« Is Obama as Brave as His Black Memphis Supporters? | Home | I Don't Believe The Washington Post »

Olympiad

user-pic

1938.jpg

Watching the spectacular opening ceremonies, I kept thinking of 1938 1936 (as you know, I was there), wondering if I was wrong. Many people in China are much better off by virtue of the spectacular economic growth. Naturally there are downsides, but the fact of an aggregate net gain seems hard to dispute.

The problem with overall net gains is that individuals can get chewed up in the process. Peoples and cultures in Western China are being destroyed. Probably with less lethality than that visited upon the indigenous people of the Americas by European colonists. So who are we to complain, you might ask, and you would be right. Nobody with a voice has standing. Nobody with standing has a voice.

In one sense the demonstration was a grand Orwellian perversity. Friendship was being proclaimed by representatives of nations that are forever conniving to eat each other's lunch, forget the assorted wars and campaigns of ethnic cleansing being administered by assorted parties as we speak.

The greatest country in the world. Can you guess which one it is?


bhutan.jpgI nominate Bhutan. That's right. Bhutan. Their long suit is not material wealth. They do have incredible scenery, but their leader proclaims the national goal to be the growth of Gross National Happiness (GNH). Modern advances in economic science make it increasingly possible to measure GNH. Unfortunately, advances have yet to make it possible to actually increase GNH.


62 Comments

| Leave a comment

Not to mention the pollution.

user-pic

I agree that the ceremonies reminded me in many ways of the Nazi Olympics---just cleaned up and real friendly.

Did you notice that they had to point out to people watching that the perfomers were instructed to smile more so as not to be too intimidating during the demonstration of Chinese power with the drummers?

you was at the 1938 Olympics ???

that musta been some hell of a show

the 1936 Olympics was in Berlin, and the 1940 Olympics was canceled

where was those "1938 Olympics held again ???

you could at least look up the fucking date the next time you decide to create some false memories

makes ya look a little more credible

never try to bullshit a bullshitter

user-pic

Thank you for the gentle correction.

user-pic

Can anyone anywhere top an authoritarian society of 1.3 billion for stage managing this pane et circensis?

With any luck 2008 is the acme of marketing these Chimplympics and it'll be all downhill hereafter.

Well, one can dream.

That wasn't the point,Did you or did you not see our appeaser President? This was better than the 1936 Olympics because they don't have to go to war with us to take our country. Nixon started the Mortgage procedure and Bush was their to hand over the keys. The Chinese were so grateful they gave the world this spectacular party.

user-pic

Dear China,

Do whatever the heck you want.

Love,
The World

PS One reason Bhutan is great is that Bhutan doesn't even want the trouble of ever hosting the Olympics. New York City is similar in that regard. Mayor Bloomberg really wanted to host some games. But nobody who lived here wanted the hassle. Since we have the most byzantine zoning, real estate and event planning laws around it was easy to stop him.

user-pic

If the world had any integrity they would have blocked China from hosting until they got out of Tibet.

until they got out of Tibet.

And returned it to the rule of an autocratic theocracy instead of an autocratic military occupation. Quite the improvement!

user-pic

This is an excellent point. Have always thought that the Dalai Lama is nothing but a wannabe dictator that Richard Gere likes.

user-pic

I think the people of Tibet were much happier and better off under their "autocratic theocracy instead of an autocratic military occupation," and given a choice would prefer the Dalai Lama to Wen Jiabao.

That is almost certainly the case. My point is more addressed to the popular conception of a freed Tibet in the West, which seems to think it would become a paradise of liberal thinking and peace rather than the feudal serfdom it was the last time a Dalai Lama held earthly political power over it.

user-pic

Ethan,

from this liberal's viewpoint, I'd just like to see a free Tibet, let Tibetans determine whatever kind of rule they want.

Fair enough. On the other hand, what chance will they get when their head of state is already chosen for them? And could they really have a chance of ousting him should they want to?

I don't know, of course, and you're right, it'd be much better to see Tibet free according to its people's wishes (just like Kosovo and, oh, say, South Ossetia).

But the issue ought be considered fully rather than in terms of evil communists on one side and butterflies and unicorns on the other.

user-pic

Ethan,

heh, the last thing I worry about is Communists.

What I DO fear is the Bush/Cheney gang and a possible McCain Presidency.

....try polling 1.3 billion Chinese and ask them what they think....

user-pic
Peoples and cultures in Western China are being destroyed.

What is the basis for this statement damning China?

It is not surprising for Americans to dump on China. It has been going on for years, with the Chinese Exclusion Act, etc.

