Ten Things I'll Miss About George W. Bush
Tough assignment. My first draft was a blank screen. But in a sick, twisted way, there are some things I will miss about George W. Bush.
1) The word "nucular": Can't beat a guy with his finger on the nuclear button who can't pronounce the word "nuclear."
2) Donald Rumsfeld: Was he a jerk? Yes. Was he a genius at asking and answering his own questions? Sure. Was this habit occasionally amusing? Almost. Am I glad he's gone? You betcha.
3) Dick Cheney?
Well, no, the only thing I miss about Dick Cheney is the fact that he hasn't been indicted for war crimes (yet).
4) The Bush Presidential Library: Has to be amusing, given that his three favorite books are "My Pet Goat," "The Very Hungry Caterpillar," and, I forget the third one. Should have plenty of space for lounging around, working out, whatever . . .
5) Laura . . . She was married to the guy, a huge minus. But she read Dostoyevsky. Got to be worth something on the ratings scale.
6) Mangling the language: "I know what it's like to try to put food on your family"; "We need to make the pie higher"; and books worth of other malaproprisms.
7) Bush Bash Books: Sure, they got repetitive, but many a progressive author made a buck or two pointing out why Bush was bad for America, and the world.
I'll have to think about numbers eight through ten. Nobody said this would be easy (unlike what they said about invading Iraq, for example).



















I admit, I liked Rumsfeld's tv personality too. Trust me, I hate the guy for ruining America and causing us to torture people. But brazen quotes like "There are known knowns. ... There are known unknowns. ... But there are also unknown unknowns." That's brilliant. And totally crazy.
December 25, 2008 5:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wasn't Rumsfield paraphrasing the opening lead to the old Star Track series?
December 25, 2008 8:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" was Rumsfeld at his most idiotic.
December 26, 2008 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Learning where Crawford, Texas was. And that no rancher clears brush in the summer, except Bush.
But best of all is the huge damage he did to the conservative brand.
December 25, 2008 5:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tom,
coincidentally, all the brush in Crawford has been cleared, and it coincides with the end of the Bush Presidency and his buying that house in that posh Dallas suburb.
December 26, 2008 8:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'll add one;
8--- I'll miss all the trees that will have to be cut down to make all the paper for the subpoenas and indictments if there is a "surge" of investigations by the new administration into the machinations of the Bush gang.
December 25, 2008 6:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought "Make the Pie Higher" was Dan Quayle.
Somebody should write a play where Bush and Quayle talk to each other...
December 25, 2008 8:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
destor,
they did, it was called "Beavis and Butthead do Dallas."
December 26, 2008 5:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
John, thanks for calling in today! Josh
December 26, 2008 11:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Josh,
it seems I'm a C-SPAN/TPM junkie.
:-)
December 26, 2008 12:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
All this reminds me of Roy Clark's old song: "Thank God and Greyhound...."
December 25, 2008 8:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
I will miss the commercials on my favorite radio station that has a voice impersonator ask the 'constitchants' to buy a car from a local dealer to 'stimifacate' the 'conamee'.
December 25, 2008 8:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
9. How many presidents are going to grin when a shoe is thrown at him? Then grin again when the second shoe comes flying? And he had pretty good reflexes. I am thinking Obama would have caught the first one and thrown it back. Gerald Ford, though, would have got knocked in the head, twice. Nixon would have gotten hit once, but would have been way behind the podium before the second shoe got there. Kennedy would certainly have caught the first one and kept the game going by throwing it to someone else.
December 25, 2008 8:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Enjoyed your speculation about how other Presidents would have responded to the shoe throwing. What about others? Me thinks:
Reagan would have kicked it aside with a disdainful sniff.
Jimmy Carter would have taken off his own shoes, and politely offered them to the thrower.
LBJ would have taken off one of his Texas boots, and thrown it back with deadly accuracy.
December 26, 2008 10:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
I can't claim the phrase, but someone used the term "moral clarity" to describe Bush and I agree. It's what I will miss most about him. People viewed his "right or wrong" attitude as too simplistic but hopefully years from now people will appreciate it more. It came from Reagan who said "tear down the wall", not to put a gate in it or take down a couple bricks. I hope Obama appreciates this perspective. But I'm afraid we're just going to get a lot of rhetoric
We have not been attacked since 9/11, Libya no longer has nuclear weapons, Syria was stopped from acquiring them and Iraq is on its way to being a nation that fights terrorism.
