TPMCafe
« The Hebrew Republic | Home | Palin: North by Northwest »

Zionism and Democracy

user-pic


First, I would like to thank everyone at TPM Café for hosting this discussion.  And I would particularly like to thank friends and associates who have agreed to keep the discussion going over the next week.  Somewhere in the back of every writer's mind is the dream of enabling this kind of give-and take.  I do not take such gifts lightly.

Let me briefly set the stage.  My first book, The Tragedy of Zionism came out in 1985, three years after the ill-fated Lebanon War.  The book focused on how Israel's mounting military crises grew, not only out of Arab enmity, but out of certain failures in its own democracy: that the settlement movement, especially, was not simply the result of some post-1967 intoxication with the land, but that settlement was inspired and materially supported by residual Zionist institutions that should have been retired in 1948.  That Israel's state apparatus was only doing outside of the Green Line after the Six Day War what it had been doing inside the Green Line after the War of Independence. 

I argued, in effect, that the State of Israel had been founded as two states: a democratic state encasing a revolutionary Zionist settler state, the former developing a Hebrew civil society, the latter privileging Jews (defined by Rabbinic strictures) over non-Jews, which developed a world of its own in and around Jewish Jerusalem and the settlements of Judea and Samaria.  (In recent years, many of the settlers have actually begun to say they live in Judea, not Israel.) 

I doubted back in the 1980s that any peace process would succeed until Israel confronted its structural anomalies in addition to its missed diplomatic opportunities.  This whole complex of legal ambiguities and settlement was systematically alienating Israel's substantial Arab minority, while advancing the interests of Jewish orthodoxy. I concluded that Israel would not only have to repress "Judea" to make room for Palestine--that is cut a deal with Fatah--but get past the anachronistic Zionist theories and institutions that crimped the evolution of its own democracy.

These were very difficult things for people to hear in the 1980s. Diagnosis seemed a kind of embarrassment to American Jews in particular, who saw their role as, in a way, Israel's brand managers.  They could not hear doubts about Israel's democratic achievement, which was admittedly significant for all of its deficiencies.  But three years later there was the first intifada, and a great many informed people in the US began to see that the occupation must end.  By now, the larger question of how (or whether) Israel can be both Jewish and democratic is on virtually everybody's mind.

So my new book, The Hebrew Republic, builds on and updates these more established arguments. The process of integrating and alienating Israeli Arabs is a generation more advanced. The same can be said of ways Orthodox Judaism has been established as a state religion. One quarter of Israeli first-graders are now Arab, and another quarter are rigidly orthodox, devoted to the idea of greater Israel. You don't have to be a prophet to see where the children of Israel are heading.

Yet something important has changed in Israel since my first book, and this is the integration of the country's elites into global markets and the culture of globalization more generally. More and more educated Israelis are coming to understand that you can't have an economy like Singapore's and the nationalities war like Serbia's.

My new book is therefore in many ways a more programmatic (and hopeful) book than my first, even though the dangers and the violence are much more extreme today than in 1985. Back then, the culture heroes were the West Bank settlers. Today, the culture heroes today are global entrepreneurs. The people of the Israeli "center," who have the growing political power and global vision, have an inherent interest in bringing about the necessary reforms.

Does any of this analysis justify the end of a Jewish state.  Not at all.  The Hebrew Republic maps out the Jewish state as the most original forces in the Zionist movement conceived it. It is a democratic country whose language is Hebrew, much the way the French Republic is French. I am not proposing anything terribly original here. I'm just trying to bring Israel up to code. In a way, I'm trying to imagine what Israel would look like if it accepted, for example, the charter of the European Union and became a member, as I hope it eventually will be.

Zionism, remember, grew out of the insight that to survive in the modern world Jews would have to transform themselves into a nation. Jews would embrace scientific doubt, tolerance, individualism, and get out from under the suffocating power of rabbinic orthodoxy. They conceived of a Hebrew enlightenment. Many Zionists, is true, were appalled by the growing power of anti-Semitic movements in Europe. But Jews who were mainly concerned about that went to America, not to Palestine. The Hebrew Republic is meant to be a retrieval of Zionism's original vision, that Jews should ask modern questions, from technological to erotic questions, in Hebrew.

A final word of introduction, to connect the dots.  It may happen that the government of Israel and the leaders of the Palestinian Authority will be able to conclude some kind of peace treaty in the foreseeable future. Many argue that the question of how democratic a Jewish state can be should be deferred to this more hopeful time. 

