TPMCafe
« Charlie Gibson's War | Home | Israel: "Peace? Thanks, But No Thanks" »

Democracy and Media

user-pic

All Americans obtain the greatest part of their news and information about national events from the television, including broadcast and media. The television content is informed to a large degree from the major newspapers, and many papers own some television businesses. So by the mainstream media or MSM, we mean the large conglomerates that, across newspapers and television cable and broadcast outlets, provide the largest share of news and information to Americans.

And my goodness is that MSM sabotaging democracy. By far, this is the worst election coverage in the history of electronic media.

The primary problem is that the MSM has virtually en masse decided that the election is a celebrity feud, Entertainment Tonight, verbal WWF, high school hallway shoving match -- and that both truth and the direction of America are quite irrelevant to the sheer fun of broadcasting each twist and turn of the name calling emanating largely from the McCain camp.

The effect of this dizzying descent into triviality is that the dazed voter cannot have the remotest idea, for instance, that if he votes for McCain he is voting against the fellow who has promised a large tax cut --- unless that voter is making more than a quarter of a million dollars a year, and hardly anyone is in that category. Americans now are being told on a daily basis by the MSM that Obama would raise their taxes, when in fact he would cut them.

The MSM asserts that they don't tell anything, they just broadcast what the candidates say. But they don't broadcast what the candidates say; they select from what the candidates say and they sell time to allow the candidates to say anything. In the selection and the sale of time, they create a narrative. They know it; and any watcher gets it. And the narratives that are patched together are now almost completely divorced from reality.

We are having a democratic election about sock puppets, fictional images created by a combination of advertising and willing encouragement of falsehoods on the part of the MSM. People are being told by the MSM in effect to vote against their own interests and vote instead on the basis of emotional reactions to catch phrases and visual images. It is a jet fighter and a comely lass with a dead moose against a basketball player and a guy with a family. So the airplane and the dead animal are leading.

The remedy is quite available: the MSM actually does have a duty to do some intermediation. Call a lie a lie. Do some homework. Ask follow up questions, not silly gotchas like what is a doctrine. Decline to run lies even if they are paid for.


7 Comments

| Leave a comment

LOL. And I suppose folks like you in the blogosphere have no responsibility to do the same? Consider this verbal image....

It is a jet fighter and a comely lass with a dead moose against a basketball player and a guy with a family. So the airplane and the dead animal are leading.

I'd say that demonstrates that you are doing pretty much what you think the MSM shouldn't.
and that both truth and the direction of America are quite irrelevant to the sheer fun of broadcasting each twist and turn of the name calling emanating largely from the McCain camp.

In my world that's called hypocrisy. If you don't like it, don't do it.

user-pic

You are implicitly assuming that the MSM wants to remain neutral in the election, so a failure to do adequate reporting is a failure of their mission.

But the MSM is part of the corporate power structure that actually runs this country. They are not neutral, they support policies that are most similar to stated GOP positions, that's why in most elections the vast preponderance of corporate giving goes to Republican candidates. (In this election some of them are hedging their bets because they realize they may have to play ball with a Dem majority.)

GE, owns NBC and is a major military supplier. Murdoch owns Fox and a number of other outlets and is seeking a waiver of rules to limit media consolidation. Disney managed to get the Mickey Mouse copyright law passed which limits the free use of previously published material.

Walmart, being typically ham handed, has been running indoctrination sessions for its employees saying explicitly that a Dem government would lead to better labor laws and harm their business.

The Dems, even while being demonized by the right, are hardly any better. The cost of elections means that most legislators are beholding to corporate money as well. The only real difference between the parties is that the Dems are willing to spend a bit more on social programs and do some minor fiddling with marginal tax rates.

If the MSM did its "job" people would start to realize that neither party is looking after their real interests and then where would the carefully crafted American myth be?

user-pic

Well Thank you, Reed.

You could take it to the next step or two, rdf is quite right that the pretense of neutrality is a sour joke that only idiots believe.

Yet I still say Thank You, Reed, because all day yesterday as I scurried around in my relatively low-paid but union job trying to fake a performance on all the tasks management will never give us the hours to really accomplish, I was saying to myself ..."At what point can we say that the MSM is the greatest obstacle to democracy in America?"

For me, that point was somewhere back before the infamous night of Nov. 7, 2000 ... yet I am so glad to wake up today and see Reed's words here.

Now the rest of it up to us. PUSH BACK.

