« When Good Democracies Go Bad | Home | A Speech for Barack Obama »

Wake Up, Obama Camp

user-pic

The last month has been excruciating for Obama supporters, watching him and his campaign squander so many hopes and resources on an utterly wimpy campaign. For me, the last straw was yesterday -- in the VFW speech when supposedly Obama was gettting tough against McCain's character assassination strategy -- to watch him speak like a soporific college professor, repeating McCain's charges at length, flattering McCain as honorable and patriotic, and then, finally, sort of begging McCain to take it back! Josh Marshall is totally right to call Obama out on this.

What are they thinking in Chicago? Why would they ever imagine that Americans will vote to make President a candidate who evades and begs? This is like football. If you are hit hard in the pile, you hit back, you don't run to the refs. If the refs (media in this context) make a bad or missed call, you just get up and play harder, hit back harder, throw passes. You never expect the other side to play nice, you never beg for that; and you take for granted that the refs will overlook a lot of stuff.

On evasion: A national, turning-point campaign is not an academic discussion of the issues! You don't go into Saddleback and give a ridiculous, distanced, abstract, evasive, talmudic answer to the abortion question you knew was coming! You look the television camera/voters in the eye and crisply explain your own personal moral perspective in clear, plain language -- acknowledging AFTER you state your views that other moral people can have different views and underlining that you will always respect them, listen to them, and look for common ground. This is not rocket science!

On fighting back: For weeks, Obama has ignored or wheedled when McCain and Lieberman attacked his patriotism and judgement. He has repeatedly begged them to stop because, supposedly, they are more honorable than that. He has asked them to discuss the issues dispassionately. What an insipid approach! McCain has NOT been honorable or honest, and Obama and his surrogates need to hammer on that incessantly. Use words like "lying" and "losing himself" or " (better) "forgetting what he is supposed to stand for." Stop focusing on decades ago in the POW camp. Talk about now, about the last years and months. Make the really obvious point that no candidate for President at this time can really be putting country first if he runs a dirty, lying campaign of false smears. That betrays the public trust. Tell it like it is, Obama!

Politics is not just about issues, it is a metaphorical test of strength. If a man will not get immediately -- if quietly -- angry and fight back when his patriotism is attacked, why should we trust him to defend the country? And if he won't punch back by explaining clearly why his approach to foreign policy is actually tougher and smarter, why McCain's is thoughtless and reckless, why would we think he is better to be Commander in Chief?

And on issues like oil drilling, why not recognize that McCain has adopted an ACTIVE metaphor that makes emotional sense to people? He is saying we should act to tap U.S. resources, and people are not really concerned about how many years it would take to tweak pump prices. They hear action and will and resolve -- and these are highly valued in a President! Obama can certainly get a hearing for other active steps, but he and the Dems should stop pretending that they can parry drilling with logic.

Obama is lucky he is not further behind already. And he is going to fade fast if he just runs a feel-good, bland convention about abstract "hope" and "change." In addition to getting gritty and colorfully clear about his recipe for making Americans' lives better -- AND about his approach to make this nation safer and stronger in the world -- Obama needs to signal all the major speakers at next week's convention to go after McCain in a key part of each speech. We need to hear why McCain is wrong and dangerous and no longer so honest and honorable. It needs repeating with force and humor and passion.

Otherwise, the Convention will be wasted, and this historic turning point for our country will be lost.

And pick a FIGHTER for VP, please. Do it yesterday. Obama, you need someone who will push hard at your side and make you better, too. And you never should have gone on vacation (shades of Kerry) without a VP to carry on. Biden will work, I think, but -- and I never expected to believe this -- it might be time to turn to Hillary. She is at least a fighter, and this election really matters to a lot more than you and her.


238 Comments

| Leave a comment

Wow! Thank you for saying what needed to be said, Theda.

