« Knitting Celebrities and the Proliferation of Status Hierarchies | Home | Power Laws and Inequality »

The Post-Black Man's Burden

This is why Obama's Father's Day speech leaves me ultimately cold. To see people whose understanding of hip-hop doesn't extend past a few random viewings of BET, or their disgust at the handful of black boys they happen to notice on the street or on the train, proffering this idea that Obama will civilize the blacks makes me retch:

Lately I've been wondering what an Obama White House might mean for the future of bling. For the fate of heavy gold, medallions, below-the-butt denim, the whole hip-hop gangsta fashion habit. What if January 20, 2009 turned out to be not just a cultural and clothing pivot point for adults -- a return to the minimalism of sleek, 60s-era sharkskin suits, the containment of golf-ball sized Barbara Bush costume pearls -- but a watershed fashion moment for teenaged boys?

That's Mary Battiata whose ignorance of black kids is revealed by the fact that she's still using the word "bling." The "racial resentment" in her statement is like level 12 on the "Arrogance of Whiteness" scale. I could almost hear the Pat Boone rocking in the background. Battiata then launches into a predictable argument that hip-hop fashion is the real problem in the black community, and that Obama's aspect may create some sort cultural transition in which black kids think it's cool to walk around in business suits, because everyone knows hip-hop fashion doesn't can be summed up in gold teeth, wife-beaters and gaudy jewels. No one in hip-hop wears suits.

Listen man, I don't busy myself perusing the fashions of teenage white boys, but I'm quite certain if I did, I could find some pretty objectionable outfits (ones not ripped off from black people). But black people are the stand-in for poor people in this era, and poor people are always held to a higher moral standard. Battiata seems completely ignorant of the fact that hip-hop's sales have been tumbling for a few years now, that part of that tumbling is the disgust that black youth themselves have expressed with the music. A few key-strokes of google or, heaven forbid, some actual reporting with real live black kids would have given Battiata some grounding. But nuts to that. Better to sit on one's ass and hold forth on the finer points of black youth culture, because, you know, it's only black people.

I'm not suprised to see Mickey Kaus jumping in on this. Kaus can only think of three things when it comes to the blacks--welfare, affirmative action and sista souljah. He isn't even worth a block quote. I'm a little more bothered by Andrew Sullivan (anyone who reads this blog knows I'm a fan) pushing this dumb-ass notion that black kids don't call Obama "'nigger" out of some sort of sign of respect:

Random anecdote: walking the beagles the other day, I bumped into a neighbor who told me that she noticed one word that the young black teens and boys she knows in the neighborhood don't use about Obama. The n-word. Or as Battiata puts it: the suit next time.

First, I'm almost certain that isn't true. I know in moments of levity in my home, I've definitely heard an Obama speech and issued a "Nigger, please."  I know some of you agree with Andrew. You know how I feel. But, more generally, I hate this idea that ALL black teens are somehow interchangable with what a few white bloggers find most objectionable in hip-hop. When you have actual black teens in your family, when you are raising them yourself, when you were one at some point in your life, you understand how this need to make us smaller,  this desire to turn the most troubled amongst us, into all of us, is the cousin of welfare queens and Willie Horton.

A quick aside: I've spent most of my life learning this great craft from two sources--rappers and professional writers, most of them white.  I've been reading The New Republic, The Atlantic, and the New Yorker for most of my life, steady banging Wu-Tang Forever, or Reasonable Doubt the whole time. My Black Panther father put me on to Wall Street Journal when I was in high school, and the New York Observer when I was in college. My heroes in this business are virtually all white (how many black people are doing long-form journalism these days? I'm still stuck on Baldwin) and when I read shit like this and this, I'm left humbled wishing I was smarter and worked harder. And yet so often, these same writers (not literally the ones I linked) whose minds are so nimble and nuanced, go rigor mortis when it comes to black people. I don't get it.

There are many, many tribes of whiteness in America which I don't particularly understand. I didn't get how some white people go off to expensive colleges and then spend their friday nights, french-kissing a keg of the world's cheapest beer, until they're rendered unconscious. I remember the first white parties I went to, in my early twenties, and I was shocked to see people standing around clutching plastic cups, music playing, but no one dancing. It took some time for me to get blue-collar comedy. I'm still not up on cucumber sandwiches--but judging by the diabetes rates here in Harlem, maybe I should be.

