Hillary's Smart Speech, and What Bill Should Say Tonight
Last night Hillary Clinton had one singular objective: tell her recalcitrant supporters to accept her defeat in the Democratic primary and support Barack Obama in November. From that perspective, it's hard to judge her speech as anything but a rollicking success.
To be sure, I don't see any long, soulful walks on the beach or late night gab sessions over beers in their future. They are, and remain, political rivals and as the saying goes, politics ain't bean bag.
It was in this vein that Hillary Clinton delivered her remarks last night, eschewing a more effusive personal endorsement or even a no-holds barred attack on John McCain and instead offering her supporters a more interest-based rationale for supporting Obama. 'You may not like this guy,' she seemed to be suggesting, but 'if you share my values and my concerns then you need to hold your nose and vote for him. '
On the surface, this may not seem like the most generous or warmest endorsements of Obama but it is the smartest. It's the sort of pragmatic approach to politics that Democrats have at times avoided; preferring instead to be right than making sure they do what has to be done to win. Last night Hillary Clinton took the most direct approach to satisfying her supporters, by reminding them that the alternative to Obama is to deny the whole rationale for her campaign. As she plaintively told the audience, "Were you in this campaign just for me?"
Nonetheless, some pundits are complaining that Hillary did not make the 'leadership" argument for Obama; she didn't argue persuasively enough that Obama is ready to be President. But that wasn't really her job. Instead that responsibility will fall squarely on her husband, former President Clinton.
There is no better figure to vouch for Obama's preparedness as Commander in Chief than the last Democrat to hold the office. For all of Clinton's shenanigans and ill-advised statements during the primaries he is still revered among Democrats and his Presidency, if not the man, is viewed in largely favorable terms by the electorate. He has a unique credibility and opportunity to make an affirmative case for Barack Obama and, if you will, pass the baton of presidential leadership from one Democratic president to potentially another.
In addition, to making a symbolic case for Obama, President Clinton will have a unique opportunity to lay out the differences in the approaches of the two parties, particularly when it comes to the economy and foreign policy.
Last night, Hillary Clinton reminded the convention that under the Clinton years, the country had it pretty good. I expect that we'll be hearing more of that message tonight from Bill, who not surprisingly loves to talk about the 22 million jobs and peace and prosperity of his Administration. Offering hope to the American people that an Obama Administration can offer the same potential and reminding the country how the Bush Administration mishandled a record budget surplus and a thriving economy will provide a powerful and effective contrast.
One of the key goals of this convention for Democrats is not only to tell the American people that they have a plan for the country, but that they actually know how to implement it, i.e. that they have a plan for governing the country. Comparing the past performance of Democrats with the poor performance of Republicans over the past eight years will be an effective means of making this critically important point.
Of course, tonight's speech from President Clinton - and last night's from Hillary -will not be without irony. After spending more than a year trying to defeat Obama the Clintons are poised to become two of his greatest assets in the general election to come.















Has anyone checked the polls, past and present? Are the Clintons really the most favorite people in the US?
They just lost an election, primary and caucus and delegate and super delegate driven, but hey, they lost. Bill got fired. Hillary didn't get the nominee spot on the ticket.
It's about time they suck it up, face reality and disappear quietly into the land of has-beens.
August 27, 2008 5:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Obama took your advice and asked Bill and Hillary to go shut up in the corner, he would lose so thoroughly that he couldn't even be an effective senator. Get a grip on yourself. Obama won the primary be the slimmest of margins and he doesn't need shitheels trying to divide the party and alienate the votes he needs to win. Why don't you take your own advice?
August 27, 2008 11:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bill should say that Obama is a lot like he was.
Smart, ambitious, and able to take on the Republican agenda on the terms it validated itself upon.
August 27, 2008 6:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
You just can't give up the narrative, can you? Here we have a candidate that has been asked to do something that no other candidate has been asked to do and that is endorse the rival candidate and do so by making a speech on prime time television. She unequivocably, in the strongest language possible endorsed Barack Obama on June 7th when she stopped her campaigning and did the same last night, while today she made the motion that the roll call be stopped and Barack Obama be nominated by acclamation and the hacks from the think tanks and the press still can't bring themselves to say one damned thing about her that isn't couched in the press narrative.
Well, that's your story, and you're stickin' to it, aren't you? You're too lazy and unoriginal to even bother to attempt to write something new - it wasn't "effusive" enough, it was a "hold your nose" endorsement" she didn't make a "no holds barred attack on John McCain" and she "plaintively" asked her supporters why they were involved in this race.
"Some pundits" your ass. It's you and hacks like you who keep this story alive no matter how stupid or wrong it is. Every remark you wrote on this site was said by Tucker Carlson, Mike Murphy the republican consultant and Joe Scarborough this morning. Every - single - remark, all made by the Stepford Hacks who always know better than anyone else as to what should have been said, or should have been done and yet have never, ever been able to do it themselves.
August 27, 2008 8:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, BevD. Well said.
August 28, 2008 12:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Chet Edwards, who? Guess John Edwards was preoccupied with other matters.
A great starting speech from Sen Jack Reed.
Wow, Sen Kerry showed some real spine....
Sen Bayh did a good job in his efforts to also hang the Bush rope around McCain's neck.
Sen Biden did okay but thought he had a bit of a cheesy start....
As for the third night of the Convention - bash, trash, and then toss in the dumpster....
August 27, 2008 11:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bev. D--
What you said.
August 28, 2008 8:35 PM | Reply | Permalink