Bill Clinton on MEET THE PRESS. He Sure Loves McCain
Bill Clinton is something else. Just read what he said on MTP this morning. And this by a Nehesi Coates.
I think he'll be voting for McCain-Palin -- we'll never know, will we? The whole idea of Barack Obama seems to offend him. (Like McCain, he can't look at Barack, metaphorically in Bill's case. It's very odd.)
But I don't think that, at this point, his disdain for Obama has anything to do with Hillary. She is out there for Obama and, unlike Bill, is not using the Jewish holidays as an excuse not to campaign this week. (Yes, Bill told Larry King he won't campaign on Rosh Ha Shana!).
No, it's not about Hillary. Not now. The reason he prefers McCain is because with McCain in the White House, he remains the most important Democrat, the last Democratic President. If Obama wins, he becomes Jimmy Carter, just another ex-President.
The thought drives him crazy. And that is why he wants Mc Cain to win. It is that simple.

















The more he acts out like this, the more I blame him for being complicit in this financial meltdown. Repealing Glass-Steagal, signing Gramm-Leach-Bliley, and almost signing in Bankruptcy "Reform." Ending welfare "as we knew it". He also walked away with $110 million in Private Equity cash in the last 8 years. (What's in our wallet now? Worthless paper and debt.)
He bent over for the Republicans because of his incessant need to be loved at all times.
Bill: 51% of the country loves you. Work for us. Get Obama elected, and stop the snide comments.
September 28, 2008 2:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Except for the first sentence of the last paragraph, I agree. Billy sold his sole and our infrastructure and manufacturing base and go along to get along approach to governance(also the current DINO mantra).
In my book Bill is a shell of his former self, whatever that may have been!
September 28, 2008 2:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is a smart blog. I mean it. You have so much knowledge about this issue, and so much passion. You also know how to make people rally behind it, obviously from the responses. Youve got a design here thats not too flashy, but makes a statement as big as what youre saying. Great job,children health indeed.
January 19, 2011 8:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for your patience and sorry for the inconvenience!
Best regards, Mary CEO of convert youtube videos
December 22, 2010 4:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think so, MJ. He supports Obama. I think he's still miffed at Obama but he supports him. I don't believe that Clinton wants to be the symbolic head of the party out of power.
September 28, 2008 2:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
If he were supporting Obama he would have been out campaigning for him instead of taking off time for the Jewish holidays. Seriously? He's dragging his feet as long as he thinks he can get away with it and milking all the attention he can get for himself.
September 28, 2008 4:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bill isn't even subtle.
He even sent out Donald Trump to support McCain and, of course, say a few nice words about Bill and Hillary.
Did you see that?
I wonder in what other ways he is subverting Obama?
September 28, 2008 2:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was surprised and deeeply dissappointed to see Trump support McCain. It's insane. Trump has demolished Bush and Condi Rice in the past for being completely worthless and incompetent. I am shocked, SHOCKED(!) that he doesn't see the same buffoonery in PALIN/mccain.
September 28, 2008 3:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
I will never forget or forgive Bogus Bill Clinton for touring the country during Al Gore's campaign in 2000 giving self-adoring interviews featuring priceless put-downs of Gore as "the next best" option for America after himself. He reminded me so much of President Eisenhower saying he would need an hour or so to think of any meaningful decisions that his Vice President, Richard Nixon, might have made. Nothing new in regard to the monumental self-regard of All-About-Bill Clinton this campaign season, either.
The "political genius" Bill Clinton had the once-in-a-lifetime post-cold-war Peace Dividend to fund his administration and Ross Perot to badly split his Republican Party opposition -- twice. A lucky man, indeed, but far more lucky than politically astute. Bungling Health Care, losing both the House and Senate, and blowing up the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade really didn't testify to any economic, political, or foreign policy skills, either. And did I mention the reckless, self-indulgent blow jobs that nearly brought down the government of the United States? A very, very mixed record indeed.
