TPMCafe
« A Beggar in Jerusalem | Home | Maliki's Pushback »

Bob Herbert In The Times: It's Race, Stupid

user-pic

This is depressing.

I agree with Herbert that Obama is clearly behind NOW. But I think that can change and that our ground operation on Election Day can make the difference. In any case, once the Democratic choice came down to an African-American and a woman, it was inevitable that racism or sexism would be a significant factor. If we wanted a 10 point lead, we should have nominated a southern white male (like the late lamentable Edwards).

I have been keeping tabs of my favorite phrase white Democrats use to justify their anti-Obama sentiments. Obviously, they can't say, "hey, he's black." So they say "who is he" or "I don't know anything about him."

Like they knew Bill Clinton in 1992 or Mike Dukakis in 1988. I kind of wish they would just say that they won't vote for a black guy. It would clarify things.

Actually, Jewish Democrats who oppose Obama (a tiny tiny minority) have no choice but to go the honesty route. After Obama picked pro-Israel stalwart, Joe Biden, they can't very well say that he's anti-Israel so all this will be left is to tell the truth about why they are "uncomfortable" with Obama.

I any case, read Herbert. and this great piece by Jacob Weisberg.


35 Comments

| Leave a comment

You're going to get a lot of push back on this one MJ, but it doesn't mean you are not right!

user-pic

Yes, there are folks who wont vote for a black candidate, a woman candidate or an old candidate. But to paint everyone who doesnt support YOUR candidate as racist is self defeating.

This is how we will lose this election. By saying that anyone who cant see how wonderful Senator Obama is MUST be a racist. That will turn off more voters than anything McCain or Obama says.

HRC brought many women into the Democratic party to vote for her, women who have voted Republican in the last couple of elections. The fact that they have moved back to the R column is no necessarily because they are racist. However it is sentiments like this that will keep them there.

Funny, I didn't get that out of the story. I don't think he is saying all that don't support Obama are racist, just enough of them that it could make a difference. It doesn't take much to through en election these days.

Yes, Les Ismore protests too much. Less what, I wonder.

user-pic

You make my point exactly Wig

Epsecially the "I don't know anything about him" excuse gets tiresome. You can find out where Obama stands on almost any issue by spending a few minutes on his web site. The people who claim not to know where Obama stands are being deliberately obtuse.

I know, that's the laziest, most disappointing answer a person can give to such a question. Like, what the hell is wrong with people who say this? WHO THE HELL's job is it to know about their presidential candidates? It is YOUR job as a citizen to know! How on earth people can content themselves with simply not knowing anything about the people who will be elected as their leaders - mind boggling. Right now though, there are a lot of white middle age people saying this exact thing though. Wilfull ignorance on their part, and they blame Obama. They "don't know enough about him", but they also "don't want to hear more about him". What does that mean? Simple. I won't vote for this black guy who did better than I did in life, because he must have benefitted from Affirmative Action, and only got to where he is because he's black. That's what the middle age white Americans who "don't know enough about Obama" are largely saying. Sad self-parody.

user-pic

And it's the same people who are blind to the fact that McCain got into Annapolis because his father was an admiral. (Affirmative action is only a negative when made available to the poor or minorities. Like Bush's admittance into Yale had absolutely nothing to do with his father?)

user-pic

Johnny McMaverick earned that spot at Annapolis by working hard being the son and grandson of admirals. Also called the "lucky sperm" club.

user-pic

I love me some Bill clinton but it time to stop kissing up the Clintons.

we meed to do what the Republicans are doing and tell people why they shouldn't vote for McCain. I think we need a pro-choice ad up in all the swing states.

It's not race. He just needs to FIGHT!! Oh my god it's like I'm on crazy-pills... Get negative. Get tough. Bloody McCain's lip once, preferably twice, a day. American's hate losers. And Barack is acting like a pencil-neck-geek loser. (Bonus: Once he starts FIGHTING, Democrats will stop the HRC infighting....)

FIGHT DAMMIT!

Six weeks is an eternity in American politics. Hang tough.

Wigmarx: Thanks. Agreed, but we're dealing with "negatives." I thought that once negatives set in, they're nearly impossible to make go away. Obama's "negatives" have skyrocketed in 6 weeks.

user-pic

HRC brought many women into the Democratic party to vote for her, women who have voted Republican in the last couple of elections

Okay, if you say so.

