Wake Up, Obama Camp
The last month has been excruciating for Obama supporters, watching him and his campaign squander so many hopes and resources on an utterly wimpy campaign. For me, the last straw was yesterday -- in the VFW speech when supposedly Obama was gettting tough against McCain's character assassination strategy -- to watch him speak like a soporific college professor, repeating McCain's charges at length, flattering McCain as honorable and patriotic, and then, finally, sort of begging McCain to take it back! Josh Marshall is totally right to call Obama out on this.
What are they thinking in Chicago? Why would they ever imagine that Americans will vote to make President a candidate who evades and begs? This is like football. If you are hit hard in the pile, you hit back, you don't run to the refs. If the refs (media in this context) make a bad or missed call, you just get up and play harder, hit back harder, throw passes. You never expect the other side to play nice, you never beg for that; and you take for granted that the refs will overlook a lot of stuff.
On evasion: A national, turning-point campaign is not an academic discussion of the issues! You don't go into Saddleback and give a ridiculous, distanced, abstract, evasive, talmudic answer to the abortion question you knew was coming! You look the television camera/voters in the eye and crisply explain your own personal moral perspective in clear, plain language -- acknowledging AFTER you state your views that other moral people can have different views and underlining that you will always respect them, listen to them, and look for common ground. This is not rocket science!
On fighting back: For weeks, Obama has ignored or wheedled when McCain and Lieberman attacked his patriotism and judgement. He has repeatedly begged them to stop because, supposedly, they are more honorable than that. He has asked them to discuss the issues dispassionately. What an insipid approach! McCain has NOT been honorable or honest, and Obama and his surrogates need to hammer on that incessantly. Use words like "lying" and "losing himself" or " (better) "forgetting what he is supposed to stand for." Stop focusing on decades ago in the POW camp. Talk about now, about the last years and months. Make the really obvious point that no candidate for President at this time can really be putting country first if he runs a dirty, lying campaign of false smears. That betrays the public trust. Tell it like it is, Obama!
Politics is not just about issues, it is a metaphorical test of strength. If a man will not get immediately -- if quietly -- angry and fight back when his patriotism is attacked, why should we trust him to defend the country? And if he won't punch back by explaining clearly why his approach to foreign policy is actually tougher and smarter, why McCain's is thoughtless and reckless, why would we think he is better to be Commander in Chief?
And on issues like oil drilling, why not recognize that McCain has adopted an ACTIVE metaphor that makes emotional sense to people? He is saying we should act to tap U.S. resources, and people are not really concerned about how many years it would take to tweak pump prices. They hear action and will and resolve -- and these are highly valued in a President! Obama can certainly get a hearing for other active steps, but he and the Dems should stop pretending that they can parry drilling with logic.
Obama is lucky he is not further behind already. And he is going to fade fast if he just runs a feel-good, bland convention about abstract "hope" and "change." In addition to getting gritty and colorfully clear about his recipe for making Americans' lives better -- AND about his approach to make this nation safer and stronger in the world -- Obama needs to signal all the major speakers at next week's convention to go after McCain in a key part of each speech. We need to hear why McCain is wrong and dangerous and no longer so honest and honorable. It needs repeating with force and humor and passion.
Otherwise, the Convention will be wasted, and this historic turning point for our country will be lost.
And pick a FIGHTER for VP, please. Do it yesterday. Obama, you need someone who will push hard at your side and make you better, too. And you never should have gone on vacation (shades of Kerry) without a VP to carry on. Biden will work, I think, but -- and I never expected to believe this -- it might be time to turn to Hillary. She is at least a fighter, and this election really matters to a lot more than you and her.










Wow! Thank you for saying what needed to be said, Theda.
Sign me up.
August 20, 2008 4:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Truly awesome summary of recent events. I'm sick of hearing about McCain's service to the country, from OBAMA! It's time to take the gloves off, and grow up. This is about hope and change, but Obama needs to realize that he'll have no opportunity to deliver either if he can't clarify his positions into catchy soundbites and hit McCain often and hard.
As said, this is NOT rocket science.
PEACE
August 20, 2008 5:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well said Mom!
On this quote hangs the entire election:
"he is going to fade fast if he just runs a feel-good, bland convention about abstract "hope" and "change."
On the other hand, if he can put meat on his resounding platitudes, he'll put McCain away easy.
August 20, 2008 5:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, and bottom line, for me, is if Obama doesn't step up his game, I'll bug the sh*t out of Moveon.org and tell them to tell Team Obama "sorry, glove are off". This is Obama's race to lose, its OUR race to lose. If Team Obama is unwilling to get dirty, the 527's will need to do the job for him.
PEACE
August 20, 2008 6:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good idea.
August 20, 2008 6:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree Theda. You do not say "That honorable guy questioned my patriotism!" You say, "that asshole had the nerve to question my patriotism because he's either a cranky old man, a senile old man or a desperate old man."
But I'm not sure why you think Biden can help.
August 20, 2008 4:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Because Biden's perfect as an attack dog. Loud-mouthed and dismissive of his political opponents. Exactly the opposite of Obama's style, which is what's badly needed right now.
August 20, 2008 5:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Looks like the campaign has a muzzle on attack dogs. I can't remember a surrogate attack, or even a strongly worded surrogate remark since Clark's slap down. Chicago's making a huge mistake.
August 21, 2008 4:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes. Thank you Theda.
I just posted similar points here and here.
August 20, 2008 4:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
It seems like ever since the Wesley Clark fiasco, the Obama camp has decided that they must risk no sharp attacks on McCain.
I don't get this. Clark had a point but he misfired to some extent. This should not have been taken to mean that no sharp attacks could work.
August 20, 2008 5:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Indeed, sTiVo. Clark was perfect to seriously pull rank and ask the questions necessary to poke fatal holes in McCain's narrative; like, "How exactly does 'getting shot down and taken prisoner' (Bob Schieffer's question, we'll recall) qualify a man for president of the United States?" and "Exactly how does McCain know how to win wars?" Too bad the campaign put Wesley Clark and all his old medals back in the box.
August 20, 2008 6:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
I felt the same way about Clark: they should have stood up for him. Here was a Hillary supporter _really_ stepping up to the "we're all on the same team" plate and they dissed him and lost his very on point message in the process.
I had not thought about the fact that he, if anyone, could "pull rank" on McCain. A great observation.
August 20, 2008 9:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
I couldn't agree with you more, STiVo. Obviously, the Obama Campaign shouldn't take the same tack as General Clark -- i.e., John McCain's time as a POW doesn't necessarily add to his qualifications to be President -- but there is much distance between that argument and ones based entirely on policy differences. Americans routinely prove that, to them, character matters in a presidential election. What is more, character issues -- perceived or real -- can sink a candidate with superior policy prescriptions (and, one imagines, superior oratorical skills).
Put plainly, John McCain has a character issue, but outside of TPM, DailyKos, Air America, "Countdown with Keith Olbermann," and other liberal (read: truth-telling) venues, there's little, if any, mention of it. The Obama Campaign and Sen. Obama himself need to recognize this and start mentioning this character issue at every opportunity. They also needn't get mired in the weeds explaining the foundation for these character issues. After all, voters tend to remember only declarative statements, anyway -- "John McCain is X, Y, and Z" -- while forgetting or failing to analyze critically the reasons offered for those assertions. (See, e.g., "Britney Spears and Paris Hilton are the second and third biggest celebrities in the world?!")