Barack Obama, on the other hand, will enter the presidency facing horrendous problems like a crushing national debt, resurgent international competition, a gutted middle class, two debilitating wars, and a hollowed-out manufacturing economy that will need a crash rebuilding before the American government can get anywhere near solvency again. If President Barack Obama can meet those enormous challenges and perform anywhere near competently in solving them, he will go down in history as a significantly more important president than William Jefferson Clinton. This prospect of impending second-fiddle-ness among Democratic Presidents bothers Bogus Bill far more than the fact that his wife and he ran such a lousy primary campaign and lost to a relative newcomer.
September 28, 2008 3:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dude, are you stoned? When was the last time this country was in that good of shape? Revisionist peace time benefit? Well who gave us a peace time benefit? Lost congress? How about blaming Jim Wright and Bobby Byrd or that. We had full employment...people getting into houses living the American dream. Peace. We helped solve the Balkan Crises as best that could be possible. Yes, we lost out and didn't do the right thing in Rwanda.....However, overall those were 8 great years in the Countries existence. To try and belittle it makes your own self look sad.
September 28, 2008 5:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
I used to like Clinton, but most of that was because the right wing attacked him so viciously
and he was so good at beating them in the polls.
I think I confused "like" with defend. As I said before; "With Republicans we get trickle down economics, with today's Democratic Party we get trickle down government."
The more I look back on Clinton's Presidency the more disappointed in him I become. The latest reminder was his signing the Gramm/Leach/Bliley act. Apart from the Hillary issue, if Clinton doesn't like Obama maybe its because he sees Obama as not friendly enough toward Wall Street.
Clinton was/is just one of a number of Democrats who is owned by the Banking, Insurance, Credit, and Investment community. To see Clinton, Chris Dodd, Chuck Schumer or even Joe Biden commenting on the financial mess we're in is laughable.
Oh, did I forget to mention the Bankruptcy Reform
Bill?
Its not bad enough we have to put up with Republicans, but when you add business friendly Democrats to the mix, you know 90% (arb) of the public is going to get fu**ed.
September 28, 2008 3:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bankruptcy reform was brought to you by Joey Biden. Where is right now?>
September 28, 2008 5:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
He's running with that guy who's pretending to be protecting us from CEO's getting golden parachutes on our dime.
September 28, 2008 6:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good grief, MJ. Confusing strategy with tactics?
Clinton is doing the same thing Obama is doing. He is going for undecideds by avoiding dissing McCain or Palin.
Maybe you should knock this crap off. Both Clinton and Obama are winning undecided votes with their self-restraint and simple respect for the GOP, knee-jerk reactionaries like you are losing them.
Quit it. All of you. You sound like fargin freepers.
Thanks.
September 28, 2008 3:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Worthless.
September 28, 2008 3:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Right. It's strategy! Why didn't I realize that? A
September 28, 2008 4:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, if you're merely trying to stir the pot, this is a pretty good subject to do just that.
Enjoy.
=D
September 28, 2008 8:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Currently we are just trying to find a solution to the financial crisis. However, later we will have to figure out what went wrong and how to establish new regulations so that this does'nt occur again. In an Obama administration that process will not be kind to Clinton. Very likely repealing Glass-Steagal and signing Gramm-Leach-Bliley will be recognizerd as opening the door to this mess. Republicans will of course be doing backflips to prevent any real analyses of what went wrong since they were in the center of this deregulation movement from the beginning.
Clinton deserves much of the blame and a McCain administration may help Clinton preserve his reputation.
September 28, 2008 4:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mj, look. Bill is the worst loser of the two in any contest. Check out how he reacted after he lost the Governors race in Arkansas......He doesnn't like to lose and with the Primaries he did. Do you think it is easy for him? It isn't easy for any of us. The best Obama can do is put him in situations that he can be positive. Does he like McCain? More than likely. We all did. Remember when we actually thought it might be a good idea for him to be on Kerry's ticket?
September 28, 2008 5:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Armchair psychology, practicing without a license. Peggy Noonan does it better than you (to worse effect, of course.) With each and every political post, it becomes ever clearer that this is what you want to be, Obama's Peggy Noonan. Except it's not clear at all that you have cleared your ramblings with the campaign. Dangerous, that practicing without a license.
September 28, 2008 5:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow... who knew Rosenberg was a psychologist.
Idiot.
September 28, 2008 6:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rovenberg's specialty is armchair psychology. Because I supported Hillary Clinton instead of Obama, I have a problem with race and don't know who Kanye West is. That's the kind of depth of thinking he is capable of. Seriously as bad as any of the right-wing nutjobs out there.
