« It Takes Everything: Unifying Two Approaches | Home | Brother Can You Paradigm? »

Obama's Jews

user-pic

Barack Obama is still leading among Jews 2 to 1, and pundits are still telling us that this is a sign of weakness: that historic levels of support among Jews, 3 (or even 4) to 1, are needed to win Florida and Pennsylvania; and that Obama's not going to get there unless he's willing to be as "Zionist" as McCain.

There are too many misconceptions in this analysis to be dealt with here. (I try to lay them out more fully in the current Harper's.) But it is meanwhile worth having another look at this penetrating Gerstein-Agne poll, conducted for the rising J Street Lobby. It suggests that Jews are seriously divided: that the vast majority, around 70%, are more or less liberal, opposed the Iraq war, and want to see the US pressure Israelis and Palestinians into a peace deal; while our most prominent Jewish leaders, in AIPAC, the Council of Presidents, and the World Jewish Congress, tend to promote the agenda of the 20-25% who identify with conservative politics, and would never vote for Obama no matter what he does.

The poll suggests, in other words, that Jews will have less of an impact on the Obama campaign than it will have on them. For its raises the question of why, and how long, American Jews will continue to tolerate its own leadership.

And the question is the more intriguing since the most progressive Jews seem most generous to both Jewish community organizations and political campaigns. I asked Jim Gerstein, who conducted the J Street poll, to run the relevant numbers. He wrote me back, generously: "Among 'liberals,' 51% contribute to Jewish organizations and charities no different from the overall sample; 50% contribute to political campaigns, 8 pts. higher than the overall sample. Among 'progressives,' however, 56% contribute to Jewish organizations and charities (4 pts. higher than the overall sample); while 63 percent contribute to political campaigns, a remarkable 21 pts. higher than the overall sample."

Jews, I need not add, have means: over a third earn $100,000 or more. So if you assume that the Obama campaign has the trappings of a liberal movement, you have to wonder if the Jewish majority is not on a collision course with the organizational leaders who purport to represent Jewish interests. This collision seems imminent if Obama wins, but seems the more inevitable if he loses--and loses in part because of the solidarity between McCain's forces and a deceptively prominent Jewish right.


25 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

What kind of an idiot goes before AIPAC and comes out for an undivided Jerusalem? And then attempts to retract it as depending on negotiation between the parties?

Jews I need hardly say are well educated and for any body who is remotely familiar with the Mideast situation a statement like that should have started multiple alarm bells ringing before it was spoken.

Similarly, Obama aggravated the situation with Pakistan by announcing that he would violate Pakistani sovereignity if need be.

Unclear and provocative statements are not the hall mark of mature judgment and an ability to bring people together.

Pandering statements of that type are a hallmark of a politician desperate to get elected and lacking in principle.

The division in Jewish support may not fall along liberal versus conservative lines with respect to Obama but rather on clear sighted realism versus wishful thinking about who Obama is.

user-pic

I don't understand your position. Are you for or against an undivided Jerusalem? I assume you are for McCain. What, if anything, about his positions/actions on Israel and the Middle East do you prefer? A little clarity would be nice.

I am Jewish, pro-Israel, and for a negotiated settlement that necessarily will involve dividing or "sharing" Jerusalem. I am also a strong Obama supporter. I wish he hadn't said what he did to AIPAC, but he's trying to win an election, and unfortunately all serious presidential candidates pander to AIPAC. Are you seriously saying McCain is more honest than Obama?

user-pic

AJM, I have no comment on Jerusalem, but as for going cross border into Pakistan; well it all depends on the circumstances. Obama said if we have actionable intelligence he'd do it. I agree.

If Pakistan is ignoring people like Osama in their territory and we know these people are there we need to put Pakistan on notice, you do them or we will.

Didn't Israel bomb Iraq's nuke site? Didn't Israel invade Lebanon?

Violating sovereignty seems to depend on who's ox is being gored

user-pic

JohnW,
Yes. I couldn't fail to disagree with you less.
z2v

user-pic


What did zeno just say?

user-pic

Hell, if I know. I like to say that and I keep hoping someone will explain it to me so I'll know what I mean.