Spread the word that rdf is spreading. Unplug your friends TV sets, cut their cable if you have to. Smash the windows of businesses that advertise on the MSM (and let them know why). Call the advertiser's national headquarters over and over over, call the media companies over and over and over (or write postal mail, email is useless), scream at your D. congress-critters to get some real reforms going, and especially write letters to your local print media (even if they're just as bad, they might eventually print it because of their loss of market share to the broadcasters and narrow-casters).

If we let McCain win and the MSM spread its crap[ unchallenged, America will never be free and prosperous again, I really believe that.

Spread the word, the broadcast media are the greatest obstacle to democracy, freedom and prosperity in America, and the greatest obstacle to a better future for the world as whole.

user-pic

Well Thank you, Reed.

You could take it to the next step or two, rdf is quite right that the pretense of neutrality is a sour joke that only idiots believe.

Yet I still say Thank You, Reed, because all day yesterday as I scurried around in my relatively low-paid but union job trying to fake a performance on all the tasks management will never give us the hours to really accomplish, I was saying to myself ..."At what point can we say that the MSM is the greatest obstacle to democracy in America?"

For me, that point was somewhere back before the infamous night of Nov. 7, 2000 ... yet I am so glad to wake up today and see Reed's words here.

Now the rest of it up to us. PUSH BACK.

Spread the word that rdf is spreading. Unplug your friends TV sets, cut their cable if you have to. Smash the windows of businesses that advertise on the MSM (and let them know why). Call the advertiser's national headquarters over and over over, call the media companies over and over and over (or write postal mail, email is useless), scream at your D. congress-critters to get some real reforms going, and especially write letters to your local print media (even if they're just as bad, they might eventually print it because of their loss of market share to the broadcasters and narrow-casters).

If we let McCain win and the MSM spread its crap[ unchallenged, America will never be free and prosperous again, I really believe that.

Spread the word, the broadcast media are the greatest obstacle to democracy, freedom and prosperity in America, and the greatest obstacle to a better future for the world as whole.

There is much frustration and worry being expressed about the present state of news reporting and analysis. The whole lipstick on a pig media diversion has peaked this concern for me. As Obama said, it was like cat-nip for the media.

This, of course, is not a new situation. The value of news reporting to our democracy has been eroding steadily for years. The press has a unique role in our democracy. So much so, that are granted specific protection under the Constitution, the only profession to be granted such. The press must stand apart from influences beyond serving that protected role, from serving the public.

The problem seems to have begun with the free-market polices of Ronald Reagan. His policies allowed the consolidation of news media in to large and few media empires, such as Newscorp and Clear Channel and also within large conglomerates such as GE, Microsoft, and Disney. The problem hasn't just been Reagan either. Those policies have been continued by every president since.
Throw in the elimination of the fairness doctrine and we had a recipe for the dramatic diminishing of the critical public service value of the "Fourth Estate".

I believe the answer to the nearly useless state of the press, especially TV news, is that we need a reversal of those Reagan policies. I'm talking about drastic measures here. I'm talking about an anti-trust style reverse consolidation. Why is that necessary? Because news departments today are driven to maximize their contribution to the corporate bottom line. They used to be permitted to operate at a loss in performing their Constitutionally protected public service role. This is the root of the problem.

The natural pressure to contribute profits to large corporate parents, who themselves have shareholders breathing down their necks, is the force behind the problem. News show producers have discovered (as have TV entertainment show producers) that reality programs are the most profitable form of TV programming. What is the key to every successful reality show? It's conflict.

Conflict creates drama, which creates entertainment, which creates viewers, which creates profits. Conflict = Profits.

That's why the news has become so useless. They are more interested in creating and sustaining conflict than in public service. They are now totally profit driven. Yes, there are also ideological elements at play, most obviously at Fox News, but ideology doesn't explain the behavior of all the other news organizations.

Maybe, solving this problem doesn't require a massive reverse consolidation of news organizations. Maybe, there's a better way.

Please note: The above comment is repeated here from a previous post of mine.

