TPMCafe
« Credit Cards, Bankruptcy Laws and the Mortgage Meltdown | Home | On Wealth and Governance »

Lieberman, Engel and Others Endorse Hagee Conference: Is Right-wing Anti-Semitism Okay?

user-pic

Here is a list of those endorsing the July 20th Christians United For Israel. That is the right-wing assembly organized by John Hagee, the minister who has said that Hitler was doing God's work, who believes that the destruction of Israel is both inevitable and necessary and who propagates a theology according to which all but 144,000 Jews must be destroyed as a prelude to Christ's coming.

I guess that means he is an anti-Semite. But, no, he's okay (unlike, say, Jimmy Carter) because in the meantime he supports the occupation, the settlements, and endless war with the Palestinians. Actually it all makes sense. The policies he favors for Israel are destructive to Israel and since his game plan requires Israel's destruction, why not?

Anyway here is a list of some of those endorsing Hagee and CUFI's Washington prayer fest for Armageddon.

- Patrick Clawson, Deputy Director for Research at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy
- Frank Gaffney, Founder and President of the Center for Security Policy
- Adam Hasner, Florida State Representative
- Charles Jacobs, Founder & President of the David Project Center for Jewish Leadership
- William Kristol, Editor of the Weekly Standard
- Jennifer Laszlo Mizrahi, Founder and President of the Israel Project
- Clifford May, President of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies
- Daniel Pipes, Director of the Middle East Forum
- Dennis Prager, Nationally syndicated radio host and author
- Roz Rothstein, International Director of StandWithUs
- Larry Weinberg, Executive Vice President of Israel 21c

I guess right-wing anti-semitism is okay with these folks as long as its coupled with the pious mouthing of rightwing talking points on Israel. In other words, it's fine to be anti-semitic so long as you are pro-Israel. Are they nuts? Or just right-wing nuts?


44 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Joe Lieberman is not the sharpest knife in the drawer.

Facebook

This is a smart blog. I mean it. You have so much knowledge about this issue, and so much passion. You also know how to make people rally behind it, obviously from the responses. Youve got a design here thats not too flashy, but makes a statement as big as what youre saying. Great job,children health indeed.

user-pic

The right-wing nuts are inconsistent nuts.
The left wing patriots are consistent.
They are anti-Semites and anti-Israel.

user-pic

What about left-wing Jews?

Facebook

Thanks for your patience and sorry for the inconvenience!

Best regards, Mary, CEO of youtube download

I'll be anxious to hear or read Lieberman's speech.
I'm sure the rest of the Civilized World would like that,too.
My guess is that he's not going to stand up and repudiate Hagee.
Therefore, I can only assume that Lieberman will be holding a sewing class in an anteroom.
Right?
or far right?

Engel is my Representative.
He strongly opposes impeachment, but is a strong proponent of Armageddon.
While contemptible and inhuman, this is at least consistent.

Please do us all a favor and leave Riverdale if you find Rep. Engel so contemptible and inhuman. I'm sure Dennis Kucinich will be glad to welcome you in Cleveland.

The sad fact is that the Democratic Party is filled with people who consider Pastor Hagee more sensible than Dennis Kucinich.

I don't--they're equally dumb, in different ways.

may be he's arguing the point of having to burn down the village in order to save it, in his own frustrated way!? hmmm........

this is not going to be a popular comment, I can tell. but please read it with an open mind.

here's Hagee's actual [partial] quote:

"Hitler was a hunter...And the Bible says -- Jeremiah writing -- 'They shall hunt them from every mountain and from every hill and from the holes of the rocks." It was the truth and it is the truth.... How did it happen? Because God allowed it to happen. Why did it happen? Because God said my top priority for the Jewish people is to get them to come back to the land of Israel."

now--let's pretend for a moment that you are a bible-believing Christian. that means you believe in an omnipotent god. a god who made everything, and who can do anything. so Hitler being god's "tool" is not an impossible concept.

I mean, let's remember, this is the same god who gave up his only son to be sacrificed for our souls, right?

before you all flame me with righteous condemnation, please note that I'm only saying that as a Jew myself, I don't find his remarks particularly anti-Semitic in the sense we generally use the word. Odd, stupid, disturbing, sure. anti-Semitic in the accepted sense--not so much.

I'm not saying that Hagee's not a grade-A nutbag, I think he probably is. I'm just sayin'...well, I'm just sayin'.

user-pic

gretz says;

"Hitler was a hunter...And the Bible says -- Jeremiah writing -- 'They shall hunt them from every mountain and from every hill and from the holes of the rocks." It was the truth and it is the truth.... How did it happen? Because God allowed it to happen. Why did it happen? Because God said my top priority for the Jewish people is to get them to come back to the land of Israel."

gretz, this post isn't to you but to the quotation.