Sign me up.

user-pic

Truly awesome summary of recent events. I'm sick of hearing about McCain's service to the country, from OBAMA! It's time to take the gloves off, and grow up. This is about hope and change, but Obama needs to realize that he'll have no opportunity to deliver either if he can't clarify his positions into catchy soundbites and hit McCain often and hard.

As said, this is NOT rocket science.

PEACE

Well said Mom!

On this quote hangs the entire election:

"he is going to fade fast if he just runs a feel-good, bland convention about abstract "hope" and "change."

On the other hand, if he can put meat on his resounding platitudes, he'll put McCain away easy.

user-pic

Thanks, and bottom line, for me, is if Obama doesn't step up his game, I'll bug the sh*t out of Moveon.org and tell them to tell Team Obama "sorry, glove are off". This is Obama's race to lose, its OUR race to lose. If Team Obama is unwilling to get dirty, the 527's will need to do the job for him.

PEACE

user-pic

Good idea.

user-pic

I agree Theda. You do not say "That honorable guy questioned my patriotism!" You say, "that asshole had the nerve to question my patriotism because he's either a cranky old man, a senile old man or a desperate old man."

But I'm not sure why you think Biden can help.

Because Biden's perfect as an attack dog. Loud-mouthed and dismissive of his political opponents. Exactly the opposite of Obama's style, which is what's badly needed right now.

Looks like the campaign has a muzzle on attack dogs. I can't remember a surrogate attack, or even a strongly worded surrogate remark since Clark's slap down. Chicago's making a huge mistake.

user-pic

Yes. Thank you Theda.

I just posted similar points here and here.

user-pic

It seems like ever since the Wesley Clark fiasco, the Obama camp has decided that they must risk no sharp attacks on McCain.

I don't get this. Clark had a point but he misfired to some extent. This should not have been taken to mean that no sharp attacks could work.

user-pic

Indeed, sTiVo. Clark was perfect to seriously pull rank and ask the questions necessary to poke fatal holes in McCain's narrative; like, "How exactly does 'getting shot down and taken prisoner' (Bob Schieffer's question, we'll recall) qualify a man for president of the United States?" and "Exactly how does McCain know how to win wars?" Too bad the campaign put Wesley Clark and all his old medals back in the box.

I felt the same way about Clark: they should have stood up for him. Here was a Hillary supporter _really_ stepping up to the "we're all on the same team" plate and they dissed him and lost his very on point message in the process.

I had not thought about the fact that he, if anyone, could "pull rank" on McCain. A great observation.

It seems like ever since the Wesley Clark fiasco, the Obama camp has decided that they must risk no sharp attacks on McCain.

I couldn't agree with you more, STiVo. Obviously, the Obama Campaign shouldn't take the same tack as General Clark -- i.e., John McCain's time as a POW doesn't necessarily add to his qualifications to be President -- but there is much distance between that argument and ones based entirely on policy differences. Americans routinely prove that, to them, character matters in a presidential election. What is more, character issues -- perceived or real -- can sink a candidate with superior policy prescriptions (and, one imagines, superior oratorical skills).

Put plainly, John McCain has a character issue, but outside of TPM, DailyKos, Air America, "Countdown with Keith Olbermann," and other liberal (read: truth-telling) venues, there's little, if any, mention of it. The Obama Campaign and Sen. Obama himself need to recognize this and start mentioning this character issue at every opportunity. They also needn't get mired in the weeds explaining the foundation for these character issues. After all, voters tend to remember only declarative statements, anyway -- "John McCain is X, Y, and Z" -- while forgetting or failing to analyze critically the reasons offered for those assertions. (See, e.g., "Britney Spears and Paris Hilton are the second and third biggest celebrities in the world?!")

user-pic

I disagree that Clark "misfired". I think the Republicans were just waiting for someone to make that very point so they they could jump on it and squash it, since McCain's status as POW is evidently what they were planning to build their campaign on all along. (No surprise, they don't have much else.) By creating a giant firestorm the first time someone dared to question that experience as demonstrating fitness to be president, and by intimidating Obama into rejecting Clark's point, they cleared the way to keep pounding the "Vote for me, I was a POW, how dare anyone question me" theme.