We all have our prejudice, but every time I've ever mistaked that prejudice for some sort of insight, I've paid for it. I learned to like going to parties standing around at actually "talking"--I didn't have to worry about some dude forming a Soul Train and forcing me to do my pitiful rendition of the Reebok or the Cabbage Patch. I still don't get the "keg party" shit, but I can be found on Saturdays in September, at half-time, standing on the sidelines, my hand on my son's face-mask, telling him "Get'r done."

Before, I started reading Andrew, I thought all gay people liked the HRC, sort of how a lot of white writers think all black people like the NAACP or Al Sharpton. You live and you learn I guess. I want people who don't know Raekwon from Ray-Jay, to have some respect for their own ignorance. There is a reason you don't see me critiquing the latest Joshua Redmond. I want writers to stop assuming that they know who we are, that black people are so simple as to be summed up in the latest Henry Louis Gates' missive (or Ta-Nehisi Coates missive, for that matter). I want writers to stop wishing that Barack Obama will teach us how to act. As in most things, when discussing us, they've got it exactly backwards.

Cross-posted from www.ta-nehisi.com

EDIT: I flubbed Battiata's name little ways down in the post. Nothing deflates your point like misspelling the name of the person you're going after. I try guys. But I'm human. Sloppy, but human


Comments (47)

Ta-Nehisi, criticizing white commentators for using outmoded words like "bling" really isn't dope, okay? It's just not the fresh, def thing to do.

I'm so glad you posted this here. I read it on your blog this morning and was going to ask you if you were planning on making a TPM appearance for it.

I'm still thinking about what to say though.

avatar

I was in complete agreement until you mentioned you are a fan of Andrew Sullivan...why?

"I'm still stuck on Baldwin"

Alec? Seriously, I was alive and sentient when "A Letter from a Region of my Mind" was published in the New Yorker (Nov. 1962). I've got to tell you, that was the most-photocopied essay ever (at least in San Francisco.) You couldn't get a copy of the magazine at a newsstand - all sold out by 8:00am. It was phenomenal. "America" had never read anything like that before. Can anyone "get over" James Baldwin once his pandora's box is opened?

Here's a teaser that's up on the New Yorker web site:

"[W]e may be able, handful that we are, to end the racial nightmare, and achieve our country, and change the history of the world. If we do not now dare everything, the fulfillment of that prophecy, re-created from the Bible in song by a slave, is upon us: God gave Noah the rainbow sign, No more water, the fire next time!"

neo-
Thanks for that anecdote, like a freshwater pearl to someone with my interests. :-)

Ah...yes. A little confession: I'm getting addicted to "Cash Cab" because the New Yorkozoids are such interesting creatures. Seriously....

avatar

I disagree with Sullivan immensely on some issues (religion being the most obvious), but I respect the hell out of him and greatly enjoy his writing.

avatar

I can't imagine anyone respecting Andrew Sullivan, I'm sorry, I just can't. He's not even a good writer.

avatar

OK, Obama was in a black congregation, the man had to show that that Wright guys place was not his, but where in the damn speech did he say only black men should stick around to raise the kids? Do you have any familiarity with the family situations from sea to shining sea? I have seen a lot but will relate my own families experience.

My kids went to an 99% white elementary school with a black male principal, and he called for meetings with fathers to ask them to volunteer at the school because he said 'Hey, I'm the only male in many of these kids lives, that's not good'. Few Dads ever showed up to help, and the black principal, smart and the best my kids ever had, has since moved up to a job where he doesn't have to deal with misbehaving (white) kids with no discipline, and their mouthy Moms.

From what I have seen, the problem of kids in one parent homes and absent Dads, Moms and Dads, and kids being raised by grandparents or in foster care is rampant in most ethnic groups.

avatar

Ta-hesi: your columnns are generally moderately interesting, even when they're off target, but the real joy in reading your stuff is the posted comments of your audience.

I'm super glad that the white people who thought of Barack Obama as "the hip black friend they didn't have" now ALSO have a second hip black friend in you.

