TPMCafe
« Hillary's Smart Speech, and What Bill Should Say Tonight | Home | Another One Bites the Dust »

James Carville Hasn't Changed; He Was A Spy for Bush in 2004

user-pic

This is a repost of what I wrote here in TPM in 2006.

I just came across a troubling incident that Bob Woodward reports in his new book. Very troubling.

On page 344, Woodward describes the doings at the White House in the early morning hours of Wednesday, the day after the '04 election. The Bushies were worried that Kerry would dig in and fight. They needed the election wrapped up.

But, apparently, Kerry had decided not to concede. There were 250,000 outstanding ballots in Ohio.

So Kerry decides to fight. In fact, he considers going to Ohio to camp out with his voters until there is a recount. This is the last thing the White House needs, especially after Florida 2000.

So what happened?

James Carville gets on the phone with his wife, Mary Matalin, who is at the White House with Bush.

"Carville told her he had some inside news. The Kerry campaign was going to challenge the provisional ballots in Ohio -- perhaps up to 250,000 of them. 'I don't agree with it, Carville said. I'm just telling you that's what they're talking about.'

"Matalin went to Cheney to report...You better tell the President, Cheney told her."

Matalin does, advising Bush that "somebody in authority needed to get in touch with J. Kenneth Blackwell, the Republican Secretary of State in Ohio who would be in charge of any challenge to the provisional votes." An SOS goes out to Blackwell. And the corrupt Blackwell took care of it.

The rest is history.

And now Carville is trying to sink Obama.


73 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Another one is that creep Harold Ford who I just saw blathering about McCain getting off the plane in Israel bleeding from being knocked in the head on a tough ride. Just what we need a blue dog giving McCain a Purple Heart.

Wow, I thought I followed the aftermath of 2004 very closely, but I never heard this. God, just another injustice to choke down. Thank you, though, for telling us, to remind us what is at stake.

user-pic

Yes, Harold's defeat in '06 was one of the many delights of that evening.

user-pic

MJ,

I had a love/hate thing with Harold Ford's defeat;
hate because a Democrat lost, but love because it was Harold Ford.

I never liked Ford, he always came off as a self interest opportunist, someone who was in politics
for all the benefits he could mine.

user-pic

The 04 Carville story is an old story. I have heard it before. However, it doesn't mean it's not true.

A few things. Is Carville anywhere on the record discussing this? Defending himself? Denying any part of it? Has anyone ever asked him about it for the record?

Ditto all of the above for John Kerry.

Thanks.

Judas anyone?

user-pic

Hohw is Carville trying to sink Obama?

I'm being serious here, asking a genuine question. My personal stance is that Carville's continued existence is a blight on our entire party, but my own feelings about the man don't speak to the specifics of the matter at hand. It seems doubtful to me that Carville would have any access with Team O-B'08, so unless he is a Clinton Dead-ender conduit, I don't see where his information would come from...

Without disputing Woodward's account about 2004, some of us reading M.J.'s guessing game post remain clueless as to what Carville is now doing to merit this accusation with regards to Obama in 2008. The substance of the accusation needs to be spelled out.

Agreed.

You've piqued my interest, MJ! Make with the story! What do you know? If Carville remains a possible conduit, he needs to be taken out of the loop.

user-pic

All I know is what I wrote. It's all from Woodward.
Carville never denied any of it.

user-pic

Woodward wrote about Carville and Kerry. You wrote that Carville is now "trying to sink Obama." What evidence do you have to support this accusation?

user-pic

And Woodward's source is...?

This is a pretty strong accusation. There were many problems in Ohio in 2004, and I'm not a fan of Ken Blackwell, but is there any evidence that he did more to swing the election after the votes were cast?

user-pic

No, Blackwell was smart enough to rig it before any votes were cast.

user-pic

If all you know is what you wrote, then maybe you shouldn't have written it. Why didn't you give Carville a call and ask him about it? Or wouldn't that be sneaky enough for you?

yeah the same discredited Woodward who had the temerity to go on the air and say that the Valerie Plame leak was all "a tempest in a teapot" and that there was nothing to it.

Excuse me while I barf.

