Will it ever end? Probably not. Once again a Republican presidential hopeful is accusing a Democrat of being soft on (what else?) national security.

Today it was Mitt Romney's turn to sing from the old hymnal at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, DC, where he announced that President Obama is imperiling America's freedoms by speaking too freely. His speech showed the extent to which the GOP remains trapped in a cold war narrative of America as the righteous redeemer that only needs to increase defense spending constantly in order to save the rest of the globe.

Romney began his remarks by complaining that Obama recently went on an international "tour of apology." According to Romney, "with all that is transpiring in the world, in Iran, North Korea, Georgia, Somalia, Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan, this is the time for strength and confidence, not for apologizing to America's critics." But Obama's point, at least as far as I could tell, was that America could only exercise its moral strength by facing up to its past shortcoming, which Romney is unwilling to acknowledge in the first place. There is a fascinating contradiction between the savior impulse that Romney espouses and the refusal to recognize the most of the globe turned its back on America because of the insalubrious and shameful conduct of the Bush administration. Instead, Romney concluded with the standard boilerplate about America as the "hope of the world."

Yes, yes, yes. But what does it add up to? As Romney spelled it out, America should be spending lots more on defense--isn't the $527 billion that Obama is devoting to the defense budget in 2009 enough?--and most particularly on missile defense. Missile defense has become the Rosebud of the GOP--an obsession with little relation to reality.

Perhaps most troubling, however, was Romney's simpleminded approach to dividing the world nearly into four kinds of powers. First comes America, which embodies freedom. Then comes China, which supports free enterprise and authoritarianism. Next is Russia, whose power derives not from industry but energy. According to Romney, "They seek to control the energy of the world..." But how would Russia successfully control Middle East oil?

Romney ends, of course, with "the Jihadists" who are out to turn the clock back to the Middle Ages for everyone else. This is straight out of George W. Bush's rhetoric about taking the fight to "the terrorists," which camouflaged the fact that there is no one terrorist grouping; rather, America and other countries are threatened by a variety of groups and individuals. But as Romney's speech indicates, the GOP, at least for now, doesn't seem any more interested in doing nuance than it was during the 2008 election.