August 20, 2008 6:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I disagree that Clark "misfired". I think the Republicans were just waiting for someone to make that very point so they they could jump on it and squash it, since McCain's status as POW is evidently what they were planning to build their campaign on all along. (No surprise, they don't have much else.) By creating a giant firestorm the first time someone dared to question that experience as demonstrating fitness to be president, and by intimidating Obama into rejecting Clark's point, they cleared the way to keep pounding the "Vote for me, I was a POW, how dare anyone question me" theme.
Obama played right into their hands.
August 20, 2008 8:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clark misfired ONLY in that he didn't call Schieffer out on his clearly pro-McSame slant. I am tired of hearing Dems call out Clark for this truly clarifying moment.
August 20, 2008 10:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
He did misfire, in that he said McCain had no leadership experience in the military and that his time as a POW did not qualify. This allowed his remarks to be smeared as "elitist", and of course with Obama not having had any military experience himself, Clark left himself out on a limb.
Clark's point could have been better made. It could have been more sharply focused on his hotheadedness and errors of judgment on Bush's wars. Having been a POW doesn't - all by itself - make one more qualified than anyone who's never been one.
But none of that is the point. The point is that it seems to have spooked the Obama camp away from making any other sharp attacks on McCain.
August 20, 2008 11:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wrong, wrong and wrong.
Clark gave a straight, accurate, no-nonsense refutation of Schieffer's question. The only misfire came from Clark's Democratic colleagues who failed to counter-attack on his behalf with double the intensity.
You know and I know that if a Democrat criticizes McCain's comb-over, The Right will hyperventilate that they're disrespecting his POW experience. The merits of what any Democrat says is irrelevant; the Right will simply distort and fabricate anyone's words to spin it as an attack.
You draw the erroneous conclusion that if Clark had only used different words the Right wouldn't have smeared him.
Wrong.
Had Clarke's erstwhile allies --especially fellow veterans-- stood by him with double the intensity, the event would have ended positively for Obama and negatively for McCain.
August 21, 2008 12:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
sTiVo,
When CLark made his comment about qualifications, in a snit, Scheiffer asked, "really"
Here's what Clark should have asked that asshole Scheiffer;
"Liberal Senator George McGovern flew 35 bombing missions over enemy territory during WWII, but since he didn't get shot down he wasn't qualified to be President, Bob?"
August 21, 2008 9:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks. As I have said before, the bottom line is Obadiah (TPM spell check correction for 'obama') has not shown why 'the hands that built.....can now build.....' need Obama to build anything.
It must be shown that under McCain the lobbyists will rule and America will continue to be looted, lied to, and the economy will continue to sink.
Given the choice, many 'undecided' lunchpail types would just as soon build new stuff under an old and 'honorable war hero' (who is white) than a rockstar black with a funny name.
August 20, 2008 5:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your "bottom line" is copy-pasted on many posts regardless of the topic.
August 20, 2008 6:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
The truth deserves repetition. Hope Obadias is listening.
August 20, 2008 7:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
With friends like you, who needs enemies? Glad to see the left doing the neocons work for them. No need for them to be overly critical of Obama when the democrats are more than happy to tear him down for not following their advice and having the temerity to keep winning.
Based on all real measures like money raised and primary votes, vice biased polls, Barack is doing just fine. Good thing he is pulling about 20% of the republican vote right now or you clowns would be bitching for the next four years about President McCain and how evil he is.
Principals without pragmatism are useless in moving polical change forward. Obama can't come out swinging for the fences with McCain's head as the ball. It goes against every thing he has already campaigned on. He can't all of sudden become that which he has campaigned against.
Barack didn't have to do it against Clinton. He won't have to do it against McCain. He is barely keeping the corporate media from sinking his campaign as it is. He can't give them a petard on which to hang him between now and November.
Stepping up in front of the VFW and telling them how a decorated POW is evil slime is the exact thing that would make hima footnote instead of president.
Do you guys even read this stuff before you post it? That goes double for the blog that inspired it.
August 21, 2008 6:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know what polls you are reading but McCain has consolidated his base and is pulling a far greater percentage of his base than Obama is his.
August 21, 2008 7:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Polls are worthless and compromised as a method of actually gauging the electorate, especially given how many people are exclusively using cell phones, most of whom are Obama voters. Further, even if the polls can be trusted, this far out they are basically worthless.
If the best you can do is cite polls as to McCain's mythical transcendence, I suggest you look for a more logical baseline. I prefer to use the primary as a good way to examine the data available from this year, rather than trying to fit years past into a changing paradigm and electorate.
August 21, 2008 12:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
PS: Which part if the democratic base won't vote for Barack? Alternatively, the republican "base" is crumbling, so exactly which part of that disappearing base is he getting more of? This comment makes no sense at all.
August 21, 2008 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ole laid back, easy does it, respect McCain the war hero and his service Barack Kerry is on his way to being an also ran.
Obama: 'Folks, make no mistake, I respect the war hero John McCain for his magnificent service to our country and his many honorable years in public service as a U S Senator......'
Public; 'OK, say no more, you convinced me, I'll vote for McCain."
August 20, 2008 5:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Adding to my own post, I don't really think this afternoon's Obama conference call will work, with Susan Rice and Richard Clarke calling McCain reckless. This theme needs to be in a larger across the board critique and push back -- especially one using his own words to show how hot-triggered he was in the original plunge into Iraq. But don't start a push back with a metaphorically weak point, during a week when Russia is a bete noir for attacking Georgia (which has good ties to the U.S. media). Start with points that bespeak strength first, and don't have experts deliver them. Have political leaders do it.
August 20, 2008 5:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
The only way the reckless meme can work is if it's linked to McCain's finger on the (nuclear) button with his "bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran" playing on loop in the background.
Obama's folks are greatly overestimating the intelligence and/or attention span of the nation.
Also, in today's town hall, McCain basically said we may need to reinstate the draft. Play that over and over again, with photos of children morphing to men/women in uniform.
Scare the crap out of Americans, but make sure that McCain is the scary guy this time.
August 20, 2008 5:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
It shouldn't be difficult to make McCain seem scary, Spencers Mom. He's a nightmare. I used to think it couldn't get worse after the Cheney/Bush cabal ripped The Constitution to shreds and sent our young to kill and be killed for the PNAC. I've reassessed.
August 20, 2008 6:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed. Need a real time hook for that. Attack hard and have patience, McCain will provide the video tape soon enuf
August 21, 2008 9:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
And while you're at it, the democratic congress needs to get off their collective ass and start acting like a democratic congress. Introduce new bills, talk up new programs, deliver some change that can help people. What a disaster Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi have been for the party. I have never seen a party so uninvolved in a national election as important as this.
August 20, 2008 5:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Theda Skocpol for VP. It's not too late!!
August 20, 2008 5:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
This (and Josh's front page post) should drive NCSteve and his brethren right through the roof! Heh-heh...
"Everything is fine!"
"You just wait til after the convention!"
"Just wait til he picks a running mate!"
"Just wait til he start really fighting back!"
"Who are you to question his campaign team?"
"How many campaigns have you run?"
"Watch what you say!! The MSM is watching and taking notes!"
*sigh*
August 20, 2008 5:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Remember this?
"One thing about John Kerry, he's a great closer. He knows when his homework is due. He picks his moment to fight back. Just wait till he swings into action... just wait... keep waiting... keeeep waaaaiting..."
August 21, 2008 1:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Great stuff, Theda. I swear (or affirm, actually) that I didn't read you before I posted mine. This fight-back can't just be left to surrogates. Obama's a better speaker than any of them will be--any.