"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction."

Blaise Pascal

I say to Hagee and his ilk; God is the greatest mass murder in the history of the universe. As to his reference to Hitler, where was God when those innocent Jewish childen (and adults) were being herded into the concentration camps?

I stopped believing in God when I walked into an active concentration camp in 1945.

user-pic

gretz,

as a Jew myself, I don't find his remarks particularly anti-Semitic in the sense we generally use the word. Odd, stupid, disturbing, sure. anti-Semitic in the accepted sense--not so much.

I think we must also consider the level of cynicism at work here in Hagee's "mission" (for lack of a better word). To the extent that Hagee genuinely believes his schtick, it may be taken as odd, stupid, disturbing. But the extent to which it may be taken as antisemitic would seem to rise with the level of crass opportunism at work in Hagee's "mission." The consequences of which may then appear less unforeseen and more a simple matter of confident exploitation for the sake of a means to wealth and power, which is a consistently historic component of genuine antisemitism.

Before I comment on Hagee, please bear with me on something else. Maybe I've missed it, but I've been reading TPM the last couple of days, and didn't see Mr. Rosenberg comment on the prisoner "swap" with Hezbollah. There would seem to be much to comment on, and if I did miss it, I apologize in advance.
A child-murderer was released to the adoring crowds of Hezbollah and supporters, who have been taking over Lebanon by force. Christians have been marginalized (not many Jews in Lebanon, and virtually none left in Arab countries.) Israel was given the corpses of two young soldiers kidnapped in 2006.
Also noteworthy is that until a few days ago, the parents/fiance, etc. of the the young soldiers thought they were still alive. The Palestians/Hamas/Hezbollah don't bother to allow Red Cross contact with prisoners, provide information on their health, etc., even though required under all relevant codes. Israel allows even murderers and terrorists in its jails to have contact with the outside world, and be accounted for. I don't see Amnesty International sustaining any kind of protest about the mistreatment by Arab countries on Israeli prisoners. Mr. Rosenberg, have you spoken up about this long-standing practice? I hope you have, and would appreciate being directed to what you have said. Now would be a good time to visit or re-visit this topic.


OK on Hagee. The concern about him has some merit, but the presentation is incomplete. He has disavowed the 20 year old Hitler remark (and gretz provides useful context).
Actions speak louder than words. Hagee has done many good things that are clearly in Israel's interests. It seems that to some, if you aren't largely critical of Israel, then you must be anti-Semitic. Mr. Rosenberg simply concludes that certain policies of Israel, supported by Hagee, are destructive of Israel, and then ties that to the biblical prophecy. If I'm Israel, I favor those who help me in this life, as compared to those who claim to know my interests better than me, and want to force to into compromises of my security and stability.
That's not to say that I agree with all of Israel's policies. In fact, I have serious disagreements with the continuing occupation, and think that most of the settlement lands should be given to the Palestinians. But while almost every Arab state remains technically at war with Israel, while Hamas/Hezbollah call for the destruction of Israel (i.e., no borders at all), then I tend to want to balance that by supporting Israel, and balance criticism with perspective and context.
Just listing a Hagee comment, and then concluding that a list of mostly or wholly Jewish names are willing to support right-wing anti-Semitism doesn't advance the discussion. In my view, it diminishes the reality of anti-Semitism, which, sadly, occurs frequently (even if not every single time it is claimed to).
As for the column's reference to Jimmy Carter, let me try to bridge my two topics here. When Carter talked to Hamas in April, why didn't he ask to see their prisoner, Galil Shalit? Why didn't he at least ask Hamas to deliver a note to him, and deliver his response? How about a current photo, and a statement of his health (or whether he is even alive)? Carter said he would bring up the issue, in an effort to appear "balanced." But he did nothing substantive. (Of course, his proposed "solution" to the Gaza mess went nowhere once the media coverage for him and Hamas was over. I won't even get into the millions of Arab petrodollars funding Carter.)
So if you read this, thanks, since I recognize it wasn't completely on topic. It just seemed to me that the cruelty of Hezbollah cried out for comment.

user-pic
It seems that to some, if you aren't largely critical of Israel, then you must be anti-Semitic.
It's exactly correct. Israeli policies are self destructive. Therefore people who support Israel are anti-Semites, people who are against Israel are not.
user-pic

tnathan,

what does being anti semitic mean?

user-pic

Ask M.J. Rosenberg.
My understanding is that people who disagree with M.J. Rosenberg are anti-Semites.

user-pic

tnathan says:

"Ask M.J. Rosenberg.
My understanding is that people who disagree with M.J. Rosenberg are anti-Semites"

So, you don't know what anti semitic means?

user-pic

Anti-Semitism is a trick invented by Zionists and neocons to shut down any discussions about crimes committed by them.

user-pic

tnathan,

so, you don't know what anti semitic means, ok.