Obama played right into their hands.

user-pic

Clark misfired ONLY in that he didn't call Schieffer out on his clearly pro-McSame slant. I am tired of hearing Dems call out Clark for this truly clarifying moment.

user-pic

He did misfire, in that he said McCain had no leadership experience in the military and that his time as a POW did not qualify. This allowed his remarks to be smeared as "elitist", and of course with Obama not having had any military experience himself, Clark left himself out on a limb.

Clark's point could have been better made. It could have been more sharply focused on his hotheadedness and errors of judgment on Bush's wars. Having been a POW doesn't - all by itself - make one more qualified than anyone who's never been one.

But none of that is the point. The point is that it seems to have spooked the Obama camp away from making any other sharp attacks on McCain.

user-pic
He did misfire, in that he said McCain had no leadership experience in the military and that his time as a POW did not qualify. This allowed his remarks to be smeared as "elitist"...

Wrong, wrong and wrong.

Clark gave a straight, accurate, no-nonsense refutation of Schieffer's question. The only misfire came from Clark's Democratic colleagues who failed to counter-attack on his behalf with double the intensity.

You know and I know that if a Democrat criticizes McCain's comb-over, The Right will hyperventilate that they're disrespecting his POW experience. The merits of what any Democrat says is irrelevant; the Right will simply distort and fabricate anyone's words to spin it as an attack.

You draw the erroneous conclusion that if Clark had only used different words the Right wouldn't have smeared him.

Wrong.

Had Clarke's erstwhile allies --especially fellow veterans-- stood by him with double the intensity, the event would have ended positively for Obama and negatively for McCain.

user-pic

sTiVo,

When CLark made his comment about qualifications, in a snit, Scheiffer asked, "really"

Here's what Clark should have asked that asshole Scheiffer;

"Liberal Senator George McGovern flew 35 bombing missions over enemy territory during WWII, but since he didn't get shot down he wasn't qualified to be President, Bob?"

Thanks. As I have said before, the bottom line is Obadiah (TPM spell check correction for 'obama') has not shown why 'the hands that built.....can now build.....' need Obama to build anything.

It must be shown that under McCain the lobbyists will rule and America will continue to be looted, lied to, and the economy will continue to sink.

Given the choice, many 'undecided' lunchpail types would just as soon build new stuff under an old and 'honorable war hero' (who is white) than a rockstar black with a funny name.

Your "bottom line" is copy-pasted on many posts regardless of the topic.

The truth deserves repetition. Hope Obadias is listening.

With friends like you, who needs enemies? Glad to see the left doing the neocons work for them. No need for them to be overly critical of Obama when the democrats are more than happy to tear him down for not following their advice and having the temerity to keep winning.

Based on all real measures like money raised and primary votes, vice biased polls, Barack is doing just fine. Good thing he is pulling about 20% of the republican vote right now or you clowns would be bitching for the next four years about President McCain and how evil he is.

Principals without pragmatism are useless in moving polical change forward. Obama can't come out swinging for the fences with McCain's head as the ball. It goes against every thing he has already campaigned on. He can't all of sudden become that which he has campaigned against.

Barack didn't have to do it against Clinton. He won't have to do it against McCain. He is barely keeping the corporate media from sinking his campaign as it is. He can't give them a petard on which to hang him between now and November.

Stepping up in front of the VFW and telling them how a decorated POW is evil slime is the exact thing that would make hima footnote instead of president.

Do you guys even read this stuff before you post it? That goes double for the blog that inspired it.

user-pic

I don't know what polls you are reading but McCain has consolidated his base and is pulling a far greater percentage of his base than Obama is his.

Polls are worthless and compromised as a method of actually gauging the electorate, especially given how many people are exclusively using cell phones, most of whom are Obama voters. Further, even if the polls can be trusted, this far out they are basically worthless.

