TPMCafe
« Unsolved Terrorist Crimes: A Thought Experiment | Home | Obama Sea-change »

Why Are We So Intimidated By The Right When They Have Always Been Wrong and We've Always Been Right?

user-pic

This is not directed at the President. He's doing fine. I think he learned his lesson: you cannot deal with people who have no regard for the country. Rush Limbaugh's prayer that Obama (and America) fail is typical of almost all the Republicans in Congress (obviously, not the three who voted for the stimulus package) but every other one of them -- except Ron Paul who is a true conservative ideologue rather than a partisan slug.

My question is why do we have to even pretend to respect these people? I know we don't have the magic 60. But why can't our President go after them with such force that some of these guys just surrender to constituent pressure?

Have conservatives been right about anything since FDR's day when the two parties essentially coalesced into their present form: the Democrats are liberal, the Republicans are conservative.

Here is my tally. And it is far from conclusive. SAME means Dems right, Repugs WRONG.


Social Security. Dems FOR. GOP against. Dems RIGHT.
Minimum wage laws. SAME.
Child labor laws. SAME.
National Labor Relation Act recognizing right to join unions. SAME.
New Deal jobs programs. SAME.
Instituting the draft in 1940 to prepare to fight Hitler. SAME.
FDR Banking Reform. SAME.
Civil Rights Laws of the 60's. SAME (although the now extinct liberal Republicans were strongly with the Dems. The Goldwaterites opposed).
Vietnam. BOTH WRONG.
LBJ Regulation. Environmental laws. Clean Air, Water, Product safety. SAME
The Iraq Wars. BOTH WRONG. A few libs right.
Clinton tax hike. SAME
Bush Tax Cuts. SAME.

I'm stopping there because I'm too lazy to consult my history books. But I have to wonder. Are their significant instances where THEY were right and WE were WRONG.
I don't think so.

So why the hell don't we act like it?



72 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Amen. Megadittoes M.J.!

user-pic

Ditto!

user-pic

Democratic cowardliness is a mask that hides a lot of lobbyist bribes.

user-pic

Ouch! Hurtful to admit, but true!

user-pic

I agree, Dems have too much dependence and fealty to corporate rule, but why are we afraid of Republicans?

Because they're bullies and have had leaders assassinated and are prone to and not above electoral and/or military coup d'etats, and they will use heat rays and stun weapons, as well as live ammunition, against us in the streets, not to mention arbritrary arrests.

Until that is all brought to the conscious level, preferably officially, and dealt with psychologically and legally, then Dems and others will be intimidated. In our hearts, I think we're afraid of becoming the losing side in a Spanish Civil War situation, in a word, Guernica.

After all, what is Republican radio really but Radio Rwanda?

Hopefully all that remains in the movies for us here.

user-pic

I think Obama is doing the right thing. The contrast of Obama trying to save the country compared to the actions of the Repubs (sic) recalls the creatures Reagan referred to as the Nabobs of Negativity.

The constant chorus of we have a leg up now, we're winning now, we hope Obama fails is self-descriptive. The lyrical message they repeatedly sing is party first, country last. Thankfully the party of the wrinkled, wealthy and white is outnumbered and shrinking fast.

user-pic

Actually, either Pat Buchanan or William Safire writing for Nixon/Agnew dreamed up the alliterative attack on the press - "Nattering Nabobs of Negativity".

user-pic

I thought it was Spiro Agnew.

user-pic

OK, Safire coined the phrase and Agnew used it to refer to the 'liberal media'.

user-pic

OK. I'll throw my log on the fire.
As I recall originally it was, "The natering nabobs of nagging negativism". But I could be wrong.
It certainly was Spioro Agnew who uttered it repeatedly to howling crowds of supporters for, how was it put, "Bomb 'em back to the stone age!"
LBJ and the Dems might have been wrong about Vietnam but it was Nixon who gleefully rode that monkey, driving the wedge firmly through American civil socioty that has led us to this sad pass.

user-pic

I think it was Gen. Curtis LeMay who coined the "Bomb back to the Stone Age" line. Aside from the inhumanity of those words, they also demonstrated ignorance because Vietnam was already an agricultural society.

user-pic

You don't understand.

Tax cats worked. Clinton ran a deficit for eight years; Dubya ran a surplus.

The Democrats can't be trusted to protect us. bin Laden destroyed the Twin Towers under Clinton's watch, not Dubya's.

Republicans are good in emergencies. Bill and a horse show organizer watched while New Orleans drowned. W rebuilt it in six days and rested on the seventh.

Republicans trust markets. You can't trust the Democrats with our money, but the Republicans are sound money men.

Democrats aren't good managers. Hoover was fixing the Depression until Roosevelt made it worse.

Get your facts straight and stop whining.

user-pic

And they accuse me of inhaling paint fumes?!! :)

user-pic

So you don't bother to pay attention to even the broad stroke of actual facts?

user-pic

I believe the comment was a joke and a cautionary tale all in one.

user-pic

Thank you, Marquis.

Surprised that had to be explained.

user-pic

People are tense these days after 8 years of the (as Gore Vidal named it) "Cheney/Bush junta".

user-pic

The Republican Party lost its reason for existence when it embraced ignorance under Reagan, arrogance under Gringrich, deceit under Rove, and flaming hypocrisy under the chickenhawk neo-cons of the Cheney administration. This appalling spectacle has little or nothing to do with the two sides of the National Assembly hall in Revolutionary France. It does relate to a set of mistaken "Liberal" notions going back to the 1960s: that dumbing-down and tolerance of incompetence are pathes to inclusiveness and social harmony. Republicans acted like moronic juvenile deliquents in the stimulus plan debates because they perceived little cost to doing so. The going out of business mainstream new media will move on to some new collection of soundbites next week. Spare the rod, spoil the child, and you end up as we have with a Congress of Republicans having little respect for consistency or honesty and of Democrats with little clue of what a backbone is.

user-pic

... or even earlier when the anti-Civil Rights whites in the South left the Democrats and joined the Republican Party in the 1960's.

user-pic

Good point. The party of Lincoln opening its arms to the Dixiecrats, to wavers of the Confederate slave-owners' battle flag and to wearers of white sheets and hoods, no doubt put its first president into a subterranean spin. But Goldwater and Nixon were at least true to Lincoln's intellectual rigor, shared his partiality towards clear thinking and articulate speaking, and were mindful of his prescient message about how all the people cannot be fooled all the time.

user-pic

How Obama's lust for getting credit for personally creating the first instance of true bipartisanship in American political history in the first days of his presidency will work against his and the Democratic Party's, and ultimately the nation's, best long term interests.

