TPMCafe
« Why Isn't this News? | Home | Onward with the Mediterranean Union »

Private Online Spying All Too Common

user-pic

While the full United States Senate takes up the subject of wiretapping by the government, the Senate Commerce Committee will take up the subject of wiretapping by private industry. It's a tossup which one is more scary.

The Senate vote scheduled for today (July 9) on the bill to grant the Executive Branch almost unlimited authority to wiretap private citizens without any judicial oversight. Just before the votes, the Commerce Committee will hear testimony from Robert Dykes, the chairman of NebuAd, a controversial company recently in the news because his group came up with a novel way of getting detailed information about Internet users. NebuAd wasn't satisfied to get information only from a customer's use of one Web site. Instead, they want to see everything that a Web surfer does online.

Here's Dykes pitching his company at a conference in New York earlier this year:

Note the level of detail about which Dykes boasts, and how he talks about the supremacy of the NebuAd system over Google's relatively meagre advertising technology. Google's Ad Sense only gives advertisers information about one Web page at a time. That's an important point to remember, because whenever AT&T, for example, gets upset at reactions to the possibility it might filter content in its network, the company always points to Google.

But what AT&T wants to do for content filtering, and what NebuAd is doing with some broadband companies, is another level entirely because then the activity on the whole network, not only at one site, is at risk for invasions of privacy.

Listen to Dykes tell the conference about the advantages of NebuAd, a service that takes its information from within the network, unseen by any user. "Understand what pages you went to, we understand what search terms you went to, so we have much more knowledge about user than existing online systems," Dykes said.

"We get to see virtually every site you go to," Dykes added. Not only that, NebuAd can tell what you did at those sites. If it's a travel site, we know that you're looking to go to Las Vegas or to the South of France. If you go to an automotive site, you're interested in a used car, luxury car or SUV. If it's an electronics site, a Sony camera or Panasonic TV." And it is all, for the moment, legal. And very scary. They know what ads you clicked on, whether ones sponsored by NebuAd's partners or by competitors. It's all made possible because NebuAd is taking advantage of its place in the network, not on a Web site or even in your computer.

Some of NebuAd's customers,like Charter Communications, have been scared off by the negative publicity surrounding exposure of its business methods. That isn't good enough. The Federal Trade Commission, which is also testifying at the July 9 hearing, should have privacy rules and enforce rules against deceptive practices. But they won't act, preferring the fiction of "self regulation." Congress is starting to get involved with the Senate hearing, and the House may get in on the act as well. That's welcome attention. Legislation would be more welcome.



9 Comments

| Leave a comment
Facebook

Thanks for your patience and sorry for the inconvenience!

Best regards, Mary, CEO of youtube to mp3

Facebook

This is a smart blog. I mean it. You have so much knowledge about this issue, and so much passion. You also know how to make people rally behind it, obviously from the responses. Youve got a design here thats not too flashy, but makes a statement as big as what youre saying. Great job,children health indeed.

Facebook

This is indeed a very scary scenario. The privacy of any client is important and knowing the browsing history is almost like reading one's personal journal. What's next? Knowing what file extensions we used and when we used them? I strongly hope that this initiative will be obliterated.

Facebook

Madison believed that we should have separation of church and state throughout the land, federal and local. There was a fascinating moment during the congressional debate over what became the First Amendment. How could the beloved First Amendment be harmful to religion? Huntington feared that it would overturn or interfere with Connecticut’s approach, which was to have state-supported religion.
Chat | Chat

Facebook

religious sect may degenerate into a political faction,' wrote James Madison, but the new American nation would nevertheless be protected against the ungovernable combination of religious fervor and political power as long as the Constitution prohibited the federal government from establishing any particular creed as preeminent.
Egitim | Chat

Facebook

Are you good until this issue thanks admin.
Chat | chat

Facebook

The possibility that one man or a corporation could have access to so much information scares me. I'm sure that there are a lot of users that plays at online casinos and prefer to stay anonymous. I hope they'll reconsider this privacy policy.

Facebook

This information is very useful! Thanks!
Best regards, Katya, CEO of hyper v failover, iscsi initiator for linux

Facebook

Si vous etes interesses par le dossier, ou desirez en savoir plus, contactez-moi par mail, et je vous mettrai en contact.
Best regards,Jane, CEO of virtualization high availability

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address