TPMCafe
« Wonderful Life v.2.0 | Home | Back To The Issue - Can We Avoid A Quagmire In South Asia? »

Elections Have Consequences

user-pic

At the Pentagon.

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said Wednesday that, over two years, he would all but eliminate an unpopular practice that has prevented tens of thousands of active-duty soldiers and reservists from leaving military service on time if they were scheduled to deploy to Iraq or Afghanistan.

At the Justice Department.


Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. on Wednesday outlined a shift in the enforcement of federal drug laws, saying the administration would effectively end the Bush administration's frequent raids on distributors of medical marijuana.

In Congress.
The House voted Wednesday to approve the largest expansion of government-sponsored service programs since President John F. Kennedy first called for the creation of a national community service corps in 1963.

Before you give yourself a heart attack over the AIG mess, take a deep breath and know that Obama's election in November really mattered.


22 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Right, and I can give Obama more time but it has to start mattering on more and bigger issues.

Leaving 50,000 troops in Iraq and calling it a withdrawal isn't what I voted for. Ramping up operations in Afghanistan at great cost to the treasury and to our military isn't what I voted for. Continued domestic spying and a justice department that seems eager to protect the same government secrets the Bushie's did isn't what I voted for. They're still following Bush's economic crisis strategy as you point out.

This is not the time to give up hope or faith. But enough time has past that the left can start criticizing from the left.

user-pic

Enough time has NOT passed. The Left has been criticizing from the Left months BEFORE Obama got into office. He's been accused of being like Bush, had his intentions towards the gay community questioned, called a sell out for trying to be bipartisan and now they are calling for him to fire Geithner and Summmers. Everyone has a right to their opinion but let's not pretend that Obama has been getting a free ride from the Left.

I think the point of the author's post is that before we start claiming Obama is "not change we can believe in", take a look what else he's doing. They may not seem important and big enough for you, but all three of those things will have a huge effect in someone's life.

user-pic

I think the left has been generally supportive though. And calling for Geithner's head isn't all that radical a notion.

user-pic

The criticism of the left thus far has been muted in the face of numerous significant flip flops by Obama and his people. The left wants to be supportive, but what is wrong with legitimate criticism in the first place? Do we really just want to ape the behavior of the Republicans and march in lockstep to whatever tune is called by the leader? I think not.

user-pic

Des, I know you were paying attention during the Campaign. That said, you can't be surprised by the escalation in Afghanistan.

user-pic

Fair enough.

user-pic

GWB. I'm The Decider. Translated; fuck you!
BHO. The Buck Stops Here. Translated; fuck you!

user-pic

Interesting, a stopped clock which is right only once a day!!

user-pic

Honestly, as much as I approve of and like the things mentioned here these items are mere window dressing.

I'd be much happier if we had a list that looked more like this:

Amdinistration announces sweeping investigation into illegal behavior during Bush years including war crimes abroad and corruption throughout the federal government at home.

Administration announces goal of reducing "defense" spending by 50% in 5 years in order to fund domestic programs and end the permanent war economy. Obama says coutnerproductive, wasteful and immoral policy of "endless war" is being shitcanned forever!

Administration announces program to put all insolvent banks and financial institutions into receivership and bring a halt to any further "bailouts" for Wall Street and the wealthy.

Administration announces formation of new unit in DOJ to investigate fraud, malfeasance, and other illegal activities in the financial services sector.

President changes course, abandons insurance subsidy program and endorses Rep. Conyers' bill for Medicare for All as the cheapest, most practical, and realistic course for covering every American and resolving the health care crisis.

Administration announces new review of illegal domestic spying programs: promises no further domestic spying from now on and proposes legislation with specific penalties for President's, Vice Presidents and cabinet members who knowingly violate the law or conspire the violate the law.

Administration announces it will not defend bogus claims of executive privelege from prior adminstrations. Support announced for the right of Congress to issue subpoenas and the duty of executive branch employees to respond to them: suggests toughter penalties for executive branch employees found to be in contempt of Congress.

Administration announces it will actually end the Iraq War as promised by the President when a candidate. No troops to be left in Iraq.

Administration announces reversal of escalation in Afghanistan and instead decides to emphasize nonmilitary approach that might have a chance of working.