August 20, 2008 5:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with the gist of your sentiments, but I suggest you lose the wimpy "-back" in "fight back" and simply advocate going on the ATTACK. Attack first, and don't -- ever -- apologize for getting truthfully aggressive. Let the Republicans take a shot of the awful truth first and then stagger around trying to figure out how to "fight back." Put them on the defensive.
The entire point of Barack Obama's problem here stems from his (and his party's) instinct to take a punch rather delivering a barrage of them instead. Americans do not sympathize with the victim of a mugging but rather admire the audacity and ruthlessness of the mugger. Barack Obama claims to hail from Chicago politics but his take-it-on-the-chin campaigning lately sure doesn't support that claim.
August 21, 2008 12:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Act, and stop reacting.
I'm quite tired of the Democrats inability or unwillingness (epitomized by the Obama camp) to not go on attack.
August 21, 2008 11:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Todd,
I agree, it can't be left to surrogates as that would leave Obama to look wimpy, something every Democrat should try to avoid.
August 21, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Preach it sister.
August 20, 2008 5:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think Obama needs to change the direction of his attack. Don't take the battle to McCain, take it to the Republicans -- make THAT the focus. Attacking McCain personally is a no-win. He is viewed as a war hero and a likeable guy. Nobody's going to change that paradigm in a couple of months.
Obama needs to make the narrative that this is a choice between him and the party that brought you the catastrophe the United States is suffering today.
He needs to be asking the "are you better off today that yesterday?" question over and over. REMIND people what McCain's party has wrought, NOT what McCain has done personally. He's seen as a candidate who has bucked the party, so that dog won't hunt.
August 20, 2008 5:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I could hardly agree with you more.
McCain is a Republican and they as a party have been guiding this ship FAR too long.
So screw McCain, he is one of them (not a maverick) and let's get a new philosophy going.
August 20, 2008 5:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, you just do not seem to get it. The McCain war hero automatically wins no matter how you try to parse it. And you are just too stupid to understand. McCain will simply say that he is the Maverick of the party and that he will change the party. Of course, you will sit back and suck your thumb because you will not attack the War Hero. Then he will simply lie and eviscerate Obama. But you will not question his methods because it scares you to take on the War Hero. We already see the ads touting him as coming in to change DC. You have already conceded the argument and if you try to change, they will merely point out that a War Hero would not lie.
There is only one workable strategy at this point. First, stop praising McCain. He does not praise Obama. He mocks Obama. He pisses on Obama and you are too stupid to realize the Obama validates it with his simpering responses. Second, you wait till somebody else brings up the issue. Then Obama should use the following statement:
"Yes, McCain was indeed a good soldier when a POW. But something has changed in Senator McCain with the passage of the decades since the Vietnam War. He is not the same man that he was even during the 2000 primary campaign when he held honor over the smear tactics used against him by Bush and Karl Rove. Indeed, that was the McCain who said that there would be a special place in hell for Karl
Rove and those like him.
Perhaps it is ambition as John said himself in his book on the 2000 campaign: - add quote - . We do know that John started these demeaning ads after his chief campaign strategist became - add name. Karl Rove's second in command.
I am sorry to see the old John McCain. You know, the John McCain who criticized the extremism of certain leaders of the extreme religious right now embrace them. I miss the old John McCain who was the Maverick and was independent until he moved to gain political points by changing his views on taxes, drilling, ect. I miss the old John McCain who fought special interests until he finally gave in to staff his campaign with lobbyists. I miss the old John McCain that would not question the patriotism of another member in the Senate. "
It is tough, but appropriate and would be very effective. There was nothing more pathetic than General Petin the hero of France during WWI who became the puppet of the Nazi's in Vichy France during WWII. The past is past and sometimes you just have to break those old myths.
August 20, 2008 6:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nice. YES. Does Obama have the cajones to do this?
August 20, 2008 10:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Whoops, sorry about the bold type -- that was a boo-boo.
August 20, 2008 5:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
what a major league disappointment this Obama campaign has become. Kerry redux. In fairness to Kerry, the attacks on Obama are not anything compared to the swift boat attacks on Kerry. The McCain camp will not even need the heavy-duty stuff. McCain supports the worst president in history, weds himself to an incredibly unpopular war, supports the economic policies that are impoverishing the middle class, flips repeatedly on every issue, has character issues a mile long and the Obama camp is on the defensive every day. The Democratic Party, aka "Wimps 'R Us".
August 20, 2008 5:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama is on track to lose.
The supposed high point of the campaign, the convention, is happening as Obama is failing.
Everyday, every thread has Obama supporters screaming for him to get tough. He hasn't and at this point really can't. It will just seem desperate.
How can you continue to ignore the fact that essentially as many people who supported Obama as the nominee also supported Clinton?
The trend and momentum are all important in an election. Right now McCain has it and is likely to keep it. There is really only one way to change the dynamic of this race in the Democrats favor. You guessed it: Hillary Clinton.
Clinton needs to be offered a free and clear shot to be the nominee at the convention. It would change the entire dynamic, through McCain off his game. She demonstrated quite well that she is a fighter and will not quit.
With the calls for Obama to win at any cost, attack, attack, attack, raise massive money to buy the election how can you all ignore that those methods were exactly what you claimed to despise in Clinton. Hillary Clinton is the only way to pull this one out of the fire.
August 20, 2008 5:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
You are just a stupid person. I don't understand how you can even occasionally read this site, and still be as stupid as you are.
August 20, 2008 5:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for your thoughtful response. It is typical of myopic Obamites.
August 20, 2008 6:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sear this onto the shriveled surface of your cerebral cortex: HILLARY CLINTON LOST SIX MONTHS AGO. SHE IS NOT IN CONTENTION FOR THE DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION IN 2008, NOR IS ANYONE OTHER THAN BARACK OBAMA. Honestly, how can you be so goddamned stupid? I'm just asking. You children love to talk about how "Obamabots" don't pay attention to reality, ignore their candidate's weaknesses, etc. Speck in our eye, versus 7,000-acre old-growth redwood forest in yours, anyone? Does it not occur to you that it might be a fairly serious flaw with your perfect savior candidate that she couldn't even win a series of elections among a big group of Democrats, the party she is a member of, to be their nominee?
Just...no. No, no, no, no. There is less than zero chance Hillary will be the nominee in 2008. Were you standing around in December 2004, speculating about how maybe John Kerry could pull off a surprise at the meeting of the Electoral College? How fucking stupid do you have to be to believe that Clinton has a chance in a convention at which an outright majority of the delegates are either pledged or long-time supporters of Barack Obama? Especially when the majority of her support has long since shifted to him? You and your ilk are just so sad, and so trapped in your alternate fantasy world.
August 20, 2008 6:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Damn, this site could really use a preview function for comments. The bold tags are supposed to close when the capital letters end. Oh well.
August 20, 2008 6:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Certain gusts of wind blow through here SS451 because they want somebody to pay attention to them. They are defined by externals not interiors It makes them feel significant when the bait is taken. Sadly, it inevitably is.
As thinking beings we can learn by our mistakes, though.
August 20, 2008 6:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
714Day,
excellent point.
August 21, 2008 6:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama is running a classical Democratic campaign.
The Democrats are only placeholders until we can find something better (a third party that will replace it).
They have run Congress so poorly that maybe it wasn't such a good idea for them to become (care of Lieberman) the majority Party in both houses.
The need for a third party has not been so great since the 1850's.
