TPMCafe
« Community in Barack Obama's America | Home | Truth-Digging Requires Full Reports, Not Sermons »

"The Ways We Use Energy Strengthen Our Adversaries And Threaten Our Planet"

user-pic

President Obama (and I do like typing that) made a large number of evocative, important, and profound statements, but none more so in any of these respects than his commitment to rebuild our economy on a green base. In the stimulus appropriation and tax bills, in his continued reminder of the importance of obtaining energy independence and abating climate change, while creating millions of new green jobs (a trifecta of policy goals), our new and much welcomed President is making a clear statement of strategic direction. No other President has ever said and done so much to alter at the basic level the energy platform of our economy, and President Obama has only had a half-day in office.

Execution on his promise, pursuit of his direction, will be a monumental and hellishly complicated task. It will require not only the full force of the existing governmental apparatus but also many companion efforts outside government. But the direction set by the President is absolutely clear and that is the necessary, crucial first step.


6 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic
Execution on his promise, pursuit of his direction, will be a monumental and hellishly complicated task.

You ain't just whistlin' Dixie. The status quo will fight it tooth and nail, as I'm sure you know, Reed. I imagine the lights are burning brightly tonight in the lobbyists' offices on K Street. What will be their strategy?: Invest in America as we know it and not as we wish it to be? Or what?

user-pic

The #1 source of greenhouse gases that we could easily get under control is from automobiles. Doing something effective to reduce auto emissions to zero in 10 years would do more for the environment than just about anything else our President could do.

First, the government must mandate emissions free vehicles and no, it is not okay to compromise AGAIN with the forces of predatory wealth and allow the auto companies more time and to market their inferior hybrid vehicles. We need plug in electric vehicles at reasonable prices and in large quantities. Period. Get this simple idea through Congress in the first hundred days as the President's top priority on the environment in combination with the second item on this list.

Second, make a genuine, long-term committment to defeating terrorism and cleaning up the environment by funding a massive mass transit building program. Also, an equally ambitious program for assisting local transit authorities with operating costs of existing systems which are chronically underfunded and not well maintained. Along with emission free vehicles, cities with the infrastructure for alternative transporation modes will reduce both greenhouse gases and our dependence upon foreign oil. Frankly, it can be done in numerous ways, but I would take half the proposed highway and road money being proposed and put it in mass transit instead. It is an initiative long overdue and desperately needed. If we want to be free from our dependence on foreign oil, especially arab oil in a decade, then we need to make the appropriate investments now and in a massive way. If Obama's people follow the same barely-better-than-the-Republicans course the Clinton White House followed on mass transit we're going to be just as dependent on foreign oil in a decade as we are today and we won't have made any progress on climate change.

So, the big items don't need to necessarily be all that complicated or difficult as long as they aren't mixed up with a whole lot of other legislative mumbo jumbo.

user-pic

I think "hellishly complicated" is about right.

Without *inspired* direction, we are on the verge of a brief, govt-sponsored "green" bubble. Blindly throwing money at clean coal (which isn't all that clean) or nuclear plants (which private investors shun) is not the answer. Blindly building sinkhole mass transit projects for someone else to ride isn't the answer. No matter how promising alternative energies may be in theory, throwing money at venture capitalists wearing green blazers is not the answer.

Here's to hoping Obama's team digs deeper on these issues than the rosy scenarios painted by lobbyists.

user-pic
nuclear plants (which private investors shun)
Do you have something to document this? From what I understand the hold up is Govt.
user-pic
It has been an entire generation since nuclear power was seriously considered as an energy option in the U.S. It seems to have been forgotten that the reason U.S. utilities stopped ordering nuclear power plants was their conclusion that nuclear power’s business risks and costs proved excessive. ... Estimates for new nuclear power place these facilities among the costliest private projects ever undertaken. Utilities promoting new nuclear power assert it is their least costly option. However, independent studies have concluded new nuclear power is not economically competitive.

Business Risks and Costs of New Nuclear Power
http://climateprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/nuclear-costs-2009.pdf

user-pic

Thanks. That and some googling elsewhere was very informative. You are indeed correct.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Kyle Krahel-Frolander



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address