The Shame of EMILY'S LIST: Its Candidate Uses Anti-Semitism To Defeat a Liberal in Tennessee
It's bad enough that Emily's List would back any challenge to Steve Cohen, one of the most liberal members of the House.
But now Emily's favored candidate is using racial and anti-semitic charges to defeat Cohen.
What gives? Does Emily's List believe that, by definition, any woman is better than any man? Does Emily's List condone anti-semitism? Or racism?
Or is everything permissible when you know you are a liberal? Sickening.















I believe there's a similar campaign underway in Florida.
August 6, 2008 2:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
I want to withdraw the above. I mistook one partisan's statement of the candidate's position for that of the candidate. My apologies.
August 6, 2008 5:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
If his name were Steve Christopher, what about that commercial would have been different?
August 6, 2008 2:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nothing, if "Steve Christopher" were Jewish. But then Tinker would have to be more explicit in her anti-semitism because she couldn't count on his name to show he's Jewish. But if "Steve Christopher" were Christian, I'd guess that, at the very least, the "our churches" part wouldn't be there. More likely though, the entire ad would have been different and neither Steve's religion nor his old state senate vote (which Cohen's spokesman denies) would have been mentioned.
August 6, 2008 5:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
the "our churches" remark isn't a reference to his jewishness. black people say "our churches" all the time to refer to the black large as the institituion. there is likely no anti-semitism here.
there is, however, race-baiting. the core theme behind this ad is that he's white running in a black district that should have black representation. in my opinion, the ad is anti-white not anti-semitic.
August 6, 2008 7:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
"...to the black large as the institituion. there is likely no anti-semitism here."
this should say, "...to the black church as the institution."
August 6, 2008 7:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nikki Tinker is a stinker,
Lets all cast a vote to sink her.
Anti semitism and racist remarks are generally subtle, this bimbo shoots them out with a howitzer.
August 6, 2008 3:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
At the risk of seeming woefully obtuse, I thought that the answer to this question was a prosaic and obvious "yes." Isn't that the point of Emily's List; to get pro-abortion women elected to high office? I remember when Michigan lost a house seat in 2000 that John Dingell and Lynn Rivers were thrust into a primary race to see who would represent the newly consolidated district. Dingell was obviously the candidate with more seniority and more plum committee positions, so most democratic activist organizations endorsed him. Emily's List, however, backed Rivers, not because of her greater commitment to abortion rights - their voting records were equally strong on that issue - but simply because she was a woman. That is the reason for Emily's List's existence.
August 6, 2008 4:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Emily's list is innocent until proven guilty.
The sensible response is to put MJ's questions directly to them and give them a chance to answer.
I think MJ should do that. If he doesn't,you could. Or I could.
That's better than just making accusations, even accusations which posture as rhetorical questions.
I'm certainly willing to join in a condemnation of Emily's List if they do not provide an explanation . But only after they are asked to explain.
August 6, 2008 5:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Accusation? I am not sure what that even means in this context. One "accuses" folks of crimes or misdeeds. It is not a crime to back women candidates over men candidates. I think, as such, that any talk of "accusation" is just tossing around unnecessarily loaded words.
That said, Emily's List's own mission statement claims that
In other words, they are only interested in electing women, not men, who share their basic ideological commitments. Commitment to abortion rights is only part of their platform. The sex of the candidate elected is another part. I suppose it is unfair to describe this (as Rosenberg and I did) as the position that any woman is better than any man, but I do not think that it would be unfair to recapitulate Emily's List's position as "any pro-abortion rights woman is better than any man."
August 6, 2008 6:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, to be fair, according to Emily's List, any pro-reproductive freedom, Democratic woman is better than any man.
The party is the third party of the equation.
August 6, 2008 7:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Emily's List has in fact disavowed Tinker. Perhaps we ought not to be so quick on the draw.
.
August 6, 2008 8:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
A Missouri voter writes,
Earlier,
No one is "pro-abortion." That is a right wing propaganda rhetoric. While your "pro-abortion rights" remark is a bit better, it still serves to demonize the pro-choice perspective. While no one is "pro-abortion," a pro-choice perspective supports sustaining the legality of the medical procedure as an option, and not as a compulsory requirement. Big difference.
August 7, 2008 10:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
That would be news to the abortion industry. It is rare to find workers, management, vendors, and dependants in any industry that are not pro-industry. The abortion industry is no different.