Obama's management technique is sometimes described as "It's amazing what YOU can get done if you don't care who gets the credit." That strategy is workable in a layered, segmented corporate bureaucracy, for example, where some manager oversees peers or underlings who do the managers bidding, but are allowed to take credit for the work accomplished at their level. However, at his higher level, the manager claims overall success of the project, because he induced underlings to perform in his specific areas.

That technique fails from the office of the presidency because regardless of the contributions of allies and previous foes alike. the president will ALWAYS get the credit. The more the president says I owe it all to my previous opponents, the greater the victory for the president. Republicans will not allow themselves to be brought into the trap of being "seduced" by the "smart, charismatic manager" president. Obama appears totally oblivious to that political dynamic.

Immediately upon taking office, Obama mimicked the impatient suitor who wanted to skip the courtship and to immediately achieve intimacy with his natural opponents. He lusted for a very quickie marriage before the Justice of Bipartisanship. Really now, what kind of girl did Obama think the Republicans are? The haste was unseemly, embarrassing to both parties, and ultimately dis-respectful to Republicans who were given the option of swooning or slipping out the back door.

Obama's courtship of the Republicans would have had a far more likely chance of success if Obama had FIRST established he didn't need ANY Republicans. Create the Stimulus bill he EXACTLY wanted and thought was needed and present that to Congress. If the Republicans threatened filibuster, then he should have said "I am sorry you feel that way, and you are doing a GRAVE dis-service to the American people but let America observe the obstruction for themselves." The initial battle sets the tone and tenor of the relationship for the rest of the presidency. There would have been no more opportune time to leverage his initial political capital against the Republicans than the initial "America desperately needs the Stimulus" start of his administration. If the filibuster worked, Obama could have tweaked the bill, and tried again. How many times could the Republicans DARE to Filibuster the fate of the American economy? The president would have prevailed WITHOUT the help of any Republican. Obama would have countered the cries of being disingenuous in his campaign claims to work for partisanship by saying, there is a time for bipartisanship, and there are grave times for clear and undiluted action. Now is just such a time. Asking the same people who got us into this economic debacle for the way out of it probably was NOT a good way to begin practicing bipartisanship.I will try to reach out to the Republicans in the future, if they allow me.

Then, after he had established the power relationship with Republicans, he could reach-out for the few Republican moderates first, and start to cultivate a four year courtship (with intermediate weddings throughout) of those who were truly trying to work across party lines. He would be seen approaching bipartisanship from a position of strength, when he did not HAVE to reach across the aisle, not as he currently is perceived, as NEEDING Republicans for his programs to move forward. It was a need wholly manufactured and nurtured by an Obamian self-confidence in his powers of rational, empathetic seduction of his opponents. It simply failed spectacularly.

The present and future damage Obama's Rush To Bipartisanship has caused is considerable.

A) He has alienated a growing portion of his base, who were expecting some measure of pay back after 8 years in the wilderness. At least for the first couple of months - a sense of relief at a job well done, and the ship of state again pointed in the right direction could have made the later bipartisan overtures more palatable. But Obama denied those who brought him to the dance, even the very first dance. Some things a date never forgets. Obama appears to be exhibiting some traits of Don Juan, for whom a personal conquest meant only that it was time for the next conquest to begin. Hell hath no fury like a spurned conquest. Obama WILL learn first hand.

B) Obama has revealed that in his earnestness to seduce, he is willing to offer a handsome first offering. The more intransigent the pursued, the larger the initial entreaty. Henceforth, Obama can expect everyone's initial price to be inflated, and simply a starting point for other, larger concessions. Whether the Republicans, the Russians, or the Iranians, Obama has revealed that he is a big-time spender on his first date. Obama has thereby limited his options in bargaining with everyone for the next 3+ years. In this character peculiarity, Obama appears to be exhibiting some traits of Don Quixote, believing that a gesture of kindness will modify the nature of the be-kinded. Obama WILL learn that lesson first hand, also, that if you first walk into a neighborhood saloon wearing a tutu, don't expect that wearing a gorilla suit the next visit will gain you anything but massive guffaws from all present.

C) By Obama insisting that the Republicans "have good ideas" that Obama wants to seek out and incorporate in his own administration, he is paying insincere and undeserved homage to a destructive philosphy which has brought the U.S. to the current precipice on which it balances.He is giving the Republicans a seat at the table of those who believe government is a force for progress and social justice. That seat is undeserved. At the same time Obama ignores True Knights of the Good Government Round Table like Dennis Kucinich, Russ Feingold, and Bernie Sanders. They are out in the cold of the Obama Castle. Some King Arthur this King Obama be.

user-pic

Sorry - correction needed

Obama would have countered the cries of being disingenuous in his campaign claims to work for BIpartisanship by saying, there is a time for bipartisanship, and there are grave times for clear and undiluted action. Now is just such a time. Asking the same people who got us into this economic debacle for the way out
of it probably was NOT a good way to begin practicing bipartisanship.I will try to reach out to the Republicans in the
future, if they allow me.

user-pic

The Democratic Party is largely built of liberals, but not to the extent that it can ignore conservatives. We still have conservative Democratic members of the Senate and the House. So, while the party has a 57-59 vote total in the senate, that includes some conservative senators, and that stops us cold when it comes to being overly pushy.

