Max Blumenthal's Brilliant Video of New York Pro-Gaza War Rally
I posted yesterday about Al Franken showing up with Norm Coleman at a solidarity with Israel rally in the Twin Cities. I thought it odd, to say the least.
That led me to check on other "solidarity" demonstrations in other cities. And I was surprised.
They have taken place in virtually every major city with a significant Jewish population. But hardly anyone is showing up. In New York City, on Sunday, 8,000 (and that is the estimate from the organizers) came out. 8000! In New York, pro-Israel rallies tend to draw hundreds of thousands. And that was the biggest rally in the country.
What does it mean? Is the Jewish community turning on Israel?
Absolutely not.
Jews are not coming out for these rallies because they think that this war is not good for Israel. Sure, many, if not most, are appalled at the killing in Gaza.
But even more suspect that this war is destroying Israel in world opinion, outraging non-Jewish Americans, and may, in fact, kill the two-state solution.
In their heart of hearts -- and I'm hearing this from lots of people who are quite traditional on the subject of Israel --they are deeply worried that this war could make it impossible for Israel ever to have a secure future and may even threaten its survival.
And that is why they are ignoring the solidarity rallies by the millions, because they -- unlike the Israeli flag-waving Jewish organizations -- deeply care about Israel. Solidarity is one thing. But the solidarity of lemmings is something else.
Jews are voting with their feet on this war. And they are voting "no."
Caring about the survival of Israel dictates that vote. But it may be too late. An old friend, a friend who tends to disagree with me on all matters relating to Israel, said this to me on Sunday. "In the history of the Jewish people, what is 60 years, 70, 80. In the end, this will be recalled as the moment in history when Jews got their state back for a little while and then lost it."
I pray he's wrong. Because it is totally preventable.
I'm glad Jews are not standing in solidarity with bad policies. But you get no points for silence, which amounts to tacit support. At this rate, we will be the lucky generation who lived at the time of a Jewish state. Our kids too. But our grandchildren? Maybe not.
hose who can't see that are blind.
As the AIDS activists used to say, "Silence Equals Death."
AND HERE IS MAX BLUMENTHAL's brilliant video on the New York pro-Gaza war rally. Note the sparse attendance and that those who did attend come from the same tiny segment of the community who voted for McCain because Obama was "bad for Israel." Mainsteam? No way.



















Egypt's friendship with the Palestinians is based on their mutual hatred of Israel. Otherwise, they wouldn't pass weapons to Hamas through the tunnels connecting the Sinai and the Gaza strip. As we know this is one of Hamas' main sources of ammunition against Israel. This is called peace between Israel and Egypt?!? This is called "let's say we have peace with Israel, and let Hamas do our dirty work" which Hamas is most happy to do. Hamas deliberately launches rockets into civilian areas because obviously they have no regard for life. They are stupid because knowing that Israel will defend itself by returning fire, Hamas continues with its rocket attack on Israeli population centers. The Egyptians are simply smarter, not more humane "peace-seekers" than Hamas
January 13, 2009 8:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
From the US perspective, this "war" looks like a preemptive strike against the possibilities offered by the new administration. How can any honest observer expect the Palestinian, or Arab reaction, to be anything but negative about the topic of comprehensive peace talks for the next four years?
January 13, 2009 8:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
How many "Stop the War" rallies have Jews like you organized? How many Jews have appeared at such rallies? Phil Weiss showed a photo on his anti-Zionist web site of such a rally in Los Angeles and we see three (3) protestors in the photo. Has "J-Street" made such a rally? In Israel, the Left is solidly behind the war, so in Israel we aren't seeing such things.
See this:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/13/world/middleeast/13israel.html?_r=1&hp
Jews are voting with their feet by not coming to such rallies. This proves the Jews are not on your side.