But this line of thought misses the ways the deficiencies in Israel's democracy create an obstacle to peace, or at least, to hope.  Think of it this way: if you ask most Israelis if they would be in favor of a peace treaty with Syria and most would, of course, say yes.  But ask them if they would want such a treaty before the Palestinian issue is resolved and a great many, perhaps the majority, will say no.  Why give up the Golan Heights, they ask, when a lack of resolution of the Palestinian question will almost certainly lead the parties back to war?

A very similar thing is going on in with regard to the Palestinians.  Ask Israelis if they are in favor of a deal with the PA--say along the lines of the Clinton parameters--and most will say yes.   But ask them if they would be prepared to confront Jewish settlers on the West Bank to enforce such a deal and most will say no.  Why, they ask, should we go to war with our fellow Jews on the West Bank, you know, to help create a Palestinian state, when we know this will not be the end of the conflict. Our own Israeli Arabs will then rear up and make demands we cannot possibly fulfill.  After all, they say, we want to have a Jewish state here, though they don't really know what that means, except that it looks like the status quo, and is therefore a state that no self-respecting Arab minority could accept.  So they assume in advance: there will be a confrontation, a fight to the finish.  They say, okay, the we might as well start the fight now.  In the end, as Benny Morris suggests, there will have to be another "population exchange."

You see, this whole way of looking at peacemaking must change. Israelis must begin to understand that there is a world to win: that peace means further integration to a larger system of collective security--that they are not alone in the world, and that the absence of peace means economic disaster.  Israel, they must see (and perhaps only an Obama administration can help them see it), is not being asked to embrace anything more that all European countries have embraced.  We have to get past the idea that the peace process means Israelis saying: well, let's give the Palestinians some land, and maybe they (and the world) will leave us alone.


25 Comments

| Leave a comment

It would be to the benefit of both Israelis and Arabs if The Hebrew Republic were to jog Israelis into reckoning with the issues raised by author Bernard Avishai. The Hebrew Republic makes clear that Israel's prosperity and the whole Israeli project are at stake. As he makes clear in the last paragraph of his opening entry for the TPM cafe discussion, the entire way of approaching peacemaking must change.

What are the chances of this happening? It is hard to be optimistic, notwithstanding the nothing-is-taboo liberty with which Israelis debate the issues, a joy to follow, observe and emulate.

Prime Minister Sharon, never a great explainer, nonetheless hinted clearly at Israel's dilemma in his TV address the night before the Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and the northern West Bank, to the effect (from memory) that the situation in which 8000 settlers were juxtaposed with one and a half million Palestinians living in hate and squalor in a disproportionate area of the Strip was unsustainable. Prime Minister Olmert's Haaretz interview directly after the Annapolis conference was an eye-opener: a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not only critical to the survival of the State of Israel, it is also urgent, if only because it is only a matter of time before the Palestinians will constitute a majority between the Jordan and the Mediterranean, and the Palestinians will only have to demand one vote per man and the US Jewish community will have to insist that Israel be true to its vaunted democracy.

And yet only yesterday the Israeli Cabinet preferred to postpone a proposal to offer compensation to West Bank settlers prepared to move out of occupied territory, thus fortifying Palestinian scepticism about Israel's willingness to come to terms even as a hypothetical question.

There is plenty of room to doubt whether a two-state solution is still possible, whether the chance wasn't missed at some indeterminate point not too long ago. The Hebrew Republic may be a Hail Mary pass (an expression which I hope I don't have to explain to non-Catholics), but, I say, let us pray.

Alvaro de Soto

user-pic

One day the Palestinians will get smart and demand that Israel take within its national borders all of the lands of pre-1948 Palestine.

Then, they -- the Palestinians -- can demand that the government recognize their civil rights and demographics will take care of the rest.

Why continue to be a de facto South Africa when you can be a real, de jure South Africa?

Ellen there are Palestinians demanding just want you describe. Integration into the state of Israel and thus full rights under democracy.

user-pic

. . . a Hail Mary pass (an expression which I hope I don't have to explain to non-Catholics) . . . . Alvaro de Desoto

Nah. Most of the non-Catholics -- even the athletically-challenged -- hanging out here get the reference.

But do you think you could you help me with Touchdown Jesus?