By contrast, there are no liberal republicans in Congress - that is zip, nada, zilch liberal republicans. And, that makes it much easier for them to present a united front - a misguided, idiotic united front, but still a united front. Even the 3 who were the key players in passing the stimulus bill are very conservative senators, just mildly rebellious senators.

user-pic

Misguided and idiotic, absolutely.

But what is "conservative" about being so ignorant of Economics 101 that a trillion dollars borrowed to build bridges, schools, increase health insurance and invest in science is termed horrible government "waste" but many trillions borrowed to cut taxes so that rich people can blow money away in toxic derivatives and overpriced crap real estate is considering "stimulating" of the economy?

What is "conservative" about draft dodgers flushing away trillions more to invade and occupy with breathtaking arrogance and colossal blundering, a country that had not attacked us and whose only threat to do so was being subject to unprecedented UN inspections?

What is "conservative" about looting public lands, or about fighting tooth and nail for urban sprawl that has destroyed much of America's best farmland and squandered its natural wealth?

What is conservative about voting for a VP so dirt dumb she doesn't know 4th grade geography (the continents of the earth)?

What is "conservative" about lying, cheating, and worshipping ignorance?

Conservativism has manifold faults, but that is no reason to insult it by associating it with today's Republican Party.

user-pic

Hey, I'm pretty sure there aren't 116 Senators, and calling the only three Republicans in both houses of Congress to vote for this porkulus, conservative, is buffoonery. Think before you comment.

user-pic

When are Democrats going to stop whining? We just got a historic and massive economic package that contains more than the amount that was in the plan rolled out in December. It contains a very nice mix between short term stimulus and long term public investment. It is loaded up with wildest-dream progressive goodies. Meanwhile, the Republicans have been made to look like total assholes who have blown their credibility with the American public to engage in transparently selfish electioneering.

Obama looks like the guy who bent over backward to involve Republicans in a bi-partisan economic recovery, even inviting one of them to be his Commerce Secretary, but couldn't crack through their stubborn, head-up-the-ass Hooverism. After dallying with them for a few days, he took his show on the road and that was all she wrote. The train of history is leaving the station, and the Republicans are standing on the platform, shaking their fists, and yelling that we should have taken a horse-drawn buggy instead.

Damn. It's all good! What do you guys want? Republican heads on stakes around the Capitol, just to prove it can be done?

I know; I know. Since we got $800 billion, we should have asked for a trillion. And if we had gotten a trillion, the naysayers would be saying we should have asked for $1.3 trillion. Talk about your nattering nabobs of negativity! What a bunch of complainers. Even when they win a blowout victory, Democrats need to talk themselves into a story about why they lost.

user-pic

There are two elephants in the room.
1. The high cost of running for office. Both parties have to court big business interests to get elected and once in office they continue to accept money from these groups and the army of lobbyists that now infects every legislature.

2. The power of the fourth branch of government - the military. Notice that Obama has agreed to expand military spending, increase troop strength in Afghanistan and has kept much of the permanent government in the DoD in place.

So the GOP and the Dems only differ in one small area. The Dems are slightly more willing to fund social programs than are the Repubs. Even so it was Bush who pushed through the drug expansion of Medicare.

Notice that Dems aren't doing much differently when it comes to the financial bailout either. Geitner is a creature of the banking system and has now appointed many from the industry to be in his department. This is the same fox guarding the henhouse that we hand when Paulson was in charge.

Perhaps Dems are a bit more empathetic than the Repubs, or perhaps they are just more sensitive to the idea that if they don't throw a few bones to the working class in terms of expanded unemployment benefits and the like they risk seeing riots in the streets.

user-pic
Even so it was Bush who pushed through the drug expansion of Medicare.
Very funny, but not really. What Bush pushed through was a gift to the insurance companies and the pharmaceutical companies, and called it "Medicare Part D". That act has made wealthy people of the salesmen who peddle the Medicare supplement policies, it has protected the huge profit margins of the pharmaceutical industry, and it shut down any real effort to provide coverage for prescription medications. Not funny.
user-pic

Thank you for catching that one hoppy. I was dumbfounded when that came out and everyone was shouting hallaula.

user-pic

Yes it was a flawed program expansion, but it was still an expansion.

Many people are now getting drug coverage that weren't getting it before. Once the concept that Medicare should cover drugs has been made acceptable there is nothing to prevent it from being modified later.

There is sort of an expectation ratchet with social services. Once they are offered they become the norm and it is hard to eliminate them, that's why having Bush adopt this was so unusual.

Drug coverage will be fixed as part of an overall health care reform, we just don't know when.

user-pic

I have to disagree. All that Part D did was establish that the government would do nothing to rein in the accelerating cost of medical products, set the precedent that all medical care has to go through insurance companies so they can take their cut, and close the door to any constructive action to actually reduce the cost of medical care. It has been a bonanza for insurance salesmen (I know that from personal experience), and, for me it actually reduced my health insurance coverage.

user-pic

Q. Why Are We So Intimidated By The Right When They Have Always Been Wrong and We've Always Been Right?

A. They have the National Rifle Association. We have Jimmy Crater.

user-pic

That is funny!

user-pic

MJ,

We don't have to pretend we respect the lying, cheating, corrupt Republicans. We never did. It was our weak and cowardly leadership that insisted on that. It's time to put that foolishness to an end and forever crush the right wing in this country. But I doubt it will happen because our leadership in Congress remains just as weak and cowardly as ever.

user-pic

The Republican reason for existence just about has a stake through its heart.

And here comes King Obama riding to their rescue. If there ever was a time to finish off the utter lunacy they have practiced since 1967, now is that time. There is a existence of difference between being civil and being rational.

Obama saving and rehabilitating the imploding Republican Hate Machine so they can strike again IS political insanity.

user-pic

Agreed!

user-pic

Yes, our Congress persons REALLY ARE those folks living on a hill, separated from the masses by a Beltway moat of billions of dollars "contributed" by (I like the term) the predator class.