In any event, you hand-wringing over "the children" as expressed in an earlier thread is merely crocodile tears. You couldn't care less about Palestinian children. All you care about is making sure your image as a "Jewish progressive" is clean. How do I know this. Because before Oslo in 1993 you were one of those "progressives" who insisted that Israel bring Arafat in and impose him on the Palestinian people. Just like your failed Jewish 'peace mafia' people...Kurtzer, Indyk, Miller, Ross, etc...with their impressive record of failure. They also supported Israel's adventure with Arafat. Well, what was Arafat's record before 1993? He ignited bloody civil wars in Jordan and Lebanon with tens of thousands of dead. What about those Jordanian and Lebanese children who died? (I am ignoring the Jewish children murdered by Arafat's terror groups before 1993, because you will explain that terror away as being "understandable", just like you do with HAMAS's today). You knew this, but you didn't care about them. You just wanted to feel good about yourself by being in the "progressive" column. Well, just like the dead German children in Dresden and Hamburg were the responsibility of Hitler, and NOT the RAF or USAF, the dead Palestinian children should be on the conciences of those in HAMAS who cynically use them as human shields and who, on their own initiative and at their declaration, announced they were ending the "tahadiya" cease-fire.
January 13, 2009 8:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
The supposed unity of Israel on the Gaza escapade does not impress. NYT was saying similarly dubious things about how America was solidly behind the hypocrisy-laden and utterly botched Neo-con rush to invade Iraq in 2003. If 2/3 of Americans really were stupid enough to believe that Saddam was involved with 9-11 (doubtful) it is certainly not at all difficult to imagine that a large slice of the Israeli populace might be similarly temporarily hoodwinked into thinking that killing Palestinian children "defends" Israel. Especially with a massive propaganda machine incessantly pouring out such nonsense. Meanwhile, YBD, your sense of history is badly warped by your fear and arrogance. Hitler was responsible for the fire-bombing of Dresden, one of the great artistic treasures of the world having practically no value as military target?! You sound like him yourself: Jews were themselves responsible for the Holocaust because their plot to dominate the world so outraged the masses of peace-loving Europeans that they rose up to smite the Bolshevik-Hebrew murderers, etc. etc.. Two wrongs do not make a right and dozens of Big Lies do not add up to truth.
Comparing Israel today to America in 1945 is furthermore an insult to the United States. Dresden was an outrageous atrocity but it was an anomaly in the allied war effort. America did not occupy Germany for 40 years, criss-cross it with ugly fortress "settlements" and deny its right to ever have self-determination.
January 13, 2009 9:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Please, no spin. How many German kids were murdered by Americans in WW2?
January 13, 2009 10:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
"How many German kids were murdered by Americans in WW2?"
Hard to say. I think the British did more bombing of civilians in the European theater than the US did. I v recall looking at Chuck Yeager's autobiography when he was ordered to do strafing attacks on anything that moved one day and he whispered t that if we were going to do stuff like this, we'd better be on the winning side. I found the quote on Amazon's search function for his book,but don't know if the link will work--
Link
Japan was a different story--we killed hundreds of thousands of civilians with firebomb attacks, even before Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
One can defend WW2 as a just war and still think that both sides might have committed war crimes. So are you saying that Israel is committing war crimes now? I agree.
January 13, 2009 11:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
The link did work. Here's the previous page, where Yeager actually says what the order was--
Link
January 13, 2009 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for the continued fine coverage, MJ.
Meanwhile how about a "shame on Israel" rally organized by Jewish Americans? Two wrongs don't make a right. Perhaps in some archaic fringes of Judaism, a few Israelis killed by Hamas rockets justifies dozens of slaughtered Palestinian children, but that is not the view of most Americans, and I highly doubt whether most Jewish Americans are much different from the rest of Americans on that issue. It might well be noted that a majority of voting Americans in 2004 implicitly approved the "logic" of 3 thousand killed in Sept. 2001 justifying thousands of Iraqi children being killed in the course of the bungled US invasion and occupation from 2003 on. But that is no reason for those of us who were against THAT disastrous (for AMERICA!) idiocy from the beginning (when Hillary Clinton and Bill Kerry, for example, helped authorize it), to hold back now from condemning a similar sort of idiotic (and bad for Israel AND America) behavior on the part of the Israeli government today.
