TPMCafe
« Depression Economics: Normal Rules Don't Apply | Home | Stability is Destabilizing »

Tough Times Indeed

user-pic


Participants in this discussion share the view that the toughest choices facing policy makers are imposed by the clock: how quickly can government spending flow into the economy thereby propping up demand, and slowing the rate of business collapse, while making the economy cleaner, greener, and fairer too.

The views expressed earlier in this discussion are that serious errors of theory and policy led to the belief that depressions had gone the way of the dodo bird. Yet, many of my colleagues in economics--with views dismissed by the academic establishment, rejected by policy makers, and ignored by the press--never bought into the idea that monetary policy and tax cuts would banish economic crises. The profession's surprise at the current disaster shows us just how well economists understand the real world.

Because depression economics is front and center, government support for employment through expansive public works is necessary. One bright note in the midst of this gloom, though, is the possibility of using new spending programs to eliminate long-standing patterns of occupational segregation by race and gender. For all the social progress made during the New Deal, we need to recognize that job initiatives during that period were overwhelmingly directed toward workers who were predominantly white and male. These exclusions were a mistake in the 1930s and would be an even greater one if they were repeated today.

Jobs created by government spending--and no-one is arguing for willy-nilly, zero accountability, make-work projects, since the infrastructure is literally rusting away--must respond to the fact that only 9% of construction workers are women and only 7% are men of color.

After thirty years of predatory economic policy the nation's social infrastructure--sectors such as health, education, and social services that rely heavily on women's employment--needs at least as much attention as the physical infrastructure.

Employment equity in economic recovery requires conscious attention to gender and race. Specific steps are needed to ensure that women and people of color benefit equally from any new jobs programs.

The Labor Department should revive and enforce regulations requiring affirmative action plans from government contractors who must demonstrate that they employ women and minorities. Contractor compliance must be closely monitored. In connection with the infrastructure projects, institute apprenticeships, and ensure that at least one third of the positions go to women. Add projects in health, child-care, education, and social services, to both provide jobs to women and provide vital services to everyone who needs them.

Paul's first comment made the absolutely correct point that dealing with the disasters that lie ahead requires "policymakers here and abroad (to) wrap their minds around this Alice-in-Wonderland world." Where men on the bank boards, get up and tell us what to do. And we've just had massive layoffs so demand is really low. Can't check textbooks. They don't know. That their logic and assumptions are fallen squarely dead. Causation's running backwards, from the firm into your head. Remember what the critics said, "Can't rely on the FED. When the market's dead. Use planning instead. That's the only way we can achieve a high employment, high wage economy.


Editorial Note: Apologies to Jefferson Airplane


15 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic
"One bright note in the midst of this gloom, though, is the possibility of using new spending programs to eliminate long-standing patterns of occupational segregation by race and gender."

Hear hear.

With regard to Labor Department, the Obama team should also reinstate watered down rules on overtime pay (largely ignored by the press) and advertise that their enforcement unit is open for business. Most of us, blue collar and white collar, have little to no control over our work loads, and the days of Bush-condoned legalized slavery in the office suites and elsewhere must end. Such a crackdown will also serve to create jobs necessary to maintain productivity levels previously attained by "asking" employees to stay late, come in on the weekends and work until the job is done (i.e. slavery).

Facebook

This is a smart blog. I mean it. You have so much knowledge about this issue, and so much passion. You also know how to make people rally behind it, obviously from the responses. Youve got a design here thats not too flashy, but makes a statement as big as what youre saying. Great job,children health indeed.

user-pic

You got a lot of things right here, lady. This is a good post. Remaking America in time of crisis.
Yes, yes, yes!!!

Thank you.

user-pic

Good point. I'd been worrying about this, too. The construction industry and unions seem to have been extraordinarily effective at excluding women and minorities. I am concerned, though, that it takes time to remedy that. Plans for quick spending may really conflict with addressing the inequities described.

user-pic

a quick,easy and broadscale first shot to slow the downward spiral would be to send $100 per person to each state, to forestall crises and layoffs and/or cuts of service; then offer federal guarantees to state-designated bonds so they can borrow and proceed with projects that are already approved and awaiting funding. after that there will still be plenty of need for targeted stimuli directed to education, health, enrgy, and environment initiatives.
Barley

user-pic

Great ideas. Women are an integral part of the economy as individuals and heads of households. Why do we stop caring about their health and economic well being when their children turn 18?
A good start on the Medicaid portion of the economic stimulus plan would be to encourage states to adopt full coverage of the Breast & Cervical Cancer Treatment Program, allowing all uninsured women diagnosed with these diseases to be automatically enrolled in Medicaid. Like CHIP, the program includes a significantly higher federal match to help states cover the cost.

Such programs not only stave off medically induced joblessness and poverty, they provide economic benefit.

user-pic

What we really need to do is recognize that our future is reliant upon an energetic society that actually makes things people want.

This first requires that we make it economically undesirable to offshore manufacturing. Free trade is a stupid idea. While evry other major economic unit on earth is working diligently to protect jobs we are going the opposite way. The cockeyed people who figured out that we can compete with other nations where their standard of living is so far below what we enjoy ought to be shot. Nothing could be more stupid. Clean air, clean water, reliable public transportation, a safe food supply, quality medical care and all the other things we enjoy cost money. Proponents of free trade seem not to have taken those things into account. Free tade that lessens our quality of life and our standards is as backward as it gets. Let the rest of the world catch up to us.

user-pic

Whee.

I guess electing Obama didn't shut these folks up after all.

I miss the heady days after the election when Jon Stewart was joking that Jesse Jackson was crying at Obama's acceptance speech because he was out of a job the next morning. (Actually, that was the nice version... when I saw him crying I thought he was thinking "It should have been me, not that whippersnapper Uncle Tom.")

Anyway. Hire whoever will work for the least money and do the best job.

user-pic

...anything less would be a betrayal of the people paying for the darn thing... the taxpayers.

user-pic

Tough times never last
Say out loud now:
Jesus I believe and I receive
you in my heart and eternal life
please save my soul and heal me
infois.blogspot.com

Facebook

harika ötesi sikiş türk porno filmler.

Facebook

Ah well, times are even tougher now - what are you going to do. Might as well enjoy the ride. Or play some silly games like snap, or strip poker. Just my two cents.

Facebook

Madison believed that we should have separation of church and state throughout the land, federal and local. There was a fascinating moment during the congressional debate over what became the First Amendment. How could the beloved First Amendment be harmful to religion? Huntington feared that it would overturn or interfere with Connecticut’s approach, which was to have state-supported religion.
Chat | Chat

Facebook

This information is very useful! Thanks!
Best regards, Katya, CEO of hyper v management console, iscsi best practice

Facebook

Si vous etes interesses par le dossier, ou desirez en savoir plus, contactez-moi par mail, et je vous mettrai en contact.
Best regards,Jane, CEO of high availability cluster

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address