Since Obama is a Dem, I expected this poor campaign, and I expect it to get worse.If he wins, it will be in spite of his Party, not because of it. And if he loses, the only good that could possibly come of it would be that it will end the Democratic party as we know it.
August 20, 2008 5:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
He is running a classic democratic campaign? Name one democrat in the last 40 years who captured a significant percentage of the republican vote in the primaries.
Obama is running the anti-liberal campaign. He isn't afraid to talk about faith. he isn't afraid to talk about race. He isn't afraid to talk to us like adults. He doesn't want string up republicans in retribution for Bush and the neocons crimes.
He is the anti Democrat. That's why he is winning.
August 21, 2008 1:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
I posted this over at Steve Clemons' site and I am reposting it here. Thank you Theda. I am so worried about the VP choice -- I fear that it is going to be the nail in the momentum coffin:
Remember all the excitement generated by the Clinton/Obama
primary? How with every state's turn to vote the media
breathlessly reported on all the thousands and thousands of new
voters, the long lines to vote, the harried local/county registars
talking about running out of ballots for people? How they'd
"never seen such numbers," how the excitement was palpable
and unprecedented, how the turn-out was like no other primary
in recent memory?
That's all over now, isn't it. The zeitgeist is flat and stale. Bored,
even.
With Clinton out of the mix, Obama now stands alone -- and he
is in total free-fall against one of the most comprised
presidential nominees in a very, very long time.
Pick Clinton. Bring back the vigor and excitement of the primary.
She's been through the ringer for the past, oh, 30 years, and she
can stand her own.
Talk about being seen as a sure bet on the economy. And of
course she has down sides, but who doesn't? Hair-plug Biden?
Please, talk about a Beltway Porcellian lifer. That choice would
certainly support the BO theme of change, huh.
But for me, an Obama voter, a cost-benefit analysis of a Clinton
VP shows far more upsides. She's such a known quantity, and
that would really counter his problem of being the exact
opposite.
She will also be one of the most effective fighters available -- in
direct opposition to Obama's current offensive strategy (term
used very loosely) of rainbows, unicorns, and sunny Shirley
Temples sent out to fight the Wehrmacht.
If Obama is too prissy to get down in the dirt with McCain then
for the love of god -- for the sake of our country -- choose
someone who will.
August 20, 2008 5:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Amen to that
It just does not seem to be in Obama's psychological makeup to get down and dirty and finish the old fart off. Hillary can do it. But she will be at the bottom of the ticket and if she does what she does so well she will make Obama look like HE should be on the bottom of the ticket.
It is really tragic.
Obama lives in a world where he thinks that the way for him to get elected he has to match the oratory of Martin Luther King. He is no Martin Luther King, and even if he were to be, THAT would not get him elected president either. Kennedy who could match MLK in oratory decided—wisely—to pick Johnson as his VP.
I have argued elsewhere that Obama is in a difficult position. If he gets down and dirty with McCain, people will see it as an "uppity" response. If he takes the high road (which is what he is trying to do), he seems like a weak sister. So what is the answer?
My suggestion is
1) Pick Hillary.
2) Adopt a position that is neither wimpy nor aggressive. Exactly how that would look, I still don't know. Obama has some very strong assets: he is thoughtful. McCain--in contrast--is THOUGHTLESS. You can be thoughtful and still not project an air of wimpiness and you can be thoughtless and fail to convince the masses that you know what you are doing.
It is true that McCain's bellicosity comes through as "assertive" even "decisive". He is taking a page from Bush Jr. who also milked that confusion for all it was worth.
The trick is not to succumb to bellicosity, but to make McCain look reckless and dangerous for our country: which HE REALLY IS.
Stick with what is true.
America cannot afford another four years of reckless bellicosity. Tie McCain's bellicosity to Bush's. Ask the rhetorical question
Can we as Americans afford to elect a president who shows all the signs of being dangerously bellicose in a world that needs thoughtfulness?"
That would be my approach off hand.
Let Hillary do the dirty work.
It is Kennedy/Johnson all over again.
August 20, 2008 8:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hear! Hear!
I've felt that way since February, but the fact is we're stuck with him. Our only chance is if somehow, somebody talks some sense into him so he gets off his ass and fights to win. I ain't holding my breath though.
August 21, 2008 2:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm honestly dumfounded by the Democrats' collective refusal to use words like "lie" to describe deliberate falsehoods and "liar' to describe those who lie.
Obama’s problem is that his responses to McCain are cerebral, not visceral. The average American voter is ill-informed and apathetic. Because it takes far more than a single election cycle or a 30 second ad to educate a voter it is far more effective to appeal to their raw emotion than to reason. Republicans have recognized and exploited this basic fact of American politics for a generation.
If Obama wants to win this thing, he needs to stop saying McCain is a Bush clone or that he favors tax cuts for the rich and start selling the story that McCain is a borderline-senile, cranky old son-of-a-bitch who thinks he’s better than the rest of us.
It ain't bean bag!
August 20, 2008 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cheshire, if they started calling McCain and Repubs liars, it might raise questions about why it took them so long to figure it out...
The ostrich approach is the one they adopted long ago. An ostrich does not turn into an eagle overnight.
August 20, 2008 5:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
An ostrich doesn't turn into an eagle overnight, which is another reason to bring Hillary on as VP. No one is going to see it as inconsistent if the first thing Hillary does is goes down to the school yard and rips McWimpy's balls off with nary a flick of her wrist.
August 20, 2008 8:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
An important point here: an ostrich doesn't EVER turn into an eagle is the reality.
We need Democrats who aren't beholden to the very same interests the Republicans are beholden to. Unless and until that day comes we're all fucked.
August 21, 2008 2:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
...and where are all the usually feisty Dems who can tell it like
it is such as Carville and Begala??? They've been awfully and oddly silent. Are they all still mourning Hill? Come on guys! Isn't the prospect of the neocons for 4 more years destroying America enough to motivate y'all to move?! I hate to say it but, country first... ouch. If I didn't know better I'd say they all want O to lose, then again, maybe they do but at what cost to us all?
August 20, 2008 5:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree completely. Have we learned nothing in the last 2 elections? Obama needs to run a campaign that is the polar opposite of Kerry 04.
If he picks Bayh, it will be a disaster of epic proportions.
Bring on a fighter like Clark, or even Hillary. Actually, Hillary is looking a lot more appealing these days.
August 20, 2008 5:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agree-Hillary ain't looking so bad, although she has got little chance to get VP.
August 20, 2008 7:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is almost like the Obama campaign is trying to win the approval of a hand full of media pundits. When they don't give their approval (as in the Clark dust up) they drop their heads, sulk away and try something else. It is just time for Obama to realize that it is better to be respected than liked. The media types aren't going to like him anyway. Punch McCain in the nose. If he gets up, punch him again.
The other day I say a wonderful memo from the Obama camp outlining McCain's weakness on womens issues. He could win the election if he just hits McCain and kept hitting him on his anti-woman positions. I saw a wonderful memo but no follow up. No comment in the press. Nothing. Just a damn memo outlining exactly how to hit McCain.
The same on national security. McCain is a hothead of the first order. Obama's surrogates have said so this afternoon. I bet by tomorrow morning that approach will fall by the wayside as some pundit says it is unfair to McCain or some other person on the Obama campaign wimps out.
The story for the next two months should be about McCain's weaknesses. The story should be unrelenting.