January 13, 2009 8:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
MJ, you may be off on this one. The ice/snow storm on Saturday and the Giants-Eagles playoff game at 1 p.m. on Sunday are the most likely proximate causes for low turnout. Surely the Brooklyn Hassids and right-wing Jews from the UES and Long Island would have made a better showing if not for those two events.
January 13, 2009 9:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
I had this precise discussion yesterday. I also wonder the extent to which there is opposition and at least disapproval for this war among American Jews. We will never know; the supporters of every Israel move (no matter how heinous) are organized, well-funded, well-connected and with access to mainstream media to amplify their position. But I think there is a very sizable body of Jews increasingly estranged from Israeli policy. I am sure that the "Death to Israel" signs and sentiments that sometimes arise in anti-Israel protests, keep many Jews away from explicit protest (more say than by the ubiquitous but by now ineffective charge of "self-hating Jewish anti-Semite" coming from the AIPAC-loving crowd.
January 13, 2009 9:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Max Blumenthal has a youTube video of the NY Jan 11, 2009 gathering
Bomb A Ghetto, Raise A Cheer
January 13, 2009 9:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
THANKS! I linked to it.
January 13, 2009 10:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Israel really is putting enormous pressure on non-Israeli Jews by taking such a hard line on the issue of the Palestinians, essentially claiming that any sympathy at all is nothing more than anti-Semitism and support for terror.
Personally I think it's an enormous mistake to call every critic an anti-Semite and to expect Jews to fall in line supporting a very dubious military incursion. The danger is that when you call large number of folks anti-Semites you not only provide huge cover to the real anti-Semites in the crowd, you also run the huge risk that some folks will accept your accusation and decide maybe they are what you call them.
It's certainly heartening to see that American Jews aren't as blindly supportive of this mess as American politicians are.
January 13, 2009 10:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
"The danger is that when you call large number of folks anti-Semites you not only provide huge cover to the real anti-Semites in the crowd, you also run the huge risk that some folks will accept your accusation and decide maybe they are what you call them." The other danger is the you alienate people who may have been sympathetic. Then they begin to reason that if you're lying about who is an anti-Semite, you may be more broadly dishonest, perhaps dislikeable, irrational, and unworthy of their trust/good will.
January 14, 2009 1:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jewish communities, in the main, support Israel because they feel somewhat simplistically that it is their duty to so - whether they live in NY, London or Paris. As a generality, thinking Jews and academics are more circumspect and critical and recognize that Israel's bombing and killing of Palestinian women and children is counter-productive to say the least and at the worst will hasten the demise of the Zionist state, as it is now constituted and governed.
The concept of a tiny country on the shores of the Mediterranean, of just 6 million in barely 20,000 M2 having such a grossly disproportionate influence not only over America but also over the EU, is so ludicrous that it would make a good comic film script, were it not so tragic.
Every day, the world's media is full of the actions and utterances of Israeli politicians, and, of course, their remote 24/7 audio transmitting station in AIPAC. All this when the world has hugely serious economic and political problems that do not depend on a few million illegal settlers in Israel or on whether Livni or Barak or some other Likudnik gets into office again.
The international community needs to rethink its priorities urgently. The Israeli conflict certainly needs resolving before more hundreds of innocents civilians are killed and a nuclear war breaks out in the Middle East - but our lives must not be structured and defined by political Zionism.
January 13, 2009 10:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree that The international community needs to rethink its priorities urgently:
January 13, 2009 10:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
MJ sSays:
"In their heart of hearts -- and I'm hearing this from lots of people who are quite traditional on the subject of Israel --they are deeply worried that this war could make it impossible for Israel ever to have a secure future and may even threaten its survival."
The Economist has a good cover story and the "deterrence" falacy. Let's see what happens in Arab Regimes over the next six months.
January 13, 2009 10:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
If Hezbollah won the last war, why don't they help their brothers in Gaza? Maybe deterrence" is not a fallacy
January 13, 2009 10:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe Hezbollah follows their own time line, not yours.
January 13, 2009 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
January 13, 2009 10:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for sharing!
