Convening A Blogger Ethics Panel
In Bloggers On The Bus Eric Boehlert, despite being a big fan of the netroots, doesn't pull his punches when talking about some of the sorrier episodes of the 2008 election season, including the way the Obama/Clinton primary got ugly and the rumors that flew about the blogosphere regarding Sarah Palin's last pregnancy and whether or not she faked it. The former is too big a topic for one blog post, but the latter raises some interesting questions.
The problem for liberal bloggers is that while we automatically have better ethical standards than the mainstream cable news media by virtue of not using Matt Drudge as our guiding light, we don't get the benefit of the doubt the way they do, because we're not as shiny or expensive. But a lot of bloggers, particularly smaller ones trying to make a name for themselves, feel the same pressure that the cable news networks do to scoop everyone else. The cable news can afford to take the risk of being wrong in order to get to a story first, but since establishment media and politicians are eager to discredit the bloggers, we can't afford goof-ups like promoting the false story about Palin's pregnancy.
But how can we stop such a thing? By and large, most major bloggers didn't touch the non-story, and some of us condemned it. Despite this, once the rumor touched the liberal blogs, stopping it completely was impossible, since any group of people with reason to try to compete with each for esteem is fertile ground for the worst kind of rumor-mongering. In retrospect, I agree with Eric's conclusion that big bloggers should do more work coming down on these stories, even if it insults our intelligence to acknowledge them. Again, we don't have shininess or money to buy public esteem, so we have to work twice as hard to earn it.
That said, I have to point out that even with the most outlandish example of the worst aspects of blogging, the liberal blogosphere collectively shows way more sense and honesty than either the cable news-driven media or the right wing bloggers. It's not a coincidence that the person who did the most to spread the Palin pregnancy rumor doesn't fit the liberal blogger mold. The only reason the story got much oxygen at all was that Andrew Sullivan, who spent time as an establishment media figure and then as a right wing blogger before becoming an Obama supporter. Both of these fields downright encourage that sort of Drudge-worshipping lack of standards, and both for the same reason---they get lavish rewards on the occasions that their rumor-mongering turns out to be right, and everyone politely ignores it when they get egg on their faces. Sullivan didn't realize that changing camps meant the rules had changed.
Liberal blogs have been an important force in making it harder for the right wing noise machine or their mainstream media enablers don't get away with pushing misinformation. A lot of us did come to blogging in no small part because we couldn't stand how the Bush administration just lied outright about the presence of WMDs in Iraq, and how this lie was echoed uncritically in the mainstream media. We need to keep this part of our identity front and center as we move forward, particularly since the right wing noise machine is gearing up to create another outlandish rumor mill like the kind that legitimately crippled Clinton in the 90s. Now their rumors and conspiracy theories can be subject to the sort of debunking and mockery they didn't get back then, and by holding ourselves to a high standard, we'll make it easier for people to see the huge differences between the liberal blogs and the right wing noise machine.
Title owed, in the true blog fashion, to an in-joke from Eschaton.





















I think we do a pretty good, and natural job of policing ourselves about things like the Palin pregnancy rumor. One nice thing about lefty blogs is that as much as people might be trying to "make names for themselves" there's also a lot of writers, big and small, who really see their role as "helping the movement" and they're just not going to allow others to engage in behavior that they think will hurt us at the polls or even in opinion polls.
Heck, I think the issue of blogger ethics is probably not as important as blogger sense of humor. Some folks take our electoral responsibilities so seriously that you can't even tell a joke without riling people up.
June 19, 2009 9:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Indeed. Obama is doing such an excellent job of destroying his own Presidency that he does not really need rightwing rumor help.
June 19, 2009 11:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Am I the only one that sees the delicious irony in having Marcotte post an article about a Bloggers and ethics.
This is the same person that tried and convicted the Duke LaCross team and then when they were completely exonerated, she claimed that they are still guilty because they would have raped a black girl if they had had the chance. Then she scrubbed this from her blog.
I'm not making this up.
This is the same person who published a book with such a racist cover that it was immediately recalled and reprinted with different images once it was released.
John Edwards' team hired her and then took one look at her writings and dumped her like a hot potato within days.... And given John Edwards' morals, that fact is by itself is astounding.
Now, if telling the truth about an arguably objectional person you allow to post here is a crime, please let me know now. I point this out because this is a major liberal blog, not some extreme site and I would have thought that you would have been more careful who you give voice to. I guess I just expected better.
June 19, 2009 10:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
O my God! People saying irresponsible and false things on the intertubes! What next? Premarital sex?
People are going to talk about what they want to talk about on the blogs. If they find that the environment they occupy is too constricting, and the blogs they visit and associate themselves with too dismissive of their views or theories, they will go somewhere else. I think it is probably a mistake to aspire to maintain some collective enterprise - the liberal blogosphere - that the "big bloggers" need to police and maintain as a respectable neighborhood. People can do that, of course, but the result will only be to transform that self-defined grouping into a mainstream blogosphere (MSB) that is just as tedious and rigid as the old mainstream media they decry. The next generation of poorly behaved and free-wheeling young Turks will then come along to knock the MSB back on its heels. As long as they don't start legally regulating the whole thing, someone somewhere is going to be blogging about the latest Sarah Palin rumors, so long as there are Sarah Palin rumors to pass around.
Every individual blogger, on the other hand, is free as ever to criticize or not criticize any other blog as they see fit.
The evolution of blogger consciousness is a funny recapitulation of Aristophane's The Birds. First it's all about freedom and getting away from the dominant mainstream culture and corruptions of Athens. But before you know it, the rebels are saying, "You know, this Cloudcuckooland place is getting overrun by nuisances. Let's build a wall. And let's become the new dominant power ourselves. And let's make some rules."
I would guess that if blogs cease being an environment that offers target rich opportunities for the mainstream media to dismiss and discredit bloggers, then the blogosphere has probably lost the vitality that would make it an interesting alternative to the MSM. Many have already tamed themselves quite a bit, cutting out a lot of the bad language and gravitating toward polite policy wonkery written in conventional beltway idiom.
June 19, 2009 10:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are you telling me that people actually BELIEVED that rumor about Palin? Jeebus, I just thought it was a fun kind of parody of a wingnut rumor. Good lord.
June 20, 2009 8:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nice apology, Dan K
June 20, 2009 7:32 PM | Reply | Permalink