I've never read so many fawning, anxious posts from white liberals yearning to be thought of as "cool enough" by you, desiring validation that even though MOST white people are clueless, they alone "get it"...white liberals who bend over backwards to prove to you that they know how un-cool they are. adorable!

but anyway: here's my question to you, and it's not PC or fawning, but it is sincere:

I went to my daughter's high school graduation a couple weeks ago. most of the kids had their names called, got their diplomas, went back to their seats. however, many of the black kids did not. their entire families hooted and hollered from the stands, so loud and so long that you couldn't hear the next name after theirs. several young men went what I can only call "shucking and jiving" their way down the aisle, stopping to high-five (and in some cases chest-bump) their friends along the way. one of them pulled aside his graduation robes to reveal yellow plaid shorts, worn gangsta-style way down around his hips.

why am I mentioning all this? because as I was watching these kids (and squirming with discomfort) I actually thought of Barack Obama, and wondered what he would think. I wondered if these kids realized what clownish buffoons they looked like to the majority of the audience.

now before you call me Barack's old white grandma, I should explain that I'm talking only about acceptable behavior at public (and important) events like these commencement exercises. I am NOT talking about when you're with your friends hanging out...at home...at your leisure. I have been known to listen to hip hop myself (I'd have to go with Geto Boys over Wu Tang but that's just me--and now see how cleverly I worked it in that I am down wit' it too, just like the other white libs who write you? ;-))

so anyway, what's my question? I guess I have a few:

-do we ascribe the differences in this graduation behavior example to "white culture" and "black culture"? if so, do we forgive "bad" behavior because it's culturally appropriate, even if it's played out in an inappropriate context?

-is there still such a sense of injustice among black people in this country that ANY attempt at conforming to the "white" culture is seen as Uncle Tom-ism? (cf complaints that Obama wasn't "black enough" early in the campaign)

-if all students are supposed to get their diplomas and sit down and shut up, shouldn't black students also be expected to do this? if we expect less from them then are we doing them any favors? I mean, are we saying "well, we didn't really expect you to behave, since we don't really think you're capable of it."

I would be very interested in your feelings on all this. I talked to several other (white) parents after the event, and everyone felt the same as I did: embarrassed by the behavior, embarrassed that we were embarrassed, and unsure of how we were "supposed" to feel.

avatar

entire families hooted and hollered from the stands, so loud and so long that you couldn't hear the next name after theirs. several young men went what I can only call "shucking and jiving" their way down the aisle gretz

'Hard working white folks' families scream just as loud in the red states, for many of these white folks and relatives, it is the only time in their lives they 'are there' for the kid who is graduating.

Get over it. There are cultural differences between the races, and your standard for "appropriate public behavior" might be outdated. Big deal. But your arrogance is on full display, denouncing "white liberals" for "fawning" over Mr. Coates, and "seeking validation".....Jeez. Just respond to people on the merits and save the armchair philosophy.

Just to add...I'm quite sure the kids looked like fools, but they graduated, didn't they? Isn't that the point? A graduation is a celebration of achievement, not some solemn funereal event. So what if your definition of cutting loose is slightly different than theirs? Haven't you ever seen a new graduate act like an idiot on stage? That sort of thing is hardly limited to black graduates....

avatar

Sorry the point is about social decorum.
Knowing how to act in public and acting appropriately.
Those kids, along with any others of any race, who act inappropriately in public are WRONG!

It is not their own private affair where they get to act out in anyway they choose because folks are there to see them only.

Rather, there are many people there celebrating with their loved ones and as a consequence the appropriate behavior is essential so that EVERYONE gets to enjoy their loved one's achievement.

It has nothing to do with black white pink or orange and everything to do with respecting others and acting like you have manners in public.

We experience this same ignorant disruptive public behavior with cell phones. Where folks think because they are in a public venue they can talk as loud and long as they choose without regard for others.

It's WRONG.
and
call it what it is.

No home training. No one who cares enough to teach the kids appropriate behavior for civilized citizens.

We can only have a civil society if everyone respects each other.

Doesn't have diddly to do with race other than acting like a civilized human being who is respectful of the human RACE, i.e. mankind

Wow. I mean really. Wow.

First of all, sounds like your crowd is pretty boring. At every single one of my siblings' graduations, we "hooted and hollered". Why? Because it's a milestone to be celebrated. I don't give two shits who "was embarrassed by the behavior", and I don't think anyone was, cause they were all doing it too. Oh, and for the record, the high school that we all graduated from is about 99.9% white folks. What was really great was my sister's graduation when all the kids hid beach balls under their gowns and hit them about. The teachers managed to get a couple every time they did that, but they always had more. It was great. Fun too. Why'd they do it? Oh hell, I don't know. Maybe cause they're kids and they were excited. Fuck it. They should have just sat there and shut up. Accomplishments like that are meant to be solemn, somber occasions, right? I guess in you're view we're "bad" too.

