Long Shadows

Thanks TPM and fellow participants for this week's book discussion. My final thought about this conversation is that while I think Norrell is right to insist that we view Washington within his historical context, it is hard to keep him there. I think this is in part because Washington bequeathed a political legacy - numerous and diverse ones, actually - that have shaped racial politics and visions from his time to ours. I think it is in part also because America has not come close to solving its racial problems - if viewed by disparities in income, assets, home ownership, infant mortality, life expectancy, employment, imprisonment, education or myriad other indices. Arguments over how to solve these problems inevitably raise questions about causes and solutions that evoke the competing (and often intertwined) perspectives that we attach to Washington and DuBois.
We now have an African American president who, seen through this long debate, evinces elements that we associate with each. Speaking about the responsibility of the black poor to change their behavior, or of the dignity of labor, he recalls Washington. Speaking as he did in Philadelphia a year ago about structural racism and the legitimacy of black grievance he sounds more like Washington's critics. As president of the United States, clearly Obama signifies far more than racial politics. Yet the fact of his race fundamentally alters the national identity of a country founded in slavery. And with this alteration comes questions of how best to tackle racial problems in changed circumstances. In this questioning, Washington and DuBois continue to cast long shadows, even as the landscape itself changes in profound ways.

















Your analysis of our circumstances brings cheer and provokes interest.
"Arguments over how to solve these problems inevitably raise questions about causes and solutions that evoke the competing (and often intertwined) perspectives that we attach to Washington and DuBois."
So much to read.
"In this questioning, Washington and DuBois continue to cast long shadows, even as the landscape itself changes in profound ways."
One of the problems burgeoning in the US is the process of incarceration as a profit making enterprise. While the consequences of the criminal justice system can be observed to have impact on people of color out of proportion to their statistical prevalence in the total population, those consequences also function against a population comprised of those within certain economic strata, regardless of 'race'. In effect, people are criminalized for being poor or mentally ill, as well as for looking different. All are forms of being not of the dominant culture - which might also be considered a state of being excluded from that culture.
After eight years of a national foreign policy that might be described as pre-Apocalyptic, people now are dying at increased rates because of the lack of funding for safety net programs.
Why is that?
March 14, 2009 10:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know-- but my brother, a highly trained chef, who ran the kitchen in a high security state prison for a few years, where he created a kitchen training program for the recidivism prevention department, always said the guards are worse than the inmates.
Now he owns his own restaurant, which is probably a good thing, because I don't imagine it would be easy to go back to horse country to sling salmon and pheasant at the country club with a blot like that on your record--or resume (whatever).
Too bad about the economy, though.
No, I don't know that the landscape has changed all that much.
March 14, 2009 3:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Full disclosure: Joe Lowndes and I shared some thoughts offline which I initiated.
It is important to note that President Obama's comments regarding personal responsibility, behavior and "attitude adjustment" have not been limited to just the black poor, as Joe suggests, but to all African Americans and, plainly, all Americans, period. Second, Booker T. Washington did not hold the exclusive rights to the "respect yourself" discussion. In fact, W.E.B. Du Bois was as outspoken on the matter as, if not more so than Washington.
[*Consumption refers to tuberculosis.]
And by comparison, from Barack Obama's "A More Perfect Union" speech:
Do not make the mistake of confusing Obama's call that our "black" problems" be bound to those of our white brothers and sisters as some capitulation or accommodation. Recognize first and foremost that as a man -- a black man -- running for President, his goal to govern all the people, not just black people. And especially note, that Obama did not address "just poor blacks" as had been suggested, but the African American community and subsequently the "American community" as a whole.
And recall also a continuing note in all of his speeches, that we are all our brothers' and sisters' keepers. That we are all in the same boat together, and that we rise and fall together. That our responsibilities are shared.
Ultimately, Norrell's version of history regarding Booker T. Washington will be judged with direct comparison to the "definitive" histories already written about Washington and Du Bois. If his more version of events leads a reader to read on, to compare and to contrast the Norrell history with that of Harlan, or Lewis (in the case of Du Bois), it has earned its place on the bookshelves.
March 14, 2009 4:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Should read: "If his more flattering version of events..."
March 14, 2009 4:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
This information is very useful! Thanks!
Best regards, Katya, CEO of hyper v vhd, iscsi boot initiator
March 31, 2011 10:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Si vous etes interesses par le dossier, ou desirez en savoir plus, contactez-moi par mail, et je vous mettrai en contact.
Best regards,Jane, CEO of hyper v high availability
April 28, 2011 9:18 AM | Reply | Permalink