December 25, 2008 8:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
I (won't) miss hearing about a President who had one 9/11 on his watch claiming credit for not having had yet another.
Also (not) missed, a President who along with his supporters like middleclassbill, pretend that Iraq is 'on its way' to becoming a Dallas on the Euphrates, when in fact it is, and will continue to be, a very unstable and devastated country and a training ground for terrorists, liable to explode at any time and for any reason for many, many years to come.
I (won't) miss being told we have victory in hand when Iraqi's lives are still at risk merely for working for Americans and when no Iraqi, including its highest officials, are in danger for working with or for the Iranian government.
December 25, 2008 9:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Noble,
Bush's democracies are always just around the corner, just like the babble that History will grade him a great President.
December 26, 2008 5:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry MCB, Bush absolutely did/does not have any sort of "moral clarity". In fact, he isn't a moral person.
He is a phony--all the christian posturing was phony, the brush clearing was phony, the ranch was phony, there is absolutely nothing decent or admirable about this guy.
He is a horrible person who made us into a nation of torturers.
December 25, 2008 10:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hmmm,
Correct, Bush is the master of the Potemkin Village, whether its in Crawford, or the "Democracies" in Iraq or Afghanistan
December 26, 2008 5:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'll miss especially the endless resort to time-dishonored fallacies like "arguing from ignorance." Dick Cheney especially could work this disreputable dodge to shameless perfection. Like when he would insist about the whereabouts of fabled Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq: "We just don't know." He meant to fallaciously imply, of course (as a sycophant press dutifully inferred), that a complete lack of demonstrable evidence indeed did prove that Saddam had overwhelming stockpiles of the scary shit!
Even more ludicrous, of course, runs the argument-from-ignorance that "America hasn't been attacked since 9/11." True, although this irrelevant nonsense constitutes evidence and proof of nothing. America hasn't suffered an asteroid strike since 9/11 either. So what? "Absence of evidence," as Donald Rumsfeld should have said, proves absolutely nothing about anything. Only the existence of evidence can validate or falsify any proposition. Rumsfeld didn't say that, of course, because his grating, goofy gobbledegook always seemed to mesmerize a sub-educated American press that never heard of blatant fallacies (known and ridiculed for centuries) like Arguing From Ignorance.
In fact, evidence of 3,000 dead Americans on 9/11 proved demonstrably that the Bush administration couldn't "fight them here," in America where Deputy Dubya and Sheriff Dick slept on watch. Then, in a cynical ploy to exploit 9/11 for domestic political aggrandizement Deputy Dubya and his pathetic posse provided more conclusive evidence -- in the persons of 4,000+ dead Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan -- that they couldn't "fight them there," overseas, as well. Evidence of dead Americans at home and abroad proves precisely the contrary to what Deputy Dubya and his apologists allege: namely, that they have "kept Americans safe." Over 7,000 dead (and over 30,000 wounded) Americans proves absolutely nothing about "safety," for anyone, anywhere. Thus the inescapable dialectial gambit of the criminally culpable: Arguing From Ignorance.
In fact, since Dubya and Dick proved so obliging in sending so many Americans halfway around the world to where the "bad guys" could kill and maim them in greater numbers than having to come to America again could accomplish, why would any intelligent "bad guy" not just wait for the enraged and panic-stricken targets to come to him where he already lived? Hasn't Osama Bin Laden patiently explained how this asymmetric strategy works, ad nauseum? I realize that this line of argument sometimes receives rebuttal from Republicans on the grounds that American men and women in our marooned and abused military don't really count as "Americans." Obviously, as a victim/veteran of the Nixon-Kissinger Fig Leaf Contingent (Vietnam 1970-72), I refuse to accept any such bogus "argumentation."