August 20, 2008 5:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
How about one ad -- just one ad -- repeating or eluding to some of Sen. McCain's (in)famous jokes or off-the-cuff (and off-color) comments? Even if the punditocracy questioned whether the ad went below the belt, that at least would ensure that the country would be hearing about the rest of Sen. McCain's character. Can any of you see your septuagenarian or octogenarian grandparents -- grandmothers, in particular -- casting their ballot for someone who thinks a woman being raped by an ape is funny, or who thinks calling his wife a "trollop" and likening her to a four-lettered expletive for women is appropriate?
August 20, 2008 6:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
By the way, where is he spending all of his campaign cash?
I'm not seeing many ads, and the ones I am seeing are blah, blah and blah.
Jeez, put the Will.I.Am videos on TV. Anything effective.
I can only hope he is saving all of his firepower for the fall.
August 20, 2008 5:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hope the Obama campaign reads this (and other intelligent criticism) and puts its recommendations into action, including selecting Hillary as VP (never thought I'd say it).
August 20, 2008 5:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good post. I agree. Americans will not elect a wimp! Pleading for decent conduct from McCain is what weak children do against a bully. The messages continuous on television is that Obama is a celebrity, will raise taxes for families, and is not ready for leadership. And from Obama? Not much that sticks in my mind. Something about the same ole, same ole.
As far as the VFW speech, what the heck was he thinking?
Clinton lost because she had no plan B. Obama's people though it was because they beat her. McCain was watching.
Almost every Democrat knows they can lose the race in August. Obama went on vacation. Well, at least he didn't go windsurfing.
McCain has the momentum and if Obama does not wake up, it will become a landslide.
Just as Obama seems to give long winded responses, perhaps his people read how it was to be the Democrats year, and forgot they had to fight for it.
August 20, 2008 5:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Obama wants to continue to produce change and be seen as reaching across the aisle, I think Chuck Hagel would be a great VP choice. Hagel is an veteran who bucked his party, and criticized the war when it was VERY unpopular in his party to do so.
He has loads of foreign policy experience, and he's a forceful speaker.
August 20, 2008 5:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Apparently Barack has lost the election? Thanks for the update. I slept through the past two months. November 5th sure did get here fast.
August 20, 2008 5:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bless you for making your point very clearly to the Obama Camp. It's so damned frightening to watch hopelessly as McSame gains in the polls when he should be way behind. For America's sake, Mr. Obama, heed the warnings before it's too late! You CANNOT REASON with emotional Americans. Hit McShame in the gut, and DO NOT LET UP!
August 20, 2008 5:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
OMG
He's gonna lose it.
August 20, 2008 5:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed. Who pays attention to the surrogates' conference calls anyway?
August 20, 2008 5:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Amen to everything. If you knew me, you'd know how incredible this next is, but I even agree that it might be time to make Hillary the VP. Things do change.
August 20, 2008 5:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
O is not a wimp. He is tough but he is a finesse player, like his basketball game. But I do think that he has to adjust to the opponent's game because they got his number now.
He needs to grind it out and put him on his heels.
August 20, 2008 5:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bah!
I've seen no evidence at all to suggest you are correct about this. His lack of ever having had a difficult election is showing here very clearly. He doesn't know how to fight and he's demonstrating that ever day. It isn't finesse, it's ineptitude.
August 21, 2008 2:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Amen to everything. If you knew me, you'd know how incredible this next statement is, but I even agree that it might be time to make Hillary the VP. Things do change. (And, like they say: Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer.)
August 20, 2008 5:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
A few last thoughts before I get back to work:
Many people are desperately hoping the Obama GOTV operation will save the day. I know I am. I cling to it because it's the only thing that seems to be going well right now. But isn't a successful, election-determining GOTV operation predicated on the idea that the people you get to the polls give a sh*t about the candidate? I mean, what happens when there's a huge GOTV operation for a candidate that no one cares about? So what? Great, you got all 400 Obama enthusiasts to the local Vegas ballot box. Seems to me that a passion-filled GOTV operation needs passion for the candidate in order to work, right? I don't know, but after the excitement of the primary the bloom sure does seem to be off that rose.
And then I hope for an exciting VP choice, but man, that VP choice is going to be the consensus of all the geniuses who are advising Obama to be above the fray and praise McCain. Hello, their judgement sucks!!
August 20, 2008 5:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
OK... to be fair... As someone has pointed out several times. McCain does seem to have a ceiling. He is throwing quite a lot of money around and advertising heavily and yet it's still close. Maybe Obama's campaign really is holding their fire, their cash, their rough and tumble smack-backs until after the convention and VP pick. Fine. I hope those folks are right. This, however, doesn't negate everything Theda, Todd, and Josh (and a few of us readers, to be a bit conceited here. ;^}) have said. The VFW speech was weak, there should already be hard hitting ads about McCains duplicity, etc... Not later, now!
Yes, Theda, it's way past time for them to wake up.
August 20, 2008 5:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank God we know that Obama reads TPM.
OBAMA! Listen to Skocpol! All of your supporters want you to start playing hardball! All of us! You won't be disappointing anyone! You said this is our campaign, right? Okay. I vote for you to start swinging.
Put on some AC/DC and start hammering the old geezer! Because that's what he is, Obama: a DANGEROUS, CREEPY, RICH, OUT-OF-TOUCH, MEAN-SPIRITED GEEZER!
August 20, 2008 5:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
THANK YOU!!!! I couldn't agree more. There are 2 campaigns taking place here. The "hit hard and fight back campaign" from sites like this (and Jed, C&L,Americablog etc.), and then there's Obama's and the DNC. It would behoove them to take note of this article and fix their campaign now.
August 20, 2008 5:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think they are just getting started! I have learned throughout this campaign not to underestimate this guy. Every time I think he got it wrong, he comes out smelling like a rose. The combination of Rev Wright and taking on the Clintons would have decimated most politicians. But, he is still standing. I suspect a lot more is coming soon.
August 20, 2008 5:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great Post!
If only someone from the Obama campaign could read your post.
That's exactly how many of us feel.
Hoping for Biden as VP but it will probably be Bayh who isn't really a fighter.
At this point I don't have much hope for a fighting VP choice.
August 20, 2008 5:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maritza,
Obama needs to take Hillary as his VP, and if he does that, McCain is a goner.
August 20, 2008 8:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
The situation is close to dire. At this point I'm sorry I didn't invest my time and money in Hillary. What's going on in Chicago?
August 20, 2008 5:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Theda,
Well said. Wake up! Obama. Forget Kaine, Biden and Bayh. You and ur campaign quite your stubbornness and tap HRC for the number two.
August 20, 2008 5:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama’s opponent is NOT McCain right now. Obama’s real opponent is Obama. The problem with Obama is his arrogant thinking that he has the CREDIBILITY as a Democratic Party Leader. The primary electorate who voted for him overlooked his major weaknesses. First of all, he should accept that. Moreover, he doesn’t have any credibility to attack McCain because of his lack of presence in the National or State political scene in the last several years. Even his VP (like Biden, Nunn , Hillary) candidates may have credibility attacking McCain not him. Obama wasted almost two months of precious time with a ton of campaign money. With his ton of campaign money, he could have orchestrated several monologue type solo prime-time national town hall meetings (like Hillary’s Hallmark Channel town-hall meeting) to explain each of his public policy positions (Health Care/Economy & taxes/Foreign Policy/Iraq war etc) in a very substantive manner. Also, Obama could have used the friendly MSM to write positive things about his town-hall meetings. By presenting this way, the UNDECIDED ELECTORATE would have taken him seriously as a substantive leader. Since this was not done, the celebrity ads by McCain camp worked. It is already too late. Obama cannot do this in Denver convention. Right after convention, instead of big rallies and inspiring speeches, he should immediately conduct these kinds of solo National Town Hall Meetings in the prime time in NBC/CBS/ABC. This should be done before the first presidential debate and the World Series. Otherwise the game is over.
