Incitement: McCain Fostering Climate of Violence
Have you seen McCain' and Palin's latest attacks on Obama?
Because what they are doing is nothing less than incitement. Saying that we don't know where Obama came from or who he is or what he would do to America is to say that, as President, he would pose a threat to America.
This is the message being circulated in millions of anonymous emails which fill in the "blanks" with xenophobic libels. What McCain and Palin are doing is saying, "yeah, there's some truth in those charges." They are not only disrespecting our democratic system by inciting hate against the other party's nominee, they are saying that Obama's election would destroy those things Americans hold dear. And the crowds are responding as intended.
They are, in short, inciting against Obama with no regard for how their words will be heard and by whom.













Funny, I was just addressing this on my local newspaper's blog. But our local bunch of raving maniacs have been pressing this for a week or so now: "we don't know anything about Obama."
The implication is that Obama is successfully hiding his true, Marxist dirty commie pig socialist self from us. And the less evidence there is, and the less Obama supporters can pooh pooh the claim, the stronger the claim becomes.
This is the stuff that psychoanalysis is made of.
October 6, 2008 7:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Really, we are on the verge of Kristalnacht.
The brown shirts are marching. It CAN happen here.
October 6, 2008 11:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank God someone else saw it.
Watching McCain smiling as the crowd roars, "terrorist!"
It's as if I was watching some film school parody trying to paint McCain as the evil one, his soul searing with the power as he whipped up the hate.
But it's not a poorly acted hatchet job! It's McCain himself!
October 7, 2008 1:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed, McCain and his operatives are shouting terrorist but their endgame, I fear, is to generate hatred. (Hitler did a bang-up job, remember.)
Just as love blinds us, hatred shuts down our thinking, and reasoning - which is what McCain is really committed to accomplishing. One of his handlers even admits same when he says that the McCain campaign has to take people's attention off the economy/Obama, maneuver them into not thinking about it (or him in a positive light) - a sure-fire way to do that is to get them to hate.
October 7, 2008 1:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
c4,
agreed.
McCain is rabble rousing, the worst elements of the republican party; the socio-paths, the racists, the homophobes, the anti-semites, the easily led, the bullies, the book burners and the 'mile wide, half inch deep' crowd.
Christ, this is the gang I fought in WWII
Ernst Rohm would be proud.
October 7, 2008 3:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
The line has been crossed!
Obama has been accused of being a terrorists; if I remember right,it is now our patriotic duty to water-board him until he reveals what his little terrorists friends are.
Nothing to see here. Move along.
October 7, 2008 1:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
These are dangerous people. I am very worried for the future of our country when our leaders promote hate, spew lies, inspire ignorance, and tolerate the indefensible.
October 6, 2008 7:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
The important people to watch in the days ahead are his surrogates with political futures. People like Mitt Romney, Tim Pawlenty and Charlie Christ.
Pay close attention to see how many of them back off the campaign trail now that it has become a spitball circus. If the public doesn't like the tone, they will be the first to drop.
If they are willing to do McCain's dirty work they are risking those futures and should be held accountable by voters, if not the media.
In fact, that is another strategy that the Dems should employ. Kill the messenger.
October 6, 2008 7:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
The word "kill" has no place in any political campaign.
McCain and Palin themselves seem so disconnected from civilization that one should wonder if either one carries a gun. They are obviously deranged and dangerous.
October 6, 2008 8:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Remember it was Hillary Clinton that brought up William Ayers in the Democratic Debate--what does Hillary have to say now that Gov Sarah Palin is taking her talking points to the next level........
Why isn't the Obama campaign using the effective rebuttals Obama has given on the campaign trail, in the political ad wars, instead of the constant milquetoast reaction every time the McCain/Palin smear machine cranks out another "winner"...the latest, guilt by association.
October 6, 2008 8:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama is not rebutting it because he has an association with someone who blew up government buildings.
The Liberals know that if Palin had ever associated with anyone on the "fringe" such as an abortion clinic bomber, that the Liberals would be hammering nails into her and crucifying her on the cross.
If she said "I was only 8 years old" we'd all hear what a lame excuse that is.
What are the effective rebuttals that Obama has given regarding Ayers? I haven't heard any. He said that he didn't regret setting bombs!! C'mon, let's not try to say "it was a long time ago".
Maybe you can try to say that Barack never "really" was friends with him. But Ayers hosted a fund raiser for Barack's first run at the senate. And Barack was ran the CAC, which was founded by Ayers.
