The news about Friedman is truly frightful.

Thank you, thank you, thank you, Rotwang!

I was starting to suspect, given the tone of the conversation around here, that it was no longer liberal to not want the president to have a bigot perform the convocation at his in inauguration and New York's (and my) Senate seat should go to a qualified caretaker rather than a famous nobody.

Sadly, a well meaning attempt to not criticize the incoming administration over every little thing has turned into an "Obama is a Genius" movement that seems willing to accept everything, including atrocities like anti-gay bigots being given national forums at taxpayer expense and socialites being named senator by unelected governors.

Rotwang, nice work, not only on Reverend Warren, because the ridiculous attempts to justify it boggle my mind, but also on reminding this Clinton defender that there was and is a helluva lot of current bases for criticism of him too.

I haven't had the strength to get into the fray on Warren around here, except I did make a tepid comment in destor's post thread earlier in the week. But it was a silly move, even if for the moment it makes certain evangelicals feel a little warm and fuzzy about Obama. And, assuming Obama had no other way of trying to convey to evangelical christians that he would be their president as well as everyone else's under the stars and stripes, unlike other fundamentalist evangelical ministers who could have been selected to participate in his inaguration, Obama has chosen a guy who actively campaigned for Proposition 8 and who has publicly analogized homosexuality to pedophilia. This is why for one of my New Year's resolutions I will continue to use "faux" progressive around here where appropriate. What patent nonsense it is to defend the Warren invitation.

As to Clinton, my guy. you're right. His triangulation helped to set the stage for much of the aversion in Washington to doing what needs to be done immediately to help working people. Yea, Clinton sounded really groovy and 90s-like when he announced that the "era of big government is over". Well, methinks that we need a little bit of that big government now, and we need it quickly. Thanks Bill.

And, what of the current reality? I like what PE Obama has done for the most part so far. This week I was elated by his choice of Labor Secretary, and I really like the way that he met with all factions in the American Jewish community this week, signaling that he is prepared to continue and move beynod direction that President Clinton was going, albeit too lately in his Administration. But dang it, politics weren't born yesterday, and the notion that Obama is going to make us all come together and please everyone is nonsense. I like that he's trying to unify, but people forget that Clinton did too, and ultimately he got us and his legacy little for it. At the threshold, there are lines to be drawn.

Finally, beyond the merits of Obama's approach, this notion that we can't criticize PE Obama for pulling boners like inviting a bigot to participate in his inaguration is preposterous and fundamentally dangerous. Not only that, it's stupid.

Rotwang makes a good point. Obama ought to publicly disassociate himself from anyone who believes that any sex between consenting adults is ever anything less than wonderful.

Anyone who thinks that any sex can everbe considered immoral is obviously an intolerant bigot who is as bad as the Nazis and must be treated as such.

Every and all bariers to completely unrestricetd sex can and must be broken.

thank you.
türk pornoları

This information is very useful! Thanks!
Best regards, Katya, CEO of hyper v blog, windows xp iscsi boot

I admire the valuable information you offer in your articles. I will bookmark your blog and have my children check up here often. I am quite sure they will learn lots of new stuff here than anybody else!
The Krup Law Group