And the "white people who thought of Barack Obama as 'the hip black friend they didn't have'? Do you even know who said that? Let me give you a clue. It wasn't an Obama supporter. Maybe you should look into that. I'm not looking for a friend. I've got plenty. I'm looking for a capable President.

So yeah, you should be embarrassed that you're embarrassed. Because you're racist? I guess not - you proved that by telling us you listen to hip-hop and you can write "down wit' it". Because you're clueless.

avatar

Um...while you're at it, would you ask him what black people eat for breakfast? I've always wanted to know that.

Just an observation.

I've been to a number of High School graduation ceremonies over the years, all the schools had mixed races graduating. After reading gretz's post it occurrerd to me that the behavior he describes doesn't occur at Catholic High School grad ceremonies, at least none that I've witnessed. At the public school graduations I do remember cheering from the audience, but that was about it.

Billy Holiday said that being black in America was like spending your whole life walking around in shoes that were one size too small. But I think it has more to do with "America" than with being "Black".

When, in my 20s I hung out with a lot of Venezuelan and Cuban kids with quite a lot of African in their family trees, as a yanqui, I was struck by how comfortable they were with me and how comfortable they made me feel... in fact most of them didn't even have being "Black" or any other particular color as an identity. You were either funny "tenías gracia" or you didn't. Apparently they thought I did, and we all were friends... I mean "visit there homes and have dinner with their families and date their sisters" type of friends. not just being civil in the office type of "friends".

Later as a student in England, I had more or less the same sort of thing with African students and others whose heritage was British-Caribbean.

So I think all of this is about America and Americans and all the anxieties and hang ups we have and which they use to sell us innumerable placebos, self-help books and messianic politicians to assuage them.

avatar

Most of you are making this much too complicated; the most direct response is dumb + dumb = dumb! Most of the world is beyond the tip on one's nose and experiences; it is called limited vision.

Hell, I went to a graduation and the folks from Tonga or Samoa did all of the shouting; I doubt their blackness would be called into question. A white kid went up to the stage with a pair of low top Converse Chuck Taylors and cut off jeans under his gown. Another kid gave his greeting in Farsi, and he was not singing Bomb, Bomb Iran!

Coates move on from this garbage, much of what you say is old as the hills, and as you appear to recognize their is more to the this country and your own experiences; the hip hop world is a part, it is not a world on to itself. Folks are focused on the tip of your nose to distract you from your immense vision; this crap ain't worth the effort.

And don't forget WHITE Robin Williams, who's bare ass showed in the back of his Medical School graduation gown as he walked down the aisle!

Like I said on your last post here, you're a real asset to this Cafe site, perhaps the best thing that ever happened to it. Carry on!

What artappraiser said, and then some.

agreed ta-nehisi. this is an extremely important perspective to have out there. many progressives -- especially progressives of color -- have been really wary of one of the "hopes" that obama seems to inspire in white people, which is that a black president will 'finally inspire those black hooligans to behave.' it is not that i disagree with his message, or indeed any message, that encourages people of whatever race/creed to take responsibility for their own fates, believe in their personal and political efficacy, etc. but there is something sinister about the glee with which white observers celebrate obama's supposedly unique 'tough talk.' the impression that something is amiss intensifies when the first step to controlling 'the-problem-that-is-black-teenagers' (all of them being interchangeable in this view, as you point out) is apparently, killing hip hop. a form of music which is, incidentally, like jazz, one of the only original american musical art forms and neither can nor should be reduced to it's "gangsta" aspect any more than rock and roll can be reduced to the unfortunate 80s hair band period. this kind of reduction -- not only the reduction of hip-hop to 'bling'-etc., but the reduction of black teens to 'problem' is yet another piece of evidence that america still has a long way to go before all kinds of people who make up the polity will be equally respected regardless of who is our next president.

avatar

excellent! I'm glad I incensed you all enough to write what you did, especially the writer known as HillaryM.

Hill: that's great that you can take me to task for not being exciting enough. no judgment there! no, that's right--it's ME who's being judgmental, not you. you can backhandedly call me a racist and outwardly call me clueless and you're the good guy! love it.

it's also wonderful that you want a president not a friend. that really puts me in my place, because clearly I want a friend, not a president.

I was asking a legitimate question occasioned by a legitimate concern. it's the same concern that was raised by the whole Wright thing--omigod, there I go again being racist by mentioning something you don't like to think about!

it's the question of whether there is "black culture" and "white culture" and I'm not the one who brought it up, it's a real issue and Americans are thinking about it and talking about it. as usual, you left-lib Democrats ignore it at your peril--but there I go being clueless again...