China serves as home to 56 official ethnic groups. The PRC's Constitution and laws guarantee equal rights to all ethnic groups in China and help promote ethnic minority groups' economic and cultural development. One notable preferential treatment ethnic minorities enjoy is that they are exempt from the population growth control of the One-Child Policy. Ethnic minorities are well represented in the National People's Congress as well as governments at the provincial and prefectural levels. Some ethnic minorities in China live in what are described as ethnic autonomous areas. These "regional autonomies" guarantee ethnic minorities the freedom to use and develop their ethnic languages, and to maintain their own cultural and social customs. In addition, the PRC government has provided preferential economic development and aid to areas where ethnic minorities live. The "regional autonomies" are also to protect ethnic minorities' freedom of religion, however, the issue of freedom of religion in the PRC is, in itself, highly controversial and debatable.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_minorities_in_China

Recently the US president, who has defended torture, has castigated China for its human rights violations. In that spirit, it's "Peoples and cultures in Western China are being destroyed." Baloney. You made that up.

user-pic

I agree that our soon-to-be-sidelined, pro-tortue tyrant's hypocrisy was on full display when he had the gall to criticize China's human rights record, but you aren't actually defending it are you Don?

user-pic

oleeb says;

I agree that our soon-to-be-sidelined, pro-tortue tyrant's hypocrisy was on full display when he had the gall to criticize China's human rights record...

More gall on display; This morning Bush condemned Russia for invading a "soverign country."

user-pic

Don, are you seriously going to get pissed off about the Chinese Exclusion Act? That shit was passed in 1882. And you're pissed about it now?

Maybe you'd like to ride your penny-farthing down to the telegraph office to send a cable to Congress to complain? Or perhaps you should hire some Pinkertons to investigate it.

As for China's constitution, you can't pretend that they have a rule of law state. The constitution in China is like the constitution in the USSR. It's cheap window dressing to distract outsiders. The Congress has no independent power whatsoever and exists only to ratify decrees announced by the party leadership.

Don't get confused by the fact that Bush has tarnished the US by authorizing torture and indefinite detention--China really does engage in massive human rights violations. They're doing it right now as the games are going on.

user-pic

Having actually visited a couple of Chinese autonomous zones I feel uniquely qualified to offer my opinions here. (hah!) Ten years ago a small group of ethnically mixed Americans, including my wife and I, visited parts of China, including most memorably the Uighur areas. Those people are Moslems, more related to Europeans than to ethnic Chinese. We saw lots of friendly people, lots of very poor people, where donkey carts were the primary transportation method, other than feet. Our local guide spent quite a bit of time telling jokes about Beijing, and how they largely ignored the central government.

There was no obvious evidence of any effort by Beijing to "destroy" the local culture. But, I am aware of the movement by that area to separate from China.

I don't see a parallel between 1936 Germany and 2008 China, other than that both countries made full use of the Olympics to promote their country. China has, so far, done it better. May they continue to be our bankers.

user-pic

I've never been there. All I know is what I read on the Intertubes. Looks like a classic colonial/settler process of making indigenous cultures disappear, in this case by absorption and attrition rather than by extermination.

user-pic

Throughout China's history there has been conflict between "ethnic groups". The Manchurians invaded China in 1644 and ruled it until 1911 when the Chinese rebelled and forced the Manchurians out. During the Manchurian reign there were constant rebellions and uprisings by the Chinese peasants and the Muslims in the West.

user-pic

C.V. has posted no counter-argument, but has posted links which include following:

* "Despite reports of police shootings and arrests at a protest demanding Uighur independence on March23, the world has paid little notice. . .Such repression ranges from vetting imams and closing mosques to executions and the detention of thousands of people every year, it claims."

Comment: People wanting independence from their country better be prepared to fight and die for it, because they will be given the opportunity. Is there any recollection of Yankee aggression against the Southern states when they demanded independence and seceded? Of the people and cultures of the South being destroyed? As for executions and imprisonment, the U.S. leads the world. It has more people in prison than China, which has four times the US's population. And executions are a forte of the U.S. -- remember how Clinton okayed the execution of a mentally impaired man to enhance his tough-on-crime creds, and Bush has taken delight in executions.

* "The number one grievance, however, has been China’s occupation of Tibet and the oppression of its local inhabitants."

Comment: Tibet is recognized by the US to be a part of China, which Tibetans are protesting in spite of the Dalai Lama's non-approval. Good luck.

* ". . .human rights abuses directly related to these Games, including the forced eviction of Chinese citizens from their homes to make way for new Olympic venues, the exploitation of migrant workers who built these venues, and the jailing of activists who courageously denounced such abuses."