Allegory of the Cave (Plato, Republic(


Socrates] And now, I said, let me show in a figure how far our nature is enlightened or unenlightened: --Behold! human beings living in a underground cave, which has a mouth open towards the light and reaching all along the cave; here they have been from their childhood, and have their legs and necks chained so that they cannot move, and can only see before them, being prevented by the chains from turning round their heads. Above and behind them a fire is blazing at a distance, and between the fire and the prisoners there is a raised way; and you will see, if you look, a low wall built along the way, like the screen which marionette players have in front of them, over which they show the puppets.
[Glaucon] I see.
[Socrates] And do you see, I said, men passing along the wall carrying all sorts of vessels, and statues and figures of animals made of wood and stone and various materials, which appear over the wall? Some of them are talking, others silent.
[Glaucon] You have shown me a strange image, and they are strange prisoners.
[Socrates] Like ourselves, I replied; and they see only their own shadows, or the shadows of one another, which the fire throws on the opposite wall of the cave?
[Glaucon] True, he said; how could they see anything but the shadows if they were never allowed to move their heads?
[Socrates] And of the objects which are being carried in like manner they would only see the shadows?
[Glaucon] Yes, he said.
[Socrates] And if they were able to converse with one another, would they not suppose that they were naming what was actually before them?
[Glaucon] Very true.
[Socrates] And suppose further that the prison had an echo which came from the other side, would they not be sure to fancy when one of the passers-by spoke that the voice which they heard came from the passing shadow?
[Glaucon] No question, he replied.
[Socrates] To them, I said, the truth would be literally nothing but the shadows of the images.
[Glaucon] That is certain.
[Socrates] And now look again, and see what will naturally follow if the prisoners are released and disabused of their error. At first, when any of them is liberated and compelled suddenly to stand up and turn his neck round and walk and look towards the light, he will suffer sharp pains; the glare will distress him, and he will be unable to see the realities of which in his former state he had seen the shadows; and then conceive some one saying to him, that what he saw before was an illusion, but that now, when he is approaching nearer to being and his eye is turned towards more real existence, he has a clearer vision, -what will be his reply? And you may further imagine that his instructor is pointing to the objects as they pass and requiring him to name them, -will he not be perplexed? Will he not fancy that the shadows which he formerly saw are truer than the objects which are now shown to him?
[Glaucon] Far truer.
[Socrates] And if he is compelled to look straight at the light, will he not have a pain in his eyes which will make him turn away to take and take in the objects of vision which he can see, and which he will conceive to be in reality clearer than the things which are now being shown to him?
[Glaucon] True, he now.
[Socrates] And suppose once more, that he is reluctantly dragged up a steep and rugged ascent, and held fast until he 's forced into the presence of the sun himself, is he not likely to be pained and irritated? When he approaches the light his eyes will be dazzled, and he will not be able to see anything at all of what are now called realities.
[Glaucon] Not all in a moment, he said.
[Socrates] He will require to grow accustomed to the sight of the upper world. And first he will see the shadows best, next the reflections of men and other objects in the water, and then the objects themselves; then he will gaze upon the light of the moon and the stars and the spangled heaven; and he will see the sky and the stars by night better than the sun or the light of the sun by day?
[Glaucon] Certainly.
[Socrates] Last of he will be able to see the sun, and not mere reflections of him in the water, but he will see him in his own proper place, and not in another; and he will contemplate him as he is.
[Glaucon] Certainly.
[Socrates] He will then proceed to argue that this is he who gives the season and the years, and is the guardian of all that is in the visible world, and in a certain way the cause of all things which he and his fellows have been accustomed to behold?
[Glaucon] Clearly, he said, he would first see the sun and then reason about him.
[Socrates] And when he remembered his old habitation, and the wisdom of the cave and his fellow-prisoners, do you not suppose that he would felicitate himself on the change, and pity them?
[Glaucon] Certainly, he would.
[Socrates] And if they were in the habit of conferring honors among themselves on those who were quickest to observe the passing shadows and to remark which of them went before, and which followed after, and which were together; and who were therefore best able to draw conclusions as to the future, do you think that he would care for such honors and glories, or envy the possessors of them? Would he not say with Homer,