Regardless of party or affiliation, Congress feels much like a besieged exclusive Country Club of the elite, able to feel each others pain much more than feel the pain of those of who voted them into the Congressional Country Club of the Political Elite.

(Apologies to Kucinich, Feingold, and Sanders.)

user-pic

Agreed once again!

The awful truth is that whether in politics or business: our elites have failed the nation utterly and none of them who were in power and helped to bring about this vast economic dunkirk for our nation should be allowed to remain in power or have any influence from now on.

user-pic

"But why can't our President go after them with such force that some of these guys just surrender to constituent pressure?"

Answer: Our constitution and it's bill of rights, you Marxist SOB, Our constitutions and it's bill of rights.

user-pic

Another genius.

user-pic

A genius with a real way with words too!

user-pic

(on the loud speaker) Paging Joe McCarthy. Is Joe McCarthy still in the building?

I find delicious irony in conservatives whining about the protecting the Constitution and Bill of Rights after the past eight years of disdain for Habeus Corpus, torture and renditions under fascist rule...

You must have a pair which are big and hairy...

user-pic

=D

Or maybe, none.

user-pic

OMG!!! Are you saying he is in fact a...a...a eunuch? :-P

user-pic

Eunuch? You mean eunuchoid, or Eunice?

user-pic

LOL...touché. :D

user-pic

I agree, MJ. But there are conservatives out there that I respect. The really good conservatives, the William Buckley types the "classical liberals" who are really into individual freedoms are, well, wrong on the economics but right on the social libertarianism and I can deal with them. I also find a lot of them to be congenial, open to debate and well meaning.

But... these are not the types that Obama is dealing with. Its there demagogues that are worrisome.

user-pic

Buckley, and others of his ilk, are the "civil" worms on the conservative angler fish. Try to swallow their bait, and you become their food.

Or another analogy ...

You believe that breaking bread with Buckley at a conservative's table will acheive a palatable consensus between the two views of government. BUT, Buckley is (was) not the seat of power - it was Gingrich, and Norqvist (sic) and Cheney. THOSE are the "chefs" in the kitchen, preparing your repast. Eat that offering at your own risk.

Or put bluntly, Buckley was just (another) useful idiot trying to create a society which could only exist in the theoretical.

user-pic

Says Obama, if I told the American people the "TRUTH", I would end up like Lincoln and Garfield, in a wooden coffin, eight feet under...of course, it also does not help when the mainstream media gives equal air time to the losing party, with their loser ideas... but having said that too, with the aide of Congress (though mostly Republicans), this country is being taken over by global banking interests and turning the U.S. into a third world operation of the rich over the masses of mostly poor people (a third made up of the formerly known "Middle Class"). Not withstanding the recent passing of the Stimulus Bill, that is crumbs compared to what the government may do to bail out the financial industry; expect another 2 or 3 trillion to prop up and sustain the banking system. [I posted those sentiments at the whitehouse.gov web site, though they only give you up to about 500 words to rant and comment.] Short of riots and starvation already experience in other third nations, collective souls need to get rid of, if not at least limit the powers of fractional interest banking and the political powers behind international banking and the Federal Reserve; breaking them up into smaller entities as was the case in history (anti-trust).

....but here is the new manifesto, the Financial Emancipation of our times: Monetary Reform Act - A Summary: This proposed law would require banks to increase their reserves on deposits from the current 10%, to 100%, over a one-year period. This would abolish fractional reserve banking (i.e., money creation by private banks) which depends upon fractional (i.e., partial) reserve lending. To provide the funds for this reserve increase, the US Treasury Department would be authorized to issue new United States Notes (and/or US Note accounts) sufficient in quantity to pay off the entire national debt (and replace all Federal Reserve Notes).

The funds required to pay off the national debt are always closely equivalent to the amount of money the banks have created by engaging in fractional lending because the Fed creates 10% of the money the government needs to finance deficit spending (and uses that newly created money to buy US bonds on the open market), then the banks create the other 90% as loans (as is explained on our FAQ page). Thus the national debt closely tracks the combined total of US Treasury debt held by the Fed (10%) and the amount of money created by private banks (90%). Because this two-part action (increasing bank reserves to 100% and paying off the entire national debt) adds no net increase to the money supply (the two actions cancel each other in net effect on the money supply), it would cause neither inflation nor deflation, but would result in monetary stability and the end of the boom-bust pattern of US economic activity caused by our current, inherently unstable system.

Thus our entire national debt would be extinguished – thereby dramatically reducing or entirely eliminating the US budget deficit and the need for taxes to pay the $400+ billion interest per year on the national debt - and our economic system would be stabilized, while ending the terrible injustice of private banks being allowed to create over 90% of our money as loans on which they charge us interest. Wealth would cease to be concentrated in fewer and fewer hands as a result of private bank money creation. Thereafter, apart from a regular 3% annual increase (roughly matching population growth), only Congress would have the power to authorize changes in the US money supply - for public use -not private banks increasing only private bankers' wealth.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-515319560256183936 or visit their web site: www.themoneymasters.com

user-pic

UBS CEO is one of Geithner's senior financial advisors. Bill Moyer mentioned that UBS is currently under CRIMINAL investigation, see below:

"According to a Wall Street Journal article, Federal criminal prosecutors and the SEC are investigating whether Swiss bank UBS AG, Europe's largest bank, intentionally misled investors by overpricing mortgage-backed securities (CDOs):"

http://www.generationaldynamics.com/cgi-bin/D.PL?xct=gd.e080202b

user-pic

Your solutions, or a variation thereof, would work. Few will pay much attention to what you are saying, because it sounds too different to be true. Your solution would, in effect, take back the ability to create money from the banksters and return it to our government. It would in short order bankrupt all the banks. Keep in mind, they cannot service their overhead by just taking deposits and lending that money at a 2-3% markup. Banks depend upon fractional reserves to operate, as well as make massive profits for the owners.

