TPMCafe
« Keep Your Eye on the Ball: The Untold Bush Story | Home | No, Newt, "Reverse Racism" Doesn't Exist And, If It Does, It Isn't Racism »

Oedipus Tex: Spies, Jesus, and Father V. Son

user-pic

Like Greg Mitchell, I plead guilty to not having read Russ's book yet--and that inevitably limits whatever I can add to the discourse. Regardless, I have no doubts that Bush senior's operational experience with the CIA went beyond his service in 1976 as DCI. Many years ago I co-wrote a piece in The New Yorker with Murray Waas that showed how when then Vice-President Bush was on a widely heralded "peace" mission to the Middle East in 1986, he secretly relayed operational military intelligence to none other than Saddam Hussein. At the time, Iran was balking at an arms for hostages deal because they didn't need any weapons. Bush and William Casey figured out that Iran might change its mind if Saddam bombed the hell out of them--and knew what the right targets should be. In other words, Vice-President George H.W. Bush had gone undercover as an intelligence operative.

In addition, I have no reason to question Russ's reporting on Bush 41's other intelligence ties. But I'm not clear as to what it all adds up to--especially when it comes to Bush senior's links to George de Mohrenschildt, etc. The JFK assassination is so explosive that any ties inevitably become extraordinarily sensational. What do they really mean? Just asking.

On the issue of Bush 43 and the Christian Right, I'm also sure, as Russ reports, that "the Bushes were receiving memos from a religious adviser on the need to prove one's bona fides to the fast-growing religious right bloc." (I'm curious, Russ--is the adviser in question Doug Wead?) But that doesn't mean W manufactured his evangelicalism for purely political reasons. Bush himself claims he was converted in 1985 by Billy Graham. But Graham had no memory whatsoever of that, and I interviewed a preacher named Arthur Blessitt, and members of Bush's prayer group who recall that Blessitt had come to Midland in1984 and converted Bush. [In his campaign autobiography, I suspect W put Graham's name on the conversion because Graham was a more respectable figure to the electorate than Blessitt, a hippiesque preacher of sorts who walked around the world, to hundreds of countries, with the cross of Jesus on his back.].

Ultimately, of course, none of us can know what was going on in Bush's mind--how legitimate his conversion was. But, as the 1988 presidential campaign neared, Douglas Wead, VP Bush's liaison to the evangelicals, was deeply concerned about 41's relationship(or lack of one) to evangelicals. Wead had begun writing campaign memos to VP Bush about the need for strong ties to evangelicals, and, as I report in The Fall of the House of Bush, unbeknownst to Wead, an evangelist himself, VP Bush had begun forwarding the memos to his son. In March of 1987, Wead met with W for the first time and began to use him as a key campaign operative.

As the 1988 campaign got underway, for the first time in his life, W actually performed a useful task for the family. Mickey Herskowitz, a Houston sportswriter and Bush family friend told me that until then Bush 41 said "Jeb would be the one in the family who would choose politics. Jeb, he felt, had the political gifts." This rift between 41 and 43 was deep and very, very real. But now that he was liaison to the Christian Right and playing a key role in the campaign, W was suddenly becoming a contender to be the first son.

In addition, whatever went on in the mind of W, there's no question that he came across to evangelicals as authentic and his father didn't. I interviewed not just members of W's Bible study group in Midland, but Falwell, Tim LaHaye and many other figures on the evangelical right. Yes, Karl Rove went to town with this and got unbelievable political mileage out of it. Yes, it became an elemental part of their political calculus. But I think because liberals and secularists often dismiss this stuff as phony, we underestimate its political power.


9 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

I read your book, Mr. Unger. I can't wait to read Mr. Baker's book.

user-pic

Since an evangelical conversion is a one-on-one activity -- Jesus and the Convert -- to which no one else is privy, who would know whether a conversion was "legitimate" -- whatever that may mean.

If you walk the walk and talk the talk (that is, speak Christianese), you're a convert.

user-pic

Oh, my, is that title a P.D.Q. Bach reference?

user-pic

"The JFK assassination is so explosive that any ties inevitably become extraordinarily sensational. What do they really mean? Just asking."

You won't be reading the book, will you?

GHWB ties to the JFK patsy's handler, and FBI documents connecting him to the assassination scene:
http://www.tomflocco.com/fs/Bush41RevivesLinks.htm

don't leave you any more curious.

Allen Dulles, the first civilian head of the CIA, was the lawyer for Prescott Bush's firm Brown Brothers Harriman, at the time when BBH was funding Hitler's rise and expansion of power.

Dulles was also in charge of Operation Paperclip, which assimilated Nazi spies and scientists into the CIA. Henry Kissinger served as his German interpreter.

Dulles was fired by JFK, then placed on the commission investigating his death.

George H.W. Bush, a long-time CIA operative, was placed as head of the CIA just as the Church Committee on Assassinations was ramping up its investigation into CIA involvement in the JFK murder:

From Wikipedia:
"President Ford, advised by Henry Kissinger and others concerned by Colby's controversial openness to Congress and distance from the White House, replaced Colby late in 1975 with George H. W. Bush during the so called "Halloween Massacre" in which Secretary of Defense Schlesinger was also replaced (by Donald Rumsfeld). Colby was offered the position of U.S. Permanent Representative to NATO but turned it down."

None of this sparks any curiosity, does it?

Please read Baker's book and get back to us...

user-pic

That paragraph struck me too. The idea that I get from it is: when powerful people use their power to do terrible things to affect events people should not examine those things too closely because it's just too explosive to contemplate. And ideas of world political players conspiring to manipulate world events are just "conspiracy theories" and should always be dismissed out of hand as silly.
Granted the world political stage is like a small town and people are bound to rub elbows with all sorts but after a while when you see enough smoke you just gotta ask, 'Is there some fire burnig there?'. Like the guy said, "Just asking".

user-pic

fpie,

Keep in mind that these small matters of democracy pale in comparison to Unger's hunger to continue getting published by serious, conspiracy scoffing periodicals like The New Yorker.

What's a Type A striver to do?


user-pic
Many years ago I co-wrote a piece in The New Yorker with Murray Waas that showed how when then Vice-President Bush was on a widely heralded "peace" mission to the Middle East in 1986, he secretly relayed operational military intelligence to none other than Saddam Hussein. [...] In other words, Vice-President George H.W. Bush had gone undercover as an intelligence operative.

Holy crap! I was unaware of this. Was GHWB actually the first VP Cheney?!

-- ARG

Facebook

This information is very useful! Thanks!
Best regards, Katya, CEO of hyper v requirements, 10g iscsi

Facebook

Si vous etes interesses par le dossier, ou desirez en savoir plus, contactez-moi par mail, et je vous mettrai en contact.
Best regards,Jane, CEO of high availability solution

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address