Finally, I suppose I should amend my opening comments to say that I'd like to say I'll miss this kind of dreary dialectial bullshit (or "disputatious controversy," as Schopenhauer called it) when Dubya and Dick depart. However, I fear we will only soon hear more of the same from the incoming crowd; since "in the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king;" but in America, the totally blind in both eyes will easily rule over the notoriously hapless Nation of Sheep who gullibly consume any form of conscientiously constructed controversy whenever and however offered to them.
December 25, 2008 11:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Michael,
excellent comment to MiddleClassBill, however,
During WWII when our Sherman tanks went up against a German Tiger, it was no contest. The Sherman's gun was too small, 75mm, and the Tiger's armor too thick, so the Sherman shell would just bounce off the Tiger, BOING! In effect, the Tiger was impervious.
MiddleClassBill is like that Tiger tank, impervious. Impervious to fact, to truth, to reality which all bounce off him, BOING!
Someone should make bullet proof vests of people like MCBill and send them to Iraq and Afghanistan.
December 26, 2008 5:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
But those innovative American tankers realized an pack of five Shermans could tackle and defeat a Panzer ... circle the wagon. All they had to do was aim for the treads and it became a stationary gun emplacement.
December 26, 2008 6:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
beetle,
Yep, 3 to 5 Shermans needed to defeat the Tiger; one tried to hit it in the rear as the others distracted the Tiger. And as you said, the tracks were vulnerable. And a tanker once told me the Tiger's suspension was also a weak spot, but that was beyond my pay grade at the time.
By the way, those Sherman's had to be in close.
December 26, 2008 7:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Middle Class,
its interesting that you measure FROM 9/11, thereby not counting the incident when telling us how Bush protected us. Why didn't Bush protect the homeland BEFORE 9/11?
The World Trade Center was first attacked 28 days after Clinton first took office, not only did Clinton find those who committed the act, but punished them without wars, illegal actions and shredding of the Constitution. Clinton protected the homeland from attack for the next 8 years minus a month.
December 26, 2008 5:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Also, no one blamed President Bush (#41) for it. It fell in Clinton's lap and he did what was expected of him.
December 26, 2008 6:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
No one in the right mind would make such statements unless they had a few too many eggnogs.
December 26, 2008 6:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
.
Get a fricking grip!
I'll miss all the paternalistic authoritarian enablers who magically disappear from a discussion when faced with the hard reality of someone mentioning GWB in the same breath as the WORST PRESIDENT EVER!
~OGD~
December 26, 2008 6:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
I will not miss one thing about this dim-wit, disgusting, maleavolent, ignorant pathetic person, who will cower and cry when he is finally officially accused for war crimes. HIs sissy and childish ways of getting off for his treacherous actions fall on deaf ears! Why? Because so many ears are dead that would otherwise be alive and enjoying their family's lives if not for the Bush/Cheney desire to create war out of nothing except lies.
I'm having problems with my internet or i would keep on going
December 25, 2008 9:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well I will miss having a turdblossom in the White House. I think this is #10, but I'm not sure. And, what I suspect many of us will really miss is the daily, often 2-3 times daily headlines of yet another even more abominable, stupid act by a member of the administration, on the front page of TPM Report. I'm still trying to figure out how to fill my days starting about February.
December 25, 2008 9:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
I will miss the shoe thrower discussion. The reason he actually has the freedom to throw a shoe at Bush is because the US has liberated Iraq. But alot of people don't want to recognize this (or simply appreciate it)
December 25, 2008 9:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
From what I've read, the custom of throwing a shoe or pounding somebody with a shoe, has been a sign of disrespect in Iraq going back centuries. Iraqi's already had the freedom to throw a shoe...it was not a result of the US liberating the country.
December 25, 2008 10:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Middleclassbill believes that after a million total casualties, including over 35,000 Americans dead or wounded, five years and a trillion dollars poured into the bloody sand, an enraged Iraqi throwing shoes at Bush is evidence of success...?
Is there a better example of a true brainless and conscienceless fool?
Oh, there is shooter242, who gets warm and fuzzy all over when he thinks of Bush.
December 26, 2008 1:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
.
Uhhhh . . .
Shooter242? That may be warm but not fuzzy all over. From what I've read, it's seems more like warm and wet. . .
~OGD~
December 26, 2008 6:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
And as a result of that "freedom", he gets tortured behind closed doors as before, only now word leaks out about it. I'm sure his kneecaps and fingernails appreciate that.
