Concept of Global Leadership is Obsolete
Professor Smith writes in his post: "Bacevich's belief (Chapter 1) that empire pays, and that the public appreciates a payoff from it under the name of 'freedom,' does not persuade me."
The problem here is one of verb tense. What I try to argue is that empire (or at least an expansionist foreign policy) once /paid. /Indeed, if we cite the Louisiana Purchase as the beginning of serious American expansionism, then it paid quite nicely for at least the next century-and-a-half. By the time I was born after World War II, the United States had become the most powerful, the richest, and (for the white majority), the freest nation on earth. Americans liked to attribute the nation's success to Providence or their own virtues, but that was nonsense. We acquired power because we sought power. Many (by no means all) Americans then reaped the benefits of power.
The problem is that for roughly the past four or five decades empire (or expansionism) has /ceased/ to pay. Unfortunately, our political elites, deeply invested in obsolete and bloated conceptions of "global leadership," won't face the facts.
Will Obama be able to break us of these old habits? Maybe. His pragmatic inclinations offer modest cause for hope. But persuading institutions wedded to the expansionist tradition to change poses a mighty challenge.
"The problem is that for roughly the past four or five decades empire (or expansionism) has /ceased/ to pay."
Ceased to pay for whom? Seems to be a going concern for some people.
How long till we see a fully co-ordinated media campaign to convince us withdrawal from Iraq would violate the cherished hopes and dreams of every enlisted man? Those don't come cheap.
February 5, 2009 4:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
So what you say is that realism in international affairs is changing because of globalism in such a way that the projection of military power does not necessarily lead to positive results as it has in the past.
That might be true for us but not necessarily other powers. China--although not overtly expansionist--seems to be doing quite well in its projection of power in Africa and elsewhere.
I would not sound the death knell of realism in global affairs just yet.
February 5, 2009 5:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm stupid, but I'm still Global Leader! Yay!
February 5, 2009 4:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Or maybe the failure of global leadership to "pay" is not so much an historical phenomenon as an ideological one.
If the United States was still running a global empire and taking a global leadership role to protect its parochial interests, we might turn a profit. It's hard to turn a profit when you're involved in protecting Bosnian Muslims and nation-building.
It is not our hubris but our compassion which has laid empires low. I'm not pining for a return to empire, but we cannot try to be global leaders for other people's benefit and expect to benefit ourselves.
February 6, 2009 2:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wrote a trilogy of posts, one at TPM and later all at DKos about why having or at least freely using the power of empire is liable to backfire.
In short people pin a lot of problems on you and fear you and so resistance increases. You can overcome it, but relatively, it's almost always a waste of blood, money and resources in a world where arms are plentiful and pacification tactics prohibit genocide.
February 7, 2009 12:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
When the cost of doing business exceeds the profits then empirism fails as an enterprise. Like most businesses that fail the business does not or will not retrench in a timely manner - they continue to throw more and more money into the black hole of militarism hoping that force alone will prevail.
There is no return in militarism - navy carriers do not return a profit, tankers do.
February 8, 2009 12:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
This article is very interesting. Thank you very much for sharing . Hulu Downloader
August 12, 2010 1:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for your posting. I am very intrested in it. iPad to PC Transfer | iPhone 4 Converter
August 14, 2010 1:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
n expansionism, then it paid quite nicely for at least the next century-and-a-half. By the time I was born after World War II, the United States had become the most powerful, the richest, and (for the white majority), the freest nation on earth. Amer
bags manufacturers
August 18, 2010 9:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
The problem is that for roughly the past four or five decades empire (or expansionism) has /ceased/ to pay. Unfortunately, our political elites, deeply invested in obsolete and bloated conceptions of "global car transport leadership," won't face the facts.
November 9, 2010 2:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
By the time I was born after World War II, the United States had become the most powerful, the richest, and (for the white majority), the freest nation car transport on earth.
November 28, 2010 11:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Will Obama be able to break us of these old habits? Maybe. His pragmatic tech house inclinations offer modest cause for hope.
December 11, 2010 11:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
What I try to argue is that empire (or at least an expansionist foreign policy) once /paid. /Indeed, if we cite the Louisiana Purchase as the beginning of serious American expansionism, then it paid quite nicely for at least the next car transport century-and-a-half.
December 16, 2010 2:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
"The problem is that for roughly the past four or five decades empire (or expansionism) has /ceased/ to pay."
Ceased to pay for whom? Seems to be a going concern for some people.
How long till we see a fully co-ordinated media campaign to convince us withdrawal from Iraq would violate the cherished hopes and dreams of every enlisted man? Those car transportation don't come cheap.
December 29, 2010 1:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
So what you say is that realism in international affairs is changing because of globalism in such a way that the projection of military power does not necessarily lead to positive results as it has in the past.
That might be true for us but not necessarily other powers. China--although not overtly expansionist--seems to be doing quite well in its projection of power in Africa and elsewhere.
I would not sound the death knell of realism in global Search Engine Optimization affairs just yet.
December 29, 2010 1:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
thank you admin sikiş izletmeye devam.
February 8, 2011 7:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
search engine optimization, seo, search engine marketing, sem, seo services, local seo, link building, search engine optimization.
February 22, 2011 10:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
san francisco movers, moving companies, mover companies, moving quotes, mover packer, moving company, moving services, local mover, moving leads, san francisco movers.
February 22, 2011 10:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
bağkur borç sorgulama
With all the sites out there with information on them with a ton of junk it's nice to find a blog whose admin takes the time to create good material. TY for the good post.
sgk
March 18, 2011 6:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
emekli sandığı
I used to be very pleased to discover this site.I needed to we appreciate you this great read!! I definitely enjoying every amount of it and that i have you ever bookmarked to look at new belongings you post.
araç sorgulama
March 23, 2011 12:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
This information is very useful! Thanks!
Best regards, Katya, CEO of hyper v networking, iscsi on linux
April 1, 2011 3:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
shipping a car, auto transport, automobile transporters, auto shippers, auto transporters, shipping a car.
April 7, 2011 12:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
automobile transporters, auto transport, automobile transporter, auto shippers, auto transporters, automobile transporters.
April 7, 2011 12:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Si vous etes interesses par le dossier, ou desirez en savoir plus, contactez-moi par mail, et je vous mettrai en contact.
Best regards,Jane, CEO of db2 high availability
April 29, 2011 3:27 AM | Reply | Permalink