Spreading the Wealth
In the early 1970s, when I was a young immigrant in Jerusalem, I found myself the head of my building's co-op committee. The job's main responsibility was collecting co-op fees (for heating oil, stair and entrance cleaning, etc.) from twenty-four immigrant. Our mortgages had been heavily subsidized by the government. We came from all over the world. (One Iraqi family actually brought a lamb into the elevator at Passover, which never came down.)
On the whole, it was a pleasant job. The problems started with my "Russian" neighbors, from the not-yet-former Soviet Union. I would knock on their door and invariably get a hug and a sweet and a coffee. What I wouldn't get was the 50 pounds they owed to the building. "We refuse," they would tell me, "we hate socialism."
Eventually, only one tenant from Kiev held out, and we all decided to let it go. He had lost his job; back "home," he had been imprisoned by the KGB. When you are young, and up against world-historical injury, you accommodate the odd obsession.
Besides, the stupidity of his reason for refusal made a great story. It was also world-historical, in a way. What better way to show the perverted political culture you had in the Soviet Union? Show what happens, as it were, naturally, when the basic principles of democracy (social contract, commonwealth, etc.) are not taught and aggressively defended?
I am telling the story because I heard a debate yesterday on New Hampshire public radio between congressional candidates; and the Republican, Jeb Bradley said, among other things, that he was against new taxes of any kind because he was against "tax-payers bailing-out the government." The moderator did not contradict him, nor did his opponent. Nobody seemed to think this remark was just stupid.
The problem, you see, is not simply that Joe the Plumber does not want to pay taxes, and McCain says he's right. The problem is that Joe the Plumber doesn't want to reconcile two contradictory goods in his mind at the same time (the good of having a few hundred more dollars, the good of having paying customers, roads, etc.) and the media on his lawn says he's a "demographic."
Jeb Bradley and his party take for granted that government, "Washington," and so forth, are something other than the things we do together. This has been a kind of infection on our democracy since Ronald Reagan started playing George Babbitt. The question is, what has become of our immune system?
















Frustrating, isn't it. Perhaps we could take his government away and sell it back to him piecemeal?
October 20, 2008 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sounds good to me.
I'll bid for a third of the Defense Department. The "government" can keep the rest.
October 20, 2008 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Granting vouchers for school and allowing for charter schools is a start. Walled communities is another.
Agree that privatizing government is a bad idea.
October 20, 2008 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Taxpayers are already paying for walled communities.
October 20, 2008 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
There are two distinct populations among the government-is-bad crowd. There are the idiots who think it's true, and there are those who simply exploit the idiots to steal from the public via the ignored government.
Alexander Hamilton argued that a virtue of the amendment stating that federal law shall be the supreme law of the land was that it would encourage the citizen to pay attention to his federal government, because it reached all the way to his personal life. A result of portraying Washington as distant and disconnected, unhelpful, broken, etc. is that the citizen lets it run without his attention.
We see the result.
October 20, 2008 12:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Matt Yglesias has an interesting post this morning
http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/10/spreading_the_wealth_around.php
The repugs like to spout that the top 1% is already paying 25% of taxes. Looking at real wage growth, the top 100 CEO's are making 25 times what they did in the 60's while real wages have remained stagnant.
Given the tax cuts to the top income brackets since that time, it is really amazing the amount of growth in receipts that have come from those wage earners.
Meanwhile, no one on the right wants to acknowledge the HUGE increase in payroll taxes enacted under Reagan that exempts anyone over 250K
Unfortunately guys like Joe the Plumber don't know how badly the current format screws them over - he thinks if his (hypothetical) business pulls in 250K a year he will get taxed on it - he doesn't understand that expenses get taken away first.
October 20, 2008 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Joe the plumber is just plain stupid as are most of the others that do not understand that government is not free. But they are where the republican votes are to be found.
October 20, 2008 2:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
A sign on everything that gets federal funding.
October 20, 2008 2:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now is not a time for higher taxes. It is time for outright confiscation. It is time for Woody Guthrie's words to be heard. "This land belongs to you AND me."
October 20, 2008 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
You nitwits had better get ready to argue about whether it's fair at some bracket level, to have government make more of your income than you do. Between FICA medicare and income taxes, we are about there.
Then there's the issue of how many people should be allowed to avoid income taxes altogether, currently it's about a third of households. That's a very large welfare program.
October 20, 2008 4:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thus showing you are one of those that doesn't get it. The "government" is us; it does not "make" money, it is the vehicle by which we pool our money to do the things that we agree (through our duly elected representation) to do in common.
It is only fair that those who benefit the most (i.e. get the most money from their work in society) contribute more into the societal pool.
October 21, 2008 11:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sir this is a great write up, wonderful words.
October 20, 2008 7:11 PM | Reply | Permalink