TPMCafe
« A Preference Isn't a Decision | Home | Question Wording is Just the Tip of the Iceberg... »

Why Is It So Easy?

user-pic


In his Farewell Address, George Washington famously warned against the
"insidious wiles of foreign influence." In the instructive but depressing new book Turkmeniscam, Ken Silverstein shows that this danger is very real. Moreover, it's mostly our own fault. Why is it so easy for foreign governments to sell themselves in Washington? Because there are plenty of people inside the Beltway who are for sale--or at least for rent.

Lobbying does not occur in a vacuum, of course, and three features of contemporary U.S. politics account for the extent of this problem. The first is the extraordinary openness of the American political system, which gives anyone seeking to advance some cause numerous points of access. There are 535 members of the House and Senate, and one or two well-placed legislators on Capitol Hill can do you a lot of favors so long as the rest of their colleagues don't know or care about the issue at hand. If working the Hill doesn't pan out, there will be individuals in the Executive Branch who will be willing to advance some foreign power's agenda, particularly if that agenda is being pushed by experienced Washington insiders. As Silverstein shows, lobbying firms can also count on sympathetic think tanks and a pliable media to lend their efforts a patina of legitimacy.

The second reason that foreign lobbying is pervasive is America's dominant position in the international system. In the memorable phrase of former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, we like to think of ourselves as the "indispensable nation" that "sees further into the future" than others do. The default condition of American foreign policy is meddling in other people's business, which in turn gives foreign governments a big incentive to try to influence how Washington uses its power.

This same sense of hubris also helps explain why politicians and pundits are often vulnerable to a lobby's PR campaign. When key officials are busy trying to rescue the global financial system, stabilize Colombia, stop the killings in Darfur, disarm Iran and North Korea, invade Iraq, pacify Afghanistan, advance the Doha Round, keep the lid on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, negotiate new security ties with India and find Osama bin Laden (along with dozens of other agenda items), it will be impossible for them to keep track of everything and everyone. With our leaders' attention divided and distracted, it is all too easy for professional spin-meisters to shape how a foreign country or a foreign leader is viewed in Washington. Just co-opt a couple of tame "experts" at some prominent think-tank and you are off and running.

Third, and perhaps most important, is the lack of accountability that is now
pervasive in contemporary America. As the Iraq war illustrates, failed forecasters like William Kristol routinely fail upward while truth-tellers like General Eric Shinseki are soon relegated to the sidelines. A political culture that places little value on integrity or truth will valorize spin doctors as long as they advance their clients' goals--even when the clients themselves leave much to be desired. In such a world, lobbyists who engage in deceptive practices are more likely to be rewarded than punished. Did the lobbying firm Hill and Knowlton lose business or prestige after it helped arrange bogus Congressional testimony about Iraqi atrocities prior to the 1991 Gulf war, even after it was revealed that young Iraqi refugee who bore witness to these crimes was actually the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador? Not likely.

By drawing back the curtain on these activities in an entertaining yet compelling way, Ken Silverstein has done us all a great service. But given that such activities are now hard-wired into the policy process, I fear that it will take more than his excellent book to clean up these Augean stables.


--Stephen Walt
John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University


6 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

And this of course is why change is impossible in Washington D.C. - the corruption is legal and has become systemic. Until someone has the courage to stop the legal exchange of money for votes the control of the government will always be in the hands of those with the money to buy it.

user-pic

Washington's final address, including the oft quoted foreign influences comment was in its day entirely a partisan attack for Hamilton/Adams and their pro-British/anti-French leanings, and against Jefferson/Madison and their relatively pro-French/anti-British leanings.