(Bill Clinton conducted these kinds of solo town hall meetings in 1992 and impressed lot of people like me with his substantive knowledge in Economy. His substantive explanation of Volcker/Carter’s fiasco in raising interest rates during 1976-80 recession time was hailed by the press and the electorate. At that time he was a small state governor and the electorate doesn’t know him either.)
August 20, 2008 5:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Marshall Ganz is god
Theda Skocpol is goddess!
August 20, 2008 5:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am glad you write this post. I have written on the campaign website myself, perhaps, they would feel the same sense of urgency that we felt.
This is no primary season any longer. Obama needs to step up his game and go after McCain real hard. McCain's new radio Ad is brutal and i am surprise Obama didn’t use the same language first. The Ad basically accused Obama of taxing our children to pay for his spending.
August 20, 2008 5:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Damn, get out and knock some doors. This at home punditry exercise is pathetic. Decide to win your precinct and make it happen.
August 20, 2008 5:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
What is Ploufe thinking, especially after a brilliant primary campaign? The only plausible - though hardly reasonable - explanation is that he wants Obama going into the fall election season as the underdog. Meanwhile Obama is squandering the excitement of a lot of the young people who got him where he is, including me.
The campaign strategy should be simple: Let Obama be Obama.
August 20, 2008 5:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama never was the Obama in your head.
August 20, 2008 9:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well since every single commenter seems to agree wholeheartedly, how about I actually dissent from the Greek chorus of "woe woe is us our guy's a loser and if Hillary doesn't save him we're all doomed"?
Here's my take on it; just the opposite:
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/deanie-mills/
We can all learn a little something from Ali's Rope-a-Dope.
Oh--and I thought the VFW speech was brilliant, as did my combat-vet husband, my combat-vet son, and other combat vets I know. It was McCain who was the whiner, and Obama who was coming up with real policies to help real veterans while McCain talked about restricting their care even MORE.
Don't think they don't know the difference.
Fighting isn't about just being tough. It's also about being SMART.
August 20, 2008 5:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain, a war hero who was held prisoner by the Vietnamese for over 5 years, has a lifetime of foreign policy experience, not including the over 5 years the war hero spent as a POW in Vietnam. John McCain, former POW and war hero, also happens to be a war hero who was held prisoner by the North Vietnamese for over 5 years.
McCain is a war hero, do you hear me????
McCain was a POW. He doesn’t like talking about it.
August 20, 2008 5:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Panama-John McBomb would HAVE to start tooting his own "noun, verb, and POW" horn if Barack Obama would just shut up and stop doing it for him.
I mean, why doesn't Obama just come out and say: "Please vote for my honorable, heroic opponent John McBomb because this honorable and heroic patriot honorably and which such heroism voted to help Depuby Dubya Bush lie their own country into disastrous stud-hamster vendetta against the toothless Saddam Hussein in Iraq. Only heroes and honorable statesmen would do such a noble thing, and no one should even dream of casting aspersions upon such honorable and heroic patriots. They only want the best for America."
"Now, as for the reasons you should vote for me, Barack Obama, when the honorable and heroic John McBomb has called me an unpatriotic foreign muslim who only wants America to lose in Iraq, well, if you give me an hour to stop praising the honorable and heroic John McBomb first, then I might possibly get around to telling you about myself whose patriotism John McBomb and the Republican Party have so honorably and with such heroism impugned."
The Republicans don't even need to raise a ton of money to buy anti-Obama adds on Hillbilly Cable TV networks. Barack Obama and the Democrats will gladly spend their own supporters' money buying adds repeating every falsehood (borrowed from the defunct and debt-ridden Clinton campaign) that McBomb can sling at the "traitor Democrat Party" and their unpatriotic foreign muslim candidate that only wants America to lose in Iraq (after Deputy Dubya and the Republicans have already lost for six years in Iraq.)
Oh, and did I mention that Barack Obama and the hapless Democratic Party "leadership" should not repeat even once whatever lies their reactionary repugnant opponent -- a dishonorable war-loving fraud not even born in America -- tells about them every two minutes 24/7?
August 21, 2008 9:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
LET RALPH DEBATE!
Wow, I can feel you Maniacs frothing like Old Yeller right now ... Damn ... I love you guys, though ... :)
Who the Hell is running shit at Savior Central? How can a guy as charismatic as Obama be blowing a campaign to a senile nitwit who, in the words of the "esteemed" Pat Buchanan, makes Dick Cheney look like Gandhi?
I'd absolutely love to support Obama. But I don't know who he is or what he stands for. Take the fucking reigns off, and let's see the community organizer from the South Side, not this manufactured Stepford Democrat.
Quit courting Centrist, "Undecided" NASCAR Dad and pull real progressives back into the fold. FDR is rolling in his damn grave.
ARRRGGGHHHHHHH!
I hope someone from his damn campaign is reading this. I do not vote based on electability; rather, I vote based on my beliefs. That said, Obama better get me and the other Five Percenters hot and bothered, and quickly.
August 20, 2008 6:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
More surrogates
More attacks
Repeat similar lines of attack ad nauseum until they stick. A few times is not enough. Call McCain "hothead" or "cheater" every day until November.
And excoriate the SOB at the convention. Rip into him. Not just feel good stuff. Last time in 2004, it was all feel good and the GOP's was nothing but negative attacks. They got the bounce we didn't
August 20, 2008 6:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
And further, Obama won't lose this. He really believes that "this election isn't about me." If you're not taking action at the local level to persuade your undecided neighbors then you're responsible for loosing this election. Ground game is more than GOTV, that's how he won Iowa, with a sustainable neighbor to neighbor persuasion tactic. Are you all waiting for vindication of your doomsday scenarios so that you'll be crowned head predictor? That's folly. Decide that we will win this and make it happen.
August 20, 2008 6:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
OBAMA!
McCain said the solution to our financial woes is to...get a second job!
Dude, replay that over and over again! We're americans! We hate working our EXISTING jobs, let alone ANOTHER job. He's a rich man telling us to GET A SECOND JOB.
August 20, 2008 6:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
SOMEBODY,
PLEASE CALL THE OBAMA CAMPAIGN IN CHICAGO.
To reach the Campaign Headquarters by phone, please call: (866) 675-2008
August 20, 2008 6:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes absolutely call HQ because David FREAKING Axelrod hasn't ALREADY thought about EVERY SINGLE STUPID suggestion that has been made here. Give me a break!
August 20, 2008 7:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is great. As if getting the right strategy up the flag poll is the most effective move to make. You're all smart people here. Take that passion to your neighbor's doorstep. Influence your sphere, that's how this works.
August 20, 2008 6:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, you're right, I suppose, that there's a lot of armchair quarterbacking going on here (and I've done more than my share). But I think that's just the frustration coming through. Believe me, I thought Obama would go wire to wire pulling away, but it hasn't happened and I'm getting nervous. I'm really worried about this nation and I am desperate to get Obama elected. But when you say one should influence one's sphere (tend your own garden?) I'm not sure what that means. I don't know many people who like to discuss politics. Though I believe this is the main source of the political dysfunction in the nation, it is, nevertheless, the reality. Should I try to make people listen or proselytize on the corner? Plus, typing is a lot easier.