Seriously, do you really think that Carville does NOT speak to his wife about Democratic affairs? I am not by any means a conspiracy theorists, but I do believe that Carville wants Senator Obama, as does Rendell, Koch, we know Hillary and Bill (put aside what they did to save their a*sses should he not win) to lose. IF the Clintons didn’t “seem” like they are onboard, do you think Hillary would have a shot at the nomination in 2012 IF Senator Obama loses?!?!?!?!?!?

Does this come as a surprise to anyone?

James Carville and his dog-faced wife are a couple of slugs that are just looking for the biggest salt rock to slather under. They would sell out their mothers. And James is really not an attractive guy, but I know they have transvestites in New Orleans that look better than Matlin! I’m just saying…

Demeaning Mary Matlin's appearance takes away from any point you may have been trying to make. I don't understand why it is appropriate or acceptable.

user-pic

The marriage explained.

just listening to Carville on TV makes my stomach clench. Can anyone take anything that man says as being sincere? And he reminds me of a hairless squirrel.

Indeed. Carville is in politics for the game, the show, it seems. The issues are secondary to "the game" and mere victory or defeat. He strikes me as being every bit as mercenary as Rove.

Talk about a celebrity, too. Man, that guy loves putting his grinning self on the television.

Keep him Away, Obama - AWAY!!!

I too would like to know how Carville is sinking Obama. I almost never watch CNN, so don't get to see his commentary.

I had heard of this tale back in '04 when it happened.

When you have people like this around, they should be used to advantage. He should be given information meant to be leaked, with the intent of confusing or screwing up Republican plans.

Anything can be used as a weapon to win this war, it's really just a matter of figuring out how to do it.

He is highly critical of the convention and of Senator Obama, planting seeds of doubts, unlike the republican talking heads, who would go down drowning with the idiot McCain, in the name of the party. Do you hear them, Joe Scarborough, Brad Blakeman, Lars Lunatic, that Walls woman from the Washington Times, et all criticizing McCain for running a despicable campaign?

Precisley. Caraville is sooooo easy to read. He is the Clintons henchman. They are the only Dems he is loyal too. All other Dems are nothing but obstacles standing in the way of Clintons 3rd term as 'Hillary's husband".

BTW, you guys. Harold would be much better as a Senator than any Repug.

Just my two cents on that.

Well, that's not much of a measuring stick!

""And the corrupt Blackwell took care of it.""

I want more details on this. And I want Blackwell in jail. I hate that guy.

There's a quote where Bush once said something like: "Ken Blackwell? That guy's crazy..."

You know you're rotten when Bush thinks you're crazy.

Still interested in details. Still looking for answers to my questions posed.

Wow, what a revelation, however most of us suspected it based on the fact that his wife Matalin was one of the most influencial Republican operatives at the time and still is. Carveille is a rat with a capital "R". He has been letting it show.

Blackwell will go to jail, along with Rove when their is another Department of Justice that is willing to enforces the laws. That is what these rats are so affraid of. Karl Rove and Gonzo should be at the top of the list. Rove is desperately trying to save himself.

So you don't think the Rats will say "Let's just move on-- people are tired of partisan bickering. Let's get together with the Pukes in a spirit of bipartisanship."?

By the way I hope that these future jail birds don't take much relief in John McCain. McCain won't pretect them, he won't have the Congress votes.

user-pic

MJ, back this up with something more than innuendo and gossip.

I agree that Carville has drunk his own kool-aid and become a caricature of himself. But I need more than this to even come close to believing it...expecially since you're not exactly a trusted source.

user-pic

You got google In Oregon? Look it up yourself.

Has Kerry talked about it? Have you heard Carville talk about it?

user-pic

Look it up.

Why will you not simply give a link? I believe that surely you have one.

user-pic

I don't. It's in Woodward's book. That is my only source. I can't link to a book.

As for Carville trashing the Dems. Here is that link.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/25/carville-dems-wasting-first-night/

So Carville says the first night was not good. That's "Trying to sink Obama."?

user-pic

That's the extent of Rosenberg's "evidence". People think Carville's a big mouth. That proves he's a spy for the republicans, of course to people like Sleeper and Rosenberg, anyone who isn't willing to cut and run from his convictions when the wind changes is a spy and a shill for someone, somewhere...they just have to be, because that is what they would do.