August 8, 2008 8:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
So soldiers are "pro-war," funeral directors are "pro-death," doctors are "pro-disease," and so forth. Great insight!
August 11, 2008 6:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
The article that M.J. linked (Politico) has been updated with this statement from Emily's List:
“We were shocked to see the recent ads run by the Nikki Tinker for Congress campaign. We believe the ads are offensive and divisive,” said Malcolm. EMILY's List does not condone or support these types of attacks.”
August 6, 2008 7:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh Jeez...hasn't the paragraph formatting been made automatic yet? I forgot to manually add the code between the paragraphs. That last paragraph isn't mine; it's part of the update from Emily's List.
August 6, 2008 7:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
There can be no doubt that this is anti-Semitic. The above commenter is correct that there is no subtlety. There is no place for this in the Democratic Party. Her outside supporters have an obligation to stand up and be counted. Silence convicts them of being just as bigoted. On an historical note, it is more subtle than the attacks on Leo Frank, but not much.
August 6, 2008 4:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
With real respect for your revulsion at Tinker's tactics I think that is too tough a standard.Every day some candidate somewhere says something truly objectionable and the organizations that support them could find themselves issuing a flood of rebuttals.
We donate to Emily's List so unless MJ objects or someone has a better idea I'll copy his post and send it to EL asking for their comment.
August 6, 2008 7:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
OK, EL has responded.
August 6, 2008 7:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have watched Ms Tinkers campaign from inside the district. She has made antisemitic statements. This just is not one of them this goes to the core of her argument against Rep Cohen. Her only campaign platform is, "He isn't black." When asked in the debate to name one vote he has made where she would have voted differently she could not name one.
August 7, 2008 9:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
And then people wonder why McCain is getting a large amount of the Jewish vote.
August 6, 2008 5:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
What does 2 Dems running against each other -- one with anti-Semitic ads -- have to do with Jewish support of McCain? And in any case, the large majority of Jews do not support McCain.
August 6, 2008 6:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
You have to be clued to the type of anti Obama venomous emails that fly around the pro-israel and jewish networks [for example Ziman's]. This time it will try and associate Obama to Tinker -- coz he's black don't you know...
Remember the buses that came to the DNC rules committee meeting and the interesting anti-black racism rant we got there... I assume some elements would like a repeat of that at the DNC Convention?
This type of trash we have to put up with - does [unfortunately] affect certain segments of the pro-israel community [and don't the Clinton's know it] -- it also affects fundraising -- and also allows AIPAC within the democratic establishment to again WORRY about Jewish Democratic support so they can further flex their muscles!
They love Hillary and Bayh, but absolutely hate Clark.
I'm so pissed off -- when I look at all the enablers attached to this woman.
August 6, 2008 7:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ok... "...Tinker’s work as campaign manager for Congressman Harold Ford, Jr..."
http://www.emilyslist.org/news/releases/2008_tinker_endorsement/
Creepy... hmmm... repeat real creepy!!
August 6, 2008 5:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh and bats*it crazy Hillary supporter Stephanie Tubbs Jones (Ohio) was totally over this woman too...
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/cohen-tubbs-jones-have-words-over-her-support-of-primary-challenger-2008-07-14.html
... and what is this story really about ... black people hate Jews maybe...?
I mean THIS STORY has been used before hasn't MJ.
August 6, 2008 5:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wondering if Hillary bundler and pro-Israel nutcase Daphna Ziman has sent out thousands of emails again pushing the crap that she peddles that blacks have a problem with Jews.
I disgusted there isn't a deeper story on this Tinker woman -- certain interests wanted to put this nutcase up in the media... and it certainly is the tolerant sector of the Democratic Party.
August 6, 2008 7:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm disgusted there isn't a deeper story on this Tinker woman? Certain interests wanted to put this nutcase up in the media and it certainly WASN'T the tolerant sector of the Democratic Party.
August 6, 2008 7:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Emily's List (202) 326-1400
Tinker for Congress (901) 345-5070
Hi,
If you don't like Ms. Tinker's racist, anti-semitic approach to campaigning, give her office a "hi, how are you?" at the number above. As for Emily's List, I called them too . . . and according to the poor lady stuck on phone duty, they are popular, in an unpopular kinda way today. Just tell 'em you'll give to Planned Parenthood going forward to help Emily's List avoid supporting race-baiting, anti-semitic candidates even if the racist, anti-semite has the proper genitalia. And, have a blessed day.
