Thanks for your patience and sorry for the inconvenience!

Best regards, Mary CEO of youtube downloader free

peaceMF,

Incredibly good job of twisting what I posted. My point was clear, neither person should be able to force parenthood upon the other. Palin's daughter would still maintain the ultimate choice of what to do with her pregancy and her body, but the "he" who "got her pregnant" (since, like all women, she is only a victim and never an active participant!) would also be able to choose whether he would be a parent to that child or immediately relinguish all parental rights or reponsibilities. He would have to immediately make his decision, since her decision may be dependent upon what he decides. She could complete the pregnancy, or terminate it, regardless of the input from his decision since it is still her body and he can no more force his decision on her than she can force her's upon him. This is NOT complicated, in-spite of efforts of some to make it so.

Thanks for your response. I thought maybe I was losing it or simply had lost my ability to communicate. Yep, "put up or shut up" is one way to put it - create a moral obligation on the part of the father upfront, then if the courts need to get involved later to force him to meet his obligations, they have a basis for their reasoning. A child would also benefit from having two voluntarily committed parents.