« Obama: Neoliberal, or Civic Republican? | Home | Nothing to Fear But a Lack of Fear Itself »

Tim Russert: In Memoriam

user-pic

I met Tim Russert when I was a 27 year old just put in charge of press for a statewide campaign in NY. In 1982, I was press secretary for Lt. Governor candidate Carl McCall, who was running in the primary with Mario Cuomo; this was Cuomo's first run for the Governor. He was successful. Carl lost.

Carl was an African-American candidate running in a NYS still obsessed with ethnic and racial politics. Tim was running Senator Moynihan's re-election campaign at the time.

Carl's opponent was Alfred Del Bello, then the Westchester County Executive, and we suspected that Italian-American voters would support him in the primary against Carl, even though Del Bellow as running as a mate to Cuomo's opponent NYC Mayor Ed Koch.

Tim suggested (probably only half-jokingly, I suspect) that we create the "Irish" ticket, Moynihan-McCall, keep Carl downstate and trim the palm cards upstate in green and white, playing to the Irish ethnic pride (or prejudice) of upstate voters.

He was a whiz to watch. As some of his NBC colleagues said tonight on TV, he loved politics--he understood that politics played well can have an impact for the better on people's lives, and especially on the lives of working class Americans.

As we enter this general election campaign with so much at stake, it appears that just maybe the old politics of ethnic and racial mistrust and division can be evaporated. Politicians can't be obscured downstate even if they want to, in this era of the internet and YouTube. So it forces us to put aside racial/ethnic politics and look for common ground.


24 Comments

| Leave a comment

An incredible loss, on so many levels.

user-pic

Tim Russert testified during the Libby trial that he granted all of his sources anonymity by default.

Anonymity should be used in the rarest of circumstances, because if not - it shields from responsibility those that pass off propaganda.

Tim Russert was less a journalist than an enabler.

It's sad that he died so young - but let's look with open eyes at his journalism.

user-pic

I think Russert said his anonymity guarantee, plus a right to review and retract - was a privilege he afforded his VIP subjects - like Cheney - only.

Cheney may have reciprocated: Russert's son got a music review broadcast gig along side James Carville, husband to Cheney's factotum Mary Matalin.

When it came to average folks, though -- especially those who challenged the status quo -- he was one hard-hittin' newsman.

user-pic

Jo-Ann,

Re: Tim's suggestion, around 5 years ago an African American judicial candidate here in the Cleveland area who had and Irish sounding last name. I think it was Sweeny. This is a heavily Irish area and many of the judges are Irish. Her handouts had green clovers on them and gave you the impression she was Irish.

She won.

user-pic

Why did Tim Russert run his show the way he did? Why was Meet the Press so much friendlier to Republicans than Democrats? We should avoid rewriting history here. Russert wasn't much of a journalist and while he might have run a campaign for Moynihan (a conservative Democrat if there ever was one) he was no friend to progressives or to Democrats in general.

Is it rewriting history to be respectful of a man who just died?

user-pic

It's a bad idea to lionize him as it will only undercut out criticisms of the mainstream media going forward.

You are a schmuck for denigrating Tim Russert today, as well as a complete idiot about Pat Moynihan. Senator Moynihan was one of New York's greatest progressive Senators over a twenty-four year period, and I say that as one who supported his primary opponent, Bella Abzug, in 1976. I and millions of other New yorkers were very pleased that in his actual Senate votes and the issues he cared about most was far less conservative than he appeared to be in that primary campaign.

user-pic

while I feel for Russert’s family and have no wish to be churlish, the salient fact for me of Russert’s career is that he was the preeminent Washington reporter of his time; the same time that the Bush/Cheney regime achieved a stranglehold on the press, and turned our 4th estate into a propaganda outlet.

Russert was seduced or coerced into serving as the “platform” for Cheney’s most outrageous and important lies. Material was leaked to Judy Miller in the morning, and pounded in by Cheney in the afternoon.

Russert had to know what was going on - but he rarely posed even one question.

I’m sure he was a great guy - but as journalist, he was a failure at the time when our democracy needed him most.

A poster at kos linked to this WaPo story from last year that summed up Russert’s special relationship with Cheney:

In Ex-Aide’s Testimony, A Spin Through VP’s PR

Flashed on the courtroom computer screens were her notes from 2004 about how Cheney could respond to allegations that the Bush administration had played fast and loose with evidence of Iraq’s nuclear ambitions. Option 1: “MTP-VP,” she wrote, then listed the pros and cons of a vice presidential appearance on the Sunday show. Under “pro,” she wrote: “control message.”