If the best you can do is cite polls as to McCain's mythical transcendence, I suggest you look for a more logical baseline. I prefer to use the primary as a good way to examine the data available from this year, rather than trying to fit years past into a changing paradigm and electorate.

PS: Which part if the democratic base won't vote for Barack? Alternatively, the republican "base" is crumbling, so exactly which part of that disappearing base is he getting more of? This comment makes no sense at all.

user-pic

Ole laid back, easy does it, respect McCain the war hero and his service Barack Kerry is on his way to being an also ran.

Obama: 'Folks, make no mistake, I respect the war hero John McCain for his magnificent service to our country and his many honorable years in public service as a U S Senator......'

Public; 'OK, say no more, you convinced me, I'll vote for McCain."

Adding to my own post, I don't really think this afternoon's Obama conference call will work, with Susan Rice and Richard Clarke calling McCain reckless. This theme needs to be in a larger across the board critique and push back -- especially one using his own words to show how hot-triggered he was in the original plunge into Iraq. But don't start a push back with a metaphorically weak point, during a week when Russia is a bete noir for attacking Georgia (which has good ties to the U.S. media). Start with points that bespeak strength first, and don't have experts deliver them. Have political leaders do it.

user-pic

The only way the reckless meme can work is if it's linked to McCain's finger on the (nuclear) button with his "bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran" playing on loop in the background.

Obama's folks are greatly overestimating the intelligence and/or attention span of the nation.

Also, in today's town hall, McCain basically said we may need to reinstate the draft. Play that over and over again, with photos of children morphing to men/women in uniform.

Scare the crap out of Americans, but make sure that McCain is the scary guy this time.

user-pic

It shouldn't be difficult to make McCain seem scary, Spencers Mom. He's a nightmare. I used to think it couldn't get worse after the Cheney/Bush cabal ripped The Constitution to shreds and sent our young to kill and be killed for the PNAC. I've reassessed.

Agreed. Need a real time hook for that. Attack hard and have patience, McCain will provide the video tape soon enuf

user-pic

And while you're at it, the democratic congress needs to get off their collective ass and start acting like a democratic congress. Introduce new bills, talk up new programs, deliver some change that can help people. What a disaster Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi have been for the party. I have never seen a party so uninvolved in a national election as important as this.

Theda Skocpol for VP. It's not too late!!

This (and Josh's front page post) should drive NCSteve and his brethren right through the roof! Heh-heh...

"Everything is fine!"
"You just wait til after the convention!"
"Just wait til he picks a running mate!"
"Just wait til he start really fighting back!"
"Who are you to question his campaign team?"
"How many campaigns have you run?"
"Watch what you say!! The MSM is watching and taking notes!"

*sigh*

user-pic

Remember this?

"One thing about John Kerry, he's a great closer. He knows when his homework is due. He picks his moment to fight back. Just wait till he swings into action... just wait... keep waiting... keeeep waaaaiting..."

user-pic

Great stuff, Theda. I swear (or affirm, actually) that I didn't read you before I posted mine. This fight-back can't just be left to surrogates. Obama's a better speaker than any of them will be--any.

user-pic

I agree with the gist of your sentiments, but I suggest you lose the wimpy "-back" in "fight back" and simply advocate going on the ATTACK. Attack first, and don't -- ever -- apologize for getting truthfully aggressive. Let the Republicans take a shot of the awful truth first and then stagger around trying to figure out how to "fight back." Put them on the defensive.

The entire point of Barack Obama's problem here stems from his (and his party's) instinct to take a punch rather delivering a barrage of them instead. Americans do not sympathize with the victim of a mugging but rather admire the audacity and ruthlessness of the mugger. Barack Obama claims to hail from Chicago politics but his take-it-on-the-chin campaigning lately sure doesn't support that claim.

user-pic

Act, and stop reacting.

I'm quite tired of the Democrats inability or unwillingness (epitomized by the Obama camp) to not go on attack.

user-pic

Todd,

I agree, it can't be left to surrogates as that would leave Obama to look wimpy, something every Democrat should try to avoid.