Not my team honey, sorry........

user-pic

Not addressed to you, Zeno_of_Citium; gotta check those indents, sweetie.

user-pic

I don't think you'll get much from a country whose core ideology is one of separatism and explicitly calls for the "Jewish State" to be a "rampart of Europe against Asia". Nope. Not at all. Zionism remains anti-native and its true-believers have indulged in all sorts of means to tip the scales to dislodge and dispossess the Palestinian population. It is a fundamental and fatal flaw, but one I believe can be rectified in a single united state along with those whose homeland Israel is too. Convincing yourself this isn't so will only prolong the 'existential threat' we hear about virtually everyday. But, of course, having an existential threat is at the heart of the ideology. I'd call this self-defeating.

user-pic
I argued, in effect, that the State of Israel had been founded as two states: a democratic state encasing a revolutionary Zionist settler state

I would say it this way. What you call the democratic state is a smokescreen for the true policy of Israel which is reflected in the settler movement. In their fantasies, Israeli see themselves as a democratic society but in that fantasy there are no Palestinians.

To take this one step further, I'd also say the settler movement is a smokescreen for the true policy of Israel: nuclear weapons that enforce a global banking hegemony by the West.

A nation built on the idea that its very existence relies on the association with one single religion is doomed for failure at some point.

user-pic

First, one would need to accept the flawed premise that Jewish idenity is entirely dependent upon its religious component.

I'm happy to see this discussion here. As a Jewish American, born in the same year as Israel's independence, I grew up thinking of Israel as a bastion of democracy and social justice. My parents were enthusiastic supporters of Israeli independence but were Americans first: strong supporters of civil liberties, the Civil Rights movement, and developing our American society into a community that was open to diversity of all types. I think the socialism and dedicated democracy in Israel fit with their view of what a good society looked like. Therefore it was a rude awakening to them and to me to find out that Israel could be just as oppressive and unjust as any other country.
I view the occupation as having sapped the moral strength of Israel -- not only because of the way an occupying force tyrannizes over the occupied but also because it led to more distrust of and discrimination against Israeli Arabs.
I want a Jewish state to continue to exist, but along the lines you describe above. I'm anxious to learn how you think that will play out.

I wish the people of the world could all agree that when a government (such as that of Israel or the US) has done a certain amount of harm, that the it should be done away with, and the system rebuilt from scratch. I call it The State Death Penalty.

user-pic

"These were very difficult things for people to hear in the 1980s."

How do you figure this has changed in the US?

One can hardly bring up any of this in the states without being called anti-Semitic and getting shouted down by a loud chorus of organizations and individuals who brook no criticism or even doubts about the wisdom of any Isreali policy.

user-pic

oleeb,

One can hardly bring up any of this in the states without being called anti-Semitic...

To paraphrase our good friend JohnW: "ZZZZzzzz"

user-pic

Bernard: The key question we have to ask Israeli and Arab moderates is this: Can you point out postive benefits to moderation. Unfortunately, we see precious little evidence that moderation produces good outcomes. Consider Gaza and the West Bank. Should not Abbas have tangible benefits of his moderation? Waiting....waiting...

Your approach of enlarging the definition to solve the problem is absolutely on target. The EU solution is, IMHO, the only solution.

Jewish Americans and Jews around the world should be made aware of Sarah Palin's church and their beliefs.
They believe that Jews who do not convert to Christianity will be punished by God. They sight examples of terrorists killing Jews as punishment from God.

Here is the video a must see!!!!!

"Palin's Pastor Agrees God Punishes Jews Who Don't Convert"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqMCvq26d2M

user-pic


'Touchdown Jesus' appears to be a depiction of the Sermon on the Mount. Jesus's arms are spread wide, with the upper arms horizontal and the lower arms slightly lifted. It's not really much like a touchdown signal, in which the arms are raised straight in the air.

user-pic

1) The Touchdown Jesus ain't named that for the upraised arms, it's named that because it's visible, with arms upraised, outside the stadium, behind the home goalposts.
See this picture http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:TDJesus.jpg

It's a Millard Sheets mosaic on the front of the campus library. There's a whole Millard Sheets museum at the LA County Fair, which he founded and curated for 30 years...

2) Repeat after me,"...a democracy is not a theocracy is not a democracy is not a theocracy is not a democracy is not a theocracy is not a democracy is not a theocracy is not a democracy is not a theocracy is not a democracy is not a theocracy is not a democracy is not a theocracy is not a democracy is not a theocracy is not ..."

Later, the unsolveable multi-equation algebra of Middle Eastern Militarism.
Hint: if Israel must have more arms than all Arab countries combined, and each Arab country must have more arms than Israel, how many arms vendors can beat their analysts' profit expectations?

To Bernard Vishay and the Tpm readers

To consider Israel a Democracy is a naïve outsiders' illusion.

Israel was established by an "Ashkenazi" –Jewish European "elite"- which was the Palmach, and the Ezel- the military-Zionist guerrilla brigades, who turned naturally after 48 to be the leading parties in Israel.