How can people say that they were just "passing ships in the night"???
October 6, 2008 9:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Who cares if he knows Ayers? Seriously. What does it matter?
October 6, 2008 10:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Zeno points out, below, that the Bush family has a strong relationship with the Bin Ladens. At least Obama associates with Americans. Then again, Ayers was not very effective, unlike McVeigh, who has strong associations with the American right wing.
Boy, associating is fun!
October 6, 2008 11:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ayers was never convicted, one. Ayers is now a college professor, or so I'm told, two.
What? You gonna tell me the college didn't properly "vet" him?
October 7, 2008 12:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Two phrases:
- Prosecutorial misconduct
- Cointelpro
I, frankly, would not mind having a national dialogue about both.
October 7, 2008 9:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bill Ayers worked with Republicans, independents and Democrats in Chicago about school reform, so are all those people terrorists? Bill Ayers and his wife are professors at the University of Illinois, so is the University he teaches at a terrorist institutions? Are all his students terrorist. Right wing Republicans are so despicable. Here is a country going down the drain after eight years of Republican rule and all they want to do is spread fear over manufactured lies. I suppose if Obama is a terrorist Republicans like Dick Lugar who have worked with him must be terrorist too.
October 7, 2008 3:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
the new york times article answers all of your questions, refutes most of your distortions, and knocks down you straw men as well:
A review of records of the schools project and interviews with a dozen people who know both men, suggest that Mr. Obama, 47, has played down his contacts with Mr. Ayers, 63. But the two men do not appear to have been close. Nor has Mr. Obama ever expressed sympathy for the radical views and actions of Mr. Ayers, whom he has called “somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago, when I was 8.”
bill ayers is a phony non-issue.
October 7, 2008 8:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Apparently you were not conscious during the Vietnam era, I was. Bill Ayers had a lot of popular support, to the point where there was almost a revolution. Had that revolution succeeded, we would be better off today, as the government would know they are accountable to the people. Today they are not. We really need a system wherein we could have sent them all packing a year or more ago.
October 8, 2008 12:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
MJ, I read this and I feel so sick.
What can we do?
I sent this to everyone I know. These people aren't fit to be in the company of decent people.
October 6, 2008 9:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let alone lead them.
October 6, 2008 9:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bwakfat - why don't you tell us why we shouldn't be concerned about Ayers. Thanks
October 6, 2008 9:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
You haven't given a reason why we should be.
October 6, 2008 10:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your desperate grasping at straws amuses me!
October 6, 2008 10:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're a terrist.
October 6, 2008 10:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Because there is no there there.
As much as the well-respected WorldNetDaily and the Free Republic want there to be some kind of evil association between the two, doesn't mean one exists. In fact, from all accounts by those who truly seem to know, there wasn't much of a relationship between the two.
Guilt by association--when you're down in the polls and have nothing to offer, I guess that's where you have to go. John McCain lost his soul.
October 6, 2008 10:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bill, are you concerned that Todd Palin was a member, and Sarah Palin associated with/courted, an Alaska Secessionist group (the AIP) whose founder said "The fires of hell are frozen glaciers compared to my hatred for the American government."? If not, why not?
October 7, 2008 10:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Senator McCain seems to have progressed from 'maverick' through 'floundering' to 'scraping the bottom of the barrel'.
I have a brother who served in Viet Nam and went through the very same stages.
But my special concern centers around the "Dumbing-Down" of the Presidency. The present holder of the Office is commonly portrayed as academically unaccomplished. Senator McCain, by his own admission, did not do as well as he could have. At present, the story is that Gov. Palin took 6 years and as many schools to accomplish what usually takes half? the time.
What a lack-luster succession plan!
October 6, 2008 9:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ronalawn - sorry I couldn't follow your post. But here's the bottom line - Our current president attended Phillips, Yale and HBS. I'm happy for the next President to come from a non-Ivy League school and be at the bottom of their class. I know alot of people I went to school with who got really bad grades but ended up being great leaders and running businesses.
October 6, 2008 10:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's "a lot" not "alot" (which is not a word).
October 6, 2008 10:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Stopp BEEing a Terrist@!
October 6, 2008 10:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know. Every time I correct a wingnut's spelling, Jesus steps on a puppy.
October 6, 2008 10:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well that explains all the dead, flat puppies I've been seeing all over the side of the road.
Used to be skunks.
Yet another thing I have to blame those wingnuts for.
October 7, 2008 12:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
John McCain just lost whatever honor and dignity he had left.