I realize that the post was about the supposed anti-Semitism of the Right, but does anyone want to comment on what's going on in Lebanon? Hezbollah, for Syria and Iran, is destroying a multi-religious relatively progressive country. Over the past few years, the Prime Minister and then some legislators have been killed to paralyze the government. Christians have been harrassed. Syrian troops finally left, but the influence of Syria and Iran grows through Hezbollah, which isn't shy about using force. That's the context of this latest "hero's welcome" of a child murderer.
This is detrimental to the peace desiring Arabs in Lebanon, and the region, including the Palestinians.
Also, while I am not as frequent a commenter as many others, I have to say that the personal comments, from all sides, detract from the attempt to learn something from each other. Sure, some people here appear only interested in stating their views, not in considering changing them in any way. I'm not writing for those people. I am hopeful some people (including myself) can consider different perspectives.

user-pic

Blame zionists and neocons. They want to prove that Arabs can't have a multi-religious relatively progressive country.

dsmithie,
A lot of good points, but the Lebanon war is a very shaky moral ground as it was a war of choice for Israel and it should have never happened. Allowing Red Cross for visits with the hostages, while commendable, would bring IDF, Mosad, CIA, Rambo and the Terminator in their footsteps...
Wasn't the UN Security Council permanently paralyzed by the US in regard to Israel's behavior, Israel would be paying not only reparations to Lebanon, but for the clean up of the thousands of the genocidal cluster bombs dropped on S. Lebanon which still keep killing civilians old and very young.
As unfortunate as it may be, one person's murderous terrorist is another's freedom fighter and a hero. When in Rome... and in this area it is not the "Arabs" but Israel with its brutality who is setting the tone of the exchanges unfortunately. Speaking of women and children killed, check the parity on the lists of victims. I am a strong believer in statistics as an instrument of compassion, I guess this is a quote from the great poet Zbigniew Herbert.
Now Mr: Hagee: his entire ministry is based on Armageddon and the destruction of Israel. Unlike many mild nutcakes (how is a nutcake different from a wingnut, can anybody tell me) who quietly pray for it, he is actively pursuing it. Does it make him an anti-Semite? Yes in my book, but since the word has been so abused lately for political gain/expediency, I leave it to others to decide who is one and who isn't, but it certainly makes him dangerous and possibly criminal, as in war-criminal.
Are the likes of Mr. Pipes, Kristol, Prager at al stupid? Of course not. They are using Rev (!!!) Hagee, just as much as he is using the Likud/Neocon crowd for both positive hard cash flow and/or maintaining and possibly expanding the piece of real estate called Israel.
As a New York comedienne who's name I forgot once said on NPR: religion mixed with real estate makes for a very explosive concoction.
I may not agree with everything M.J. says, but I haven't seen it yet, and I am his enthusiastic supporter, grateful for the guts and the insights. And he must be feared in some circles, as he is followed by (at least 2) apac trolls:
tnathan and apacmember who each time try to drown any meaningful discussion in the static noise of the ridiculous.
Their smart ass vitriol has stopped discussions many times already. MJ, stick it out
Peace to all

user-pic
Israel would be paying not only reparations to Lebanon, but for the clean up of the thousands of the genocidal cluster bombs dropped on S. Lebanon which still keep killing civilians old and very young.
I have to agree with legalalien Zionists and neocons are genocidal killers. Peace to all but Zionists and neocons.

I did mean Peace to All, in the ME in particular, but it will first of all require painful compromises from all involved.
And I hate to look up to China and Russia for stability in the world, but if they are to save us from ourselves i.e. the neocon
crazies ready to attack yet another country (Iran) on inflated claims then so be it.
And then from time to time, on bad days, when I loose faith in my countrymen and the humanity in general, I wonder maybe the prophecies of the Armageddon are not all just BS.
In that case, having so many squandered opportunities to prevent it, we will well deserve it all that will follow.

user-pic

I can't understand why would anybody wish peace for genocidal killers.