Remember those rabid racist hillbillies of WV that gave Hillary a 40 victory over Obama? When it became the general election, McCain was only ahead of Obama by 8 points. What if Obama spent more than 3 hours in WV and actually talked to those voters like Jesse Jackson did on a platform of economic justice?

Yes - I grant that there are some voters we will never get because they are truly racist and would never vote for a black person. By painting all the ones who still have questions about Obama that are not racially based, you are pushing them further away by 1. ignoring their concerns 2. Accusing them of racism. That's precisely the opposite of what we want to do. Don't throw the non-racists out with the bathwater.

Rcvd.

I agree. I don't get why he hasn't made the effort in those areas.

Whether it's race or not, the American voters will have to decide between the failed and loathsome GOP policies that are destroying the dreams of the working and middle class of this country and the worker-friendly policies of the Democratic Party.

If American voters cannot get past racial identity, then we are in for at least 1-2 terms of loathsome radicals who will tear our country apart and sink our middle and working class folks down the ladder to join Chinese laborers. Humans aren't always known for their critical thinking skills, after all.

But when I find a Republican in my neighborhood who wants to pour all of his/her anxiety into a political discussion and then says "but, but he's black" or, more likely, covers the real reason with "but, I can't vote for a Democrat" or the highly stupid, "but, he might get assasinated" then I have a response.

I recognize what the person says and then recommend that the person stay home from voting and let the rest of us make the decision. That's the best I can do--depress the turnout of these misguided folk.

I do not know if there are enough to support Obama by November; but this fight is worthy. I want a world that is not changed even more by these far-right radicals. My grandson deserves better from me. So I will fight on instead of getting all depressed and figuring "oh, well, nothing will change."

Depressed, my a$$. Get out and keep talking, folks. Work with the campaign so we can get the folks to the election who are not so fearful of someone's race, political affiliation or the entirely stupid fear of getting the person assassinated. Stop it right now and get busy.

user-pic

I agree with onceler.

This, "I don't know enough," or "he needs to convince me" crap is the laziest, most dishonest tripe a voter can spew out. It's the epitome of consumerism, like these guys are both out hawking a product, and the one with the best pitch wins.

Not the best product, not the product that fills your needs, but the one that's best pitched.

These folks think it sounds smart and savvy, this "I need to hear more." No, it sounds like stupid people who've been too damn lazy to actually learn about and defend their own interests.

Bet they'd do a lot more digging if they were buying a new flatscreen TV, or debating who the Lions' starting QB should be.

Instead, they'll sit on their asses, watch TV ads; express some mild discomfort with the Democrat; vote based on some inane, erroneous tidbit from one of said ads, forwarded emails, or their equally stupid and lazy neighbor; then complain for another four years while shit goes further down the toilet, and we repeat the entire process in 2012.

Because god knows, it can't be as simple as looking at who's been in charge, and living the consequences. God knows, "Bush" might suck, but modern Republican ideology could have nothing to with it.

Is it? The factor? Certainly race is in the mix - an ingredient in the race, and one of many - but is it the pivot? Do the next four years of our lives turn on Obama's race?

It's pretty clear the neoconservative right wants it that way. Its demonization of the Obamas reflects not so much what neocons themselves feel as, rather, a crude caricature of what they think the typical American peasant feels. Neoconservatives have invested so much energy and time gaining access to the eardrums of power they are utterly out of touch with “just folks.” They retain their urban, elitist fear/hatred of the populist “other”, seeing mom-and-pop America as a would-be lynch mob - a vast collective of blithering racist goons hiding beneath veneers of congenial cornpone. It’s classic Old Left denigration of the weakest link of the enemy class, and to that extent the neocons haven’t rolled that far from the Trotsky Tree.

And perhaps they project their own taste for savagery onto Americans in general, fully expecting poll boosts after showing ugly “trophy photos” of enemy corpses in Iraq, or Saddam’s own necktie party. Neoconservatives fully believe average-Joe America quakes in fear that Obama will bring ghetto vengeance to the White House, that he's a Nat Turner in tailored wool; they seek to foster and exploit that misapprehension for political advantage. Anyone buying into that line must have been astounded that Michelle Obama failed to lash out at the damn honkeys all up in her business.

