As Treasury Sows, So Shall It Reap
Once the Treasury bailed out Bear Stearns with government guarantees, the next buyer of a major US financial institution might expect similar help. Barclay's was the last likely buyer of Lehman Brothers. Earlier today, it announced that without the US taxpayers putting their money on the line, Barclay's isn't interested in buying.
We can debate whether the government should have bailed out Bear Stearns, but surely the current mess tells us one thing we should not have done: Bail out Bear Stearns and then return to business-as-usual. So long as the only tool the government seems to have to halt this crisis is a bailout, then we are in trouble. More bailouts will be needed, and, at some point, even the American taxpayer can't handle it.
Bailouts will not put a stop to the underlying problem: we can't find a bottom in the housing market. Until that happens, the value of financial instruments based on those mortgage obligations will keep falling, and the worldwide market will keep sliding toward collapse.
Worse yet, so long as the government uses bailouts, the financial institutions have an incentive to sit on the sidelines in dealing with homeowners. There's less reason for them to take their hits for bad mortgage investments if they believe that the government may bail them out.
What will it take to put a bottom in the housing market? We have a lot of evidence now that the foreclosure approach isn't going to do it, and the voluntary rewrite-the-mortgage approach won't either. Instead, we need a serious program to write down mortgages to an affordable level, and sort out which families can afford to stay in the homes and which families need to move out. That was the Durbin/Miller proposal to change the bankruptcy laws, but the mortgage industry shut down the idea. So far no one has another idea that would accomplish the same end. Without a plan to deal with bad mortgages more efficiently and to sort out who can afford houses and who cannot, we can't find the bottom on the market and get this crisis behind us.
Bailouts--without serious changes designed to deal with the problem that are causing the collapse--won't work. I hope the Treasury and the Federal Reserve won't give in. If they do, they will reap the bitter harvest of an ever-worsening financial crisis.
It is time to plant different seeds.















I'm a psychologist. I can't really add to your comment. But thanks. I'm all for reality-testing.
September 14, 2008 7:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought it was the market's job to sort out who stays and who gets the boot; pay your mortgage or out you go. If that doesn't work then the owner of the mortgage can always negociate with the mortgagee. Who better understands his financial condition? Get the politicians involved and you'll see corruption on a monumental scale; favoritism, nepotism, bribery, whatever.
That's the standard line, anyway. What am I missing?
September 14, 2008 7:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey OTY: Good to see you...
"you'll see corruption on a monumental scale"...
I think the new corruption can't be worse than what got us here. Namely, the politicians got involved by deregulating the finance industry, and turning a blind eye to the predatory lending & stoking of "house lust" that caused this FUBAR fiasco.
I think Prof. Warren is suggesting finding a soft landing for the mortgage crash by finding the solution through the perspective of the consumers, and not the lenders.
And I like it.
After all, consumer confidence is shattered. Consumers actually drive the US economy, and if you destroy/demoralize them with crushing debt, we've destroyed our economic engine.
Trust in markets is shattered. I believe we're fighting to restore nothing less than the "Full Faith & Credit of the US Government." Trust can be restored if -- for once -- Government sides with Barney Smith instead of SmithBarney.
September 14, 2008 11:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
@ Wade Boggs
If she can find a soft landing, I'd sure like to see the details. God knows we need it.
September 14, 2008 11:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe Liz is still up and can give more details... (Lord knows I'm no lawyer...)
The Debt Market/Bubble caused this problem, not the Housing Market/Bubble.
If I understand her correctly, she's saying we should call a time-out, and put a debt forgiveness plan in place. ie - Everyone in distressed contracts agrees their house is worth $50,000 less now, so the mortgage will be recalibrated to that new price as of x date. (Maybe I'm way off, but that's how I see this post...)
I'm just so intriqued by this idea. Like L. Warren and Dave Ramsey and others, I see consumer debt as the poison pill threatening to dismantle our economy. I envision that one day, government will have to through out contract law (when it comes to the bear trap Credit Card contracts at least) and rule against CC Companies in favor of the American public. Massive Debt forgiveness. Sacrificing the CC Companies and Predatory Lenders in favor of the common good / public / consumer / the Republic.
September 14, 2008 11:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I also hope Obama ties the mortgage crisis to his tax cut plan. This chart is the best explanation I've seen: http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/taxplans/
To my mind, he should say:
""""The debate is over. There are bigger tax cuts for the Middle Class under my plan. Hands down. Slam dunk. My plan is exactly what this economy needs: A stabilized middle class making stable mortgage payments again. Even Greenspan agrees:
"Greenspan: America Can't Afford McCain's Tax Plan... "I'm Not In Favor Of Financing Tax Cuts With Borrowed Money".""""
September 14, 2008 11:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
But a bailout is what we'll probably see:
Lehman: more socialising the losses of the rich
http://www.eurotrib.com/?op=displaystory;sid=2008/9/14/13725/4238
Not that they need much provocation, but the term "total financial meltdown" tends to resonate throughout the peak oil doomer community:
Life After the Oil Crash: We're at Impact
http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/BreakingNews.html
September 14, 2008 7:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is unfortunate, but it should serve as a wake up call to all American investors. If you want to protect your money, you need to diversify and invest at least some of it overseas. These are hard times for American investing firms. I personally use offshore bank accounts and they have helped me with diversification and asset protection. If you want to read more on why offshore investing is smarter, feel free to visit my website.
Best,
Frank Miller
http://www.theoffshorebankaccount.com
September 14, 2008 8:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
JDSalinger: Phil Gramm probably loves your website. Unlike the Republicans, I still care about America, so I'll invest here and pay my taxes here. Thanks, but no thanks.
September 14, 2008 11:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
September 14, 2008 8:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
airgun177,
So you're in favor of foreclosure. To drive down the value of neighbors' homes? To punish the unrighteous? It's easy to tell that you're paid by the post, not the word. And you are my b.... .
Cheers,
z2v
September 14, 2008 11:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Both offensiveto you and shooter242 rightly point out that left to its own devices, the market and the law of contracts (mortgage foreclosures) will act to find us a bottom in the housing market. And I agree.
Unfortunately, Bush, Paulson, Bernanke and Geithner don't and have done everything they could think of to interfere with the market. From the time of the first Fed Funds rate cut to the Bear Stearns bailout on to the establishment of Bernanke's "facilities" up to the recent take-over of Freddie and Fannie, the men with the power have been bailing like crazy.
So you two --
Since "bailing" is the word of the day, should we be bailing out the banks and securitized loan investors or making them take their haircuts and directing our attention to helping homeowners.
I don't think the question -- "Which side are you on, boys" -- can be avoided.
September 14, 2008 10:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ellen,
o2u is a person, disagreeing, but getting better. airgun177 is a sock puppet with multiple Atwater descendants inserting their paws.
Your comments are reasonable, but maybe more than the addressees deserve.
z2v
September 14, 2008 11:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is the Republicans that are believers in Socialized Business.
Let them pay not taxes when they are outrageously profitable,
but bail them out when they are in distress.
Keep business alive but let human being die could be the mantra of the Republicans!
We now know the Republicans are the Socialists, but only for the Rich.
September 14, 2008 11:58 PM | Reply | Permalink