An even better solution, in my opinion, is to just be upfront: Our government should take over the banking industry (and the insurance industry, and the medical industry, and the lawyering industry.) I suppose that sounds like socialism. Good enough. We need a 180 turn in this country.

user-pic

Interesting thought (though tangential to the topic under discussion). I suppose the reason it hasn't been seriously discussed in either officialdom or amongst intelligensia is that it has basically not a prayer of a chance of working as advertised.

There'd no gain for taxpayers unless the proposed new money that retires the old US treasury paper were to pay a lower interest rate. Would China, Saudia Arabia and other big holders of US gov't debt accept something even lower-yielding? Maybe if ceilings on FDIC insurance were abolished, but then since banks cannot lend anymore, and have to get rid of all their assets except reserves in one year, who will buy all their toxic junk? Who would provide mortgages, car loans, small business loans, etc. since banks won't be able do so (except with equity capital which lately has been coming mainly from taxpayers). Sounds like a recipe for nationalizing most of the banks, and most of the traditional system of loans along with them, either upfront, or after it things first collapse in a disaster that makes the '30s depression look like a picnic. In that case, why not go whole hog and move straight away to living off alalfa sprouts and sunflower seeds homegrown in communes, while barter trading macarame, sandals, T-dyed shirts, hippy beads, and Tarot cards? If we are going to do away with capitalism as the world has known it, then I'd at least like to cash in my 401K for a share in a community organic garden with a comfortable solar-powered hot tub.

user-pic

It's not intimidation. It's called having a sense of humility, of modesty in this world. We all can learn from each other, just as we all have something to teach each other. Stop and listen, M.J.... and reach out a bit. This country is not divided into "us" and "them" unless you're the one making the division. We're all just people trying to find our way.

-MCS

user-pic

I say the DNC should take to the airwaves in increasingly liberal Maine and Pennsylvania to highlight the efforts of those 3 to support a far right wing agenda when those states voted overwhelmingly against said far right agenda and for President Obama. Hell I hope the GOP targets Snowe, Collins and Specter in the primaries...it'll be that much easier for D's to take those seats and go back to 51-49 being a majority instead of 60-40.

user-pic

We are NOT now, NEVER were, and NEVER will be intimidated by theright. Theright is wrong on most critical issues, and any cursory examination of the bloody, costly horrorshow FAILURES of the last eight years will prove this telling point. Democratic leadership apparently is petrified of the right for some unknown, unknown reason. The democratic leadership fear of theright, and refusal to standupto theright is either a product of some level of complicity or rank cowardice. Progressive, however do not suffer from this affliction and have, and will continually deconstruct the false parable, partisan fictions and myths, propaganda, disinformation, and NAKED PATENT LIES bruted by the right.

The other contributing factor to this false perception is directly attributable to the complicit parrots in the socalled MSM who continually bow and cowtow to therights ridiculous babel, and NEVER or rarely bother vetting or even examining or analyzing therights wild and scurrilous slander and slime, or therights bruting of fictions, myths, partisan parables, and naked patent lies.

If the socalled MSM did their jobs, then theright would have long ago been exposed as a false and deceptive movement rooted in biggotry, racism, supremist ideologies, warmongering, warprofiteering, fascist perversions of christianity, and robbing from poor and middle class Americans to feed the predator class, the superrich.

Theright and the gop have nothing solid to stand on, and no accomplishment, or success to promote. Instead we are fed and relentless spew and chari vari of hate, mis or disinformation, warmongering, partisan propaganda, hollow visionairy promises, sectarian myths, fearmongering, race bating, biggotry, and the ridiculous babel bespeaking of freemarkets, taxcuts, taxcuts, taxcuts, taxcuts, taxcuts, taxcuts, taxcuts benefiting the predator class alone, and neverending existential threats from evildoers.

None of this gibberish has any credibility or legitimacy, yet the parrots in socalled MSM repeat these patent lies as the gospel truth, and hoist theright as noble, godfearing, terroristkilling, patriotic, exceptional human being. It is a LIE, a naked, patent, glaringly obvious LIE. If the MSM questioned, or examined, or investigated any of these issues - theright would be exposed as a hollow and moot wildly brutish and hatefilled faction that is rooted in, and based on rank deceptions, and NAKED PATENT LIES!!!!

user-pic
Are their significant instances where THEY were right and WE were WRONG. I don't think so. So why the hell don't we act like it?
LOL. You just did. You folks just rammed through the largest appropriation bill in history, that no one has actually READ. And in the process, broke the promises of stimulus and transparency. With only 3 Republican votes out of both houses! And, this will be wrong.

Like Democrat protection of the GSE securitization process, Vietnam war, Great Society, AMT tax, Allan Greenspan, re-electing Marion Barry to public office, anthropomorphic global warming, Jimmy Carter, the Alar scare, Thimerisol conspiracy, and elimination of DEET, leading to the deaths of millions from Malaria. Oh yeah, and Air America, paying farmers not to farm, and ethanol.
Just off the top of my head.

user-pic

AN ALEX JONES FAN, RIGHT HERE IN OUR MIDST! QUICK, VACCINATE HIM!

user-pic

The gop obstructionist were wrong again on the stimulus package, shooter242, and what an odd and partisan list you print. Half the admonitions fall squarely on therights lap. The other half are a strange mix of wingnut paranoia and partisan fictions, myths, and patent naked lies.

Time will tell who is right or who is wrong on the stimulus package, and your proclamation that "this will be wrong" is simply your partisan opinion, and nothing more.

The larger issue is that regardless of the gop theatrics pretending never to have read a bill they had been negotiating for two weeks, (compare with the lurch into fascism that was heaped onto congress in the cloak of night called the Patriot Act with no debate, no review, no discussion, no analysis and no democratic involvement) - the stimulus package achieved most of Obama's stated objectives.