“I suggested we put the vice president on ‘Meet the Press,’ which was a tactic we often used,” Martin testified. “It’s our best format.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....51_pf.html

It’s not my intention to knock Russert when he’s just died, but the facts of a public figure’s career is relevant to the discussion when that person pasess on.

user-pic

Cocktails with Jack Welch and a four million dollar vacation home on Nantucket ('Sconset to be precise) are pretty damn "seductive."

A Celebrity Press has no place in a democracy!

user-pic

My condolences to the Russert family. They lost a son and father. This is not equal to his loss to the 'journalistic ' community. It is so much more. I was not a fan. I felt he brought up questions regarding the administrations scandals, took an answer, no matter how gratuitious and lame, as fact and had no follow up to hold their feet to the fire. Which is what I thought the Fourth Estate was supposed to do. Expose and help eradicate lies and corruption in administrations. The Fourth Estate, not just Russert, did more to castigate Clinton for stains on a blue dress than they have/are for a war based on lies, corruption in this and the Iraqi governments, nepotisn, and incompetence. Not to forget their giving the Republicans in congress a pass for obstructionism. He was part of the corporate media. Fortunately there is the internet where these egregious actions are not only exposed but kept alive until the MSM HAS to report on it.

I was on a Senate staff when my boss asked me to brief candidate two aides from Daniel Moynihan's campaign against Sen Buckley on deficits and crowding out of capital markets - a big issue for the Republican party at the time - the USG's 30 billion deficit would lead to a credit crunch

One was Russert

I am sure he was riveted.

Curious why the MSM has yet to have any video or written reactions from Sen Hillary Clinton's comments on Russert's passing, hmmm... has it been that long ago since June 3rd...

user-pic

You don't know about Google, apparently? It's easy, you just type something like "Hillary Clinton Tim Russert" into the box and "curious" suspicious people like you can get information instead of suggesting conspiracy theories on blogs, it's like magic, check it out!

The Hillary Clinton June 13 press release with the statement is here. I heard that read aloud on MSNBC yesterday. It's quoted in this this Bloomberg article for one example of many.

user-pic

Well, it wasn't as sycophantic as I expected.

I have to be very honest, Russert represented some things I just cannot abide by, but that's for another day. He was a kind man and he did die way too soon. Tells the rest of us that we have to get our acts together, because tomorrow is never promised.

Activism today, change hopefully soon.

http://www.zmag.org

user-pic

This is a comment I left at The Swamp...he seemed like a nice man and was an engaging man to watch, but his "gotcha" interviews always scratched the surface but rarely probed below the surface of the corruption and rot in this administration...his schtick got a little old after awhile. Tim's canonization is already in full swing on all the cable shows, especially MSNBC...

And the sad part is, whoever replaces him will be probably more conservative and enabling to this corruption then he was..

RIP Little Russ...

tim russert was the leader of America's current crop of journalists

and today's journalists SUCK

dan rather just wrote a well received article about the crisis in American journalism

you can still read it at truthout

punkinhead was the leader who lead the profession into serious decline

remind me again why this is such a tragic loss ???

good riddiance, I say

user-pic

Destor,

While it is obviously your wont, this is no time for crassness. Your bitterness is misplaced and ill-timed. Russert was conventional--perhaps to a fault, but he was certain no villain. He tried to be nice. You should give it a shot sometime.

user-pic

Russert infuriated me at times, only because as good as he could be was he would give GOP talking points undeserved credibility in his attempts to be "impartial". But that is a discussion for another day.

That being said I was shocked and saddened to hear of his unexpected passing at such a young age. I want to pass along sincerest condolences to his family and friends.

wagonjak:

And the sad part is, whoever replaces him will be probably more conservative and enabling to this corruption then he was..

I'm sure it will be Brian Williams, so yes, you are exactly right.

user-pic

Yep, look for Brian Williams to get himself a McMansion on Nantucket with the rest of Jack Welch's syciphants.

Hey, maybe he already has one.

user-pic

Yep, look for Brian Williams to get himself a McMansion on Nantucket with the rest of Jack Welch's syciphants.

Hey, maybe he already has one.

I suggest Bill Moyers. ( heh heh heh )

You are a schmuck for denigrating Tim Russert today, as well as a complete idiot about Pat Moynihan. Senator Moynihan was one of New York's greatest progressive Senators over a twenty-four year period, and I say that as one who supported his primary opponent, Bella Abzug, in 1976. I and millions of other New yorkers were very pleased that in his actual Senate votes and the issues he cared about most was far less conservative than he appeared to be in that primary campaign.

Leave a comment

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »

Inside Cafe



Cafe Features


December 15-19

Book Cover

January 5-9

Book Cover

January 12-16

Book Cover

January 19-23

Book Cover

January 26-30

Book Cover

February 2-6

Book Cover

February 9-15

The Great Depression





Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Claire Wilcox



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address