From Straight Talk Express to Schmidting
Joe Klein is smoking hot on a current McCain strategy in this important Time post, oddly headlined "Angry Amateurs." It's really about Vicious Professionals--McCain's. You know the old advice to lawyers: When you don't have the facts, cite the law; when you don't have the law, cite the facts. The McCain campaign's corollary: When you don't have either, bash the press. Let's call this Schmidting, after McCain's Rove-apprentice chief strategist, Steve Schmidt.
During the years--years--when McCain was holding reporters enthralled, the right-wing crusade against the "liberal media" was muted (with respect to him), and for good reason: the sweet talk was mutual. (Recall McCain's affectionate-sardonic gag about the press: "my base.") Now, either because McCain's campaign is thrashing, or because some reporters have had enough and jumped off the Straight Talk Express, or because the pack got bored with the old reverence, or for whatever combination of reasons, the Rovian Steve Schmidt has decided to call up the press-bashing drums.
Klein begins:
The story of the day out here in Minneapolis is the McCain campaign's war against the press. This has been building for some time. Those of us who have criticized the candidate--and especially those of us who enjoyed good relations with McCain in the past--have been subject to off-the-record browbeating and attempted bullying all year.
And here's how he leaves matters:
There is a tendency in the media to kick ourselves, cringe and withdraw, when we are criticized. But I hope my colleagues stand strong in this case: it is important for the public to know that Palin raised taxes as governor, supported the Bridge to Nowhere before she opposed it, pursued pork-barrel projects as mayor, tried to ban books at the local library and thinks the war in Iraq is "a task from God." The attempts by the McCain campaign to bully us into not reporting such things are not only stupidly aggressive, but unprofessional in the extreme.
If ever there were a time when reporters ought to stare straight in the mirror and remind themselves that they do not practice their profession to be intimidated--that they have a noble mission and that when they cease to practice it they grease the skids for an awful war and for Swift-Boaters--this is that time.
Meanwhile, the Associated Press--which is owned by newspapers, TV and radio stations--hasn't incurred the McCain wrath. An AP dispatch today, under the byline Tom Raum, says: ''Many liberals are belittling the choice [of Sarah Palin], suggesting that as a mother of five children...she has neither the time nor the experience to become vice president."
Raum's dispatch quotes no such liberals, though it does quote two right-wingers cheering about Gov. Palin's multi-tasking in order to fabricate a shoddy argument about a right-left role reversal.
It sure looks as though the AP has been rolled under the stewardship of new Washington bureau chief Ron Fournier, who previously interviewed for a political adviser position with the McCain campaign. Under Fournier's administration, the AP has run headlines like: "Biden pick shows lack of confidence," "Sen. Hillary Clinton an Artful Dodger," "Obama walks arrogance line," and "Clinton's Politics of Pity."
Eric Boehlert of the liberal media watchdog group Media Matters has showed that Fournier made no pretense of fairness of balance on Republicans. His only gripe against any Republican during the primary season took Mitt Romney to task for beating John McCain in the Michigan primary ("a defeat for authenticity in politics").
Looks as though the AP doesn't need to be Schmidted--it got there first.













The Schmidt has hit the fan.(TM)
September 3, 2008 9:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
I love it!
September 3, 2008 10:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
rotwang,
HAHAHAHHHAHA, good one :-)
September 4, 2008 9:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Poor press! If McCain wins, you sure aren't going to be invited to his ranch in Arizona for barbeques!
September 3, 2008 11:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
"It sure looks as though the AP has been rolled under the stewardship of new Washington bureau chief Ron Fournier, who previously interviewed for a political adviser position with the McCain campaign."
Schmidted? How about Fourniercated? As in the AP is screwing us? WTF?
September 4, 2008 12:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Poor press! If McCain wins, you sure aren't going to be invited to his ranch in Arizona for barbeques!
September 4, 2008 12:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think Schmidtten is the word we're looking for to describe AP these days.
September 4, 2008 12:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
I heard the lawyer thing this way. "No facts, pound the law. No law, pound the facts. Neither facts nor law, pound the table."
September 4, 2008 4:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
The sad thing is that, McCain the schemer has laid down his tracks with care for many years, and the press was the first to get bamboozled. They were prime time enablers of the McCain branded myth, and now they are beginning to realize he played them, and some of them are waking up like angry hornets.
I still haven't gotten over my anger at the press corp for building this nasty little man into a 50 foot superhero. With feet of clay.
September 4, 2008 9:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Angry hornets"?
Like Katherine Seely and Elizabeth Bumiller?
September 4, 2008 9:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe not those two. But Howard Fineman, was on tv last night, following Joe Klein's lead, with a tale of resentment about McCain abusing him. I am claiming that these Klein and Fineman are canary bird in the coal mine.
September 5, 2008 7:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
And here is another example from(of all places) the AP, today:
click here
September 5, 2008 8:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
c4Logic,
the MSM still refer to McCain as a "Maverick" as though its something unique to him. There are about 50 Blue Dog Democrats in the House that are more maverick than McCain, and in the Senate you find the king of the mavericks in Dem. Ben Nelson of Nebraska. In reality, Lieberman's voting record is 100 times more along party lines than Nelson's.
Sadly, the media will have to be dragged kicking and screaming in order for them to drop the Maverick tag.
"Maverick" my ass.
September 4, 2008 9:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
So...Just forget about the free ride the press gave "Popeye McCain" throughout the primaries? Not me! I hold these reporter (groupies) in total contempt for their lap dog acquiescence to his every lie and exaggeration. Had the reporters insisted on solid responses to their soft ball queries, those facts, alone, would have kept him from being an election away from continuing the downward spiral of a nation that was once the model that all nations aspired to be. A democracy without an ever-diligent free press becomes a shell of a democracy.
September 4, 2008 12:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Funny, until I got to the very end of the first paragraph, I thought you were talking about "Mean Jean." It certainly would have been apt.
September 4, 2008 3:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, the "advice" is: when you don't have the facts, pound the law; when you don't have the law, pound the facts; when you don't have either, pound the table.
September 4, 2008 11:31 PM | Reply | Permalink