August 20, 2008 6:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama needs to be the one who stands up and takes on McCAin,
August 20, 2008 6:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama on GOP: 'If They Bring a Knife to the Fight, We Bring a Gun'
The Hill , June 14, 2008
August 20, 2008 6:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
@JohnMcCSF
Thanks so much for reminding me of this gem. The Obama campaign also promised a quick response team as well. And yes they have perfected the non-response. After all, if you neuter the '527's' to control your message, and you rule out attacks on McCain's character, all the while he is attacking on these grounds, and you preface any comment about McCain with a deferential obeisance to his honorable service (has anyone else other than McCaqin EVER served this country? I think not), his patriotism, his heroism, his courage then I think it is a little hard to ever come up to the stature of Saint McCain. Forget of course his daily opportunistic changes, his adultery, his lies, his temper, his connection with lobbyists, the Keating five.
August 20, 2008 6:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nice words from Obama. That's where it ends. Every time McCain's campaig savages him and he doesn't respond I think of that quote and how it was nothing but smoke being blown up people's asses.
August 21, 2008 2:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Great find! Not only is Obama not bringing a gun to the fight... he's a) bringing a stronly worded letter of condemnation and b) whining to the cops / his mom about the other side.
A gun, guys, represents an escalation. I.e., you question my patriotism and I will call you out for the horrible way you treated your first wife. How would you like an ad about that on Christian radio?
August 21, 2008 10:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ground game isn't worth a bucket of warm spit without a MESSAGE. (And I don't mean vague handwaving about hope.)
August 20, 2008 6:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know what the democratics (obama x2: ie. Kerry, and Gore) remind me of?
A guy who can't break up with his girlfriend because he's been taught to be too nice.
August 20, 2008 6:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
c
August 20, 2008 6:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Put me in the Greek chorus of those questioning Obama's campaign. And as I wrote over at Deanie's post, while rope-a-dope might have worked for Ali against the stronger puncher turned grill man Foreman in Zaire, it's not a campaign strategy. Anyone thinking that we should let McCain punch himself out is in a dangerous fantasyland.
As for the guerilla's prescriptions, they seem so obvious it hardly bears mentioning, but here are a few.
Define your opponent. Define yourself.
Define your opponent: The Republicans have been successful by going after the candidate's perceived strengths. Kerry portrayed himself as a heroic soldier. Cue the Swiftboaters. Obama draws huge crowds and adulation? It's nothing but celebrity. McCain? His biggest asset is his image as a maverick and a straight talker, someone who acts on principle: Cue the video showing his numerous reversals on issues like the Bush tax cuts. Seen as independent of GWB: Cue the video of him praising Bush as one of our greatest Presidents. Correctly supported the surge: Cue the video of his many statements that victory was around the corner.
Define yourself: The change theme has run its course. That may have appealed to the Democratic primary electorate, but as Hillary's success in the later primaries indicates, the voters who are likely to decide this election want something else. Hammer the economic message. Show some fire in the belly. Some understanding. A plan of action. Don't run away from the Clinton administration's record on the economy. The primary is over. Voters trust the Democrats on the economy for a reason. Drop the rhetoric about blaming Washington and add some meat and potatoes.
August 20, 2008 6:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
There wasn't anything wrong with the change theme, he just doesn't have the political courage to risk changing anything. The same is true of the entire party. Americans DO want change. They're just disgusted with the Democrats for having no change to offer.
August 20, 2008 6:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
@bluebell
exactly right. the country is desperate for change. and the Dems brought out the clowns. I thought this time we might actually have a contest. But I think our heroes have already said "no mas". There's no fight in this bunch. They lose because, ...well, that's what they do best. it's not even the losing that's the worst part...the worst part is there's not even a fight.
August 20, 2008 6:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree vlaslo!
If we have to lose it's best to lose having given it your all and gone down swinging. Bowing down meekly and allowing them to chop off your head is unacceptable.
August 21, 2008 2:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
bluebell,
excellent observation.....sadly.
August 21, 2008 10:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
oooh, good one! It's so ironic because during the primary he was trying to hide his actual Clintonian economic preferences to differentiate himself. That theme needs to start yesterday! Seems to me that would go a very long way to getting him the voters that he needs. Really, the minute Hillary pledged her support he shoulda started talking about bringing "chang,e" change right back to Clinton's economy. Heck, any damage of GOP attempts to cry "tax and spend liberal" solves itself with the crucial demographics by doing that--i.e., "were you unhappy with Bill Clinton's tax rates and what they 'did' to all classes"?
August 20, 2008 7:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
P.S. And the beauty of it is, it's pretty much the truth if you look at his economic advisors and plans. Why is he continuing to hide this connection? To be his own man or something? That would be absurd. We all know a lot of Hillary's votes in those crucial late states were really votes hoping she'd be Bill Clinton II on the economy. Heck, even her win in New Hampshire after the polls were studied showed her win to be more about "it's the economy stupid, we want Bill times back," than her supposed finding herself stuff.
To lefties who don't like the reality of it, and don't want to see Rubinomics again, I say: you've been in denial, neither Obama nor Hillary were ever for you. If any difference at all, Hillary on this stuff actually had a smidgen bit more left ideas than her husband, and Obama's white papers and promises have all a smidgen closer to Bill.
August 20, 2008 7:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
The problem with the Obama campaign is they refuse to seek help. Since getting the nomination many party elders and third parties have complained about the Obama campaign Chicago inner circle. Here's the problem: the Obama campaign got too confident about their November prospects not realizing McCain is an acquired(stale and sour) but acquired.
August 20, 2008 6:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Without reading this post. Was it a bunch of whining about what Obama isn't doing with the magic formula for what he should be doing followed by a bunch of "RIGHT ON!", "YOU SAID IT!" and other such nonsense.
So-called "progressives" are the most limp-spined, chicken-little, Pollyannish cowards around.
I like how Obama is running his campaign. Weeks of McCain's negative attacks and Obama is STILL winning. Now we're seeing the beginnings of Obama's classy assault. But you all want him to be as big a douche as McCain in doing it.
Pathetic.
August 20, 2008 6:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Look, we adore Obama. And regardless of the negative attacks from McCain, OBAMA WILL WIN. But we cannot afford to repeat the same mistakes Kerry made in 2004.
August 20, 2008 6:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Right on with your assessment. I could not agree more.
August 20, 2008 7:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
I Luv you Starky.
You have me laughing out loud: "Without reading this post." Excellent. When did Dems take the "reactionary" mantle from Republicans?
And to add some rich frosting to what was already a delicious cake, you resort to name-calling.
But wait, there's more!
You can't even explain *why* progressives are "the most limp-spined, chicken-little, Pollyannish cowards around." Care to give an example? Because we all know what a pussy Ralph Nader is, right? He's only made a fucking career out of taking on huge corporations with little more than sheer balls.
Do you mean his supporters? Not sure who you're referring to, but I have at least three heated daily discussions with coworkers and random strangers in parking lots who don't like my bumper sticker. And just like you, Starky, when it comes down to issues, not one of you can give me a straight answer.
Balls ... Maybe the Savior should grow some. You keep hemming and hawing, and you keep settling for incremental change, at best. Your party is dead, and you're throwing a rave.
Get out the glowsticks -- may as well be completely delusional. Voting for Obama is like getting half a blowjob -- come on, Dude! Just pull the lever for McCain and get full release.
