« Rahm Emanuel: Nobody Puts That Baby In a Corner | Home | 'I, Barack Hussein Obama, do solemnly swear...' »
For the Love of God. Please. Shut. Up.
Advertisement

Nov. 16-20: Going Rouge: Sarah Palin An American Nightmare
Jeanne Desko: Palin's Blame Game
Chris Hayes: What's Sarah Palin's Future In American Politics?
Richard Kim: Sympathy For The Devil?: Oprah and the Palin Media Blitz
The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars
House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor
Special Guests
Big names and big brains
Special Features
Pressing topics and trends
Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.
All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.






I'm starting to think you, Mr. Rotwang, are the best thing TPM Cafe has seen in a long while. I think so, certainly. Laughing out loud!
Seeking caption? I think I'll step lightly and get away while I can.
November 8, 2008 7:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mr Rotwang,
why the picture of Cheney?
November 8, 2008 8:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sure it's hilarious for those who understand why the f-ck they're looking at an animal's ass with some weird arrow pointing to it.
November 8, 2008 8:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Little help here? I don't get it.
November 8, 2008 9:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you, Dr. Rotwang!
November 8, 2008 9:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rotwag is being too clever for his secret self.
He's telling Bill Ayers to stifle.
Given the interesting update contained within the essay, I think Ayers should be invited to guest post anon by Josh as well:
"When Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin got hold of it, the attack went viral. At a now-famous Oct. 4 rally, she said Obama was “pallin’ around with terrorists.” (I pictured us sharing a milkshake with two straws.)
The crowd began chanting, “Kill him!” “Kill him!” It was downhill from there.
My voicemail filled up with hate messages. They were mostly from men, all venting and sweating and breathing heavily. A few threats: “Watch out!” and “You deserve to be shot.” And some e-mails, like this one I got from satan@hell.com: “I’m coming to get you and when I do, I’ll water-board you.”
The police lieutenant who came to copy down those threats deadpanned that he hoped the guy who was going to shoot me got there before the guy who was going to water-board me, since it would be most foul to be tortured and then shot. (We have been pals ever since he was first assigned to investigate threats made against me in 1987, after I was hired as an assistant professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago.)"
Want more?
Pet the horsie's rump and all will be revealed...........
;>}
November 8, 2008 9:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ugly image on a beautiful weekend? Nah.
(signed)
too happy kudo your petootie
November 8, 2008 10:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
He's talking about Bill Ayers? I thought he was talking about the people who are criticizing an Obama Administration that hasn't been chosen yet!
November 8, 2008 10:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Click on the illustration.
Considering the plethora of images featuring equine hienies, it must have taken quite awhile to find one that appears to show a mare in heat.
November 8, 2008 11:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is that really how you spell hienies? Who knew?
November 9, 2008 7:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
I thought it was heinies.
November 9, 2008 9:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
I concur. Ayers should just go quietly about his business. I did however like his Hughey Freeman t shirt. I got to get one of those.
Boondocks Rocks..
November 9, 2008 12:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Is the arrow a representation of Inuit art? (Eskimo)
The circular pattern, not clearly shown in the picture, represents continuous, without end, as in Palin is and will always be a horse?
November 9, 2008 12:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Would sure love to hear Todd Gitlin's take on this, long strange trips, et. al.
November 9, 2008 12:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
If memory serves, the arrow is the Weather Underground's old logo.
November 9, 2008 1:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Weather Underground logo
http://thehive.modbee.com/?q=node/10707
November 9, 2008 6:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
I fail to see how Ayers's variations on the "he not busy being born..." theme written for a radical Chicago periodical warrants this - quite literally - asinine response.
Sure, his narrow, shallow and monocausal critique of the failures of the New Left - "serial assassinations of black leaders disrupted out utopian dreams" - smacks of evasive self-justification.
But Ayers argument is sound. The radical right tried to smear Obama through his relationship with a reformer who possesses unimpeachable professional credentials in his field, and voters saw through it. If anything, making hay out of Ayers saying what's on his mind helps legitimize the aggressive ignorance of the anti-intellectuals.
November 9, 2008 2:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
For the most part I liked what Ayers had to say. Call me un-American if you must.