December 26, 2008 2:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
MiddleClassBill,
if he was "FREE" to throw the shoe why is he in jail?
December 26, 2008 5:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
If you're saying throwing a shoe is an exercise in freedom in Iraq, then why was he put in jail and beaten for freely expressing his point of view? Seems the Iraqi's learned a valuable lesson in freedom and democracy from the American military and CIA at Abu Ghraib.
December 26, 2008 6:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
So let's recap here...
* Here we have a bunch of people verbally abusing someone behind his back,
* Are incapable of advancing one positive thought about the man,
* Think it's elevating to tear someone else down.
From what I can see of your posts, there's nothing to recommend you folks as judges of character.
December 25, 2008 9:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, and from what we have seen, there is nothing to recommend Bush's character (as if he actually had any character.)
December 25, 2008 10:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for the heads up, shooter. The next time I apply for the character judge job, I'll know not to add your name to my list of personal references.
December 25, 2008 10:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Shitter ! ! !
Is that you ???
December 25, 2008 11:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Some notes, not that it matters:
I'm sure a lot of people, myself included, would prefer to say these things to his face. At the same time, they (or at least, I) don't find it particularly elevating to tear someone else down.
And yes, I am incapable of coming up with a positive thought about him that isn't of the damning-with-faint-praise type in the original post. I'd be happy to entertain any suggestions, but most of those I've seen put up by people like MCB are exactly the reasons why I despise Bush.
December 26, 2008 2:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
It would be hard to say anything to Bu$h face to face. Only invited guests are allowed to attend his public meetings. The general public is not allowed.
December 26, 2008 6:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
shooter,
how does commenting on this 'public' forum equate to "verbally abusing someone behind his back"?
Oh, that's right, Bush doesn't read.
shooter, I'll bet you and Middle Class Bill hang out together having a beer and commisserating about the bad old people on TPM.
December 26, 2008 5:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Whereas you are passing judgment of character here by passively defending someone who has brought the US down on both its' knees for nothing more than simple folly.
December 26, 2008 6:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
I will miss (gladly) the endless fount of poetic inspiration that pundits like David Brooks provided each time they attended one of those neoconservative-only seances with Deputy Dubya in the White House, only to emerge babbling about the "confidence" they had subliminally imbibed each time the dwarf-dyslexic chimpanzee would "crouch and swallow up the room" or "spread his arms wide to illustrate the breadth of his ideas." Oh, brother. Or, like when Dubya performed that aircraft-carrier-landing stunt which induced the Washington Post's David Broder to lapse into a senile swoon, raving: "This president has just learned to move in ways that inspire confidence!" Oh, shit. He "moved" on you, did he? Hence:
December 25, 2008 11:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
I remember as well that when ol' Gramps was on his Metamucil, his bowels moved in a regular "way that inspired confidence." And generally to the same effect as the Bush movements.
I love the poem. Very well done, and should be its own post.
December 26, 2008 12:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you for the comment and kind words. I really loved your observation about elderly bowel movements inspiring "confidence." That insight truly belongs in a poem somewhere. I'll give the possibility some thought. [momentary pause ...] O.K. How about:
The Metamucil in his milk
Made Grandpa's bowels move;
Which proved a source of "confidence"
In David Broder's groove:
That rut where having cogent thoughts
Would someone ill behoove.
Sorry I couldn't do better on such short notice. Now I know what Calvin Trillin means by "deadline poetry."
Anyway, I think we can agree that only someone with very low self-esteem would find an AWOL Texas Air National Guardsman like Deputy Dubya a source of inspiration.
Finally, as an additional background note on the poetic inspiration I'll hopefully miss once these motherless miscreants have "moved on," I once read years ago in that now-canonical article by Ron Suskind called "Without a Doubt," how one of Dubya's hired-gun word magicians, Mark McKinnon, had said of Dubya's devotees: "They like the way he walks, and they like the way he points. They like the way he inspires confidence." After a moment of meditation, this verse stanza suggested itself:
[From Fernando Po, U.S.A.)
They like the way he points, they say;
They like the way he "walks;"
Despite the fact that no one can
Decipher how he talks.