This elite is actually the same elite it to this day, in the evolvement of all governmental, military and financial, as well as civil institutions and organizations. This Palmach evolved into "MAPAI" party-until today the "Avoda"-the "Workers" Party. The EZEL parliamentary evolvement is the "Likud", which got to election winning in 1977- that got elected on the discriminated public's ticket- the immigrants from the Arab and north-Africa countries. It didn’t do much good with their socio-economic state, but it gave them the false pride of taking a part in the hegemony. It still uses the same tactic- being even more militant than the original Hegemony, it also holds to a radical neo-liberal images of the American dream- anybody can make it if he'll fight the fight, which is of no practical difference from the mainstream moderate-"left"-original hegemony.

The parliamentary Culture and way of conducting is an internal-party-coalitional-interest which is governed ONLY by the internal interests of the party's go-getters, due to the moment's coalitional interests. Those interest where NEVER the interest of the citizens. You, outsiders, must remember that except of a very small percentage, and the original citizens of Israel are the Palestinians who stayed after 1948 and after 1967 inside the green-line- and they are out of the question in terms of citizenship illusions. the brave idealist Zionists who established the Kibbutzim and other first settlements are considered as the original Israelis (aside of Bar Kohva and King David ). All the others, the majority of this country are not founders of this bravery. They are immigrants, immigrant which are refugees as well, in most cases… that as all immigrants, and even more than anywhere else, has the need to belong and prove their patriotism.

What it means is that this immigration-refugee public is a civilian Underdog bevy, with a very Strict Hierarchy of a society. So, you can rule-out a Democratic –civic consciousness that is a condition to establish a civil-democratic society, besides of maintaining it.

The respect and the authoritative consciousness in this public of immigrants-refugees, was always reserved and given only to the "defenders of our post-holocaust –we can be extinguished-in –any-moment" consciousness. Means, that this public of a hierarchy of underdogs, sees ONLY Generals as its legitimate "leaders", that are qualified for positions of power and government. Those generals established their positions before their immigrant subjects have arrived. Also among the go-getters themselves, the same Hierarchy works, naturally.

As outsiders, you must understand that in Israel, a sound mechanism that is a condition to a Democratic-regime was never established. There is no mechanism of separation between governmental authorities: there isn’t a constitution ; the Legislating authority, the executive authority and the judiciary authority are strictly NOT-separated, not by law, not by regulations and not in practice. In Israel there is no systems of checks and Balances between the authorities, and no public which in the most an immigrant-refugee (no matter if first generation of fifth by today), that has no-civil-Democratic consciousness which will demand a proper democratic conduct, which he never knew. Not where he came from and certainly not in Israel.

Yes, we do have the symbolic democratic act of elections. Not only here, the BOX with the clit as the positive American influence trick is one of the best image succeses ever. Only in a black country or "strange "Abhazi" places, us white folks don’t buy the trick..) In Israel, the parties from the beginning are not expected to be accountable, and a system of accountability does not exist. We cannot replace a party member who is usually a former general (or playing by the image of the militant-code of behavior and Demagogy which is enough to be identified as qualified). We do not have the Houses system, we do not have regional delegates that can be not-chosen a second time if they failed to fulfill their promises. Actually, they don't have to promise anything to the public, because their place in the party is set in advance by their inner-corrupt interests, which in 99% has nothing to do with any-publics true needs. It's about colloquial interests that by today are SOLELY a business of a very tight elite of the local conglomerates interests (and international weapons industry Israeli conglomerate), that has cocked and developed for the last 60 years, in a ongoing demagogic cultivation of the slim-patriotic images you must have noticed: the well known "we are the chosen people" – "an attack upon us-never again"- and the hate to the exiled Jew who "went like sheep to its own slaughter".

The meaning of the third ethos, the contempt towards the exiled Jew, Meant in practice an absolute de-legitimization of all those immigrants-refugees cultural identity and practices from each and every Diaspora. The ideal Israeli-zionist, is a simple well known fascist image of a blond-well build-proud –new Jew –who is a farmer, worker, settler, better than anyone in the world (by definition, being the chosen people)- is the only approved image by the elite, the Hegemony. They are the ones who where first and conquered the "Promised Land", the ones who ceased power – the Brave Original Mapai and Ezel members.