These are just a few real consqeunces the election might have brought about that I'd like to see. Criticize it if you like, you may have your own preferences of what you'd like to see the administration doing, but this seems to me to be a list far more consequential than the baby steps listed above which amounts to little more than saying: pay no attention to the trillions being stolen from you right before your eyes by Wall Street and be happy with these crumbs.

user-pic

Well said!

user-pic

Those would all be wonderful, but pretty hard to accomplish in 50+ days.

user-pic

But it would constitute far more consequential action than the items listed above which, while nice, aren't particularly the head of anyone's list in terms of what the consequences of the election of 08 might be.

user-pic

Yes! Great list.

user-pic

Taplin has this right.

There's a lot of yelling and screaming about Obama and how he's not doing anything. But the truth is that the man has been on the job, and has already started to undo the Gordian mess left by the Crawford Clown.

I don't agree with everything he's done. But things are already much different than they were under Bush. And *that* was what *I* voted for. So, count me happy to this point.

user-pic

I'm of two minds here.

On the one hand, I agree with oleeb that I'd personally like to see a much more dramatic shift to the left. (My first donations this cycle went to Dennis Kucinich. I would have sent money to John Edwards, if he'd stayed in the race another week -- he quit within a week after DK bowed out.) I support Obama, whom I like. But he is more centrist than I am.

On the other hand, I take Jon Taplin's point, and Boyd Reed's (above). Obama is definitely NOT Bush. And he is making changes I care about and support.

I still get mad thinking about 2000 and the infamous Nader quote that there was "not a dime's worth of difference" between the two main candidates. There IS a difference, and I like what we got this time way better than what we could've had. (Try to imagine McCain and Palin steering us through this disaster.)

-- ARG

As Steven Wright used to say: "You can't have everything. Where would you put it?"

user-pic

I voted for Obama and supported him financially twice during the campaign. With that said:

A sneaking little suspicion is entering my mind, its got its nose under the tent flap;

Is Obama another Bill Clinton? A very likeable guy, quite articulate, highly intelligent, the ability to speak flowingly with no; ehs, ums, ehs,
a sympathetic figure due to the atttacks from the right, a guy you just have to like and defend, but who...........is Business friendly, Banker friendly, Corporate friendly?

My take today is what its been since he won the election; he has a choice, represent the public first or the business interests first.

If he chooses to represent the Corporate boys first he will become known as the biggest snake oil salesman to sit in the oval office, and he'll most problably serve one term only.

If he chooses to represent the public first he may well go up on Mt Rushmnore after his second term.

(I know, I know, its a false dichotomy.)

user-pic

"I voted for Obama and supported him financially twice during the campaign. "

Me too (voted for him twice, heh, once in the primary once in Nov).

Don't let your suspicion eat away at you. Do something about it. Obama said we'd need to push him to "do the right thing". So, push effectively.

Pragmatism doesn't through business under the bus. But given the lobbying by business, if we don't push back, we might find the bus running over us even if Obama doesn't toss us there.

What bothers me is the false controversy, the orchestrated pseudo-populism I'm seeing.


user-pic

eds,

"pseudo populism"? Gee, and all along I thought it was demagoguery.

user-pic

Being a business owner, I just want to remind everyone that despite the high profile of large corporations, businesses are run by citizens.

Most businesses are not out to rape the common man.

user-pic

you either have integrity or you dont.
that means you speak up when you believe you should.
no free passes.

and if you really believe at this point that obama has not been a disapointment then you are indeed a kool-aid drinker.

an d time is running out.

the republicans have showed their strategy.

obama has only the people and this AIG is a major shift in public perception. losing the people and being ill served by staff and appointments is a disaster that escalates and gives cover to other dems in arguing against policy change.
thats the real danger and the reality that i see increasing , as i predicted last week that it would.

obama knows this.
thats why you see him on leno and now a press conference.
he must change perception.
i predict he wont be able to.

user-pic

Where is the line for those who gave up?

I want to know so I can wave while I move on. If you thought Obama was going to please you all the time, or even most of the time, then you drank too much kool-aide to begin with.

Who is ever truly happy with the "current" administration? Lots of Democrats despise Clinton. The job is too complicated and the country/world too diverse to please any one constituency. The FISA flap was the clear indication that Obama would continue the tradition of pissing people off.

Next?

user-pic

By clamoring for instant gratification, we are all perpetuating the problem; things do not change overnight. For those who want their way now on legal/police/military issues are severely confused. This country is much older and more complex than our day to day lives and desires.

Sure peace sounds great, but centuries of human behavior is working against this goal. It seems that the biggest weakness of the democrats is the expectation of idealism being translated into reality. This does not mean that idealism should be shunned, but a bit of reality should be considered when looking at the process time line.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Kyle Krahel-Frolander



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address