You completely overlooked my response, which didn't call you racist at all, only arrogant, for claiming to know the minds of us so called "white libs" and offering your tired philosophy on how we want so badly to be liked and to be cool...

I still say "so what" to the reaction you described at the ceremony. I recently attended my brother in law's MBA graduation and there were all sorts of hoots and hollers and antics from the graduates and their families, of many different races. Sure, a few were what I consider to be "over the top", but again, what's the big deal?

Your description of the hand wringing between you and your friends after the ceremony is just telling of your discomfort with people of different races and backgrounds from you. That's natural. You should just endeavour to me more open minded and see people's differences for what they are, not that big a deal.

This isn't about being the good guy or the bad guy. I thought your "question" was tone-deaf and ignorant and I called you on it.

You don't think you're being judgmental?

I'm super glad that the white people who thought of Barack Obama as "the hip black friend they didn't have" now ALSO have a second hip black friend in you.

No judgment there.
I've never read so many fawning, anxious posts from white liberals yearning to be thought of as "cool enough" by you, desiring validation that even though MOST white people are clueless, they alone "get it"...white liberals who bend over backwards to prove to you that they know how un-cool they are. adorable!

Not even an ounce.
...what clownish buffoons they looked like...

Totally judgment free.

But let's move on. You say you want to talk about "whether there is "black culture" and "white culture". I think it's always a good idea to start conversations like that with anecdotes about how uncomfortable you were when you watched a bunch of excited kids "shuck and Jive." Really gets the conversation flowing.

And you didn't come in here provoking a discussion about that. You laid down your own lines in the sand regarding this instance about what was "black culture" (hooting and hollering at the graduation, "shucking and jiving down the aisle") and "white culture"(get their diplomas and sit down and shut up). Not only that, you decided one was "good" and one was "bad."

...do we forgive "bad" behavior because it's culturally appropriate, even if it's played out in an inappropriate context?

I was asking a legitimate question occasioned by a legitimate concern. it's the same concern that was raised by the whole Wright thing--omigod, there I go again being racist by mentioning something you don't like to think about!
Perhaps where our main disagreement is lies in the fact that I don't think people excited about graduation is a "legitimate concern." You're entitled to your opinion about that, as I'm entitled to disagree with you. And you're equating the questions raised be Rev. Wright with a bunch of kids and families excited about graduation? I don't see the parallel. By the way, when did we converse about Rev. Wright? If we had, you would know I had no qualms about thinking or discussing it, here and elsewhere.
it's also wonderful that you want a president not a friend. that really puts me in my place, because clearly I want a friend, not a president.
Um, you put that on us, remember? I haven't the foggiest clue what you want in a President and I wagered no guesses. You did:
I'm super glad that the white people who thought of Barack Obama as "the hip black friend they didn't have" now ALSO have a second hip black friend in you.

There are many discussions worth having about race and cultural differences and similarities and society and so on. Buried in your original comment were some questions I would have liked to discuss were they not so couched in disdain for others.

God, I'll be glad when this election is over. What a bunch of fucking self-obsessed navel gazing.

I'm still stuck on Baldwin) and when I read shit like this and this, I'm left humbled wishing I was smarter and worked harder.

Or maybe had more interesting obsessions? It's all in the details, man. Paint the picture. Leave yourself out of it. It's not that difficult.

avatar

Agree with hrebendorf, Obama was focusing on families and most of all on children and their future, I don't note Ta-Nehisi talking about anyone but himself-an all too typical way of looking at the world in the land of the self-absorbed.

Ta-Nehisi said:

"This is why Obama's Father's Day speech leaves me ultimately cold."

You open your comment with the above quote then you go on to explain how someone's interpretation of an Obama Presidency might change a part of black culture.

I suggest its the interpretation by Mary Battiata
that leaves you cold.

On another note, I may be the one in a million white guy who likes to listen to Farrakhan's positive, 'pull yourself up your bootstraps' speeches, and it was Farrakhan, long before Obama, who preached against certain aspects of the black community. Obama's speech was about absentee fathers, Battiata ignored the main thrust of that speech as it seems you also did, at least in this commentary.

By the way, your commentary is full of strawmen:

"proffering this idea that Obama will civilize the blacks makes me retch"

" Battiata then launches into a predictable argument that hip-hop fashion is the real problem in the black community,"

"But, more generally, I hate this idea that ALL black teens are somehow interchangable.."