"Key West resident Joelna Marcus received a phone call today. She was asked if she is Jewish, and she replied in the affirmative.

She was asked if she was religious.

She was then asked if her opinion of Barack Obama would change if she knew that Obama had given lots and lots of money to the PLO."

SOURCE- http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/09/15/rovian-push-polling-in-florida-links-obama-to-plo

"It suggests that Jews are seriously divided: that the vast majority, around 70%... want to see the US pressure Israelis and Palestinians into a peace deal; while our most prominent Jewish leaders, in AIPAC, the Council of Presidents, and the World Jewish Congress, tend to promote the agenda of the 20-25% who identify with conservative politics, and would never vote for Obama no matter what he does."

Avishai

Where the hell do you get the idea, you stupid jerk, that 70% of American Jews favor "pressure" on Israel to make concessions to Hamas. Let J Street run a poll that asks American Jewish respondents if they would favor a cutoff of U.S. economic and military aid to Israel--aid that J Street says it supports--if Israel does not accept an American imposed peace plan. What percentage of respondents in such a poll would agree with that--10, 20, 30? You don't know what you are talking about.

Why don't you take the next El Al flight back to Lod, go and live in Ramallah, and do your idiotic blogging from that veritable peaceful democracy.

I am a proud AIPAC member and have given more to Barack Obama than 98% of his contributors. I did so because I am a lifelong Democrat, convinced that Barack Obama and the people around him understand what happened to that asshole Carter in 1980, and I am confident that he won't do likewise if he becomes President (and besides Joe Biden would quit as V.P. if he ever tried to). AIPAC leadership isn't on a collision course with the vast majority of American Jews--it's on a collision course with feckless naifs like you and Rosenberg and Levy who think the way to stop Hamas and Hezbollah from killing Israelis is to play nice. WELL FUCK THAT!

user-pic

apacdolt missing the I,
Is that the Jimmy Carter that brokered a peace treaty between Israel and Egypt? I think there was another country but I don't want to google something everyone here knows except me. As I asked you elsewhere, what is your final solution to the Palestinian problem?
cheers,
z2v

Dr Avishai and other "progressive" Jews constantly take polls like this one which supposedly says that "70% of American Jews want US pressure on Israel and the Palestinians in order to reach an agreement", and then unjustifiably extrapolate them to mean that 70% of American Jews want one sided pressure on Israel to make the concessions these "progressives" want, such as dividing (which means "destroying") Jerusalem. How do you know that is what the 70% wants. Do they want "equal" pressure on both sides, or do they want the pressure primarily on the Palestinians?

The fact is most American Jews are not that knowledgable about Israel and what is going on there and they are willing to let the Israeli gov't and official groups like AIPAC speak for them. AIPAC is NOT a "right-wing" organization, "progressive" types like Martin Indyk and MJ Rosenberg have come out of it. It supports the so-called (unattainable) "2-state" solution, however, this does NOT mean they want all the pressure on Israel to achieve it, particularly if it will harm Israel's security. I do not belong to AIPAC nor do I particularly support it and everything it does, but I think most American Jews accept its role.
There is VERY big money on the side of "progressive" Jews, so there is nothing from stopping them from setting up a rival "progressive" organization, except the lack of mass support.

user-pic

Forgive me if I double post because I was responding to AJM's comment and I think I lost it in the editing phase.

My anecdotal evidence and "Jewdar" tells me that there will be little if any erosion of the traditional overwhelming support in the Jewish community for the Democratic candidate. I get that from Mom and Dad and their merry band of Florida retirees down at the ole' Wynmoor Village in Coconut Creek, Florida (just north of Fort Lauderdale in the belly of the beast of Jewish retirement heaven). They smell bad stuff in the economy and my Dad, who more than most other Jews of his generation, has pulled the GOP lever, is one of those folks who is outraged by the selection of Governor Palin and is convinced that we need to change course this year. I see no erosion down in the Sunshine State (although I'm skeptical that's going to give us Florida)


Up here on the Upper Westside in the center of the world, you won't find a McCain button for miles of course. Out on Long Island, my old 6:30 a.m. minyan buddies are, by and large, going to vote for McCain, but they're a minority and they're the guys who voted for the GOP in 2000 and 2004. No change there.