August 6, 2008 5:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nobody's commented on the background “Now I lay me down to sleep” prayer. I don’t know that it is an explicitly Christian prayer, but it certainly isn’t a Jewish one. And it isn’t one a child would say in school, so it isn’t consistent with the superficial message about Cohen’s voting against the religious liberties law. I think it reinforces the “our churches” message.
Mitch
August 6, 2008 5:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ok... who the hell pressured this woman to run?
August 6, 2008 6:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'll be calling Emily's List first thing tomorrow. This is disgusting -- something I would expect out of the Rove camp (or, to date myself, the Lee Atwater camp before he found out he was dying and repented of his evil ways).
August 6, 2008 6:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's interesting that it was Ron Brown who stayed in contact with Atwater when he was dying while his (former) right wing associates largely ignored him.
August 6, 2008 7:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
I just sent him $25.
August 6, 2008 6:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ah Emily's List. A champion for paleo-feminists who put humans with vaginas over anything else.
August 6, 2008 8:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's certainly racially bigoted and it may or may not be anti-Semitic, but it is unquestionably sickening and Emilys list and any other organization ought to withdraw their support for that creep of a candidate and the newspapers in that area ought to take her apart for producing such a vile, sickening ad.
August 6, 2008 8:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Emily's List has condemned the ad.
August 6, 2008 9:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can you say "Too little, Too Late."
They knew she was basing her chalenge on race or they were not paying attention. Her only platform now and two years ago is race.
August 7, 2008 9:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
By the way, I don't believe Tinker or her supporters in the black churches are actually FOR reproductive freedom. She merely said she wasn't against it, in a tepid sort of way, in order to get the EL endorsement.
What irks me is that EL didn't research Tinker in either of the two elections. It appears they just looked at her answers to the questionnaire, accepted her assertion about having a vagina, and endorsed her. I wouldm't give a dime to any candidate based on EL's endoirsement.
August 6, 2008 10:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was gonna say I think some have been unfairly tough on EL until I read further. While condemning the ad EL did not say they would no longer be supporting Ms. Tinker's candidacy. I feel the only right thing for EL to do is stop supporting Ms. Tinker in her primary bid. They condemn her ad, but that is not a strong enough statement. They should be condemning her candidacy!! Someone as overtly racist as her has no place in power.
August 6, 2008 11:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Take a deep breath. When this thread started EL
hadn't yet commented and MJ and some of us (see above) were in full-throttle attack mode. Now they've commented appropriately they've earned the right to be given the benefit of the doubt.
Perhaps there will be a further statement. Today's was a pretty good start. After all Josh's original post still stands without any update acnowledging EL's disavowal. I don't assume that reflects prejudice against EL, just that he hasn't gotten around to it and there's more to come. Ditto for EL.
August 7, 2008 3:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Primary is today. When do you think that EL should get arround to disavowing their racist choice?
August 7, 2008 9:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
As an African-American woman, I find Tinker's ads shameful and painful. The fact that Emily's List has so lost its moral purpose is just sad. What truly troubles me is the complete and utter silence of the Black community on this woman's scurrilous attacks that resemble more Karl Rove than any Democrat, not named Zell Miller or Strom Thurmond, I have ever witnessed.
August 6, 2008 11:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
The African-American community has not been silent about her here. They are divided but not silent. There have been accusations of 'Uncle Tommism' and 'plantation mentality' flying at Rep Cohen's defenders. If you think Ms Tinker is over the top you ought to see some of the flyers that are going arround here.
August 7, 2008 9:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hat Tip to EmmaKY over at DailyKos
and then there was this article in June !
August 7, 2008 9:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Mr. Rosenberg, you are wrong. Ms. Taylor is NOT A LIBERAL she is a protoge of Harold Ford, current head of the DLC.
She may or may not be a racist anti-Semite, but she is no liberal.
August 7, 2008 10:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
From the inimitable and courageous Skeptical Brotha:
"Longtime readers of this blog know of the animosity I have for Harold Ford Jr and his demagogic brand of corporate prostitution that masquerades as political centrism. Everything he touches turns to shit and the same could be said of his protégé.
I didn’t think it was possible to be more repellent than Ford, but Aunt Nikki is the willing overseer on Pinnacle Airlines corporate plantation as Vice President for Labor Relations and General Counsel. Aunt Nikki is representative of the lowest form of human life and is the worst kind of counterfeit Negress imaginable. As an employment lawyer, she specializes in destroying employee rights to collectively bargain and be free from workplace racial discrimination, harassment, and retaliation.