"I want writers to stop wishing that Barack Obama will teach us how to act."

what makes the quotes you highlighted straw men? is this not what is implied by the ecstatic reception of the 'bootstraps' aspect of obama's speech with a total lack of recognition that obama explicitly said that structural and policy changes need to be made at the same time that we encourage personal behaviors to change.

and i hate to disabuse you, but generally speaking, white guys LOVE 'bootstraps' arguments that absolve society for any responsibility for the conditions that enable multi-generational urban poverty, especially when these arguments come out of brown people's mouths. this 'get-yourself-together' argument has been pretty consistently popular with white folks since booker t. washington was lecturing black share croppers to find some bootstraps to pull up and not worry too much about the legal and social structures that stood in their way.

for the record, i'm not saying that people don't have to do for themselves and take responsibility for their communities, they do. but i it is equally true there are many, many policy changes that have to be made in order to give any aggregate attempt at bootstrapping a ghost of a chance.

Yes, but, false generalizations and closet racism aside, there is a real problem. Statistics and common perceptions are not completely wrong, Bill Cosby did deliver his "Pound Cake Speech", (and your father did read you the riot act for attempting to belittle it and him).

Hear, hear!

It's just too bad that more of the white people who need to start hearing this sort of thing aren't on this site. My experience is that there is a vast sea of white people who think a great deal of their opinion about black people and offer it up freely for the benefit of all. It really is frighteningly ignorant behavior, but they'll never know because they don't lift a finger to find out what actual black people are like. Their experience of black people is a cartoonish version of reality informated by television and almost zero personal experience.

avatar

ah, I started writing a response to Hill and others who have contempt for me and my racist attitudes, but now I have decided to just agree with hrebendorf and his brilliant "what a bunch of fucking self-obsessed navel gazing" post.

I include myself in that.

keep it coming, brother.

I've been reading The New Republic, The Atlantic, and the New Yorker for most of my life, steady banging Wu-Tang Forever, or Reasonable Doubt the whole time. My Black Panther father put me on to Wall Street Journal when I was in high school, and the New York Observer when I was in college

One of the things I found so refreshing about you was your obvious ease and familiarity with both black and white cultures.

I assumed that was something new, something unique to your generation, which you shared with a whole group of young people in New York and elsewhere.

But now, as you reveal more about yourself and your upbringing, I'm not so sure. Perhaps it is you alone who are special and that what you know is characteristic of very few. Perhaps your only true comrades are the children of Trotsky and the like.

avatar

obama didn't make those remarks to a white audience, he made them to a largely black congregation in a church. i've read remarks like yours attacking bill cosby, of course you/they never address the important issues he was speaking in advocacy of.

instead of ranting in this largely white, and affluent forum, why not have the stuff to go into the same church, or the same neighborhoods obama spoke to?

any discomfort you feel is nothing compared with the suffering of young children whose fathers are absent from their lives. cool doesn't provide stability and safety, it doesn't provide assurance to fatherless sons and daughters, it doesn't cease their hurt over being abandoned. it doesn't fill hungry bellies or put a roof over their heads. neither does it ease the burden on the mothers all alone trying to do the job of two, or the grandparents who try to pick up the slack.

what i read in your post is the arrogance of a lazy and selfish mind. you don't care to think beyond your narrow pov and pleasures. you're in denial and like a spoiled brat are angry that you have been called on it.

i think offensivetoyou has you pegged.

I think you are making the author's point for him about some white people by missing his point.

In a literal sense, you don't really know what you're talking about regarding black men and the family either from the inside out or really even from the outside. You have an opinion, perhaps you have read about the problems some--even many black families encounter with absent fathers, but that's it. The author IS a black man. He lives in the black community. He, by definition, knows more about this than you do and he sees a far ore varied picture than the stereotype of the absent black father, he objects to lumping "all" black people into one dysfunctional category whatever that might be, he objects to black people being judged by a different standard that puts everyone in one limited slot, yet you are righteously convinced you know the score and can correct him and upbraid him on the matter.

It seems to me this sort of misplaced righteousness is more offensive when you are missing his point. One of the themes I have picked up, maybe I'm the only one but I doubt it, this author has tried to convey in his writing is that when anyone starts characterizing "all" black people, he has a problem with that. I dont think that is unreasonable. I don't think it would be so difficult to see this point if the generalizations were about "all" white people.