Yet when he mimics "standing tall,"
The stupid Boobie gawks.
No one could make up maniacs like these. How will future Voltaires and Swifts ever find the outraged inspiration that flows so effortlessly from such sub-linguistic insult to human intelligence?
December 26, 2008 9:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
I tried to think of something humorous to say here, but I can't think of anything.
About the only thing I will miss about the Bush era is this: As long as Bush and his henchmen were presiding over the carnage they wrought, I was able to maintain a certain sense of energetic purpose born of outrage. There was a name for evil, and something to fight against, and that fight at least served to distract me from the horror.
Now that the struggle is over, I am finding that the trauma the Bush era inflicted on me personally is deeper than I realized. Bush may have checked out, but my thoughts are still filled with nightmare images of the twisted and maimed naked bodies of Abu Ghraib; images of bombed, burned, shot up, beheaded and dismembered human remains in Iraq; images of waterboarding, electric shock, pain, torture and men in cages in Guantanamo; troubled thoughts of anthrax, terror alerts, and a government that now watches and listens to everything; and more...
I wish I could say that I was filled with a sense of hope that the problem was just Bush, and everything will be much better now that he's gone. But the problem is that I am instead stuck with the feeling that we are living in a nightmarish world of shit that has always existed, and of which Bush just provided a more acute perception. I'm hoping that the world of human affairs will at some point stop looking like a German Expressionist painting to me, but I'm not counting on it.
I can't shake the feeling that the social world we live in, the way we live and organize our lives, is just so wrong, ugly, brutal, banal, violent and perverse that it is hard to imagine any political solutions that could make it greatly better. I find myself numbly disenchanted and detached from political causes. Most of my happiness these days comes from my time with my family, or from immersion in elevated works of artistic or intellectual beauty.
December 26, 2008 12:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
.
Ahhhh . . .
You and Kurt Vonnegut, eh Dan K?
Actually there's nothing new under the sun, just different technology.
~OGD~
December 26, 2008 6:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes. The Bu$h years have had a profound impact on my life in the last 8 years ... none of it was good. Every time I tried to work around the obstacles put in place by his policies, I kept getting knocked down another step in the ladder. A lot of people thought I was the problem. Little did they realize what was happening to me was nothing more than the tip of a huge iceberg coming their way. Now we're all pretty much in the same boat and have to decide who bails out the water and who rows.
Bu$h was so intent on how history would view his Presidency that he paid little attention to what was going on in the present. His legacy will be his vanity. Unfortunately, he and his family will control his Presidential Library for many years, just as Nixon did, promoting his view of his Presidency. So it will be many years before the truth about how he screwed America comes to light.
December 26, 2008 6:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
DanK ... think about the history of America. It was the trash heap for the religion malcontents of Europe. Since there aren't any new continents left to discover, better to pick yourself up and find a birth in another country. That's what I did.
Perhaps one day when the republican party flushes the shit out of their ranks I may return. But the rubble of the country I left is not something I look forward to returning to.
Bu$h has ruined many a good American, both republican and Democrat. Some of us don't have enough time left to rebuild and find that our ages are limiting factors in getting back into the driver's seat. P.E. Obama has a full plate ahead of him to make good what Bu$h and the republicans ruined in America. Meanwhile, I'll sit back and make ends meet overseas where it's cheaper to live.
December 26, 2008 6:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Why is it that shooter and I can't express an opinion without getting attacked. People swear at us or if it's not a four letter word then it's "fool, idiot, troll" etc.
Can't people try to get along?
December 26, 2008 7:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
.
Get a frickin' grip . . . Pt. 2
Pt. 1 . . .
You're a victim?
Everyone stands witness of the crime.
Live with it!
~OGD~
December 26, 2008 2:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Damningly faint praise. The idea of The United States as a beacon of Truth, Justice, and all kinds of other wonderfulness is not well-served by the claim that well, at least we're better than Saddam Hussein.
Faroff, MCB isn't being "pick[ed] on" because he's different, he's being responded to, perhaps a bit rudely, because what he says is silly and ignorant.