Does anyone really think that these two political hacks just tell secrets in the privacy of the bedroom?

On the contrary ANYTIME they can gain political points by sharing secrets that some neanderthal is stupid enough to share with them they are going to take advatage of the truism "knowledge is power"

Please don't tell me ther give a fig about issues let alone their party.

My understanding is that the '04 story is entirely true. Carville actually gave a defense of his actions, but I can't exactly remember what he said.

Good visual, though he reminds me of a hairless chiwawa.

chihuahuas are too friendly-looking. Squirrels are mean and bite when you try to steal their nuts.

Carville is one of the pundit that I would like to buy him for what he is worth and sell for what he thinks he worth and I would become very wealthly. I don't know how loyal he was even to the Clinton's. Carville is like a lot of our local representation who goes to Washington they become corrupted by the glitz and glamor.

user-pic

This makes absolutely no sense. The provisional ballot mess in Ohio was challenged as early as the beginning of October and was being litigated as late as October 27th '04 and continued being litigated until 2006. Secondly, Ohio didn't have even a preliminary count of votes cast because not all the counties had reported totals until later in the day on Wednesday, like New Mexico, Ohio still did not have a vote total in the early morning hours of Wednesday Provisional ballots are not counted by the State of Ohio until several days after the election, so there would be no way of knowing how many would be challenged or even if they favoured Kerry or Bush. They had yet to know how many provisional ballots had been cast. The major problem faced in Ohio was not provisional balloting, but the voter irregularities in the rural counties where the vote tabulation didn't match the voter turnout rate and in most cases far exceeded the turnout and always favoured Bush.

The concern of the Kerry campaign was that the exit polling was not matching the vote count that was being reported by precincts as the counts came in and the "found votes" that were being reported as totals came in that favoured Kerry, tipping the vote for Bush.

The idea that Carville tipped the vote or acted as a spy is absurd to any thinking person. The voter fraud in Ohio started long before Nov. and the litigation is there to prove it. The Bush campaign would not have been worried in the least that Kerry was contemplating challenging provisional ballots - the totals were such that they would not have made any difference in the count anyway and both campaigns knew it. The only reasonable estimate was less than 3% of votes cast that tuesday were provisional ballots.

You remind me of David Horowitz who uses the same exact tactics to destroy people - find some "troubling" accusation made thirdhand by someone less than reliable (and a republican at that) and then fling it against the wall hoping it sticks. It doesn't matter to you in the least that you're ruining someone's reputation or his livelihood over a remark that you didn't even bother to confirm - it's "troubling" to you, so you're just going to make sure that it gets out there in the ether and then let someone else suffer the consequences and clean up your mess. What this does to the democrats cause doesn't even concern you because like most tunnelvisioned, shortsighted politburo hacks, it's enough to ruin today's enemy - what happens tommorow or in the future is not your concern. You disgust me.

Daaaayyuumn! ;^}

BevD cutting through the BS as always. But it's unfair to just criticize the ridiculous MJ post from 2006. He had many new insights and analysis that merited reposting this crap including:

This is a repost of what I wrote here in TPM in 2006.
And now Carville is trying to sink Obama.

PATHETIC.


user-pic

BevD, Loki and Djamo, tonight will be very hard. Just have a couple of stiff drinks and you'll get through it.

user-pic

And you keep your snout in the trough, never know when you'll find some good garbage.

I'm sorry, did I miss the post where he finally backed up his charge with evidence?

user-pic

No, apparently he still is waiting for Carville to call him back while he works on Woodward to put him in touch with his source. On the other hand, though, why should anyone bother to check baseless accusations when they're made by republican operatives and they can find some jealous patsyhack to run with it - they can always be relied upon as Stalin did the politburo fools to report any kind of rumour they could run with to the Kremlin and whisper in Stalin's ear, more in sorrow than in anger, some piece of information that can't be proved but it's the latest gossip they have and the means are always more satisfying than the end for people like David Horowitz and Daniel Pipes and MJ Rosenberg.

Wow, Rosenberg... you really are that pathetic.