And the president, and us progressives are clearly standing on these policies and this stimulus package to improve the dire economic situation for poor and middle class Ameicans heaped onto our laps by the pathological liars, traitors, criminals, and wanton profiteers in the bushgov. As Obama has already stated, he, and we expect to be judged on the success or lackthereof of this package. If things don't improve, then he, and we will suffer the political resprecussions. But unless you are psychic, which you obviously are not - then we will just have to wait and see what happens.

Your camp is throwing all your hopes into rush, joetheplumber and palin, and this coming after bush and cheney. Theright has nothing positive, and no success to stand on. The only option for the right is the relentless fearmongering and insipid repetition of the failed policies of taxcuts, taxcuts, taxcuts, taxcuts, taxcuts, taxcuts, taxcuts, taxcuts, squawk squawk taxcuts, taxcuts, taxcuts, taxcuts, taxcuts, taxcuts, taxcuts, taxcuts, squawk squawk benefiting the predator class, the superrich exclusively. Good luck.

In my opinion theright is wrong.
theleft is right.

We'll see over the next few days, weeks, months, and years if that opinion is valid.

What is incontervertable now however is that based on the bloody costly catrophic failures and horrorshows of the last eight years, - theright was definately wrong. We are only just now begining to find out if theleft is right.

user-pic
We are only just now begining to find out if theleft is right.
Heh. But Tony you've already declared that the left is always right.
In my opinion theright is wrong. theleft is right.
So in your honor I'll reprint something I composed years ago...

1. Liberals are never wrong.
2. Liberals never apologize for making a mistake. (See #1.)
3. Liberals have the absolute answer for any and all situations, and if only allowed total domination we would have a perfect world. (See #1.)
4. Liberals rarely discuss anything without incorporating hate speech toward the person they are in discussion with, or the subject.
5. Liberals, while being nearly omniscient, seem unable to grasp the fundamentals of making things that are useful.
6. Liberals, while unable to grasp the fundamentals of making things that are useful, hate those that do.
7. Liberals, while hating those people that know how to make things, think they are entitled to everything made, by virtue of being perfect. (See #1.)
8. Liberals and extreme left wing liberals are by definition moderate.

user-pic

vomiting up talking points into the mirror again, good job, boy, good boy, good boy

user-pic

Replace the word Liberals with Conservatives, and you will be right.

I stated clearly, that I am only offering an opinion on the future.

The past however is incontravertable and glaringly painfully obvious, and theright has been wrong on every single issue.

There is no hate from our camp shooter242. We only ask, or demand that Americans and American leadership abide by an honor the rule of law and that thing called the Constitution.

Instead of flinging a bunch of meaningless substantless ridiculous accusations and silliness and "Liberals", try focusing on the dire issues at hand, and what policies will remedy these horrible wrongs. If it is in your capacity to look beyond your disdain for all things liberal you will then be forced to examine the actual practical realities of the circumstances we all face and must hazard and endure. Then and only then will you begin to look to the hard facts and realities of policies and how those policies succeed, or as in the case of theright over the last eight years - FAIL miserably.

Taxcuts benefiting the predator class, the superrich are the problem, - NOT the solution.

The socalled free markets are a myth. What we actually have in practical application are crony capitalists, casino capitalist, and bandit capitalist markets that have collapse and lay dead and rotting in the field.

Irredeemable debt, models, products, and instruments are doomed to fail. Debt as an investment product is the riskiest of all instruments, and if things go pearshaped, as they did in 2007, doomed to catastrophic collapse. Forcefull regulation and transparency are the only remedy for containing the excesses of the wild and raucus and unpredictable benefits of irredeemable debt products and instraments.

The predator class and the facsists in the bushgov are not toobigtofail, or ever above, or beyond the rule of law and that thing called the Constitution.

The predator class and the fascists in the bushgov are accountable.

Liberals unlike conservative do abide by the rule of law, the Constitution, and the success or failure of our respective policies.

Obama has already admitted to "screwing up" on the vetting process. The andover cheerleader, pampered papasboy, pathological liar, fascist, warcriminal and war profiteer bush has yet to admit to any of the long and festering litany of FAILURES and mistakes during his 8 years of tyranny.

Democracy is a government wherein the authority of the government is derived by the consent of the governed. The governed, that would be us - the majority of American rejected and repudiated the lawlessness, deception, perversion, betrayal, wanton profiteering, and robbing from poor and middle class Americans to feed the predator class, the superrich that defined that last eight years of bushgov tyranny and gop domination of the government.

Three republicans voted for a stimulus package. Why? Fiscal conservatism. Are you joking? Your camp heaped the largests most porcine, most debt and deficit ridden, most tarnished, and least credible government in the history of American on the Obama administration, the democratic party and poor and middle class Americans.

What useful things are you talking about? Let me guess taxcuts taxcuts taxcuts taxcuts taxcuts taxcuts taxcuts taxcuts taxcuts taxcuts taxcuts taxcuts taxcuts taxcuts taxcuts taxcuts taxcuts taxcuts taxcuts taxcuts taxcuts taxcuts taxcuts squawk squawk that exclusively benefit the predator class.

PONZI schemes are doome to FAIL.

Wars of choice are immoral, illegal, costly bloody, and fruitless horrorshows that are doomed to fail.

Stick to the issue at hand. If you want to argue or retort specifics, I am more than willing to engage in a hearty discourse - but if you are simply wanting to slime Liberals and brute conservatives - you must provide some solid ground on which to debate.

All we have from you is your partisan opinion and the pathetic attempt to justify the bloody costly, horrors and catastrophic failures of the last eight years of conservative domination of American government and politics.

user-pic

Amidst the heated but confusing above discussion between shooter and tony, the word that sticks out most is "rank cowardice" (in shooter's first post):

"The democratic leadership fear of the right, and refusal to stand up to the right is either a product of some level of complicity or rank cowardice"

It is too early to tell whether or how much cowardice (or complicity) applies to Obama.

Cowardice certainly does not apply to some of the more strident self-termed "progressive" voices.