MCB, it's great that a reporter doesn't get fed into a wood chipper for throwing shoes, but let's not get smug. This is more than one lone lunatic with a footwear fetish. Or if you think I'm wrong, go ahead and make the case that millions of Iraqis don't have good reason to consider the US invasion and occupation as completely disastrous for their lives. Or that those Iraqis are all going to break into kumbayah any day now.
"Thanks for sharing that, Mister Shoes! Does anyone else have anything they'd like to share? Isn't it great that you have freedom of speech now?"
December 26, 2008 6:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mixed - would you prefer that Saddam is still ruling Iraq? Do you think the Iraqis would prefer having Saddam still ruling their country?
December 26, 2008 9:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
.
Uhhhh . . .
Do you like fishing?
~OGD~
December 27, 2008 12:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
And sorry I brought up the whole shoe thing, but my point was that the reporter has the right to express himself without fear of death (unlike under Saddam). Freedom of the press did not exist under Saddam and things are better than that now.
As for being in jail - I didn't mean to imply with my post that it's "OK" to throw objects at a President.
Should he be beaten and tortured in jail? No, but let's let the Iraqi government figure this out
December 26, 2008 8:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
MCB You have every right to be insulted by the language thrown your way. Those of you who think you should abuse verbally MCB are no better than the 12 year olds in the pack who pick on the one who is different. Your words are not intellectual or powerful or important. In short, you are just smart aleks. Shame on all of you.
December 26, 2008 9:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
A 'smart alek' would be saying Middleclassbill pals around with terrorists, lets babies die, is not a real American, or is a surrender monkey.
Republicans dish it out, then they bellow 'shame' when well deserved language is directed back at them.
December 26, 2008 11:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Some people on here use well deserved language (which I consider to be opinions with supporting facts).
But using terms like "brainless conscienceless fool" to describe other people posting on TPM who's views you may not agree with is not noble
December 26, 2008 12:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
You should know.
December 26, 2008 1:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
.
Ah yeah . . .
The ol' you're nuts and need meds but I don't routine...
Well, MCB could always elect to shove an anti-rhetoric laxative up the ol' asteroid-orifice and evacuate what's left of the crap MCB spews out the ol' piehole, but that's up to MCB...
~OGD~
December 26, 2008 2:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Olden,
HAHAAHAAAHHA
December 26, 2008 3:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
MCB, your lame defense has received its verdict: pollice verso
Let me explain it to you a different way: your pointing out the Iraqi journalist as an exemplar of 'freedom of the press,' leaves 4 fingers pointing back at you and Bush for the thousands who have been illegally detained and tortured on the orders of the Commander in Chief. You may have the opinion that war crimes are ok if the US does them, but we have the freedom to point out how stupid this opinion is.
And the Hague doesn't care what 'good Germans' like you think.
December 26, 2008 12:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bowman - Thanks for the lesson in Latin.
My point is that you can be tactful when people can be tactful in how they call me a F*ING idiot or you can just use the exact words.
You can certainly have your own opinion as to whether or not we've made any progress in Iraq. And you probably think that war crimes negate any positives that have come out of Iraq. That's a completely reasonable position, and I won't call you stupid just because I disagree with it.
PS - I'm not sure what you have against Germans, but I'm not one to begin with.
December 26, 2008 2:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm glad to help your education, Bill:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/14/opinion/14rich2.html
December 27, 2008 1:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dave - you lose a lot of credibility when you rely on opinions of Frank Rich
December 28, 2008 8:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Middle Class,
true, he should rely more on Anne Coulter.
December 29, 2008 10:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
middleclassbill: don't let the TPMers get you down. "conscienceless fool" is tame compared to some of the things I was called during the election (I was a disgusting racist...in other words, I supported Hillary and not Obama).
the TPM crowd likes to think of itself as the smartest people in the room. they delight in making fun of anyone who doesn't share their way-left opinions. all you have to do to earn their scorn is stick up for Sarah Palin, suggest that Bush might have done one or two things right, believe that Israel has a right to defend itself, or disagree that Caroline Kennedy would make a swell senator.
December 26, 2008 2:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Very early on -- it may have even been during the 2000 campaign, I was struck by Bush's relationship with a podium. It occurred to me that he mistook it for a woman he wanted for carnal purposes, and the thought has given me any number of laughs over the past eight years. You can turn down the sound on the Tee Vee and watch the moves -- and get lots of laughs. I suspect he will not have much use for the podium in the future.