So this huge group of underdogs are as always underdogs that were told to shed off their history and Identity (including the holocaust survivors who where defiled for their sheepiness-exiled mentality) not to speak of the ARAB-Jews, dark skinned Jews who came from the Arab countries, not to speak of the Ethiopian Jews today and so forth. The "Israeli"- Arabs are seen as an "inside enemy", "fifth battalion"). The Zionist image of the new Israeli-Jew, is made out of a classic Colonialist Racist social –emotional identity mechanisms, is an image that can be said of as actually completed Hitler's work. It did so by devouring the Jewish spiritual and cultural-practical Knowledge, by submitted it, behooving it completely to a near empty image of togetherness that does not exist. What does exist is the image of togetherness of all of us as should be this New-Jew on the Zionist poster who basically is very handsome and says "Never again, for an Israeli am I." There is literally nothing besides that, in terms of this togetherness. What there really is, is a Hierarchy of the ones who did look and behaved like the fascist poster guy, and all the rest which were not quite that, or did not succeed resembling it. (the use of Benjamin (aka Bibi) Netanyahu in his brother is classic)

The Hierarchy was executed by the parties-generals in a perfect manner. On the acme of this Hierarchy are as called in Israel "The salt of the country"-which are Ashkenazi high class young man who served and still serve in the special units, in the air-force and intelligence. They are business entrepreneurs, high-tech and so forth- and this image is no different from the usual neo-capitalist ideal.

In practice, the Public-spine of social services and institutions for a functioning society that was built by some idealists with a sense of responsibility on the first 35-40 years to the establishment the Jewish nation- -- those governmental and social systems are hanging today by their last remains. In the past 25 years they were absolutely disassembled, absolutely. So have all of the public's assets: land, water, pension funds, which where over manipulated and as much as 50% of the elderly today will not get their pensions which they paid for all their working life. They will live on social security pension which is amount to 443$ with the same no-value to the money. The private insurance market is just kicking in, in the last 10 years, you see….

By today, even the permanent public –accommodations for people with special needs where closed. There are 4 drug-rehab centers in the country. The systems that take care of dropout youth are all civic organizations, as well as hundreds of soup kitchens, medical support organizations etc. Today every fourth child lives under international poverty criteria.

The control over public money is set by an emergency-regulations law, which actually makes even the legislative-work meaningless. The people who really decide about the policy are of two sources: 1.the party go-getters (including the prime minister) and 2. The "Treasury Boys" (as their called) who are the Treasury clerks. They are ideal young go-getters, the most sharp and highly hot-couture well dressed confidential clerks, who finished masters in economics and accounting by the outdated- Thacheristic-oriented-economic studies, usually out of the "Ivy-league"-private-exclusively for elite- status –fattening college (IDC).

To make sure the parliament is absolutely futile, we have in Israel an "arrangement Law"- out of emergency regulations Laws which is a practical standard from the mid 80's (that enables many of the occupation's usual practices), which is a Democracy-redundant law for it alone is stronger than all laws and budgets "Democratically" decided by the parliament or the different governmental comities. It alone cuts and adds and decides in each and every one of the uses of the public-budget: medicines, schools, infrastructure, and security. You name it.

This Underdog-manipulated hierarchy of a public doesn’t have the mechanisms, doesn’t have the Knowledge and doesn’t have the means to take over the local-neocon-general's-go-getters half legal mafia. This public doesn’t know what are the democratic mechanisms needed to consider demanding them. This democratic-ignorance includes the minute outspoken few intelligent political critics, ( whose opinions is usually a distant sound of a self-hating yak which the newspapers maintaining their column to keep-up the democratic appearance. they never say to the public that his democratic power is an illusion).

This Banana country is the best out of the ones considered ruled by outside interests, in making PR- selling itself as a democracy. "WE are the only democratic country in the region!" this is BS. What is special, is that those belligerent thick-sculled half brained generals (including our belie president) who abuse us as if they where outsiders, are identified by this immigrant society as our defenders.

They will also not ask Uncle Sam for permission to blow the vital ("but inevitable") shot that might mark the beginning of a third world war.

Therefore, talking about Israel as a democracy is a bit uninformed.


How do I add links to the comment?

"This Palmach evolved into "MAPAI" party-until today the "Avoda"-the "Workers" Party."

- that is the Labor party. of course.

Dammit, Bernard, get out of my head, will you? I've been saying most of the same things for years, but most of my writings on the subject have vanished into the ether, and you say it much better than I do anyway. Well done, and from your mouth to God's ear.

Dammit, Bernard, get out of my head, will you? I've been saying most of the same things for years, but most of my writings on the subject have vanished into the ether, and you say it much better than I do anyway. Well done, and from your mouth to God's ear.

Dammit, Bernard, get out of my head, will you? I've been saying most of the same things for years, but most of my writings on the subject have vanished into the ether, and you say it much better than I do anyway. Well done, and from your mouth to God's ear.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »



Book Club Calendar


Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Kyle Krahel-Frolander



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address