Let's be clear about this--his campaign this year has never been about putting country first. It's all about putting John McCain first and country last.
I once liked John McCain
John McCain was a good guy
Senator McCain, you're no John McCain
October 6, 2008 10:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Like I said earlier, you should be concerned about Obama's character because Ayers is a lunatic and Obama allowed the guy to host one of his election fundraisers and Obama also ran one of his non-profits. If it had been me, I would not have been associating myself with lunatic Ayers.
October 6, 2008 10:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's no legitimate link, so there's nothing to worry about.
Ayers isn't a lunatic, he's a well-respected professor who has redeemed himself and has been forgiven by the Chicago political and academic community.
Obama attending many social events in Chicago when he kicked off his political career. Ayers' was one of dozens, and it doesn't matter anyway because Ayers by then had changed his life around and everyone respected what he had done in the past 20 years as an academic and pillar of the community.
Obama didn't run "one of his non-profits." Obama was asked by others to serve on the board of a non-profit that Ayers had a connection to. It had nothing to do with Ayers at all.
You should do your research and know what you're talking about before you post this stupid bullshit here or anywhere. Did you even read the NY Times article? It sure doesn't sound like you did.
October 6, 2008 10:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
It doesn't need to read an actual article. It wants to hate, and hate it does. It is pathetic and has no hope of real life, stuck there in its mother's basement.
October 6, 2008 11:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, I know, but Destor put me in a puppy kicking mood when he called me a "terrist"!
Ha!
October 6, 2008 11:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama "ran" a non-profit? I thought he just ran for State Senate, US Senate, and President. Go figure.
October 7, 2008 12:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
MiddleCLassBill,
Ayers isn't a lunatic, its you and those that post to you (feed the wingnut) that are lunatics.
October 7, 2008 11:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
"They are.... inciting against Obama with no regard for how their words will be heard and by whom".
No regard, huh? You sure about that?
October 6, 2008 10:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Chuck Hagel (R-NE) needs to smack John McCain down IMMEDIATELY with a prime time address decimating his "old friend".
F#CK JOHN MCCAIN! He wants actual war in this campaign and people injured or killed. He's a menace.
October 6, 2008 11:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Did you see that Hagel's wife is going to endorse Obama tomorrow? I just posted it as it's own reader's comment here.
October 6, 2008 11:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tomorrow night, I'd love to see Senator Obama turn to McCain and say this: "John, you've been saying some pretty extreme things out there on the campaign trail. Do you have the courage to say any of them to my face?"
I suspect McCain, being the low-class coward he is, seeing and hearing himself called out for his boorishness, would either punk out or go berserk with rage, live on national.
October 6, 2008 11:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
I would like to add that no one has really got bent out of shape about Bush's relations with the Bin Laden family. I find Bush's behavior toward the Sadi royal family more disturbing and prescient.
October 6, 2008 11:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
From a nice post just up at Daily Kos:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/10/7/0123/83792/89/622325
October 7, 2008 12:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, come on Opus, you know what's wrong with this... Annenberg made a mistake and gave money to a terrorist so that he could reform the education system. From 1995-1999, Obama was chairman of the board.
Then, in 2001, 9/11 happened.
What, do I have to draw you a picture?
October 7, 2008 12:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
What, are you one of those hippie-liberal elitist artists now, too?
October 7, 2008 12:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
This may backfire for McCain. They'll fire up the base but drive away some voters who don't want to be associated with that message. They won't vote for Obama either. There is "something not quite right" about him. They can't tell you... it's kind of a vague feeling they have. They'd like to vote for McCain and trust him and his running mate but they really don't want to be associated with the wingnuts.
I spoke with one of these this evening. I've spoken with him in the past. He is getting less and less comfortable with McCain and he is not a good liar nor does he try to be one.
October 7, 2008 12:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
The McCain/Palin ticket has hit an all time political low. I have seen a lot now I have seen it all. They are intentionally creating a hatred within the ranks of some of their supporters towards Barack Obama that someone actually shouted 'kill him'.
WTF is happening to our country? This f@!ked up. A line has been crossed by the republicans that in a decent society never should. I pray someone in the MSM calls for a serious 'reality check' right about now...
October 7, 2008 1:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
And you do know what we do with terrorists suspects on islands controlled by, but not part of this country. . . I think McCain voted for that one.
How long before Palin is suggesting it's unpatriotic to NOT water-board Obama in order to get him to reveal Bill Ayers next plot to destroy America.