The moral of the story: folks like MJ Rosenberg can make believe that he is the only enlightened Jewish guy who recognizes the right of Israel to exist and doesn't hate black people at the same time (I focus on MJ because that's who Josh has slotted to opine on all things Israel and Jewish and he has said some pretty harsh things about the people whom he makes a living off of), but most of my brothers and sisters in the American Jewish community know which way to go this November (even those who have been to Israel on one of those packaged tours ;)). I say 74 percent of the American Jewish community goes with Obama, and that's not bad for a bunch of scared, ignorant Israel-first bigots, as guys like MJ likes to suggest so many of us are.

And that is not all I have to say about that!

user-pic

Hey, its Bruce, or is it Forrest :-)

This comment is not related to anything Dr Avishai said, but rather to an assertion his fellow Jewish "progressive" here, MJ Rosenberg, stated in a thread that has moved way down the list due ot the financial crisis, but I believe it is important.

MJ complained that the Israeli press gets upset if "one Jewish kid is killed but it ignores the hundreds of Palestinian kids killed each week". The following quote is from Bassam Eid, a Palestinian human rights worker in today's Jerusalem Post:
-------------------------------------------

In August one Palestinian was killed by Israel whereas 36 were killed by other Palestinians. Since the Hamas takeover of Gaza in June 2007, 282 Palestinians have been killed by gunfire, 43 died of unknown causes, one was beaten to death, seven fell victim to so-called honor killings and one Palestinian was legally executed (the numbers of the West Bank are 19, three, eight, four, four).

-------------------------------------------

In addition today, in Gaza, 11 people were killed in gun battles between the HAMAS forces and the Dughmush clan.

user-pic

YBD,

In addition today, in Gaza, 11 people were killed in gun battles between the HAMAS forces and the Dughmush clan.

Without delving into the history there, when I look at what's going on between the Israelis and Palestinians, the ongoing death and destruction,
who's solution seems intractable, I see the same thing happening to the United States in Iraq.

The people that gave us Bush/Cheney and all that has wrought are back and trying to give us McCain/Palin, Heaven forbid.

I'm saddened by what is happening to the Israelis, the Palestinians, the Iraqis and to us.

user-pic

It is fair to say that in "attitude to Israel", there is scant difference between Democrats and Republicans, there is some difference in "approach", and scant evidence that McCain's approach is better.

So other issues will matter more to the majority of Jews. Economical status may pull them toward GOP, education -- away, "social issues", away, away, away.

As far as "pressuring Israel" is concerned, this is a subtle issue. Inside Israel, there is a majority that would favor more accomodation with Palestinians, but without much fervor, plus a large and fervent opposition. The majority could welcome "pressure". For example, pressure to dismantle settlements that Israel's government regards as illegal -- but supports even so.

It is important to remember, all Presidents of the US follow the same policy regarding the Arab/Israeli conflict....all Presidents want an Israeli withdrawal more or less to the pre-67 lines, and view the so-called "Palestinian right of return" (the reall killer issue, as I see it) as a matter to be negotiated between the sides. Each President, upon realizing that no agreement is possible on these terms, must then engage in "conflict management". McCain has stated that his two prime foreign policy gurus are James Baker and Henry Kissinger, neither of which has much love for Israel, so I do not view McCain as ultimately being more "pro-Israel" (which is a bad thing from the point of view of "progressives" like MJ Rosenberg) than Obama. The main differences would be in relations with countries peripheral to Israel, such as Syria, Iran, Iraq, etc.

user-pic

Bernard:

I have been meaning to come back to the issue you raise in your post concerning whether we are poised on some kind of collision course involving progressive Jews and "mainstream" Jewish organizations. I will assume for the sake of argument that AIPAC et al. are at odds with the vast majority of the American Jewish community that votes Democratic. This is a reality, however, that did not come to fruition during the instant election cycle, but rather is reflective of a disconnect between most major Jewish organizations and American Jews for quite some time I'd submit. Indeed, I've been hearing about and candidly agreeing that there is a need for a new course etc. etc. since I was a teenager in the 70s.

