TPMCafe
« Sexual Inequality, Cultural Imperialism and Political Correctness | Home | Zero is too much »

Overturning Don't Ask, Don't Tell

user-pic

This week, our nation's armed forces suffered another casualty--the loss of 1st Lt. Dan Choi, an Iraq war veteran and a member of the New York National Guard. On March 19, on the Rachel Maddow Show, Choi announced he was gay. That triggered the Army to begin the process of separating Choi from the military under the current "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy.

Choi is an Arabic linguist--exactly the kind of critically-skilled soldier and leader his infantry platoon needs if they deploy to a country in which Arabic is the common language. Bluntly stated, his dismissal from the military--and the dismissal of other gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgendered (LGBT) servicemembers--will put lives at risk.

Our national security is heavily dependent on translators, specialists, and interpreters within the intelligence community, the diplomatic corps, and the military. Prior to September 11, 2001 our intelligence community was at only 30 percent readiness in languages critical to national security. The government revealed after the 9/11 attacks that it had a 123,000-hour backlog of Arabic language recordings waiting to be analyzed. The last thing we should be doing is telling Arabic linguists in the military that they are not needed.

I have worked successfully in Congress to pass legislation to require the federal government to invest in the creation of a workforce possessing requisite language skills needed to combat terrorists. We need to produce more, not less, specialists like Dan Choi.

I know the President does not support the current discriminatory policy. He stated so plainly in a handwritten note to another Army officer dismissed under the current policy that he inherited --2nd Lt. Sandy Tsao. This is a situation where the President needs the help of Congress in correcting this policy. I am an original cosponsor of a bill (H.R. 1283) that would overturn Don't Ask, Don't Tell. We have 140 cosponsors on this bill at the moment, more than enough to justify moving it expeditiously through the House Committee on Armed Services and to the House floor before the July Fourth holiday.

In the meantime, the President could issue an executive order announcing a study of the current policy. During that time, there could be a moratorium on any investigations or prosecutions of LGBT soldiers.

Overturning Don't Ask, Don't Tell is not simply about providing truly equal rights to gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgendered people. It's about preventing the hemorrhage of critical military talent from an already-overstretched American military engaged in two simultaneous wars. It is about ensuring we don't lose men like Dan Choi who would help our military address a critical need.

Ending this misguided policy will strengthen, not weaken, our armed forces.

My colleague - the great Civil Rights hero John Lewis - often quotes Martin Luther King in saying that it is always the right time to do the right thing. To ensure that men like Dan Choi can help keep our country safe, now is the time to end Don't Ask, Don't Tell.


----
A senior Member of the Intelligence Committee, Congressman Holt is the Chairman of the Select Intelligence Oversight Panel, which was created at the start of the 110th Congress in January 2007 by Speaker Pelosi. The panel is working to strengthen oversight of the intelligence community by ensuring that policymakers receive accurate assessments, civil liberties are safeguarded, and the intelligence community is protecting Americans.


10 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

The whole thing reeks of hypocracy.

A man who attends West Point is taught honor, code, integrity but psst... on this issue you must lie and keep hidden this aspect of yourself... we put it in the military code (because we must be psycho-sick idiots) I can't believe it is would not be ruled out as unconstitutional. It must be contradicted in the code that you are not to lie and then over hear 'just don't tell the truth'. The whole things is a preposterous joke. It should be laughed out of the room, repealed, revoked, dismissed, and disappeared.

user-pic

the fact that Obama could END ENFORCEMENT of DADT with the stroke of a pen - and refuses - speaks volumes.

Volumes.

And trust me - a LOT of us ar elistening.

Closely.

user-pic

No he can't end enforcement with the "stroke of a pen". Well, I take that back, yes he could but at what cost? We were angry when Bush did the exact same thing with signing statements or executive orders. No matter how noble the idea is, Obama should remain firm and get it changed through the legislature. Yes, it's hurtful and it's very awful, but at the same time, unfortunately it's the LAW.

In the meantime, for individuals such as Lt. Choi, the President should hire him on in the NSA where there exists no law replacing them from being able to serve. This would be a good stop gap for those whose services are still needed.

user-pic

"Yes, it's hurtful and it's very awful, but at the same time, unfortunately it's the LAW."

Perhaps you are hazy on what 'undo with the stroke of a pen" means.

It does not overrule the LAW - it merely removes any funding for ENFORCEMENT of the law until it is changed - a position Obama claims to desire.

Why should ANYONE either wait or suffer under this policy if Obama is honest in his rhetoric - and possesses the executive power to end enforcement of the law until it can be expunged from the record?

user-pic

No Obama couldn't just end all this nonsense "with the stroke of a pen", because it's codified in law which he has sworn to upload and execute.

It's wise in this case to look to Abraham Lincoln, who said:

The surest way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly.
user-pic

I'm sorry the notion that he has to enforce it because it is the law is absolute nonsense. Some laws explicity require enforcement as non-enfocement constitutes an offense. For example, the prohibition against torture.

There are oodles of non-enfoced laws in this country, most of them antiquated anti-adultery laws and the like. Is it the duty of the police to arrest people for adultery? Is it the duty of federal authorities to raid CA medical marijuana dispenseries like they did under Bush?

Sorry. There is no excuse for enforcing DADT. None. If Obama does, it will be yet one more instance of his presidency being a disappointment.

user-pic

Yeah but the ptoblem with that statement is Obama hasn't been a dissappointing President. I'm glad of the things he doing, being a smart and intellegent President (finally get that after 8 years) and has passed legislation to get us out of Iraq and closing gitmo for starters. Just because you want Obama to do the same things as Bush did as wiping away legislation with a swipe of a pen via a signing statement, dosen't make it right. When they do this it will be by the law and if that takes some time to do and if it makes you disappointed then so be it, because I want this done right and not hastely. We don't need any 1993 mistakes.

Glad I got that I got that out of my system, we have different opinions and thats that. Have a good day.

user-pic

Lt. Choi's letter explicitly stated the grand absurdity of DADT; as a matter of law, uttering the words, "I am gay" is considered homosexual conduct! Doesn't matter if the speaker is celibate or has ever had any sexual conduct.
In contrast, the military has strict fraternization rules against sexual conduct among personnel. That should be enough. We should not be prosecuting or punishing anyone, least of all active military personnel for their expressions of self.

user-pic

Thanks, Representative Holt, for a very nice posting. Much appreciated. I called your office to say the same thing.

DADT has got to go. People who are physically and mentally and yes, morally able to serve this country should be able to. Being gay is not a moral deficit.

Best wishes, thanks for sponsoring HR 1283, and good luck.


Dana Curtis Kincaid
Indy 46219

user-pic

It will be interesting to see if this is the first step in the power of small making a big change. One person stepping up like this can be the beginning of a greater movement.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

November 16-20

http://orbooks.com/files/going-rouge-small.jpg

Coming Soon



November 30-December 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Versha Sharma



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address