"The Ways We Use Energy Strengthen Our Adversaries And Threaten Our Planet"
President Obama (and I do like typing that) made a large number of evocative, important, and profound statements, but none more so in any of these respects than his commitment to rebuild our economy on a green base. In the stimulus appropriation and tax bills, in his continued reminder of the importance of obtaining energy independence and abating climate change, while creating millions of new green jobs (a trifecta of policy goals), our new and much welcomed President is making a clear statement of strategic direction. No other President has ever said and done so much to alter at the basic level the energy platform of our economy, and President Obama has only had a half-day in office.
Execution on his promise, pursuit of his direction, will be a monumental and hellishly complicated task. It will require not only the full force of the existing governmental apparatus but also many companion efforts outside government. But the direction set by the President is absolutely clear and that is the necessary, crucial first step.



















You ain't just whistlin' Dixie. The status quo will fight it tooth and nail, as I'm sure you know, Reed. I imagine the lights are burning brightly tonight in the lobbyists' offices on K Street. What will be their strategy?: Invest in America as we know it and not as we wish it to be? Or what?
January 20, 2009 11:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
The #1 source of greenhouse gases that we could easily get under control is from automobiles. Doing something effective to reduce auto emissions to zero in 10 years would do more for the environment than just about anything else our President could do.
First, the government must mandate emissions free vehicles and no, it is not okay to compromise AGAIN with the forces of predatory wealth and allow the auto companies more time and to market their inferior hybrid vehicles. We need plug in electric vehicles at reasonable prices and in large quantities. Period. Get this simple idea through Congress in the first hundred days as the President's top priority on the environment in combination with the second item on this list.
Second, make a genuine, long-term committment to defeating terrorism and cleaning up the environment by funding a massive mass transit building program. Also, an equally ambitious program for assisting local transit authorities with operating costs of existing systems which are chronically underfunded and not well maintained. Along with emission free vehicles, cities with the infrastructure for alternative transporation modes will reduce both greenhouse gases and our dependence upon foreign oil. Frankly, it can be done in numerous ways, but I would take half the proposed highway and road money being proposed and put it in mass transit instead. It is an initiative long overdue and desperately needed. If we want to be free from our dependence on foreign oil, especially arab oil in a decade, then we need to make the appropriate investments now and in a massive way. If Obama's people follow the same barely-better-than-the-Republicans course the Clinton White House followed on mass transit we're going to be just as dependent on foreign oil in a decade as we are today and we won't have made any progress on climate change.
So, the big items don't need to necessarily be all that complicated or difficult as long as they aren't mixed up with a whole lot of other legislative mumbo jumbo.
January 21, 2009 2:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think "hellishly complicated" is about right.
Without *inspired* direction, we are on the verge of a brief, govt-sponsored "green" bubble. Blindly throwing money at clean coal (which isn't all that clean) or nuclear plants (which private investors shun) is not the answer. Blindly building sinkhole mass transit projects for someone else to ride isn't the answer. No matter how promising alternative energies may be in theory, throwing money at venture capitalists wearing green blazers is not the answer.
Here's to hoping Obama's team digs deeper on these issues than the rosy scenarios painted by lobbyists.
January 21, 2009 8:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
January 21, 2009 9:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Business Risks and Costs of New Nuclear Power
http://climateprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/nuclear-costs-2009.pdf
January 21, 2009 10:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks. That and some googling elsewhere was very informative. You are indeed correct.
January 21, 2009 10:55 AM | Reply | Permalink