October 7, 2008 1:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
I strongly suggest you look up the sex offender map in your neighborhood. Because, by Palinian-logic, you're a pedophile by proximity.
October 7, 2008 2:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
thank you c4logic. can we stop NOT saying 'fascism' now?
October 7, 2008 3:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Opus - yes I read the NYT article. Couple points
1. Ayers isn't a lunatic? He said as recently as 9/11/01 that "I don't regret setting bombs. I feel we didn't do enough."
I'm glad you think some people (Chicago) have forgiven him. But your trusted NYT article also said not everybody has forgiven Ayers. And they shouldn't. I wouldn't forgive someone who bombed government buildings and killed innocent people.
Where do you get things like "it didn't matter anyway because Ayers had changed his life around...". Well according to your beloved NYT article, it appears that Mr. Daley and Chicago have forgiven him, but that "attitude is not universal".
2) Chicago Annenberg Challenge - Obama was chairman of the board. Not just be "on the board" but be chairman of the board (ie "run it). And yes Ayers had a connection to it - he STARTED the CAC with Mr. Annenberg's money.
Barack was chairman of the board and Ayers co-chair of the operative and strategic body.
But you still think there's no connection?? They didn't work together?
October 7, 2008 7:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
I far more worried about McCains relationship with the Keating Five which went way beyond a nodding acquaintance. Especially now. You might want to look into it, McCains support for that murdering jackass cost this country plenty.
I take it you approve of Palin and McCain inciting violence toward your fellow Americans? I don't. I'm appalled and disgusted. Seems to me what McCain is calling for is far worse than anything Ayers allegedly did back when I was a small child.
Is this the best you guys can do?
October 7, 2008 7:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
McCain was associated with people deeply involved in trying to overthrow the Nicaraguan government in the 80s. He was neck-deep in the Keating scandal, and managed to BS his way out of it. He's sold the military, active and veterans both, down the river for power. He's betrayed himself by voting to allow torture of prisoners.
That's a bit more important to me than Ayers and Wright.
October 7, 2008 11:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
The problem with right wing knuckle draggers is that they are so literal. Little Timmy McVeigh didn't understand the difference between rabble rousing and a call to arms. I remember being stunned that there was an industry out there bent upon destroying Clinton's administration (job well done, I might add).
This crap McCain is pulling is not going to work but it will form the ground floor of the new right wing cottage industry. People forget that republicans are much better at throwing bombs than governing. I guess they are just getting a little too literal about the bombs.
And this Ayers stuff is laughable. The most relevant personal connection in this election is that between McCain and Keating. Meet the new boss same as the old boss.
October 7, 2008 7:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think you nailed it with this -- the wingnuts are going to get the idea that Obama is violating the Patriot Act and getting away with it. Thus, will they try to take matters into their own hands?
October 7, 2008 9:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is very, very dangerous. I wonder what the folks over at Commentary and the National Review think about this.
Joe Lieberman, if he has any sense of responsibility at all, should tell McCain to stop this crap immediately.
You know, once you unleash this sort of thing, there's no telling where it will stop. The Neocons should think very, very fucking carefully about this. This kind of rage is uncontrollable, and will bite the hand that feeds it, if given the chance.
This will very easily turn into anti-semitism if it's not stopped.
October 7, 2008 11:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Why anti-semitism? These rednecks use up all their hate on African Americans. most of it anyway
October 7, 2008 12:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hmmm... Dan white was a domestic terrorist who murdered two government officials. Harvey milk served together with Dan White on the same city council in San Francisco for two years. Does that mean Harvey milk was guilty of working with a terrorist?
October 7, 2008 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dan White and I attended my high school in San Francisco in the early 60's. Later, when I went to City College, I was there during the time O.J. Simpson was there. Hmm...guess I can never run for president.
October 7, 2008 1:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, and the subtext of this whole narrative is not so much that he's a pinko-commie MuslamoNazi as it is that he's black -- not one of us, we don't know anything about him, his origins are mysterious or 'exotic,' etc. He's "Other." Not in our tribe. Not to be trusted. Probably has a chip on his shoulder about the whole slavery thing on behalf of his dusky brethren. Underwent Black Nationalist/Islamist/Socialist training in the madrassas of Jakarta, Cambridge and Kenwood, etc.
Brings to mind the chanting pinheads from Freaks, only in reverse: "Not one of us, not one of us, gooble gobble, we don't accept him, we don't accept him."
October 7, 2008 12:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, it's true that most of their bile is aimed at the black population. That's an absolute given.