Please don't forget me. I think you're a waste of bandwidth, M.J. You're constantly using your AIPAC tricks here. An inside-outskie guy from the word go. Would you confirm or deny the rumor I started that you only get to post at TPM because you're Josh's brother-in-law?

user-pic
using your AIPAC tricks here. An inside-outskie guy from the word go

aha! I see what you mean! Why didn't I think of that? This post is definitely reminiscent of the "Obama is a secret Muslim" thingie. Yes, the secret loyalty smear. Also how about those victimology memes? Anti semite here, there, everywhere, anti-Democrat conspiracies here, there everywhere.

you only get to post at TPM because you're Josh's brother-in-law?

aha again! Why didn't I think of that, too? That would explain a lot, like the difference in quality between his posts here and the published content elsewhere.

I was just thinking of poor Greg Sargent, who wrote up a magnificent bunch of thoughtful analysis of the Thurs. convention speeches in record time, especially on Obama's, and has to share a banner with this kind of crap, certainly lower than Mayhill Fowler, closing in on Bill O'Reilly territory. Makes me rethink my theories about why all those "America Abroad" International Relations people stopped posting here, slowly, one by one. Maybe they had to consider their reputations by association?

What a way to ruin a good night for the Dems and for this site, M.J.

By the same token, we have to assume Carville is really for Obama and the Democratic Party because he criticizes them. And, last night, I noticed black intellectuals were criticizing Obama for not saying more about Dr. King, meaning of course that they are distancing themselves from Obama to strengthen his candidacy, as the Reverend Wright and Jesse Jackson did. As far as internationalists go, they are endorsing MJ by ingoring his posts, just as you endorse my comments by refuting them.

Yes indeed. What a tangled web we weave when we first practice to deceive.

One does not have to be a genius to make the following deductively sound argument:


1) In politics what is paramount is getting your agenda implemented whether it is getting someone elected ( including yourself) or getting elected officials to do something you want done.

2) Often your agenda is not popular and in politics if you lose popularity you lose your position of power.


Therefore: Often you need to get your agenda done sub rosa

One sub rosa technique is to pass yourself along as a supporter of agenda x ( a variant that the media uses often is passing yourself as an objective observer or some such) when you really favor agenda NOT x.

You may ask: how does that help to get agenda x implemented? Well one common strategy is advocate agenda x in such a manner as to make it unappealing to a large number of people while nominally passing yourself off as supporting agenda x. For example saying that your kid and you only listen to hip hop music might seem that you support the black cause but because a lot of hip hop is vulgar, offensive, misogynistic, anti Semitic etc.., this will have the effect of turning a lot of people OFF to agenda x.

You get the picture.


In the world of Artappraiser, such kind of RATIONAL speculation is not allowed but in the tough world of politics it is a necessary tool that is used all the time to gain power

Yep, pathetic. And sorry MJ, I don't need any "stiff drinks" to get me through the evening, thanks - this was my guy speaking. But what the heck, let's ding Carville some more - I hear he talked to Matalin back in November 2000, and sank that one too.

Oh yeah. And he brought Katrina down on New Orleans so he could come in later and buy property cheap there.

Wow.

user-pic

Well quinn, how do we know for sure you're not in on the plot, after all you have that Acadian thing going on in your commenting and all...I must admit to blood uber alles suspicions. :-) I have seen you say over and over that you support Obama, but I must say you haven't really shown that much irrational exuberance or man-love his way.

Ha! As if you would ever criticize any foreigner around here. You only use your lash on real 'mericuns like me. Therefore, you suspect the quinn is a 'mericun, posing as a Canadian to lend weight to his comments. I believe we are beginning to sort this site out.

So let me see... Carville is a spy for the Republican Party. He wanted John Kerry to lose, even helped facilitate that loss! Now he wants Obama to lose. And is apparently, according to MJ, now trying to get that done.

Well, Rosenberg, as they say in the scientific community, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." And Bob Woodward's book and Carville's pissy moment after the first night are not extraordinary evidence. They're barely "evidence" at all.


user-pic

I think Mary went to the same plastic surgeon as Greta Van Sustern. He only knows one face. They look like twins now.

user-pic

I consider every member of WHIG a war criminal and Mary Matalin was a member of WHIG.