This then raises the question of why these "progressives" -that have clearly been proven correct in many of their very early and very shrill denunciations of the Cheney-Bush administration (and to some lesser extent Democratic spinelessness against it)- have been so utterly ineffective. The Bush tax cuts are not going to be rolled back anytime soon, the idiocy of the "war on terror" will apparently be reduced, but not to a degree that the Democratic Congress couldn't have forced two years ago, and -to get to the point of the discussion- the new stimulus package is more modest and less about "change" than even Wall Street, or what remains of it, expected.

Let me suggest one problem with much of "progressive" thinking. There is a tendency, strangely reminiscent of Bush's "you are with or us or with the terrorists" to paint with a too-broad brush. What the heck do worn-out, cliched (and very "MSM") terms like "Right" and "Left" (which actually were little more than a description of the seating arrangement in the French Assembly two centuries ago) really mean nowadays? Sure, Bill Kristol, Pat Robertson, and Joe the Plumber all presumably voted for Sarah Palin, but that does not mean that they are all cut from the same cloth, or that there would be much difference between any of them and Nancy Pelosi on the question of whether the US should have lifted a finger against the Gaza massacres.

In consistency with what I've just said, it does not make much sense to try and lump a disparate bunch of folks together as "progressives" (that is why I've been putting quotes around the word). Nevertheless, there is a tendency -amongst those, say, who were the most outspoken against the Cheney-Bush admin.- to
(a) embrace grand sweeping dubious constructs like "predator class," or even crackpot conspiracy theories about Caucasian oil pipelines or secret US complicity in 9-11, and
(b) march over and over against in utterly pointless, meaningless, and total irrelevant rainbow coalition rallies in order to feel better about themselves. I am not pointing fingers at anyone on this page, but just as "conservative" is not defined in the dictionary as ignorant and deceitful (see my earlier post above on that) so "progressive" is not the same as sloppy, reckless, and slavishly devoted to impracticality.

If "blue-staters" and "red-staters" look carefully in the mirror they will see a range of colors. And there is a lot of room for improvement within BOTH muddy mixtures.

user-pic

We have been beaten over the head by either years of Bush.

We have been inundated with spin and scare reports from print and cable/tv media ad nauseum.

We have been told we are all going to hell because we're not evangelicals and God will punish us because we opt for the right to choose and stem cell research.

The above is only the tip of the iceberg. The GOP have controlled nearly all information available to the people and the corporate media have given them the bullhorn and cheered them on. When, and only when, the media decide to return to honest reporting, the people will know that we need no fear being tortured hostages of the Limbaughs, Cantors, Gingriches, McConnells, et alia.

I have grown disgusted with all media and all politics. People should wake up and rail against the garbage they are being fed. Why do they have to first find themselves sleeping in their cars or in cardboard boxes before they wake up and demand to be heard?

"We're" intimidated by the right who are always so wrong because they are constantly being pushed on us as the wunderkinds. Witness Chris Matthews giving Gregg the award for self awareness. What a putrid load of dung. When the media throw Matthews on his own dung heap, then I might be hopeful that the right wing dung flies are becoming extinct. Not before.

user-pic

{"This then raises the question of why these "progressives" -that have clearly been proven correct in many of their very early and very shrill denunciations of the Cheney-Bush administration (and to some lesser extent Democratic spinelessness against it)- have been so utterly ineffective."}

Good question. The answer is simple "progressive's are relegated to the blogshpere. We have no representation, and no voice in the government. We had hoped that Obama would offer us that voice, but have been betrayed and watched in horror as progressive voices and candidates are continually ignored and passed over. Obama's economic team is a perfect example, people entirely ENTIRELY with Wall Street insiders and the predator class operators who conjured, pimped, cloaked, profited wantonly from, and exacerbated the greatest economic crisis since the depression. Hense it should be no surprize since there are no progressive voices in Obama's economic team that all the solutions are focused on funnelling trillions of tax payer dollars into the blackhole of the economic crisis, and insolvent banks. The predator class operators and their FAILED banks, FAILED financial institutions, and FAILED models, and FAILED policies do not want to suffer any losses for their FAILURES, or have their allmighty compensation packages reduced, and have the utter gall to expect the American taxpayer and our children to burden all the monsterous costs and imponderable debts and still pay these FAILED predators bonuses, or outrageous bonuses! It is absurd and reprehensible. But Obama is only hearing the sound of one hand clapping. The predator class alone is framing the economic policy and there IS NOT ONE PROGRESSIVE VOICE in the room.

Defense and Justice are also tragically underrepresented by progressive voices.
Obama is quick to reach out to theright and the gop who will shiv him, and stick knives in his back on every occasion in every situation, - yet for some unknown unknown reason Obama refuses to reach across the isle to progressives, to seek reconcilation with progressives, to work in bi-partisan ways with progressives.

The gop and theright will never work with Obama. Progressives are responsible for his election, and represent his most loyal allies. Why have we been forsaken, ignored, rejected, and denied any voice or representation the government.

It is also fruitless and patently false to proclaim progressives are bushlike and that we adopt or would countenance a withusoragainstus mentality. This false bruting of democratsdoitto, progressives are just as bad and conservatives and refusing to recognize the marked divides between theleft and theright are fruitless, impotent, deceptive, and meaningless
excuses for failure to recognize facts and truth.

We care about what works!

Progressives are willing to hear any option, or examine any policy, or research any claim. But we never have this opportunity. Theright simply dictates what is godzlaw, and slimes the left as anti-American effete lunatics giving aid
and comfort to the enemy.

Until we actually get to the meat of matters, and truly analyze or research issues and vet facts, - there is no way to be with or against anyone. All we have are the dictates (and the last eight years proves those dictates are miserable FAILURES, and have been universally WRONG) from the right. There is no progressive voice in any position of leadership, even though Obama was elected by progressives.

Another problem is the complicit parrots in the MSM who legitimize cartoon charactors like rush and joetheplummer and palin as thoughful reasoned policy wonks, and then have the hypocritical gall to frame Dennis Kucinich (who has been on the right side of every single issue in the last eight years, most particularly IMPEACHMENT) as marginalized. Dick Cheney can threaten Obama with the sequel to 9/11 from his cave, - but Ron Paul is a radical.

