Booby Prize
When John McCain does public policy, it's not a pretty sight. Children run and hide under the bed. Women play "Gloomy Sunday" on the old Victrola. Strong men look down and spit on the ground. John is tackling the growing scarcity of fossil fuels and global warming that could exterminate the human race. What's the answer? A prize for a better car battery.
Prizes can be good, as a substitute for patents and copyrights. In return for a prize, a discovery could be put in the public domain for use by all, as that Dean Baker person has explained. Not quite that much thought has gone into the McCain idea, however.
The rights to a revolutionary car battery would be worth quite a bit more than $300 million. It's not clear whether the prize is supposed to purchase rights to the invention. Methinks not. Too much like socialism. If it is supposed to be compensation, it has to be too low. If not, it's not enough to make enough of a difference.
We should be spending a lot more for R&D, not least in the energy field. One problem is finding people to do the R&D. (I'm sorry to sound like George Bush, lecturing simpletons.) We need more scientists, which means helping kids get into and through college to become scientists. With JMC's tax cuts on top of those from G. Bush, there won't be much money for that sort of thing. In fact, earmarks finance some R&D, along with junky stuff. The anti-pork fanatics tend not be distinguish between useful public spending and the other kind, I would say because they really are against all of it.
Private companies only have an incentive to spend for R&D whose profits they can realize. Basic discoveries that can't be privatized tend to be neglected. College is getting less affordable. The smartest kids who do go to college are disproportionately attracted to professions paying the biggest bucks -- in finance, medicine, and law. Anyone waiting for JMC and/or the market to address public needs will be waiting forever.
In my own case, I am working on Maria 2.0. You can see the picture of my prototype. You can be sure I will be keeping all the, uh, benefits for myself. So the incentives in this case are properly lined up.

















Uh, why would you start Maria at that age? Or, Great Rotwang, will it age backwards? That would be genius!
June 24, 2008 9:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is a smart blog. I mean it. You have so much knowledge about this issue, and so much passion. You also know how to make people rally behind it, obviously from the responses. Youve got a design here thats not too flashy, but makes a statement as big as what youre saying. Great job,children health indeed.
January 18, 2011 3:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hate to break the bad news. There are new improved models already available. Maria is obsolete before you even finish her.
Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't realize she was already finished.
June 24, 2008 10:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Shame on me. I was already to post something that isn't snark - a momentous occasion.
The problem with McCain's prize idea is that big national, if not global problems need big efforts to find solutions. Back in the 1930's our country faced a European aviation industry that was poised to wipe the floor with the US aviation industry. War was a looming possibility, so the problem extended far beyond mere corporate profits.
The response was to form NACA, the national advisory committee for aeronautics. That very soon became a basic research organization devoted to gaining the upper hand for US aviation interests. It succeeded beyond the wildest dreams.
NACA didn't just work to develop the ultimate flying machine. The, instead, did the nitty gritty basic research in aeronautics that enabled US corporations to design the ultimate flying machines.
We now need at least a National Advisory Committee for Energy - NACE, or better still, an International Advisory Committee for Energy - IACE, to do the nitty gritty basic research that someone has to do to find orders of magnitude improvements in electric batteries, nuclear reactors, carbon capturing coal burning power plants, etc. I would applaud if Obama were to propose such a step.
June 24, 2008 10:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Please stop picking on McCain. It's not fair. You know that in any battle of wits he comes lightly armed.
Actually we have a lot of good scientists, and technicians too. The problem is that they are either (1) working for some killer Pentagon outfit or (2) scrambling for peanuts from a civilian firm, in competition with a 1-B watchamaycallit from the far east.
And why are you always working on fembots when there are so many luscious flesh-and-blood ones walking around? Jeeez. You could find a nice Russian woman on the web and devote your lab time to car batteries, or oil pumps.
June 25, 2008 12:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
I want someone to invent a politically sophisticated voter.
June 25, 2008 7:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Probably anyone politically sophisticated, like C.A. Rotwang for example, would not find anyone worthy of his vote.
June 25, 2008 9:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
I always manage to find somebody less unworthy than the alternative.
June 25, 2008 9:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Who cares!
You're a fiction -- and for all that insufficiently Dada-esque.
June 25, 2008 11:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
You sure know how to hurt.
Hurt me some more.
June 25, 2008 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Check out the new John McCain parody “Hot Headed” on Parody & Son at:
http://parodyandson.blogspot.com
or on YouTube at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_Dhxu-6l98
June 25, 2008 8:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Is anyone other than C.A. Rotwang permitted to post on the front page under a handle?
June 25, 2008 11:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
I eagerly await the Roddenberry-esque technology that will allow for cost-free, eco-friendly humvee driving and no lifestyle changes. Meanwhile, I'd settle for more human-scale design of our habitat and nifty collective transport solutions.
June 25, 2008 3:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for your patience and sorry for the inconvenience!
Best regards, Mary, CEO of youtube download
December 20, 2010 10:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Madison believed that we should have separation of church and state throughout the land, federal and local. There was a fascinating moment during the congressional debate over what became the First Amendment. How could the beloved First Amendment be harmful to religion? Huntington feared that it would overturn or interfere with Connecticut’s approach, which was to have state-supported religion.
Chat | Chat
March 2, 2011 5:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Are you good until this issue thanks admin.
Chat | chat
March 3, 2011 3:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
This information is very useful! Thanks!
Best regards, Katya, CEO of hyper v manager, iscsi target freenas
April 8, 2011 4:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Si vous etes interesses par le dossier, ou desirez en savoir plus, contactez-moi par mail, et je vous mettrai en contact.
Best regards,Jane, CEO of high availability clusters
May 4, 2011 4:45 AM | Reply | Permalink