then so be it.
July 10, 2009 5:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
As for this particular pool situation, if it is true that the people rescinded their contract due to the races/ethnicities of the kids involved, then yes, what the pool owners did is terrible. They made a deal and should be held to it.
I have heard someone suggest that the real problem is that the pool was not designed for the number of kids that the camp had. If this is true, it mitigates things somewhat, although the pool owners still should have been responsibl enough to have determined how many kids would be involved beforehand.
July 10, 2009 5:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think the pool management was flagrantly racist but you never win an argument when you try to make children carry the spear of social change. Forced busing did more damage to the Democratic Party than all the other liberal policies combined.
July 10, 2009 5:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jumping to Conclusions about Dr. John Duesler
by C. James Thomas
July 11, 2009 12:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
SORRY LINK HERE;
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/cjames/2009/07/jumping-to-conclusions-about-d.php
July 11, 2009 12:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sure Bill Gates and Warren Buffett are included in your white nationalist grouping?
As you tell the facts at the swimming pool, suspicions of racism are high. But did you tell all the facts? For example, did the kids get rowdy or destructive? Are there other factors? If not, I'd agree with your assessment.
I'll bet there are two sides to the story; then it becomes a question of who is telling the truth. That's the most important determination.
July 10, 2009 8:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Call racism by its real name and a mob will come to carry you off to burn at the stake.
July 11, 2009 6:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree this incident represents despicable attitudes.
However, I disagree that this incident exemplifies the mainstreaming of racism. Neither can it be compared to the broader issue of white enclaves (although I can certainly see how the case can be made).
I am from Philadelphia and am very familiar with the city and surrounding area. The city of Philadelphia itself is historically racist. Profoundly so. Still is. While white flight certainly exists, the attitudes displayed by the these Huntingdon Valley residents simply aren't any different, and perhaps even more moderate, than than those within the city limits.
There are significant reasons city residents move to suburban areas like Huntingdon Valley that have nothing at all to do with race (although white flight can be said to have caused reasons). The city of Philadelphia has a city wage tax. It's also dirty, provides questionable reliability of services, and comprised mainly of dense neighborhoods of rowhouses. It's practically a luxury to have a garage and a backyard. Add a little postage stamp lawn and some sort of tree and you're considered practically rural!
No question these people have deep seated despicable attitudes. However, we also need to look at the context before we draw any broader conclusions.
July 22, 2009 8:18 AM | Reply | Permalink