He made clear that his big objection to the Obama Father's Day speech is this whole trip (which really amounts to a white fantasy) that "Obama will civilize the blacks." Why wouldn't such a sentiment make the author feel like vomiting given the implications?

Holy shit, someone actually read the article before posting on it!

@ oleeb

In case you hadn't noticed, Bill Cosby is black. So is Coates' father.

@ oleeb

DR BILL COSBY SPEAKS

The Pound Cake Speech. Read it.

Coates says

When you have actual black teens in your family, when you are raising them yourself, when you were one at some point in your life, you understand how this need to make us smaller, this desire to turn the most troubled amongst us, into all of us, is the cousin of welfare queens and Willie Horton.

and

I want writers to stop assuming that they know who we are, that black people are so simple as to be summed up in the latest Henry Louis Gates' missive (or Ta-Nehisi Coates missive, for that matter). I want writers to stop wishing that Barack Obama will teach us how to act. As in most things, when discussing us, they've got it exactly backwards.
Fair enough

But for those of us who do care about civilization and its values, black culture - regardless of its complexity - constitutes a special problem...and that's true despite the shortcomings of white culture which Coates (and many others) note.

avatar

do not know who you are responding to, but in case it's me, you ought to stop and think before you presume anything. as a woman of color, who has lived her entire life in working class communities, with people of all colors, i want you to quit hiding behind an avatar that is intended to paint you as something you are clearly not.. a human being with a clue.

As I see it has now become necessary in certain quarters of TPM to identify oneself by race, and my avatar won't suffice, here I go:

White guy, but have lived an unsegregated life, having been born and raised in NYC, though I do not there there currently.

Not only am I NOT an expert on the black experience in the US, I don't particularly see myself as an expert on the white experience either.

I wrote and posted the following a couple of days ago.

It's primary themes were that the Father's Day Lecture, although delivered to and focused on the black family, transcended racial barriers and achieved in my mind the stature of one of the great socio-politcal discourses in the history of the country.

Of course, I cannot dispute the possibility that others felt it was a slap at black culture and black culture only.

Mr. Coates certainly evinces a sensitivity that perhaps a white guy like me cannot understand. But by citing and complaining about remarks by this Battiata person, whomever she may be, brings Coates down to her level. Her words shout, "I am an ignoramus." Coates obviously is not. Why dignify her by showing she got under your skin?

This white boy, for one, never responds to the obviously ignorant, because by doing so, I give credibility to their views. Granted, it may be easier for a white boy to ignore dopes than it is for a black guy; but black people are about to have a black man as President of the United States. Let the morons go their happy way, and be forced to watch a black man speaking for and re-presenting the entire nation.

Here's my Obama/Cosby post:

Comparing the Obama & Cosby Speeches
June 16, 2008, 8:42PM

When I first saw the reporting on the Obama Father's Day Speech, I immediately thought of the speech given by Bill Cosby several years ago which ostensibly tried to make the same or at least similar points.

Cosby came in for much criticism, most of it from segments of the African-American (A-A) and Progressive communities. Obama's speech has almost been greeted with silence by both those communities; I, for one, have not seen a single negative commentary anywhere.

I just finished reading the full transcripts of both speeches.

Having done so, I am not at all surprised by the reactions they provoked, except for this: Barack Obama delivered one of the greatest American socio-political discourses that this cynical, son-of-a-bitch has ever read in his life, yet he is not getting adequate credit for his achievement.

Its Content far transcends race; its Form was nearly Poetic, and certainly inspirational. It cut like a dagger through party and racial and socio-economic lines. It could have been delivered at Hagee's church (minus the African-American specificity) and drawn as many shouts and claps of approbation as the largely A-A church in Chicago that had the honor of being its presentation site.

Short of Lincoln's Gettysburg Address and Jefferson's Declaration of Independence, I have never read a politico-social document (speech) like this in my life.

(Mr. Cosby's speech is best left uncommented upon.)

Maybe someone out in TPM-land knows the answer to this question: Who wrote this speech?

MyBlog: http://ProteanPerspectives.blogsp[ot.com

avatar

There is a subgroup of Caucasians who will derive the worst possible interpretation of anything that an American-American proposes. Develop a plan that focuses on improving education in the Black community, and you are a racist who is ignoring the plight of other groups. Develop a plan that addresses all impoverished children, and the statement will be that Blacks are lazy because when given the opportunity they refused to address forcefully the educational gaps in the Black community specifically. It will be an endless loop argument. Worrying about what some White person wrote is futile.