legalalien,
Thanks for your comments. I do wonder whether it is fair or accurate to say that only Israel is setting the tone for brutality. There is a long history here, and there is certainly gratuitous cruelty coming from Arabs, mostly towards Jews and Westerners, but also in their own internal fights.
I agree with you that the 2006 Lebanon war was a mistake, and didn't intend to suggest it is the moral grounding. But what about the longer history of Lebanon, and the recent involvement of Hezbollah/Iran/Syria? Is that all the fault of Israel/US? Are the motives of Hezbollah etc. to foster any kind of freedom and independence of a multi-religious country in Lebanon, as Lebanon used to be?
I disagree that comparing the "parity" of numbers of victims is meaningful. If Israel suffered greater numerical losses (as its enemies wish) would you change your opinion on the "right and wrong" and political dynamics?
I'm not defending cluster bombs, but what about Hamas, Hezbollah, PA etc. launching rockets from densely populated civilian areas (into Israel civilian areas) where any response is likely to incur civilian injuries? Hiding among civilians is against the Geneva Convention, and just common sense. If Israel does nothing, the rockets continue.
I'm glad you are for peace for all. It's important to sound the notes that should unite us.

Since you asked about Lebanon, dc, i'll be glad to fill you in; Hizballah is a legitimate resistance organization, the 'love child' of Israel's first invasion of Lebanon in the 1980's. Syria also had a role in helping push Israel out of Lebanon, but then overstayed their welcome. So, to answer one of your questions, yes, Israel is culpable for a lot of the mess in Lebanon. (Incidentally, it should be remembered that the PLO was a secular organization, so one of Israel's later responses was to fund the growth of Hamas, hoping to divide and conquer, a strategy that obviously backfired big time.)

It was during the Lebanon incursions that Ariel Sharon earned the mantle of war criminal, by allowing the Sabra and Shatila massacres. Later on, the village of Qana in southern Lebanon, was the site of 2 noted IDF atrocities, in 1996 and 2006. Qana, like southern Lebanon is mostly Shia, so it should seem to be common sense that they would embrace a Shia-led resistance movement against the Israeli invaders who have devastated southern Lebanon many times. (The phrase 'one man's freedom fighter...' has particular redolence in this case, because Israel's 'war party' Likud, has its own roots in the terrorist Irgun organization.)

Hizballah represents most Lebanese Shia, who have historically been politically underrepresented in Lebanon, and the recent re-formation of the Parliament helped to redress this imbalance. (Incidentally, this deal only got done when the US was shut out of negotiations.) Nasrallah is on record supporting the multi-cultural identity of Lebanon, and, indeed, the rapport of Hizballah with the rest of Lebanese society was instrumental in their strategic takeover of West Beirut a few months ago.

While the US has tried mightily to thwart Hizballah, and Israel would love to kill Nasrallah (anybody care to comment on the ethics of state-sponsored assassinations?), the reality is that Hizb represents a sizeable bloc of Lebanese, so by opposing them and trying to cast them as 'terrorists', Israel and the US are vainly trying to fight against a popular indigenous national movement--which is why Lebanon is often referred to as 'Israel's Vietnam.'

Dave Bowman,
I appreciate your response. I agree with some of the facts and opinions you cite, such as the PLO being secular. However, the PLO, founded by Arafat of Egypt before the 1967 war and the occupation was always dedicated to the total extermination of Israel.
I do agree that Israel has not only made tactical mistakes, but moral ones. However, I again wonder to what extent to you think that anyone besides Israel is culpable. If so, who and why, and doesn't that need to be part of the conversation?
Hezbollah may have some rapport with some of Lebanon, certainly exacerbated by Israel's mistakes, but hardly all. The "strategic" takeover of West Beruit you refer to, wasn't that by force of arms against the regular army? It isn't like the whole of Lebanese society wants to be run by Hezbollah.

Unlike MJ Rosenberg, these right wing "anti-Semites" oppose the reprise of the Holocaust explicitly advocated by Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas, and Fatah. At a time when the six million Jews of Israel are being repeatedly threatened with death, Rosenberg targets his wrath at pro-Israeli Christians.

Rosenberg, if you ever tire of bashing Jews and the Christians who want them to stay alive, feel free to condemn the Fatah freedom fighters who slaughtered unarmed Jews in the seminary a few months ago.

Thus far, your busy (Jew-hating) schedule has precluded you from doing so.

In your next disordered column, catalog the anti-Semitic atrocities committed by contemporary American Christians, and we can compare them with the litany of Jew murders committed by your anti-Zionist brethren.

user-pic

Bob Lane,

At a time when the six million Jews of Israel are being repeatedly threatened with death, Rosenberg targets his wrath at pro-Israeli Christians.