The 1960s gave us Martin Luther King Jr saying that "A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death." Since Dr King said that 41 years ago, we have spent more on military programs than on programs of social uplift every single year. I'd say the lessons of 1960s that we might have learned have never been learned.
November 9, 2008 3:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Since when did Mr Rotwang start to channel Bill O'Reilly? As I understand the principle behind freedom of speech, we can let truth and falsehood grapple in the open because truth will win.
Really: a truly horse's ass comment by Mr Rotwang, regardless of the object it ostensibly wishes to intimidate into supine silence.
Poor president-elect Barack Obama. So many of his erstwhile supporters still can't let him speak for himself and others do likewise.
November 9, 2008 7:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Michael,
maybe you want to rethink your post after a good night's sleep
November 9, 2008 8:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
The salient fact about BA is his apologetics for criminally stupid acts. I've done some very dumb things too, but I readily renounce them to anybody who's interested (really, nobody). He has this pathological urge to offer half-assed defense. He helped screw up the student movement, and I resent the hell out of that. Mine is not exactly O'Reilly's critique. Probably SDS would have gotten screwed up eventually in any case, but BA accelerated the process.
We don't need BA to remind us of the depredations of the defense budget. No liberal or radical pablum he offers now is relevant to his historical role.
November 9, 2008 10:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
I must agree with you Rotwang.
Ayers refusal to disavow his foolish and destructive criminal behavior (even though it was long ago now) makes it virtually impossible for him to add anything of value to the national political dialogue. His every utterance is simply fodder for the right to continue to churn up. He needs to keep his mouth shut on national level politics permanently and that's all there is too it. If he wishes Obama well at all then he'll keep his trap shut because he must know that nothing he has to say will benefit anything he believes in or would like to see come to pass.
November 9, 2008 2:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
In my opinion it would have been better to eviscerate Ayers for the reasons you just mentioned than to use eight words and three periods. I strongly feel as you do, Rotwang, about his mistakes of the past and his failure to ever admit that maybe he was wrong. It seems like he considers himself a settled down Che Guevara. Like you said, his actions and the actions of the Weather Underground did more to hurt their causes than to help.
I think he deserves credit for one thing. He didn't go on a speaking tour during the election. If he had, you wouldn't be alone in telling him to STFU. I imagine if he had in any way enabled McCain to become president, he wouldn't have been able to show his face in public. Look at what happened to Steve Bartman after that Cubs game. Magnify that animosity by 1000%.
November 9, 2008 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
As far as professional activity is concerned, Ayers has rehabilitated himself. For all I know -- I haven't looked further -- his work on education may be salutory. For this he deserves credit, though obviously having a rich daddy helped. (Can you smell my resentment?) He's integrated in Chicago politics, and there's nothing wrong with that. Obviously he is not going to shit where he lives. He at least was smart enough for that.
The mealy-mouthed explanations of immoral acts just bug the hell out of me.
November 9, 2008 12:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
What bugs the hell out of me is that some school actually hired him in a fit of radical chic. Like the liberal arts don't have enough problems.
As of Tuesday he *was* yesterday's news. It's his duty to shut up.
November 9, 2008 12:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am not really in favor of shutting anyone up, except for maybe Rush Limbaugh.
But if we truly must ask Mr Ayers to shut up, then the deal should be two-for-one, and Henry Kissinger should never again be invited on a national news program to give his "expert opinion" about anything.
I see it as a messed up thing about America that we have to harp and harp about Ayers' "criminal stupidity" and "immoral acts", but Henry K walks around as a free man after helping kill millions of people. As will George W Bush on January 21. So as much as you are telling the truth in condemning Ayers, it has an air to it of just going along with this myopic view that misses the really big crimes. Just my $0.02. Feel free to resume the Ayers bashing in five... four... three...
November 9, 2008 5:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your point is well-taken, but Kissinger et al do not pretend to represent the left, which includes me. Kissinger should be hung by the short hairs, but doesn't everybody know that?
November 9, 2008 8:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Apparently the corporate mass media don't know it because he is kept in their rolodex. Ayers would only be in the FOX News rolodex as a way to embarrass Obama (if they could).
November 10, 2008 12:31 AM | Reply | Permalink