BUT -- with the Wall Street collapse underway, their rage could turn against Jews because of their alleged domination of financial institutions. People are seeing their 401K's collapse. Also, one thing 'mericans are slowly becoming "aware of" is the alleged domination of Mideast policy by Neocons, and even my own Mother, who's very well informed, asked me if the Neocons weren't dominated by people of Jewish descent.
I've heard this crap already from a longtime friend. It really surprised me. He told me that the American people need to wake up to the domination of our financial institutions by "Zionists".
Don't kid yourself. If American goes to hell and a handbasket over the next several years, do you really think the hunt for scapegoats will stop with African-Americans?
I know that many conservative Jews feel very secure about the lack of overt anti-semitism here in the states. I'm not so sure. Never really been put to the test. Just look at what Palin's church up in Wasilla tolerated in regards to anti-Jewish statements.
Once the rabid animal of racism is let out of it's cage, all bets are off. The media and everyone else should be denouncing McCain and Palin pronto.
Please. Don't kid yourself.
October 7, 2008 12:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
The note of indignation the Josh Marshall has been sounding about these incitements - echoed and amplified in other posts and comments here - mystifies me--he is usually so pragmatic, and here we are dealing with an awful Real Politik of the kind we are (sadly) familiar. This is just Rove with the edges fraying. I would like Josh and the community to address ways to itimize how this rhetoric can be used against McCain and Co. How it can be used to sway swing voters. I know we hear that swing voters are turned off by negative advertising. But since the days of Lee Twatwater I always thought this was untrue, finally. Beyond outrage (what is new with these horrible anti-American zealots that have defined republicans for twenty years at least), what are the TACTICS! (Or the strategy, for that matter.)
October 7, 2008 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fact: Protesters were paid to protest against Obama outside of the 1st Presidential debate in Mississippi.
Fact: The press are kept away from Palin supporters at her rallies.
Fact: McCain and Palin are getting a lot more vocal involvement from their crowds now, partly to the questions they're shouting to the audience.
Question: Could someone be paying for shills? Paying for supporters to lead the crowds with their responses? Are they afraid the press might question some of them?
Just a thought. The crowds seem to be getting so crazy lately at these McCain/Palin events, I'm just wondering if someone is spiking the kool-aid.
October 7, 2008 1:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
WASHINGTON — GOP presidential nominee John McCain has past connections to a private group that supplied aid to guerrillas seeking to overthrow the leftist government of Nicaragua in the Iran-Contra affair.
October 7, 2008 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
That would be a terrorist organization.
October 7, 2008 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Things are already violent. My wife had a concrete block smashed through the windshield of her car shortly after putting on her Obama sticker. Luckily it was when her car was parked and she was safe at home. I've had people spit on my sticker on my truck.
Hard to say for sure, but..........
October 7, 2008 1:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jesus Christ, where do you live and how many marriages there are between blood relations?
October 7, 2008 6:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually we live in a generally liberal section of a major city in the upper Midwest. There are obviously some pretty reactionary elements even in our neighborhood though.
During Gore vs Bush campaign the worst we had were some eggs thrown at our house. If the motivation for what just happened is indeed political then this year is worse.
I guess the point is, once the mob mentality is stirred up you really never know what will happen. This is dangerous.
When I was much younger my family lived in various regions in the south and we were subjected to some pretty bad stuff in as much as we campaigned for equal housing and civil rights. It always comes a surprise when it happens though.
October 8, 2008 4:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
I had a somewhat visceral response to your comment at first and thought about it for a moment and realized that I was reacting to a certain kind of dehumanization. A little more reflection and I realized that, sadly, it is all too human to react with violence to many things. So your characterization of the thugs roaming my neighborhood is colorful but not really dehumanizing I guess.
They are emblematic of much of what those who value rational thought and care about engaging one another with ideas instead violence are up against. They are emblematic of the Republican Party, of John McCain, of Sarah Palin and of all those who seek self aggrandizement at all costs with no care for their neighbors, their fellow citizens, their country of the planet they live on. These people are narrow minded, egotistical, bigoted, mendacious, greedy, violent, reckless, selfish thugs. All too human.
October 8, 2008 5:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's not to the post's exact point, but its close enough. A good job:
McCain on The Simpsons- Make McCain Exciting Green Screen Challenge
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vg3J00evytU&feature=related
October 7, 2008 2:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
this is even better:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzwBLSgpeh0
October 7, 2008 7:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Check out this video about Sarah Palin. It's crazy hilarious.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1exiyBYnJ00
October 13, 2008 12:33 PM | Reply | Permalink