September 28, 2008 7:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Psst. We are talking about Bill, not Hillary. Or do you see no difference?
September 28, 2008 8:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Since you bring it up, I want to give her credit: Hillary's been great about everything!
dijamo: I was just listening to Kanye when I read that. Hahaha... But come on, MJ's not so bad... I love his fiery posts! :)
September 28, 2008 9:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bill is giving genuine comments and compliments. Obama IS NOT great yet, how could he be?? Ridiculous. He is giving an honest and very positive set of comments about Obama. What a bunch of wimpy whiners you are
September 28, 2008 7:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ouch people! Ouch!
I don't know the motives behind President Clinton's reticence to support Obama, but I certainly acknowledge that he is reticent. He was just on The Daily Show and he could not have been less enthusiastic about Obama. Even after Chris Rock made such a point about Clinton refusing to say Obama's name- you would think his next interview he would go out of his way to be effusive. Not at all. I voted for Clinton twice, like them both, liked the 90's- but it is undeniable that Clinton is not interested in helping Obama get elected. Hillary seems to over it and helping.
September 28, 2008 7:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Coates says it better than me. That I will concede.
http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/09/stop_talking_about_bills_tepid_endorsements.php
September 28, 2008 9:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
...wunder if Obama would nominate Hillary as Sec of State (that could satisfy the Clintons' continuing lust for power; and the choice of rather being in front of the camera instead of behind the scenes as a SC Justice).
Bill betrayed Hillary's trust with Monica and now back-stabbing Obama and the LiberalDems...what's next, probably... Clinton/Clinton 2012.
September 29, 2008 10:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think that Clinton's being soft on McCain will help persuade undecided voters. Everyone knows Clinton is a master-politician and a Democrat. Absent some serious defect in Obama, one would expect Clinton to endorse Obama enthusiastically and without reservation. Knowing that Bill is fully up to the acting job, I expect voters will see anything less than a "wholehearted" endorsement as a weaseling lawyer's damning with faint praise.
That said, perhaps everyone is giving both Clintons more attention than they deserve. Those voters for whom a liberal approach to issues is paramount will vote for Obama anyway. Those with reservations about the breadth of Obama's knowledge might be reassured, but not by the kind of endorsement Bill seems to be giving. Those who have reservations about Obama's character and integrity will hardly care about Bill's opinion in that regard, and, needless to say, those biased against Obama for racial reasons won't listen.
I am a white, boomer-generation, modestly informed, non-political-junkie Chicago Democrat. I voted for Bill twice. This year I preferred Obama, but had misgivings in trusting the Presidency to a young and untried first-term senator. The person who has removed any doubt as to whom I will vote for has been John McCain, who in the past weeks has smashed his own facade of character and integrity, and exhibited breathtaking recklessness in choosing Sarah Palin. The nicer and more complimentary Bill Clinton is toward McCain, the less weight his endorsement has with me, and it's approaching the negative numbers.
It's just as well if Obama doesn't find himself politically indebted to the Clintons. Neither Bill nor Hillary can be trusted to serve loyally as Secretary of State, while appointing Hillary to the Supreme Court would give her enemies a field day and waste Obama's capital on someone who lacks judicial temperament anyway. I'm disappointed that my generation has given America no better presidents than Clinton and G.W., but I'm quite ready to let go of both of them.
September 29, 2008 3:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Like McCain, he can't look at Barack, metaphorically in Bill's case. It's very od bag manufacturers
September 1, 2010 9:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
religious sect may degenerate into a political faction,' wrote James Madison, but the new American nation would nevertheless be protected against the ungovernable combination of religious fervor and political power as long as the Constitution prohibited the federal government from establishing any particular creed as preeminent.
Egitim | Chat
March 2, 2011 12:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
This information is very useful! Thanks!
Best regards, Katya, CEO of hyper v server download, clariion iscsi
April 5, 2011 3:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Si vous etes interesses par le dossier, ou desirez en savoir plus, contactez-moi par mail, et je vous mettrai en contact.
Best regards,Jane, CEO of exchange high availability
April 29, 2011 10:54 AM | Reply | Permalink