Better to be the poor servant of a poor master,

and to endure anything, rather than think as they do and live after their manner?
[Glaucon] Yes, he said, I think that he would rather suffer anything than entertain these false notions and live in this miserable manner.
[Socrates] Imagine once more, I said, such an one coming suddenly out of the sun to be replaced in his old situation; would he not be certain to have his eyes full of darkness?
[Glaucon] To be sure, he said.
[Socrates] And if there were a contest, and he had to compete in measuring the shadows with the prisoners who had never moved out of the cave, while his sight was still weak, and before his eyes had become steady (and the time which would be needed to acquire this new habit of sight might be very considerable) would he not be ridiculous? Men would say of him that up he went and down he came without his eyes; and that it was better not even to think of ascending; and if any one tried to loose another and lead him up to the light, let them only catch the offender, and they would put him to death.
[Glaucon] No question, he said.
[Socrates] This entire allegory, I said, you may now append, dear Glaucon, to the previous argument; the prison-house is the world of sight, the light of the fire is the sun, and you will not misapprehend me if you interpret the journey upwards to be the ascent of the soul into the intellectual world according to my poor belief, which, at your desire, I have expressed whether rightly or wrongly God knows. But, whether true or false, my opinion is that in the world of knowledge the idea of good appears last of all, and is seen only with an effort; and, when seen, is also inferred to be the universal author of all things beautiful and right, parent of light and of the lord of light in this visible world, and the immediate source of reason and truth in the intellectual; and that this is the power upon which he who would act rationally, either in public or private life must have his eye fixed.
[Glaucon] I agree, he said, as far as I am able to understand you.
[Socrates] Moreover, I said, you must not wonder that those who attain to this beatific vision are unwilling to descend to human affairs; for their souls are ever hastening into the upper world where they desire to dwell; which desire of theirs is very natural, if our allegory may be trusted.
[Glaucon] Yes, very natural.
[Socrates] And is there anything surprising in one who passes from divine contemplations to the evil state of man, misbehaving himself in a ridiculous manner; if, while his eyes are blinking and before he has become accustomed to the surrounding darkness, he is compelled to fight in courts of law, or in other places, about the images or the shadows of images of justice, and is endeavoring to meet the conceptions of those who have never yet seen absolute justice?
[Glaucon] Anything but surprising, he replied.
[Socrates] Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eyes are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye; and he who remembers this when he sees any one whose vision is perplexed and weak, will not be too ready to laugh; he will first ask whether that soul of man has come out of the brighter light, and is unable to see because unaccustomed to the dark, or having turned from darkness to the day is dazzled by excess of light. And he will count the one happy in his condition and state of being, and he will pity the other; or, if he have a mind to laugh at the soul which comes from below into the light, there will be more reason in this than in the laugh which greets him who returns from above out of the light into the cave.
[Glaucon] That, he said, is a very just distinction.
[Socrates] But then, if I am right, certain professors of education must be wrong when they say that they can put a knowledge into the soul which was not there before, like sight into blind eyes.
[Glaucon] They undoubtedly say this, he replied.
[Socrates] Whereas, our argument shows that the power and capacity of learning exists in the soul already; and that just as the eye was unable to turn from darkness to light without the whole body, so too the instrument of knowledge can only by the movement of the whole soul be turned from the world of becoming into that of being, and learn by degrees to endure the sight of being, and of the brightest and best of being, or in other words, of the good.
[Glaucon] Very true.
[Socrates] And must there not be some art which will effect conversion in the easiest and quickest manner; not implanting the faculty of sight, for that exists already, but has been turned in the wrong direction, and is looking away from the truth?
[Glaucon] Yes, he said, such an art may be presumed.
[Socrates] And whereas the other so-called virtues of the soul seem to be akin to bodily qualities, for even when they are not originally innate they can be implanted later by habit and exercise, the of wisdom more than anything else contains a divine element which always remains, and by this conversion is rendered useful and profitable; or, on the other hand, hurtful and useless. Did you never observe the narrow intelligence flashing from the keen eye of a clever rogue --how eager he is, how clearly his paltry soul sees the way to his end; he is the reverse of blind, but his keen eyesight is forced into the service of evil, and he is mischievous in proportion to his cleverness.
[Glaucon] Very true, he said.
[Socrates] But what if there had been a circumcision of such natures in the days of their youth; and they had been severed from those sensual pleasures, such as eating and drinking, which, like leaden weights, were attached to them at their birth, and which drag them down and turn the vision of their souls upon the things that are below --if, I say, they had been released from these impediments and turned in the opposite direction, the very same faculty in them would have seen the truth as keenly as they see what their eyes are turned to now.
[Glaucon] Very likely.
[Socrates] Yes, I said; and there is another thing which is likely. or rather a necessary inference from what has preceded, that neither the uneducated and uninformed of the truth, nor yet those who never make an end of their education, will be able ministers of State; not the former, because they have no single aim of duty which is the rule of all their actions, private as well as public; nor the latter, because they will not act at all except upon compulsion, fancying that they are already dwelling apart in the islands of the blest.