And this is why I Luv Starky: he's the perfect Obamaniac. He can't give me a good reason to vote for Obama, which is what I was verily begging for ... most likely because Obama's got a sprained groin from riding that fence so hard.
Now you'll have to excuse me -- Ralph needs more money before midnight.
August 20, 2008 8:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
A wimpy campaign?
By a Democrat?
Shocking!
Alas, when will they ever learn ...
August 20, 2008 6:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Although the situation is concerning but it is NOT dire.
Hello it is August BEFORE the Democratic convention.
Now if Obama was BEHIND in October than the situation would be considered dire.
August 20, 2008 6:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
If nothing else will put fire under his pants...hell yes, start a fire.
August 20, 2008 6:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Although the situation is concerning but it is NOT dire.
Hello it is August BEFORE the Democratic convention.
Now if Obama was BEHIND in October than the situation would be considered dire.
August 20, 2008 6:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
If nothing else will put fire under his pants...hell yes, start a fire.
August 20, 2008 7:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
AMEN!!! Sums it up.
August 20, 2008 6:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Like a lot of other people I couldn't agree more. I've posted as much. But hold on to your hats. He's going to pick Bayh and that should seal the deal for McCain.
August 20, 2008 6:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Amen! I am so tired of bad news on this campaign, I think Obama really needs to shake things up with the VP nomination. A fighter, absolutely. But a big name. I'm to the point where I think it has to be Gore, Clinton, or maybe Warner. I never thought I'd say Clinton, either...
August 20, 2008 6:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
I guess the passion shows that you really care and I think that will ultimately be reflected by the turnout in November and an overwhelming victory.
A few points from a (somewhat) objective Canadian observer:
1. Likely good that it's August and people are on vacation and not really paying close attention
2. Election season does not really begin until after the conventions
3. There were similar coments made during the primaries and Obabma managed to rise above while Hillary took the low road
4. I'm sorta glad that this is happening right now; it's tough to win a race when you're leading all the way
5. When this election really gets going in the fall, the Obama money machine will roll over McCain
6. People will ultimately realize that they don't want four more years of bellicosity and failed policies
August 20, 2008 6:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hmmm...? Maybe Barack needs a Hillary in New Hampshire moment!
J/K
August 20, 2008 6:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
1. Make ads for people who hate Obama
2. Do not put Obama in the ads
3. Make ads for people who do not trust politicians
4. Do not put politicians in the ads
5. Make some ads that people like. Is this news? Pepsi? MacDonalds? I havent seen one good ad.
6. People have been burned by the lies. WMD. Iraq. They do not trust the news. They leave the room if the ad looks like the news.
7. You have a great candidate.
8. You have a great message.
9. Please, FIND A MESSENGER PEOPLE CAN TRUST.
10. Or do what you did in 2000 and 2004. Wait until it's too late, and talk about what went wrong.
August 20, 2008 6:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thumbs up on your post, Theda...until you get to the part about Hillary being the correct fighter for the team. (Fortunately that is at the end.)
You are right as rain on all of the rest, though. I hope you've inspired Obama to rummage around and find the boxing gloves. It ought to be as easy as pie to slap McCain's offal directly into the fan as soon as it is loosed - if a paddle is at the ready.
August 20, 2008 6:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
If you're not playing offense, you're losing--it's really as simple as that. Obama needs to realize that as much as he'd like to run a positive campaign, it just ain't gonna happen. He's running against a Republican, and with them, it's destroy or be destroyed. Period. Obama needs to destroy McCain.
No more Mr. Nice Guy, Barack. Hit him until he falls.
August 20, 2008 6:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sure hope this little tid bit from Taegen Goddard gets more attention:
Bonus Quote of the Day
"Ma'am, let me say that I don't disagree with anything you said."
-- John McCain, responding to a woman in a town hall meeting earlier today, who concluded her comments with the line "if we don't re-enact the draft, I don't think we'll have anyone to chase Bin Laden to the gates of hell."
What tell the rich find out John McCain wants to send their sons and daughters to war!
August 20, 2008 6:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree. Taking off the gloves means taking off the gloves, not increase the number of words or turn up the volume and certainly don't repeat false charges--that only gives them more life.
August 20, 2008 6:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I for one now have finally gained some of that *hope* because I see from this thread and others that irrational Obama-mania is over and done with at TPM. But that's me, grateful for small favors and ever optimistic that good things nationally could come out of the signifier of *change* in a single demographic. Do many commenters here realize that you are in the process of disproving McCain's "Obama is a celeb with mindless irrational fans" ads by your very complaints about his campaign?
August 20, 2008 6:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Seriously???
August 20, 2008 7:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
St. Augustine said that hope has two beautiful daughters: anger and courage. O needs to show all three: hope, courage, AND anger.
August 20, 2008 6:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
With all due respect -- and you are due a lot of it -- I think you're getting ahead of yourself and letting your emotions run away with your reason.
To start with, despite your impressive resume, I will put my money on Axelrod, Gibbs, and Obama every day of the week -- and twice on Sunday -- that they know more about what they're doing and how to do it, than you do. They've been in tight races before, and they played it masterfully. See, e.g., the democratic primary for U.S. Senate that launched Obama into federal politics. Yes, there were some fortuitous personal meltdowns in that race, but the Obama campaign was masterful. Take a look at Mendell's biography of Obama for a good account.
Second, and more importantly -- and I hope you're a baseball fan, so that you understand where I'm coming from -- you seem to want Mariano Rivera warming up in the second inning, when the score at the end of the first is 4-4. That's ridiculous, it's over-spending, and it leaves you with nothing in the later innings when it counts. Yes, (and to keep with the baseball metaphor) this is the World Series. But on August 20, a few days out from the convention and before there's even a VP, it's probably not even game five, let alone the middle innings of game seven.
Obama has built a RIDICULOUS ground game throughout all 50 states. McCain has a pile of shit for a ground game -- all he has are commercials. He's not registering anyone -- Obama's registering a SHIT-HOUSE of new voters (which raises the important question of what a "likely voter" is -- my understanding is that it is based on past voting activity ... many of Obama's voters aren't going to have ANY past voting experience ... they're first timers or first-in-a-long-timers). McCain can't change that, he's locked into what he can do, and it's one-dimensional. Obama's got people on the ground, he's got a huge ad budget, he's got the whole package.
Obama is starting to "get tough." He's done it slowly, almost imperceptibly. It's like hair growing -- we watch the election every day, every minute, so we don't see the slow evolution of the campaign. But tune out for a couple months and come back -- I bet it will be a shock. Obama and his VP will be hitting on all cylinders, pouring money into commercials, with shitloads of new voters registered. Like seeing someone you haven't seen in a long time, who decided to grow their hair out -- it's a total change. But those living with that person didn't notice the drastic change from day to day.
This is a marathon, not a sprint. If McCain wants to tire himself out now, to get all his vitriol out now, to spend all his money now, to spend all his capital now, fine. I have faith that Obama's campaign knows what it's doing. I don't want him putting in his closer right now. Stay with your starter, then hit middle relief, then shut it down with your closer.
I don't sell all the mutual funds in my IRA after one bad day or one bad week, and I don't want Obama to sell HIS portfolio out after a (supposed) bad day or week. We are no more qualified to run a campaign than we are to manage a mutual fund (except for you portfolio managers out there :) ) or the New York Yankees.
Take a valium, pour a drink, chill out, and go register some new voters. Leave the rest to the experts.
August 20, 2008 6:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Who's going to sign up with a pill-popping drunk at the door?
Are you supporting McCain?
August 20, 2008 7:02 PM | Reply |