But why do progressives maintain it's all about race? It's such obsessive subject matter it's easy to imagine some wishful thinking propelling the proposal along. Is the modern-day, American Left so stuck in a rut it must pound everything into an out-of-date format like The Constant Racial Divide? Has anything changed since 1956? How much do progressives want the whole kaboodle to be about race, race, race?

Remember: The real news here is that America's first, major-party African-American candidate is mostly leading the Presidential race. That's the important factor - not racial animosity torpedoing his run. It's there. It will always be there. But I'm one who can't believe it will conclude our fate come November.

Well.....we don't know Obama because he's new and, we don't know Hillary because.......what we see is only what we are meant to see.

Congratulations to the republicans. They have been successful, mostly, in using the Hillary (PUMA) thing to kill my ideological motivation leaving my desire and belief that "change" can really happen on the trash heap with the rest of the hopes left from my idealist youth.

Copenhagen is so nice this time of year.

user-pic

Elsewhere in TPM world there are a lot of complaints that last night was too tame on the repubs. I think the campaign did a great job however. They introduced Obama's family to the American people in a way that hadn't been done before. It will be so much harder for people to say that they "do not know him". The fact that his brother-in-law is college level basketball coach was a great touch (I didn't know that before). Many white sport's fans can identify with a black at this level.

Last night was very good for Obama, and it was good because they addressed the concerns in MJ's post.

Well, some of us actually wanted that ten point lead. For precisely this reason. Obama's good, but I've been telling people for the last 17 or so months that he needs to REALLY be ahead to win this thing. I remember the Wilder election here in Virginia. Wilder was actually ahead here by ten or so points, and barely pulled it out.

As Steve Gilliard used to say, once the curtains close in the voting booth, some will forget to vote for Obama.....

I actually thought the country was farther down the road on this issue than it is. Looks like I'm wrong. Just look at the polling number among older white Americans.

It's depressing.

Actually the bigger factor may be the close primary race, the fact that he was running against the first women to really have a shot at the Presidency and the establishment support she acquired before the primaries. If Obama's opponent had been a man and/or if Hillary had lost by a larger margin, we may have avoided this problem.

user-pic

Yes it is about race and I always knew it would be because the subject would be far too tempting for the R's to pass up. And, no, I am not saying everyone who questions Obama is a racist but we do live in a society where race is an issue. We identify ourselves by it (i.e. Irish-American, Italian-American, African-American, etc.).

The only way to win is to mobilize as many young voters as we can. They seem to be the least motivated by race as an issue. Also I think McCain's age, and declining mental capacity, should be just as big an issue.

We shouldn't wring our hands over an attack we knew was coming. As MJ pointed out they would be attacking Hillary if she was the D's nominee over her gender claiming she is some kind of radical feminist and planting the 'seeds of doubts' so whoever decided they could use them.

When the D's got down to Obama and Clinton as their potential nominees I knew that a race or gender attack was gonna happen by the R's, even if it was a 'soft attack' (the celebrity ad, stc.). All they know how to do in terms of message is attacks based on harted, fear and/or ignorance. We don't live in a post-racial America quite yet. I say attack McCain over his age, his policies which are the continuation of Bush's, his temper and his legislative record...try to put more doubt about McCain in their minds than they have about Obama. The reasons the should doubts McCain are real and tangible as opposed to the irrational doubts they might have about Obama.

user-pic

What is really depressing about this conversation (or hilarious, depending) are these three fine examples of 'white supremacy' that were arrested in Colorado yesterday for possibly plotting to shoot Sen. Obama.

It defies belief.

I actually thought the country was farther down the road on this issue than it is. Looks like I'm wrong. Just look at the polling number among older white Americans.

Yet McCain is the one who says that Social Security is "disgraceful" while quite happy to collect his every month. Most of these "Older White Americans" are the ones whose Social Security Checks are, what keeps their rent paid, their food on table and pays for their medications. Why do these people keep voting against their own interests. Do they simply see McCain as one of their own?
P.S. I'm one of the above group and I'm terrified of what McCain's handlers will do if he gets into office.

It's about skin color, unfortunately, and many will ignore their own interests to make sure that one of "ours" gets the chair.