Her campaign report is full of two kinds of people, acquaintances from her home state of Alabama and her motley collection of crooked contacts in the business world. The CEO of Pinnacle Airlines, Phil Trenary, her boss and corporate puppet master, is represented, as are Republican corporate employment lawyers from her former law firm, John and Ruth Alley. Finally, there is a member of Pinnacle’s Board of Directors, GOP rainmaker and real estate magnate James McGehee and his kith and kin. "
and again:
"My colleagues at Black Agenda Report, in their former incarnation as the writers behind Black Commentator, came up with the nifty moniker of Trojan Horse to describe Black Democrats backed surreptitiously by Republican money and the corporate and right-wing foundation elite. They highlighted BET’s Bob Johnson and politicians Cory Booker and Harold Whore, Jr. Speaking of the Whore, he has used his new wife, Emily Threlkeld Ford, to funnel more than $3300 to his protégé. The Trojan Horse moniker definitely fits Nikki Tinker to a T because as her campaign finance report shows, she is a a member in good standing of this right-wing club.
As the moniker from Greek mythology implies, Aunt Nikki is a stealth weapon of the right-wing that optimally would be used to destroy progressive black representation and the social, political, and economic viability of Black Memphis. Unfortunately for our corporate enemies on the right, Aunt Nikki’s campaign exploded today like an IED in a war zone when it released an ad which strikes a note of false religiosity and implies that Steve Cohen is an Jewish interloper unwelcome in black churches and alludes to a bill to protect “religious freedom” and the unfettered right of religious organizations to discriminate against gay and lesbian people. This is the culmination of her clumsy attempts to make inroads with the black ministerial community by pandering to the homophobia of a select group of black pastors."
August 7, 2008 2:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
della rovere beat me to the punch.
I really hadn't paid much attention to Harold Ford, Jr and was initially sad that he lost against the GOP opponent who ran the "call me" ad. it appears the voters had a choice not unlike the Edwards vs David Duke race for Governor in La.
I heard a snippet of Harold Ford Jr at a blogger's conference stating that a "Liberal" could not get elected in his district. I should have checked the facts. I did get the sense from appearances on "Morning Joe" that Ford was a right of Centrist politician. If Ford is willing to play the anti-Semitic game, he should have NO role in any Democratic Party affiliated organization.
August 7, 2008 2:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama Statement on Tenn. Primary
Statement of Senator Barack Obama on Tennessee’s 9th Congressional District primary
“These incendiary and personal attacks have no place in our politics, and will do nothing to help the good people of Tennessee. It’s time to turn the page on a politics driven by negativity and division so that we can come together to lift up our communities and our country,” said Barack Obama.
August 7, 2008 3:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
We are lucky Ford lost in 2006.
August 7, 2008 3:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
MJ, no we're not! Would've been much better to have Ford in there than who we have.
I do think Cohen's toast, sooner or later. The dog whistle's work both ways. People should never forget that. This is a southern district, and race relations are raw in the south. "They" will want their man in there, whether or not it's this time he is taken out or not.
Congressman Rodino only survived so long in a majority black district because he was the Chairman of a committee.
Her anti-semitism is stupid, and the ad is truly rancid, in my view. But Cohen in my view, is facing the same crap Obama is across the country. What's surprising is that she will stoop this low to take him out. But Cohen is facing the same crap as Obama, and whispering campaigns have an impact.
I should add that I don't think it's the fact that he's Jewish, per se, but that he's white.
Now I must go to Drinking Liberally.
August 7, 2008 6:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Tinker ad is back up on You Tube
I don't know for how long.
http://video.yahoo.com/watch/3251984/9166885
August 7, 2008 8:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
She went down to defeat...In a BIG way. With 67% reporting she is getting beat 79% - 19%.
http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/08/tennesse_jewbaiter_loses_prima.php
August 7, 2008 10:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tinker losing 79% to 19% against Cohen. Now to make people aware of Harold Ford Jr's ties to this vile campaign.
August 7, 2008 10:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Tinker lost" great words, now lets get two more, "McCain lost."
August 8, 2008 8:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
We have more knowledge,but less judgment Age Of Conan gold
August 14, 2008 11:56 PM | Reply | Permalink