Comment: Come on, ever heard of eminent domain? It's alive and well in the U.S., too, and if you protest the city's taking of your home for a new freeway or shopping center then prepare to see some blue uniforms.

Bottom line-- there is no basis for the statement: "Peoples and cultures in Western China are being destroyed," which is why C.A. had no counter on this point.

user-pic

In addition to being exempt for the one-child rule, the minority peoples of China also get free university tuition, as I understand it Tuition is not free for Han Chinese, though.


Fortunately for them, though, the Chinese are equally free as we are to get their culture desstroyed by Walmart and McDonalds (if not Disney), however.

It's too bad we here in the land of the free were not as free to watch the olympics as in, say, Canada, were it is shown on the public airwaves in real time without interruption. Here in the USA all information must be mediated by commerce. But I guess, since it reminded some of 1938 - 36, it is a good thing the media/mediators are watching over us and protecting us from the cultural pollution of the non-commercial airwaves.

Don,
Northern aggression? Please..... Guess you never heard of "Border Ruffians" trying to convert new states to slave states.

I think what we're trying to get at is cultural changes which are real and do occur whether by creep of by force. It does happen and is happening all the time. Many Tibetans desire independence, as do some other regions in China, but I hardly see anything new here. I also don't see any reason to deny these feelings are real. There is a basis for the statement, even if the concepts are vague. Are the destruction of these cultures being actively pursued? I doubt it is in any conscious manner. But cultures do loose their cultural identities.
(I used to live in Shang Hai)

user-pic

Ah, strolling on the Shanghai Bund, I bet you miss it.

people do loose their cultural identities...Sorry

user-pic

Ahhhh...time for the Olympics again. Every 4 years the world gets together for athletic competition. In the past the Olympic spirit was one where amateur athletes got together to compete for no other reason than to see who is the best. All are welcome equally to compete no matter where they called home, the color of their skin, their ethnicity or their religion.

But alas that spirit is dead. Professional athletes are now being used (Jim Thorpe was stripped of his medals for a semi pro baseball stint) and the Olympic Rings represent nothing more than a corporate marketing logo. And now countries want to host it not as much out of national pride but more so the money that can be made off of these athletes. Does China 'deserve' this economic opportunity? Do they believe in the equality supposedly embodied by the 'Olympic Spirit'? They are making progress but they probably are not deserving at this point in time. But neither was Nazi Germany when Berlin hosted the games in 1936 or the USSR when Moscow hosted the games in 1980. Then again this is coming from a citizen of a country that is trying to conclude an unprovoked war of aggression we are currently involved in. But I guess in this new world of the global marketplace where freedom is measured by earning capacity, making money trumps human rights.

So let the games...errrrrrr...advertisements begin, in a joyous celebration of the world coming together in order to see who is the best...ummmmm I mean...how much profit can be made!!!

I feel compelled to point out that less than ten years ago, Bhutan was ruled by an absolute monarchy, which is about as antithetical to democracy as you can get.

user-pic

I think we can relate.

user-pic

Nobody's perfect!!

user-pic

Are all countries better off as Democracies?

There are no benevolent despots; no charitable, peaceful rulers? No altruistic Monarchs?

Bush has made a mockery of the word Democracy with his Potemkin Village Democracies in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Look at how Bush sees our Democracy from his perch in the White House, this is what he wants to export around the world.

Well, yes, as a staunch believer in freedom of speech and the right of every human being to take part in the choosing of his or her leadership, I find monarchy and dictatorship, no matter how benevolent, an attack on basic human rights (that means you too, Britain).

Theoretically, of course. In real life things may be somewhat different. But I think it's safe to say that truly pure bleeding hearts of the type you're describing don't exist. Even Mother Teresa had an agenda.

user-pic

ethan says:

I feel compelled to point out that less than ten years ago, Bhutan was ruled by an absolute monarchy, which is about as antithetical to democracy as you can get.


Happiest countries according to Business week.

http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06/10/happiest_countries/index_01.htm


Buhutan is #8, just after the Scandanavian countries and the Bahamas, the U.S. was at 23 while Russia was 167. :-)

You know, I lived in Austria for a time and, I must admit, I was quite happy there. Must be all the mountain air. Also, the public transportation is wonderful.

user-pic

Ethan says;


You know, I lived in Austria for a time and, I must admit, I was quite happy there.

Did you see many kangaroos? :)

user-pic

People lose their cultural identities when Hollywood, Madison Avenue, and Clear Channel take over their movies, TV, and radio. And when their stores and restaurants are forced to close by Walmart and McDonalds. But we are not allowed to talk/think about that.