Sucks, but that's the way it is.

I do think he can win, but I'm not seeing any blowouts develop. If he wins, I expect the media to jump on this "story" about why he didn't win by ten points. If he loses, I also expect little in the way of commentary about how his race played a part in it all.

It's about skin color, unfortunately, and many will ignore their own interests to make sure that one of "ours" gets the chair.

Sucks, but that's the way it is.

I do think he can win, but I'm not seeing any blowouts develop. If he wins, I expect the media to jump on this "story" about why he didn't win by ten points. If he loses, I also expect little in the way of commentary about how his race played a part in it all.

user-pic

Occam's razor.

user-pic

It's all about which candidate will guarantee that 9-11, Iraq and the "Wat on Terror" will be forgotten about, so nobody has to reproach themselves, or even worse, be reproached. The man who can win is the man who can make the last eight years a "freebie" or "do-over". Obama cannot do this. His very appearance is a reproach, one which says "You white guys really fucked up"!
McCain on the other hand, will give us the best excuse to just pass all that water under the lid, and flush; the greater emergency and bigger enemies to come!
Obama knows this, it shows plainly, but there's not a damn thing he can do about it. Every time he attacks McCain, he might as well be attacking every person in America who went crazy after 9-11, then profited by it. That's a hell of a lot of people. It's a nasty situation.
Me, I'm just gonna try and pull the Obama and D handles as many times as I can before they drag me, kicking and screaming, from the booth.

user-pic

Remember, we're living in a country that put George W. Bush in office twice. The American electorate is ill-informed, disengaged, and prone to voting against their own best interests.

Given the sorry state of our media and the political culture at the moment, the only way I see Obama winning is with massive turnout. If Democratic voters show up at the polls in historic numbers, Obama/Biden will win.

"Most of these "Older White Americans" are the ones whose Social Security Checks are, what keeps their rent paid, their food on table and pays for their medications. Why do these people keep voting against their own interests. Do they simply see McCain as one of their own?"

Superficially, yes.

I have to say that when I step away from the political junkie beat, I don't see much at all about the policies of either candidate. I do see CNBC *relentlessly* lying about Obama's tax policy. There was the "drill now" blow up. Both of these play into the hands of the Republicans.

I find this really offensive. "people who don't support Barack Obama are racist, and the proof of that is they're not supporting Barack Obama."

it's been awhile since college but I believe they call that a tautology.

nobody has any real reasons for not liking him? how about these:

he's too liberal; he's too young; he's too inexperienced; he keeps changing his stances so I don't know what he really believes; he says he's about "change" but then chooses Joe "Mr. Beltway" Biden for his VP; he 's a typical Chicago pol who won his first races by political maneuvering; he's pro-choice; he spoke of having a baby as a "punishment"; he's a tax-and-spend big-government Democrat; I don't like how he treated Hillary; he didn't campaign in my state; he didn't want to seat my state's delegates; he called me bitter; his former pastor is a wack job; he wants to negotiate with that nut from Iran; he wants to pull our troops out of Iraq and leave a bloodbath in our wake; his policies will lead us to socialism.

now...I'm not saying *I* think all these things. (I don't. not all. maybe a couple.) but these are all typical comments I've read on conservative blogs.

you may choose to believe that all of these concerns are just thinly veiled ways of saying "I don't like the Negro," but I think to do that is incorrect. it's wishful thinking, because you don't want to DEAL with the fact that Obama is way to the left of most of the electorate. it has nothing to do with his skin color, much as you would like it to.

I'm not saying there aren't people out there who won't vote for him because he's black, but there are an equal number who wouldn't vote for a Jew, a woman, a Hispanic, a Catholic, a Mormon, or a freaking "Ginger." we can't do anything about freaks like this. but they represent a small percentage of the voters.

"I just don't know a lot about him" sounds like the comment of a person who just doesn't want to discuss it with you because they don't want to say anything un-PC. who wants to be called a racist, after all? what, that wouldn't happen? look again--it just did.

user-pic


In any case, once the Democratic choice came down to an African-American and a woman, it was inevitable that racism or sexism would be a significant factor.

Well what was certainly inevitable was that accusations of racism or sexism would be never ending.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »



Book Club Calendar


Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Kyle Krahel-Frolander



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address