December 26, 2008 3:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sara,
About that turning down the television volume but leaving the picture screen still glowing at you ...
Back in 1967-68 when I served in the Navy aboard a submarine tender moored at Ballast Point, San Diego, one of my shipmates and I would often knock off ship's work at the end of the day, put on some civilian clothes, and scoot on over to a rented houseboat of his at a nearby marina. There we would relax over a few cold beers, some TV, and selected tunes on the stereo phonograph. (Do't ask me to explain what I mean by that now-obsolete technology.) Too often, though, President Lyndon Johnson would interrupt our serenity by appearing on the tube with his hound-dog countenance babbling complete and utter bullshit about Vietnam and its "vital" (meaning, a matter of life and death) role in preserving Ameican security. My friend would then turn down the volume to zero on the TV and put one of our favorite rock and roll records on the turntable. Then we would sit back and enjoy watching Johnson's lying lips move silently to the following raucus background refrain screaming: "NOTHING! NOTHING! NOTHING! NOTHING!"
Turning down the TV sound volume while still enduring the optical assault radiating from the glowing screen, however, only works for those Americans who actually process verbal language in the same way they would the written word: in other words, as a conscious excercise in decoding a system of recognized symbols for the purpose of understanding their real-world referents (assuming they have any.) Unfortunately, far too many Americans have become like the fabled aboriginal Bubis who lived on the island of Fernando Po off the coast of Africa and who could not understand language unless they could "get closer to the fire so that [they] could see what [they were] saying." [edited quote from the epigram to Chapter One of The Meaning of Meaning by C. K. Ogden and I. A. Richards (1925)].
Years ago, I found that image and metaphor of the visually dependent, sub-linguistic "Boobies" so creatively productive that I used it as the basis for an epic poem (still a work in process) called Fernando Po, U.S.A., an excerpt episode of which I posted above in response to a fellow commenter. Recently, I happened upon a corroborative observation of Boobie Americans in Al Gore's recent book The Assault on Reason. As he noted, "the consent of the governed" has long since become "a commodity to be purchased by the highest bidder ... [due to] the growing importance of visual rhetoric and body language over logic and reason."
I liked Al Gore's term "visual rhetoric" in preference to the less descriptive "body language," since commercial persuasion through visually arresting gesticulation and posturing seems to have reduced much of America -- or, at least, Republicans -- to subliminally stimulated slavery.
Perhaps turning off the picture and listening to the sound might work better -- at least until the insidious inanity becomes too obvious to ignore, which might lead to just turning off the TV altogether and either reading a good book or writing polemical poetry for therapy if nothing else; something like:
"Boobie Conference Calls"
We see them in their conference room,
The bumbler and the creep.
The lips of one move awkwardly
While English speakers weep;
And snores emerge from Dubya's mouth
As Cheney falls asleep.
Michael Murry, "The Misfortune Teller," Copyright 2006-2008
December 27, 2008 3:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
That we could erase from time Jan 20, 2001 to Jan 20, 2009. Eight years of the life of every American shot to hell.
I really think we ought to administer a bunch of tests to people running for the office of president. Based on the reults, tell the dumb bastards and assholes to take a hike. Democrat or republican, at least we might have a chance that way.
December 26, 2008 3:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sure, but, as that Timbuk3 fella said, "Assholes get elected/Because assholes get to vote."
December 26, 2008 6:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama
53%
66,882,230
McSame
46%
58,343,671
don't forget, the odds are pretty good that the person standing next to you is essentially blind.
December 26, 2008 9:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Somebody should write a play where Bush and Quayle talk to each other..."
Too bad Pinter died.
December 27, 2008 5:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'll miss all the free time I put to other purposes when the President was giving speeches or holding press conferences. In eight years, I only heard one presidential speech aside from the malapropisms Letterman and Stewart aired.
I'll miss the easy jokes made at Bush's expense.
I'll miss being smarter than the most powerful person in the world.
The Constant Weader at www.RealityChex.com
December 27, 2008 4:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
I will miss nothing about George W. Bush. Good riddance to bad rubbish!!
December 27, 2008 10:32 PM | Reply | Permalink