January 13, 2009 10:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
January 13, 2009 11:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
slander! they should sue
January 13, 2009 11:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good luck finding a jury....
January 13, 2009 1:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can I ask the obvious question?
Why are Jews being singled out to have any particular set of responses to this? The overwhelming majority of Americans I know who identify their heritage as Jewish don't have any particular feeling about Israel. I'm serious. They are concerned with war and peace, ethics and law, and the security of America, which they consider their home. In other words, they are thinking citizens, but I suspect the reason so few Jews are showing up at pro-Israel rallies is because -- why should they?
It's been the devil to persuade some anti-Semites that all Jews are not in lock step with Zionism or AIPAC or support of Israel. I am perpetually mystified that Jews who publicly grieve about the actions of Israel want to re-establish in other people's minds a direct link between Jews living elsewhere and Israel's actions. I don't think it exists.
January 13, 2009 12:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Could you be "projecting?"
January 14, 2009 1:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Overreach,
"Projecting" what? I don't understand your comment.
January 14, 2009 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Interesting David D brings up Darfur, because I don't see anyone saying "Those stupid casualties brought in on themselves in Darfur." But I certainly here that about casualties in Gaza.
January 13, 2009 12:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's certainly not my experience. Here in the UK, a substantial majority of those who, like me, identify their heritage as Jewish, mostly support any and every action of Israel - no matter how brutal or otherwise - and will rationalise that support by attempting to find a justification in ethics or law. I have to say that those American Jews that I have met over recent years, have had a similar outlook. Discussions with both British and American Jews invariably end with their claim that 'the land of Israel was given to us by God', and that, for them, closes the argument and apparently acts to conceal from their consciousness and sense of morality and justice, the terrible loss of human life brutally taken without any compunction. This was never envisaged by Theodor Herzl, the founder of the Zionist Movement.
January 13, 2009 1:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
I probably do live in a bubble. During the recent election, I figured out (with a couple of my friends) that (a) none of us knew anybody voting for John McCain and (b) we had no friends who believed in God -- which we all did recognize was kind of amazing considering what's happened in America recently.
But I can't shake the feeling that it does nobody any good to keep equating the Jewish community (which is a pretty loose community if it exists) with Israel. Hell, I even know Israelis who've permanently left Israel who don't believe in God and don't involve themselves in discussions of Israeli politics.
I think it's a human responsibility to care about what's happening in Gaza, and for Americans, whose tax dollars fund the weaponry being used in this war, there's an added responsibilty. But this is mythology that Jews are responsible for what happens in Isreal. A myth that serves no one's best interests.
January 13, 2009 3:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think MJ understood me in a previous post about the matter of Franken appearing at one of these events. My guess is that you have to look at the geography of each of them to discern just what they mean.
In Minneapolis, the Jewish Community Relations Council, plus others announced the event. It got out that the planners had invited Governor Pawlenty and Norm Coleman to appear and have speaking roles, along with a Christian Zionist who is a good buddy with Pawlenty, who is also a CZ. Local Jews who had spoken out against the Israeli policy in Gaza didn't like the picture -- that the Governor and Norm would be making speaking appearances, so they rounded up Franken and showed up in numbers for the event. They did not ask that Franken speak -- they just showed up in numbers.
Across the street were gathered reportedly about 250 silent protesters who, a few days earlier, had another vigil hijacked, when hooded and scarfed people no one recognized showed up and burned US and Israeli Flags. When that happened, it was understood as a provocation, and all the peace-types walked away and went home. (People were hooded and scarfed, perhaps, for good reason, it has been below zero now for about a week -- ten below during the event last weekend, 20 below now.) Still, the local street demo community is not really into flag burning.
I doubt if the dynamics present here, were present in any other city where an event was held. In a sense it was a little like the game of capture the flag -- who occupies the chairs at the meeting hall.
Yes, I think lots of people are in a mood to speak out -- the self-censorship is becoming much less powerful and effective. Right now I tend to read it as "you don't speak for me" talk, but that may just be a temporary position for many. The process of breaking ranks and going into full opposition may be coming soon.
January 15, 2009 8:11 AM | Reply | Permalink