Reading The Pictures
Coincident with the launch of the Obama administration, one thing I'm hoping for is a greater progressive ownership in and of the "visual public sphere."
The two images above were taken by the accomplished photojournalist, Alan Chin, who was covering the event (or more accurately, "covering the coverage," or the spin, or the spectacle of the event) for the progressive blog, BAGnewsNotes. To get this more populist impression, Chin had merely to pivot 180 degrees away from "what he was supposed to be photographing" -- something most newswire photographers, conditioned by corporate media and special-interests, wouldn't dare think to do.

(click for actual size of enlargement)
Here is another example of a progressive visual read.
Back in September, the NYT published a widely-read story about Sarah Palin's treatment of friends and foes when she was mayor of Wasilla. The photo leading the article, supplied by her own family, showed Palin flanked by the 1998 Wasilla city council two years into her mayoral tenure. If you scrolled down, however, the article offered a second photo, also supplied by the Palin family when she was still a Wasilla councilwoman. (Although undated, she was a city council member from '92 - '96.) The photo -- one of those published by The Times you are invited to click to enlarge -- is also one of those easy-to-pass-by, a standard sitting-at-your-desk shot in front of a name plate.
If you actually enlarge it and look closely, what you can suddenly make out quite clearly is what Palin chose to be photographed attending to -- a newsletter with a photo of a guy in a suit, the page headlined with the title: "Con-Con Call." (A "con-con" call is a call for a constitutional convention, intended to either revise or completely rewrite the constitution of a state or the federal government.)
The article in question was part of the March 1995 issue of The New American, a publication of the John Birch society. It features a photo of Utah's Governor Leavitt, as Leavitt was spearheading a legislative attempt in Utah to approve an constitutional convention in favor of a federal balanced budget amendment.
Upon the visual discovery, David Neiwert, the Managing Editor of FDL examined the photo from the standpoint of the Palin's attendance at Alaskan Independence Party gatherings; the couple's befriending of AIP leadership; and Todd's membership in the organization. Given the John Birch Society's sympathy for militias and Todd's overlapping notion of the government as "illegitimate," Neiwert saw ample possibility the Palins had more than a casual interest in the Birch society and its political philosophy.
The association to the JBS was further strengthened after Palin anonymously quoted the right wing reactionary Westbrook Pegler in her RNC acceptance speech. Pegler was primarily known for his attacks on government power, and his specific hatred for Roosevelt who he characterized as a dictator. Pegler himself was a writer for the JBS publication, American Opinion, before being kicked out of the society in 1964 for his anti-semitic views.
After traveling to Alaska in early October and interviewing key Palin associates in Wasilla about the governor's past, Neiwert became even more convinced the publication didn't just cross her desk by accident.
For my part, it first illustrates how an army of young people worked so hard for Obama that, when it came to the end, they were virtually sleeping standing up. From a more political point of view, however, what this classic t-shirt also conveys in graphic terms -- in contrast to Sarah Palin's repeated contention that Obama appeared out of the woodwork just yesterday -- is that he started serving at the state level ten years before she did.
Michael Shaw is the publisher of the visual-political blog BAGnewsNotes.com.(updated 8:28 pm PST)
(image 1 - 3: ©Alan Chin. New Hampshire. January 5, 2007 Used by permission. image 4: Heath family via AP via nyt.com. image 5 ©Alan Chin. November 4th, 2008. Chicago, IL. Used by permission.)

















This is one of the sillier posts I've seen in a while. If a photo requires a paragraph of verbiage to describe it, it has failed. A caption is one thing, asking people to manufacture a story is quite another.
Some guy leaning against a wall looking at his shoes is hardly the stuff of heroism. The least Chin could have done is crop it closer to isolate the person from a backround that contributes nothing to the scenario you are trying to spin.
November 5, 2008 7:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
How dare he interpret a photograph? I mean, really!
November 6, 2008 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
nonsense.
the greater the image, the MORE words can be said about it. even if the image CAN speak for itself.
November 6, 2008 5:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
shooter is a clueless troll.
Just because you are ignorant of way photos can both conceal and reveal doesn't mean everyone else has to be.
Jeez, go over to Green footballs or something.
November 7, 2008 6:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
shooter, a visual is not always a picture. Sometimes words are a visual. And sometimes both words and a picture comprise a visual.
What you're looking at is a seamless integration of art direction, design and graphics that is a lot more original than any traditional form of media.
The shirt is a walking billboard. If a thousand people wear them, you have a thousand walking billboards.
Stop picking on the cropping, would ya?
November 5, 2008 10:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
another "nay" for the effectiveness of the crop and the integrity of its representation. It is in our best interest to strive for the most unadulterated information and print it on every T-shirt if necessary. The unadulterated issue is the hard part and should be the rule we follow.
We saw how our symbolic understanding of visuals (both words and pictures as you suggest) go well beyond just the dictionary. The word "liberal" and the Obama in head scarf are examples that there is no rules in language that excludes any form from interpretation. It all comes down to the craft of language, and how we understand it. Think of what the reaction to the T-shirt if the state graphic was of Massachusetts rather than Illinois.
To pull something else out of your response, "traditional form," the most traditional form of language were all graphic, pictographs and the like. Neither words or icons necessarily are supremely descriptive. An ancient cave wall pictograph has greater depth as language than the single isolated word "bison."
November 6, 2008 7:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Michael Shaw --
You're occupying well more than your fair share of the front page's limited real estate.
If possible, could you restrict the above-fold length to 3-4".
TIA
November 5, 2008 11:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with you with sadness. Wouldn't it be nice if only the best account of the daily happenings made it on the front page. With accuracy as the test, let the journalists fight over the space their representations demand whether they be visual or written. The trends of the front page, in my opinion, have been lead too much by marketing and sensationalism and less by worth.
November 6, 2008 7:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great pictures and commentary, as usual. I'm a huge fan of BAGnewsNotes.com and check it every day.
November 6, 2008 2:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent work. Thank you for this post.
I love these behind-the-scenes photographs. And we do need to move beyond the "conditioned by corporate media and special-interests" seeing only what 'they' want us to see.
As a visual artist, I'm always drawn to close examination of photographs.
November 6, 2008 2:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I often forget to critically "read" photographs in news items when I know it is imperative to be critical of every word in print. Unless it is a horrible shot, making the subject look monstrous, do I think that editorial manipulations might be at play. Even though I have become more and more distrustful of the professional standards in journalism, I romantically held to the idea that photography honors the truth.
I guess it is true that you can always see the truth clearer with a wide angle lens than with a telephoto zoom; and that cropping the photo during edit is the same as using too many adjectives in a news item. I have no problem with photography as a form of reporting on the state of the World, but I agree with the sentiment that the visual is taking over the "front page" and our ability and desire to digest the news. But I think that is a judgment about the overall demise of our professional journalists, and the public neglect and irresponsibility in not turning the page.
I remember the feeling of despair when the Boston Globe, my local paper, went to color. I was convinced that "news" was dead. But there have been many a front page, color (even half page) photographs that told the story, even the human side of the story, that words would have had a hard time describing. So thanks for making me refocus my interpretation of our visual news.
November 6, 2008 6:46 PM | Reply | Permalink