The crux of our controversy lies precisely in the premise that Hagee's CUFI is genuinely "pro-Israel." First you need to establish that premise before you may reasonably expect anyone to accept your conclusion regarding MJ Rosenberg's perspective.

user-pic

Bob Lane,

you would do better if you refrained from your outlandish and unfounded charges against MJ Rosenberg. Though you obviously disagree with him on Israel issues this doesn't make him some kind of Israel hater, Jew hater, or anti semite.

Your tactics are no different than the right wing
dittoheads of Rush Limbaugh or the Hannity fans who babble that Democrats want the terrorists to win.

user-pic

The evidence seems to indicate that he is no "different than the right wing
dittoheads of Rush Limbaugh or the Hannity fans who babble that Democrats want the terrorists to win."

One thing this discussion has proved is that there is a healthy debate on Israel being the problem or the victim. We see accusations that they are oppressors, and just the opposite, claims that Hezbollah is at fault, a terrorist organization.

I think we all try to package things neatly in categories to our detriment, and we have a tendency to cling to our original opinions no matter what we hear afterwards.

If anyone in this discussion was given a million dollar research grant to write a 1,000 page report on the problem, they'd come up with the same conclusions. Both sides are both victims and aggressors at the same time, depending on the actions of the individual Jew or Arab you are talking about.

My only metric for the ethics of anyone, regardless of their nationality or faith, is whether they are advocating double standards. For example, Eliot Engel and Joe Lieberman feel that Israel should have nukes and Iran shouldn't. Engel also feels that Palestinians should be discharged from Israel without a homeland.

So forget the eternally ongoing debate between Israel and the rest of the Mid East for a moment. This will not be solved here by us. But what we can decide is whether our local elected reps should be giving credibility to a kook like Hagee who believes today that the inevitable destiny for all Jews is annihilation.

Eliot Engel has directly handed over his Congressional power of oversight to George Bush to give him a free hand to attack Iran. After all Bush/Cheney have done, don't you think Engel should be a bit more judicious in representing the people of Rockland, Westchester and the Bronx?

Rosenberg,

You do not hate Hagee because he is anti-Semitic.

You hate him because he is not anti-Semitic.

When is the last time you wrote a column condemning someone who calls for the annihilation of Israeli Jews?

Every one of your poorly written screeds has the same theme: Israel is evil, and so are those who support its continued existence.

You are a "Jew" only David Duke could love.

Well, politics makes strange bedfellows. I will say that it sure shows what Lieberman's and Engel's priorities are when they sup with the likes of Hagee. I would suggest to them that they think this thing very carefully, and look at what Hagee and his ilk think will happen to the Jews in the "end times". Lake of fire, anyone?

It never ceases to amaze me exactly how far some of these so-called "supporters" of Israel will push the envelope and sell everything else out for this one issue. I wouldn't mind it so much if they were actually right on this issue, but they're absolutely not. And it's horrible for the the people in Israel, the West Bank, and, in fact, for the entire world.

Although I'm generally an optimist, I'm slowly coming to feel that these idiots have put the future of Israel in grave jeopardy, with horrible consequences for the rest of the world. In 20 years, there may be no Israel if they keep pushing these policies.

What is it with you Rossenberg haters? He does an excellent job. What would please you? Does he have to condemn anti-semitism? every other sentence?

Just because his take is different than yours, does this mean he doesn't want what's right for the Jewish people?

Use your heads, people.

user-pic

Hagee couldn't give two shits about the Jews or Israel, his support of each is self-serving because without them there will be no second coming, no Armageddon, no Rapture, when Hagee and his gang are taken up to Heaven while Jews who don't renounce Judaism and accept Jesus Christ as their personal Savior will burn in hell or wherever for eternity.

Israel and the Jews are a means to an end for Hagee.

user-pic

See, I am not nearly as convinced as you seem to be that Hagee even genuinely believes all that armageddon and rapture stuff. What prevents me from accepting Hagee's exegesis at face value is that his schtick has made him a very wealthy and powerful man in a most earthly sense.

Facebook

religious sect may degenerate into a political faction,' wrote James Madison, but the new American nation would nevertheless be protected against the ungovernable combination of religious fervor and political power as long as the Constitution prohibited the federal government from establishing any particular creed as preeminent.
Egitim | Chat

Facebook

This information is very useful! Thanks!
Best regards, Katya, CEO of hyper v virtual network, 2008 iscsi

Facebook

Si vous etes interesses par le dossier, ou desirez en savoir plus, contactez-moi par mail, et je vous mettrai en contact.
Best regards,Jane, CEO of windows high availability

Facebook

Thanks a lot for enjoying this beauty article with me. I am appreciating it very much! Looking forward to another great article. Good luck to the author! all the best!
KPO DJ

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address