[Glaucon] Very true, he replied.
[Socrates] Then, I said, the business of us who are the founders of the State will be to compel the best minds to attain that knowledge which we have already shown to be the greatest of all-they must continue to ascend until they arrive at the good; but when they have ascended and seen enough we must not allow them to do as they do now.
[Glaucon] What do you mean?
[Socrates] I mean that they remain in the upper world: but this must not be allowed; they must be made to descend again among the prisoners in the cave, and partake of their labors and honors, whether they are worth having or not.
[Glaucon] But is not this unjust? he said; ought we to give them a worse life, when they might have a better?
[Socrates] You have again forgotten, my friend, I said, the intention of the legislator, who did not aim at making any one class in the State happy above the rest; the happiness was to be in the whole State, and he held the citizens together by persuasion and necessity, making them benefactors of the State, and therefore benefactors of one another; to this end he created them, not to please themselves, but to be his instruments in binding up the State.
[Glaucon] True, he said, I had forgotten.
[Socrates] Observe, Glaucon, that there will be no injustice in compelling our philosophers to have a care and providence of others; we shall explain to them that in other States, men of their class are not obliged to share in the toils of politics: and this is reasonable, for they grow up at their own sweet will, and the government would rather not have them. Being self-taught, they cannot be expected to show any gratitude for a culture which they have never received. But we have brought you into the world to be rulers of the hive, kings of yourselves and of the other citizens, and have educated you far better and more perfectly than they have been educated, and you are better able to share in the double duty. Wherefore each of you, when his turn comes, must go down to the general underground abode, and get the habit of seeing in the dark. When you have acquired the habit, you will see ten thousand times better than the inhabitants of the cave, and you will know what the several images are, and what they represent, because you have seen the beautiful and just and good in their truth. And thus our State which is also yours will be a reality, and not a dream only, and will be administered in a spirit unlike that of other States, in which men fight with one another about shadows only and are distracted in the struggle for power, which in their eyes is a great good. Whereas the truth is that the State in which the rulers are most reluctant to govern is always the best and most quietly governed, and the State in which they are most eager, the worst.
[Glaucon] Quite true, he replied.
[Socrates] And will our pupils, when they hear this, refuse to take their turn at the toils of State, when they are allowed to spend the greater part of their time with one another in the heavenly light?
[Glaucon] Impossible, he answered; for they are just men, and the commands which we impose upon them are just; there can be no doubt that every one of them will take office as a stern necessity, and not after the fashion of our present rulers of State.
[Socrates] Yes, my friend, I said; and there lies the point. You must contrive for your future rulers another and a better life than that of a ruler, and then you may have a well-ordered State; for only in the State which offers this, will they rule who are truly rich, not in silver and gold, but in virtue and wisdom, which are the true blessings of life. Whereas if they go to the administration of public affairs, poor and hungering after the' own private advantage, thinking that hence they are to snatch the chief good, order there can never be; for they will be fighting about office, and the civil and domestic broils which thus arise will be the ruin of the rulers themselves and of the whole State.
[Glaucon] Most true, he replied.
[Socrates] And the only life which looks down upon the life of political ambition is that of true philosophy. Do you know of any other?
[Glaucon] Indeed, I do not, he said.
[Socrates] And those who govern ought not to be lovers of the task? For, if they are, there will be rival lovers, and they will fight.
[Glaucon] No question.
[Socrates] Who then are those whom we shall compel to be guardians? Surely they will be the men who are wisest about affairs of State, and by whom the State is best administered, and who at the same time have other honors and another and a better life than that of politics?
[Glaucon] They are the men, and I will choose them, he replied.
[Socrates] And now shall we consider in what way such guardians will be produced, and how they are to be brought from darkness to light, -- as some are said to have ascended from the world below to the gods?
[Glaucon] By all means, he replied.
[Socrates] The process, I said, is not the turning over of an oyster-shell, but the turning round of a soul passing from a day which is little better than night to the true day of being, that is, the ascent from below, which we affirm to be true philosophy?
[Glaucon] Quite so.

user-pic

I think you are going way too easy on the Democratic Party here.

If Democrats wanted to stage a show or shows on policy, they had a number of opportunities, particularly and most recently on SCHIP, to force Republicans to fillibuster. Instead, there is absolutely no issue they are willing to frame as passionately important to the American people. No issue. When you think of Obama does ANY issue come to mind? Is ANY issue in your head? Hillary had health care and the village in my head before she decided to get on board with destroying villages and muddied up her own brand. The party has no message, no brand, no credibility on any issue at all. That's what centrism gets you. Nothing.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »



Book Club Calendar


Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Kyle Krahel-Frolander



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address