The lobby now admits it is a 'sliver,' unrepresentative of majority of American Jews
Months ago I declared that Gaza had cracked the Israel lobby. It did so by causing non-affiliated Jews to at last speak out about Israel/Palestine policy. These Jews had traditionally ceded the foreign-policy turf to their pro-Israel cousins (as I did, deferring politely to Marty Peretz out of the stupid guilty feeling that he was a better Jew than I was) till they realized that their cousins were nuts.
The Israel lobby is slowly waking up to the new landscape, and blaming anyone but the real culprit: a state practicing Jim Crow with millions of Palestinians under occupation and promoting a policy of permanent war with its neighbors.
The latest evidence of the lobby's puzzlement is a highly-tendentious piece by Gary Rosenblatt in the Jewish Week about "Whispered Worries About Obama" that--while poohpoohing the settlements and feeding suspicion about Obama-- states that the body of American Jewry is with Obama, even if the "mainstream supporters of Israel and Jewish causes" (i.e. Jewish chauvinists) are against him.
Leaders of American Jewish organizations note an unease among mainstream supporters of Israel and Jewish causes... who say they voted for and admire Barack Obama and support many of his policies, but feel he is being overly critical of Israel and too soft on the Palestinians and on an Iranian regime bent on developing nuclear weapons that could end up aimed at the Jewish state...
An interview with Malcolm Hoenlein follows. The third paragraph, which I've emphasized, is the plum in the pudding:
he told me the other day that "judging from phone calls" he has received, and other responses, "there is an increasing unease" about a number of the Obama administration's recent statements and actions.Those include... the public pressure on Israel to halt settlements -- as if they represented the key to peace rather than the Palestinians' consistent refusal to recognize a Jewish state in the region -- and the lack of specific demands on the Palestinians; and the concern that the president is still determined to engage in dialogue with Iran, despite the regime's brutal behavior following national elections last month.
..[I]s the gap growing between leaders of mainstream Jewish organizations and the majority of American Jews, more than three-quarters of whom voted for Obama, support a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestinian crisis and may well agree that settlements are a hindrance to peace?
More evidence of the same trend. Here's Jennifer Rubin fulminating at Commentary, and calling on the "sliver" of American Jewry that agrees with her:
Where is the outrage in the U.S. -- especially among the 78% of Jews who voted for Obama? Where are the major Jewish institutions that in the past offered rhetorical and political support for a vibrant pro-Israel policy? Yes, Marty Peretz is pretty peeved these days, but an irate column or two from a previously enthusiastic Obama defender are less than what one would expect when Washington decides to launch this sort of policy. One wonders what those offering themselves as official representatives of the American Jewish community and friends of Israel think they are accomplishing by their relative silence.The sliver of American Jewry originally wary of Obama who had warned of just this result is outraged, but not surprised.




















People that want peace have to be strong, very strong, to prevail. It is common to confuse wishing for peace with weakness, lack of resolution and passivity.
Ramp it up, folks. Warmongers are driven by fear and greed. A peace movement will prevail if it works hard. You know you are right - use that conviction - persist and win.
July 2, 2009 9:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
I find Mr. Weiss' commentary to be hateful and dangerous. By focusing relentlessly and exclusively, and hysterically on the perfidy of Israel he impedes the cause of peace he purports to support. The fact that he is Jewish should not insulate him from criticism for his often vile antisemitism - as in this piece on "What Madoff reveals about the new Jewish status." http://www.philipweiss.org/mondoweiss/2009/06/every-couple-months-i-do-a-post-on-how-jews-are-all-over-the-american-establishment-i-do-so-because-its-news-that-is-largely.html
For the record, I favor a two-state solution, oppose the settlements and believe Obama's insistence on a freeze is just and appropriate. Once again, I am left wondering why Josh Marshall gives space to this malicious propagandist. At least most of the regulars around here seem to be staying away.
July 2, 2009 11:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Who is hysterical?
Weiss mentioned nothing about "perfidy of Israel" in this piece. And it is hard for me to find prejudice in the linked article "What Madoff... ".
And given AG's support of a two-state solution and opposion to settlements, I do not understand his fishing for "vileness", other then an attempt to have it both ways. Solidarity with fellow Jews, however insane they may be at the moment, and following common sense. But this is a bit like my favorite middle of the road compromise with our domestic Taliban: why not agree to post 5 commandments on the walls of courthouses?
The situation seems to be that as the political majority in Israel and "Jewish elite" in USA evolved in one direction, the political majority in USA, including lopsided majority of American Jews, evolved in the opposite direction. Obama chose a course of little action, but with a very careful, if not outright clever, choice of shiboleths: settlements and Iran. (About Iran: I just not see how one can whip a war frenzy in USA right now. This dog will hunt no more.)
In any case, for the alliance to survive, someone has to change. And sometimes it means the smaller country. Obama's tactic seems to be: bring your friend to a precipice, and give some time to develop healthy vertigo.
July 3, 2009 1:33 AM | Reply | Permalink