So why has there not been the type of collision you predict? The answer is one of trust I think, and that is that, given the desires of most American Jews for a more "even-handed" approach to Middle East affairs, there is a vacuum between the devil the rank and file knows (i.e. AIPAC et al.) versus the devils the rank and file don't know and don't trust. That is, the J Street Projects of the world are few and far between and have not sent an alternative message that resonates with most American Jews who think about Israel.

The American Jewish community, or a great swath of it, is in need of members of its own community who convey a real understanding and respect for the affinity that American Jews have for the State of Israel. They need to know they can trust the folks who say that Israel can and does do wrong and lots of it. The folks on the left for the most part don't fit that bill; the Jewish left lacks voices that reach out and do not ridicule their more conventional Jewish brothers and sisters.

Like all American voters who vote with their gut for the politicians they think they can trust, American Jews react in the same way. It's all about trust, and the alternative Jewish voices can and should come to terms with this reality at some point.

Thanks for your thought-provoking and rationally presented post. I think you get the need for the trust that I'm talking about.

Bruce

user-pic

Dear Bruce,

I think you're on to something very important here. Though I'm on the left side of the equation, I felt this same divide--inability to communicate--back in the day when my little leftie group tried to interact with the Jewish establishment. And it wasn't over Israel, but over civil rights, etc. To them, we weren't very Jewish (I don't think) or very responsible. To us, they were shallow, materialistic and not very concerned with anything beyond "their little Jewish world."

And yet, somehow, staring each other down across the table, we knew we were related. We just couldn't communicate very well. We were always trying to guilt-trip into supporting something or other and calling them names. And they were doing whatever they were doing. Not taking us very seriously as Jews, I suspect. And maybe they were right, in a way.

What you're saying--or what I'm getting from it--is that to many establishment Jews, these new organizations don't feel very Jewish and are led and populated by people who are nominal Jews, but not real Jews. Maybe, even, traitors to their people or willing to betray them. There's no level of comfort that these ersatz Jews won't "give away the store" or pursue a course of action that isn't particularly Jewish.

So trust is the key word, I agree.

That said, presumably these new organizations could command the following of many millions of progressively-oriented Jews. Except that, I'm not sure the vast majority of them identify with a Jewish community per se. Yes; they see themselves as Jews, but they don't necessarily think of themselves as belonging to a Jewish COMMUNITY except in a theoretical way.

user-pic

Peter:

So nice to hear from you. I think we are on the precise wavelength. That's a good thing.

All the best.

Bruce

user-pic
70% .. want to see the US pressure Israelis
What are you smoking, Bernard? Do you have any data to support your claim?

How do you say "Yes, We Can" in Yiddish?

They say "Ms Tzipi Livni had run a successful Barack Obama-style campaign as the candidate for change, while Mr Mofaz was seen as less likely to commit to any of the compromises that backers of a swift peace accord deem necessary to end decades of conflict."

"Male rivals have called Livni "weak" and "that woman." And there is talk about ultra-Orthodox Jewish lawmakers being uncomfortable with the idea of a female leader. Livni has played down the gender issue. "The fact that I'm a woman doesn't make me a weak leader," she told the Jerusalem Post last week. "I have no problem pulling the trigger when necessary."

user-pic

Better late than never.

Of all crazy places, I found the full version of Bernard Avishai's Harper's column on a thread on Josh Landis "Syria Comment".

Extended excerpt follows. It's a must read in toto:

"For the Jewish right, then, there was a universal Jewish vulnerability that required a universal Jewish toughness. It was as if there were an ongoing referendum on the virtue of Jewish power, whose implicit foils were Great Society initiatives at home and United Nations’ resolutions abroad. When Ronald Reagan was elected, neoconservatives joined the revolution and pro-Israel leaders cozied up to the administration. Liberalism, which purports to mitigate conflict, was viewed as a kind of schlemiel faith in the conscience of the world. And after 9/11, if you were managing the brand of the West’s key strategic asset, the “clash of civilizations” became useful.

