Kristol On The Neocons' Last Chance
New York Times columnist, Bill Kristol, epitomizes neoconservatism. He is a direct descendant of the neocons' founding father and mother, Iriving Kristol and Getrude Himmelfarb. He is a de facto member of the other big neocon family (Norman Podhoretz, his wife Midge Decter, son John Podhoretz and step-son-in-law Elliot Abrams). He is also the most prominent and prolific neocon.
In his Times column today, Kristol says that for him, the number one issue in the 2008 election is Iraq and that it is their respective positions on the "surge" that should decide the election.
"Early 2007 was as close as we're going to get to a commander in chief moment for Senators McCain and Obama. They had to make a judgment in a difficult real-world situation -- not on the healed planet of Obama's dreams. With the Iraq war going badly, McCain took the lead in calling for a change in military strategy and a surge of troops. Obama, by contrast, went along with his party in urging withdrawal. Now, 18 months later, McCain seems pretty clearly to have been right," Kristol writes.
In other words, judge the candidates on the issue of Iraq and vote accordingly.
It is worth noting that Kristol is an orginal McCain supporter. He supported him in 2000, largely because he trusted McCain to carry out the neocon blueprint more than he did Bush. Happily for Kristol, the war on terror came along and Bush grabbed the neocon standard and ran with it.
But Bush is not the Kristol ideal. The other day VP Cheney's daughter, Liz, spoke at the AIPAC conference and blasted the Bush-Cheney administration for not being tough enough on Hamas, Hezbollah and other Middle Eastern bad guys. She even blasted Israel for not going all the way in Lebanon during the war -- she meant all the way to Damascus or Tehran.
Kristol is on the same page as Cheney. He likes Bush but thinks that he's been a bit of a wuss. (He's hoping that the US or Israel bomb Iran before January but is not optimistic).
John McCain is not only the neocons' last hope but their best hope. The Cheney=Kristol-Perle-Feith-Krauthammer-Bolton gang does not consider the war a failure. They would send the 4000 dead there again, if they could. Their only problem with America's failed policies, as with Israel's, is that they are just not aggressive enough.
For them, this election means the death of their dreams or the last opportunity to secure
the realm (all their realms) forever. They have learned nothing except that it's all good. More, more.

















The mantra spouted by so many: "the surge is working" is easily refuted when one considers the objective of the surge, if not the occupation of Iraq.
The news media should avoid its shallow view of the surge through just the military lens, and assess where things are overall - sovereignty, security, civic infrastructure, etc.
June 9, 2008 2:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain and Co. will tell you that the problem with the war in Iraq has been in its execution. The war was not the problem, just bad management. Yet, contra McCain, others insist that had we known then, what we know now, we would not have gone to war. But the fact is that many of us did know, or at least knew enough, and were angry and demoralized because there was nothing we could do to stop the war. Through poor judgment or political calculation (or both), our representatives in the House and Senate voted to authorize Bush’s war on October 11, 2002. Just five five months later, on March 18, 2003, the war began. And now, five years later, in some sort of bizarre parody of Churchill, we have McCain calling for victory and promising never to surrender. (Never surrender to what or to whom?)
From "Iraq: It was Never the Right Choice (and we told you so)"
http://msa4.wordpress.com/
June 9, 2008 3:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Have fun polishing that turd, Mr. Kristol.
June 9, 2008 3:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
He is a direct descendant of the neocons' founding father and mother, Iriving Kristol and Getrude Himmelfarb.
That's one baby that should've been snuffed in the cradle.
June 9, 2008 3:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let's hope that McCain takes his advice and runs on this. Preliminary indications seems to be that he will. The delusions here are astounding, not more so than the delusions that led to the war in the first place, but more so because they can't seem to learn.
Stumbled into a revealing quote on Rosner's domain at Haaretz:
Working for peacefull resolution of the Iran stand-off is by definition wrong; Obama knows it but is just pandering to the popular vote. Don't worry though, Obama will follow the advice of the realists. Oh the arrogance of the Israelis and their neocon brethren.
June 9, 2008 4:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
The response to the "surge is working meme" should be that "it's working great for Iran"...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7441329.stm
June 9, 2008 6:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for your patience and sorry for the inconvenience!
Best regards, Mary, CEO of youtube converter
December 20, 2010 4:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
(jackifus beat me to it, but here goes.)
Well, let's consider the surge a success and get out of Iraq. The whole war has been a success, in fact, for Iran and some well-connected Americans.
The US has eliminated Iran's chief rival and created in its place an Islamic fundamentalist state. Many of its citizens are in the streets at the moment, brandishing large pictures of the vehement anti-American nationalist Muqtada al-Sadr, and burning American flags.
Here at home, we are creating millionaires at a record pace, suckling off the obscene raids on the US treasury authorized by Congress. Dick Cheney now lives comfortably in a $2.9 million house paid for with Halliburton dividends.
So the thousands of patriotic US troops were not killed and injured in vain -- many have benefited and they naturally consider the war a success.
June 9, 2008 7:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
On the way to work this morning, gas was selling for $3.82. On the way home, it was selling for $4.04. Kristol isn't fooling anyone but himself and his sick cult of warmongers.
June 9, 2008 8:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Try to imagine the price of gas after an attack on Iran shuts the Strait of Hormuz.
At least $7, likely more.
The idea would be to lock President Obama into a never-ending war with Iran, but the effect would be to sideline the Republican Party for decades to come.
And send a struggling world economy into the toilet.
Unfortunately, Cheney is stupid enough to think it's a gamble that might work -- and Bush is stupid enough to believe what Cheney tells him.
Stupid, stupid people.
Who voted for there guys, anyway?
Oh, right.
June 9, 2008 11:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Madison believed that we should have separation of church and state throughout the land, federal and local. There was a fascinating moment during the congressional debate over what became the First Amendment. How could the beloved First Amendment be harmful to religion? Huntington feared that it would overturn or interfere with Connecticut’s approach, which was to have state-supported religion.
Chat | Chat
March 4, 2011 6:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
This information is very useful! Thanks!
Best regards, Katya, CEO of windows server 2008 hyper v, iscsi san nas
April 8, 2011 5:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Si vous etes interesses par le dossier, ou desirez en savoir plus, contactez-moi par mail, et je vous mettrai en contact.
Best regards,Jane, CEO of high availability storage
May 4, 2011 5:50 AM | Reply | Permalink