It is historically inaccurate to use the Washington quote to actually mean "stay out of foreign affairs" etc. It is historically accurate to use it to show how words are used in speeches to mean things beyond their literal meaning.

user-pic

This makes little sense to me. It is doubtful on its face that George Washington--the man who led the revolutionary war—would embrace foreign entanglement. My history lessons led me to conclude that Washington was neutral with respect to the French revolution and foreign affairs. Are you confident that Washington's warning against the dangers of foreign influence was “entirely a partisan attack” against Jefferson and Madison? If so, could you explain why George Washington would launch a "partisan attack," on this issue, against Jefferson who had similar concerns about foreign entanglements?:

"I sincerely join... in abjuring all political connection with every foreign power; and though I cordially wish well to the progress of liberty in all nations, and would forever give it the weight of our countenance, yet they are not to be touched without contamination from their other bad principles. Commerce with all nations, alliance with none, should be our motto." --Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Lomax, 1799. ME 10:124

We have a perfect horror at everything like connecting ourselves with the politics of Europe." --Thomas Jefferson to William Short, 1801. ME 10:285

"Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations--entangling alliances with none, I deem [one of] the essential principles of our government, and consequently [one of] those which ought to shape its administration."
--Thomas Jefferson: 1st Inaugural Address, 1801. ME 3:321

"I have ever deemed it fundamental for the United States never to take active part in the quarrels of Europe. Their political interests are entirely distinct from ours. Their mutual jealousies, their balance of power, their complicated alliances, their forms and principles of government, are all foreign to us. They are nations of eternal war. All their energies are expended in the destruction of the labor, property and lives of their people." --Thomas Jefferson to James Monroe, 1823. ME: 15:436


"Let the general government be reduced to foreign concerns only, and let our affairs be disentangled from those of all other nations except as to commerce, which the merchants will manage the better, the more they are left free to manage for themselves, and our general government may be reduced to a very simple organization and a very inexpensive one; a few plain duties to be performed by a few servants."
--Thomas Jefferson to Gideon Granger, 1800. ME 10:168

"We wish not to meddle with the internal affairs of any country, nor with the general affairs of Europe. Peace with all nations, and the right which that gives us with respect to all nations, are our object."
--Thomas Jefferson to C. W. F. Dumas, 1793. ME 9:56

"I see... not much harm in annihilating the whole treaty-making power except as to making peace" --Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, 1796. ME 9:330

"In national as in individual dealings, more liberality will, perhaps, be found in voluntary regulations than in those which are measured out by the strict letter of a treaty, which, whenever it becomes onerous, is made by forced construction to mean anything or nothing, engenders disputes and brings on war."
--Thomas Jefferson to Alexander, Emperor of Russia, 1804. ME 19:143

And a Plain Language Quote from Washington:
'Tis our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of
the foreign world.

user-pic

The general situation is self-correcting, as has been illustrated with Iraq, Afghanistan and Georgia recently. As US world hegemony is shown to be more feckless, and the world becomes multipolar, lobbyists will divert their financial lures to influential people in other countries. China, for example.

I haven't read the book, but a huge gas field has been found in Turkmenistan, which makes the real purpose of the US entry into Afghanistan -- the need for a gas pipeline (TAPI) to Pakistan and India -- even more urgent, and this should increase the urgency for a settlement of the Afghanistan War. Hurrah for that.

user-pic

But there are sufficient pipelines going west through Russia, but thank-you very much for offering Afghanistan.

And also welcome to Stephen Walt, our hero in combating troublesome foreign lobbying.

user-pic

A useful primer in the dynamics of Congress, newly contemporary in its cogency, is Mark Twain's "The Gilded Age".

The best source of venture capital and free promotion is Congress, once you pay the right people.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »



Book Club Calendar


This Week

Blood and Politics: The History of the White Nationalist Movement from the Margins to the Mainstream, Leonard Zeskind

Next Week

Henry Waxman, The Waxman Report: How Congress Really Works

July 13-17

Justin Fox, The Myth of the Rational Market: A History of Risk, Reward, and Delusion on Wall Street

July 27-31

Plenty Enough Suck To Go Around, Cheryl Wagner

« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Kyle Krahel-Frolander



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address