MJ, count me on the list of those who have no love whatsoever for James Carville.

However, leaving aside the question of 2004, I don't see the connection to Carville in 2008. He's a miserable son of a bitch, I grant that. But his opening-night whining in Denver doesn't constitute "sinking" Obama.

Upthread, you said you posted nothing but information from Woodward's book. But your last sentence is not a quote. It's your direct accusation against Carville. Yet, you present absolutely no evidence on that front. This makes your accusation irresponsible at best.

With all due respect saying that [you grant]“Carville is a miserable SOB” reduces to no more than the ad hominem "Carville is a miserable SOB, yes indeed".

Many people take the locution "I grant that" as having some reinforcing role in what follows it, when it really is some vague implication such as “I'm-really-reluctant-to-say-this-but overwhelming-evidence-forces-me-to-say-that [“CARVILE IS AN SOB.] Without it lending an iota of support to the bracketed assertion.

user-pic

Matalin does, advising Bush that "somebody in authority needed to get in touch with J. Kenneth Blackwell, the Republican Secretary of State in Ohio who would be in charge of any challenge to the provisional votes." An SOS goes out to Blackwell. And the corrupt Blackwell took care of it.

LOL. If the call goes out this November, here's who'll be on the other end:

Last Sunday's Dispatch article titled "Ousted," suggects [Democratic] Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner has been heavy handed in her removal or rejection for reappointment of some election officials. Among the published list is the former Chair of the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections and Chair of the Ohio Republican Party, Robert Bennett, notorious for his role in the Ohio election of 2004, where voter suppression and voting anomalies were evidence of a strong partisan interference to sway the vote. Keith Cunningham, former Republican member of the Board of Machine Examiners, was another infamous character out of the drama of 2004, who attempted to interfere with the Green Party Recount by not using a random system.

The article claims the former "fair-minded" judge (Brunner) has been accused by a prominent Republican legislator as "injecting a culture of fear and intimidation" into the county BOE's. It would seem that it is the Dispatch which is injecting fear by their relentless criticisms of Brunner who is just trying to fix the broken system she inherited, including inherently flawed voting machines.

"Fear and intimidation" -- GOP speak for cleaning out the Augean stable of Republican election hackery.

Good luck with that one, Sen. McCain.

The lesson to be learned from the Carville/Matlin marriage is that the two sides have far fewer differences in actual goals than they profess in public.

user-pic

I seriously doubt you've ever really listened to him:

...Because one of the things that we have to change in our politics is the idea that people cannot disagree without challenging each other's character and patriotism....

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/08/the_full_text_of_obamas_speech.php

Well I guess I am one of the only people who has watched Carville on CNN since Obama won the primary. He has trashed Obama at every opportunity and last week when Obama announced Biden as the choice, Carville immediately went on the air to stir up the so-called disaffected HRC voters. He repeatedly said that Hillary had been disrespected by Obama by not only not vetting her but by not consulting with Hillary or Bill about his choice. He conveniently forgot to mention that the Clintons did not want to turn over sensitive documents unless it was a sure thing. He trashed his fellow Dems the first night of the convention, but managed to make sure he was photographed wearing his PUMA sneakers. And I think you are missing the big picture when you ask why he would want to derail Obama. It's about Hillary in 2012, stupid. I guess we now know why Kerry has been such an emphatic supporter of Obama.

I remember reading about this, and believing every word. Carville is a piece of garbage.

It seems very ineffective for folks to spend so much time and energy creating divisions and spreading little fights among like minded people. I do not understand why you would rush to label Carville as an "enemy". He does not have to be viewed that way. Rather he can be seen as a valuable asset.
Sure I can understand that in order to live with Matalin I would personally need a lobotomy, I have no idea how he does it or for that matter how she can do it. The explanation of him being a political slut seems plausible it would also apply to her.
My point is that the Clintons are very capable and effective politicians and we get absolutely nothing by carrying on a crazy fight against them.
Come on folks, can you see that these little bouts of internecine fights are truly the delight of Mr. Rove and his ilk? Save your attacks and your energies to unite against the common enemy and to defeat Bush/Chenney/McCain.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address