Still A Boys' Club at Treasury: Where Is Sheila Bair?
Last week, Associated Press ran a piece profiling several potential candidates for the next Treasury Secretary. The candidates had one feature in common with all prior Treasury Secretaries, they are all white men. This fact is especially egregious because one of the most obviously qualified candidates is a woman: Sheila Bair, the current chairperson of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
During ordinary times, the FDIC is a relative backwater, having to deal with minor policy tweaks or the failure of a small bank here or there. However, the housing crash has put the FDIC at center stage. Ms. Bair has been forced to arrange the takeover or merger of many of the country's largest banks, including Wachovia, Washington Mutual, and IndyMac. The FDIC has been a key actor in containing the credit crisis.
In this process, Bair has shown a willingness to both confront the big Wall Street banks and to stand up for homeowners. When the FDIC took over IndyMac, one of the mass market subprime lenders, Bair ordered a moratorium on foreclosures on the mortgages held by the bank. She announced that the FDIC would arrange write-downs that allowed homeowners to stay in their home wherever possible. Bair has since been vocal in her criticisms of other banks for being unwilling to take the same steps.
Bair is a Republican, but in the world of Big Finance it is not clear that party affiliation makes much difference. Most of the public will probably care more about the fact that she has managed to steer clear of the Wall Street cesspool than whether she is a Democrat or Republican.
If Sheila Bair's name is not on the Obama transition team's short-list for Treasury Secretary, then he needs a new transition team.















[Bair] announced that the FDIC would arrange write-downs . . . .
Mrs. Santa Claus hands out taxpayer monies without a by or leave.
October 21, 2008 2:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Perhaps she had instructions from someone of a higher paygrade? I dunno.
In any case, I am only semi-knowledgeable about financial affairs. Ellen's comments in past blogs show a greater expertise.
But I have been impressed with her and agree with the blog writer that she deserves at least some consideration
October 21, 2008 3:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know know what "by or leave" means in this sense. My assumption is that it is a free pass or get out of jail free card.
It might be a gift to the home owner, but although paid for by us, isn't in our best interest to actually make these write downs and stabilize the market with people still in the houses?
October 21, 2008 3:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
My fault -- I meant to write by-your-leave.
My sardonic point was that we have too many tsars (tsarinas?) in Washington who manage to find some recondite provision in some obscure statute which they claim authorizes them to act by diktat.
Dean has hung out in that corruption on the Potomac for so many years he has forgotten that we are supposed to be ruled by laws and not by the personal predilections of men or of women.
October 21, 2008 9:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Who does have the authorization to make those write downs? The Chairperson doesn't have the statutory direction to make these decisions?
I would hate to have to wait for the good sense of those on Capitol Hill to get around to it. If she is the one willing to put her neck out, all the better. But in understanding your criticism, if she is acting beyond her duties, it means that someone should knock her down a bit or that someone is not doing their job that she has assumed.
October 22, 2008 10:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
I guess it all depends on whether one believes some jumped-up bureaucrat should be making policy which affects the entire country -- its debtors, its creditors, its money and banking system, its taxpayers, and its economic future -- on the back of an envelope while lunching at the Prime Rib.
I don't.
October 22, 2008 11:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
I would hope the bureaucrat would make decisions in our best interest and following the law. That is the job of the bureaucrat, from FDIC Chairperson to EPA scientist. If not them, who?
My question was did she act out illegally - or was it just a wrong decision to make the write downs and why? It seems like a responsible decision.
October 22, 2008 2:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
So, is Bair the real Maverick?
I am immediately distrustful of another "one of the old boys group" to hold the position - forgive the term - because of the need for a regulation overhaul. Is she someone who understands that the position is to protect the interests of the people? The health of the financial community is for the benefit of the people and not at the expense of it.
Is it necessary to have such an insider to be able to understand the intricacies of it all? And if it does, isn't there something wrong with a system that is so complex that it is almost uncontrollable? I am slowly piecing together the banking environment starting from a place of checkbook ignorance.
What do you think are the most important qualifications, outside of industry experience, that a Secretary must have?
October 21, 2008 3:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here is Sheila Bair on Charlie Rose from last Friday. She seemed very knowledgeable at least up to the point when I fell asleep. I did the the video excerpt of Warren Buffet praising how she handled recent bank failure like IndyMac.
Would she be a good Treasury secretary? I have no idea. I do think it would be wise to keep people who know what they are doing in place until things settle down in the financial sector. Her term as FDIC chair runs to 2011.
BTW, Hank Paulson is on Charlie Rose tonight.
October 21, 2008 5:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
I nominate Zoe Cruz.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoe_Cruz
October 21, 2008 6:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now, that is funny!
October 21, 2008 9:26 PM | Reply | Permalink