The duplicity, hypocrisy, and rank deception of the socalled MSM is appalling and contributes to the dumbdownging of Americans, the perpetuating of naked patent lies, and the likes of rush and joetheplummer rizing to positions of leadership and message-force multipliers to therights policies.

user-pic

One last thing. It is fashionable to marginalize progressives as conspiratorial. If there ever is a real investigation into the events of 9/11, then the claims of Sibel Edmonds, Indira Singh, Ptech, Cheney's curious wargames mirroring 9/11 on the morning of 9/11, the odd and unusual large weirdly prescient and selective market moves just prior to 9/11, the spiriting out of the country of 140 Saudi nationals including bin Laden family members in the dark hours and days after 9/11, and the forensic issues and unanswered critical question with all three attack sites will turn much of what you obdurately dismiss as "crackpot conspiracy theories" will be proved more factual then the current PATENTLY FALSE narrative and fictions involving 9/11.

I never said anything about "Caucasian oil pipelines". I have written and warned about an the erection of an oil and energy corridor through the Caucacus bypassing Russia. Again, you simply slime the message as conspiratorial but refuse to examine or analyse the facts. Do a little research and get back to me.

Lastly I stand on the term predator class as accurate and necessary to define the top 1% of the population in terms of wealth, and thier policies. It's based on such constructs of the predator state which has a long and well respected place in the lexicon of economic theory.

What do you call executives earning a 150mn dollars a year, who conjured, pimped, cloaked, and profited wantonly from PONZI schemes and the packaging of the riskiest of all possible investment intraments based on irredeemable debt products divided and subdivided a thousand times over and intentinally FAILING to recognize or account for the RISK elements of those products, that ultimately contributed to the collapse of the global economic system and the greatest economic crisis since the depression - and then still have the gall, beg the government for bailouts of their FAILED and insolvent institutions, and to heap all the debt and costs on the taxpayers and Ameica's children - and reward themselves 18bn in bonuses.

I feel more than comfortable and accurate in framing this small imponderably wealthy and wildly detached and obdurate population - as the predator class. What would you call them?

user-pic

I would call overpaid incompetent executives criminals (if they broke laws) or unemployed EX-executives; in other words they should be indicted where laws were violated, fired in any case where the taxpayers have had to throw in money, and at least their 2008 bonuses confiscated.

I just don't see the value, intellectual or practical, in labeling everyone with above average income, or all business executives at major firms, or everyone one disagrees with as "predators" (even if SOME of them basically ARE!).

I thought I was clear that I wasn't pointing fingers at any particular individual "progressive." Nobody to my knowledge here on TPM has been talking about Cacausian oil here lately, and my specific use of that was merely as one example of misguided "progressivism" (mainly from some years ago when some people were trying to explain every issue under the sun from Bosnia, Afghanistan, to the dot-com bubble bursting, using various half-baked conspiracy theories).

If more "progressives" had your righteous indignation, Tony, then "progressives" as a group probably would be much more successful. But righteous indignation is most effective when it is focused on clearly identified targets. There IS a difference between what Obama is doing and what McCain would have done. Not a huge difference in the overall scheme of things, but noticeable and positive. Some "progressives" bought into the "change" BS too heavily, but at least Palin is not in the White House now, and "progressives" WERE effective for once in helping avert that disaster.

When I think back (again not to be critical of any particular poster here but just in general) to all the demos against the Iraq invasion, with placards hoisted on a dozen different issues, some worthy others less so, but all quite irrelevant to Iraq, Palestinian flags waving etc., it is clear to me that a large swath of the "progressive" movement is completely happy feeling good about being right and being eternally useless at actually accomplishing any real change.

user-pic

No argument from me.

user-pic

In immortal words of fafblog [the characters slog toward the end of the world which is still not in sight]

"It sure was a long way till the end of the world," says me.
"The way was guarded by lions and chimeras and manticores and logicians and other ferocious beasts," says Giblets.
"Fortunately we are impervious to logic," says me.
"Modus ponens has no hold on Giblets!" says Giblets. "He swats antecedents like flies!"

user-pic

Though wary and suspect progessives are doing well Ptroub.

Iran won Iraq.

Iraq was from the beginning, is now, and always will be a crime scene and excuse for wanton profiteering for the fascists in the bushgov. Nothing good or positve will ever come or be recognized by poor and middle class Americans from the costly bloody, war of choice and excuse for wanton profiteering and oil piracy in Iraq.

Progressive have always been right on the Iraq issue, and wingnuts will always be wrong. There is no prettifying, or painting lipstick on the pip that is the bushgovs deceptive abusive costly bloody, and criminal misadventure in Iraq.

Progressives have won and gained from the stimulus package. We will all see what the future holds, but as the post above details, Obama has won more for progressives in two weeks, than the Clinton government did in eight years.

That said, progressives will do even better and recognize more triumph and policies in place once the obstructionist, Obama hating, backstabbing, pathological lairs and hypocrits in the gop are knockedout, chokedout, submitted, and thoroughly defeated.

user-pic

hey Shooter...you need to get over the"Liberal" crap. You are an American. That means you don't look the other way and/or make excuses when individuals or corporations damage your country. That is what way too many Americans have done the past eight years and look where it's brought us to. Stop identifying with a brand and wake the hell up. It's not high school football where "my team" no matter what applies. Either help right the wrongs, that ignorant and incompetent, foisted on our country these past eight years, or get the hell out of the way so the grownups can fix things.

Facebook

bağkur borç sorgulama

With all the sites out there with information on them with a ton of junk it's nice to find a blog whose admin takes the time to create good material. TY for the good post.

sgk

Facebook

emekli sandığı

I used to be very pleased to discover this site.I needed to we appreciate you this great read!! I definitely enjoying every amount of it and that i have you ever bookmarked to look at new belongings you post.

araç sorgulama

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address