This rhetoric has become entrenched among Jewish leaders. Local Jewish federations have more or less succeeded in sustaining a big tent, but after thirty years of Israeli governments that increased by tenfold Jewish settlements on the West Bank, the most activist leaders drifted to the right. Too often, Jerusalem has seemed for many Jewish leaders not a mythic object of desire but a kind of world-historical Epcot Center, while Israel has seemed something between a bastion against gentile hatred and a great Jewish convention to which they imagine themselves superdelegates. Supporting this leadership, aside from the Orthodox, are recent Russian-Jewish immigrants, free-market radicals, Joe Lieberman admirers, and some considerable part of the half a million Israelis living in America.

The point is, most Jews identify not with Lieberman but with Jon Stewart’s send-ups of Lieberman. One recent poll showed Obama almost twice as popular as Lieberman among Jews. Yet this majority has never confronted their rightist leadership—not, at least, within the precincts of institutional politics—because to do so would have meant engaging in the very parochialism most wished to distance themselves from. Besides, why embarrass Israelis, who were making sacrifices American Jews were not? What did American Jews really know of Israel’s politics and perils anyway? What did they know of Hebrew culture? The majority poured their energies into their universities, their professions, their families—that is, into their America.

This indifference is just what the current election must begin to change. Rightist notions like “the global war on terror” have shown how Israel’s conflicts are consonant with America’s. The Israeli government’s ambivalence about ending its occupation, its default to military force, its tensions with Iran, etc., have seemed a kind of U.S. policy agenda in microcosm. And if America approaches its Middle East problems, as Obama insists it must, not with military preemption but with an emphasis on collective security, patient alliances, containment, the power of the global economy, and so forth, how can this not imply a verdict on Israeli occupation?"

http://joshualandis.com/blog/?p=876&cp=2#comments

@ comment #12

And Tzipi Livni is the new leader of Kadima and closer to becoming Israel's PM........

user-pic

Now this is the old lally I know and absolutely appreciate. Thanks so much for posting this. Respectfully, I just don't think the hearts and minds of the great swath of American Jewry is at all influenced by arguments that equate concerns about the security of Israel or the survival of the Jewish people, with neoconservative and imperialist American foreign policy. And I write this while recognizing and appreciating the parallels being drawn in Avishai's compelling piece that you cite to. Remember, MJ Rosenberg is not the only American Jew who loves the State of Israel and hates the Occupation.

Simply put, the majority of American Jews are good and decent progressives, but they will not take kindly to the kinds of parallels being drawn by Avishai. There will have to be another way to bridge the gap; these dogs won't hunt. The essential concerns of American Jewry, rightly or wrongly, are deep and virtually inpenetrable and reinforced by the uniform and worldwide criticisms and isolation of the State of Israel, even when those criticisms are justified. It sounds no different to American Jews, I submit, when the criticisms come from inside America's borders, even when the critics have a bar or bat mitzvah under their belts.

I hate to be redundant, but logic is one thing, and trust is another. One of these things has to be earned.

In any event, we don't always agree lally, but nobody addresses these issues as well and as comprehensively as you do. Nice work.

Bruce

user-pic

second sentence should read: ". . .ARE [not is] influenced . . ."

user-pic

Bruce.

I'm sorry if I wasn't clear enough, but the excerpt I posted was from Avishai's full article in Harpers; his words, not mine. I don't know enough about the issues to begin to address them in anything other than a superficial, ancedotal manner.

Which is why I have been uncharacteristically mute on this issue. Sometimes, I do know when I don't know WTF I'm talking about....

My beef with "progressive" activist American Jews is that their support for their embattled Israeli compadres seems miniscule when compared to the influence of the usual suspects from the Right. I don't understand the reluctance unless it's linked to the outdated "policy" of not discussing Israel's dirty laundry in public ie not in front of the goyim.

Bruce, just an ironic note re Livni's election. Did you know the Arthur Finkelstein came out of retirement to run Mofaz' campaign and that the infamous "3am phone call" meme was used against her? BTW, Hillary called Tzipi to congratulate her on her victory.

Leave a comment

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »

Inside Cafe



Cafe Features


January 5-9

Book Cover

January 12-16

Book Cover

January 19-23

Book Cover

January 26-30

Book Cover

February 2-6

Book Cover

February 9-13

The Great Depression

February 16-20

Tear Down This Myth

February 23-27

Demagogue

March 16-20

Engaging The Muslim World




Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Claire Wilcox



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address