The best that can be hoped for is that the public can be educated that studies indicate that for entry level jobs, Blacks who have never been in trouble with the law are less likely to be hired than Caucasians with a criminal record. The public can also be made aware that even with good levels of income and equal health care plans, Blacks are less likely to receive state of the art medical care for disease like heart attacks and cancer. This educational process can come, in part, with the help of the government.

On the other hand, a question has to be asked why Michael Vick got more community support than the Black teen that was allegedly assaulted by R Kelly.

Hip Hop is a powerful music force. However, it is open to criticism when a subset of the genre degrades women. There were no police dogs, fire hoses, or lynch mobs that rappers faced who were trying to keep them from using the n-word. There was no battle fought in taking the n-word back from a hostile mob.

True power was manifested when Michael Jackson uttered words considered offensive by another community. The album containing the offending words was removed from the shelves. The words were changed before the album returned to the stores. That is the power of taking back a word.

The segment of hip hop that focuses on the worst aspects of behavior does aid in creating a mindset where n-words can be blown away because they are not human. I am not saying that gangsta rap caused the problem, but it does aid the process. Name another group willing to degrade it's community in the fashion depicted in gangsta rap.

If a man pulls a chair from under you and you fall to the floor, that's the problem of the person pulling the chair. If you are still on the floor a week later and have made no effort to get up, that's your problem. The role of outside forces is to recognize that the guy pulled the chair from under you and knock the offender to the floor, but the initial move to an upright posture is in your hands.

Idiots like gretz are all around. It's point of view is unimportant. The point of view of some Caucasian writer is unimportant. What is important is where we go from here.

FredrickBernake,

You still don't get it.

Goldspinner,

I'm ready to learn, but you're not helping me do so with the one sentence replies.

FB

avatar

Ok. I just spent the better part of an hour reading, of course, not only the article from Mr. Coates, but more importantly all of the comments from other members. The points of view are wide, and vast. Some in my opinion have a little more depth of thought then others, and then again some of the others kind of have more wheels then the others. Isn't diversification of thoughts and dialogue a real kick in the ass?. Now...imagine EVERYONE doing exactly what we are doing here. Do it in school, do it in church, do it at civic functions....I am about as white as they come. I don't have a national organization that I can join specifically designed for the betterment of life for White people. The last time white people got together to organize a political organization for the furtherance of white people...well...we all know what happened there. I don't know a lot about Black people...there, I have said it. However, I am a professional DJ. What I do know of Black people is a pretty broad crossection of their musical culture. I like it. In fact it speaks to me of possibility and growth and artistic acheivement, Some of you, or perhaps A LOT of you have never heard the music that I am speaking of because it is not played on the radio. It does not sell in album form. You have to go and find it. This is also true I think for other things pertaining to other cultures. First thing to understand is the necessity of HAVING your own culture. A way of identifying with people who at least look like you. To those that say white people are ignorant of what it is to be a black person, I say...YEP!..You are right! Tell me. Take the time to talk to your white friends and start there, because unless you do, you are gonna have to live with the description, that the gangsta, thug, OG, persona that is displayed in much of your music. Quit telling me I am an ignorant cracker, and blaming me for things I have no influence in, nor power over, and simply explain what it is you want me to know. Then, perhaps, I will tell you why I think that I am becoming the most discriminated against cross section of the population of America. THAT should go over like breaking wind in church.

Peace and Love.

I was with you until you mentioned that you think White Guys are now the most discriminated against cross section of society....

Unless you meant Professional DJ's, of course. In which case I say, "fight the power, DJ's of the world, unite!"

avatar

My point was aimed at the racial profiling, in the work place. Also at the freedom of speech thing that is being bandied back and forth when the N word is used in Lyrics written by Black folks, aimed, I suppose at other black folks.

Same rules don't apply for whitey. Of course I suppose I could go around calling my friends Cracker...but I just don't see the positive side of it. It is always amazing to me the power that that word has, I think it is an ugly word, and completely negative. I was making a point here somewhere....oh yeah. A white guy in the public eye says it once regardless of context, and gets fired...where as Lil Wayne can say it twenty times within the lyrics of a single song and can sell a million albums in one day because of it. More then charity starts at home friends and neighbors. I believe that patience, tolerance, forgiveness and respect for others do to.

Post a Comment

Inside Cafe



Cafe Features


August 18-22

Book Cover

September 1-4

Book Cover

September 8-12

Book Cover

September 15-20

Book Cover

October 6-12

Book Cover





Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Al Shaw



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address