Israeli Labor Leader Calls for Severing of Ties with Hagee/CUFI
Israel's former Consul General to New York, and now Labor Party parliamentarian, MK Colette Avital, has called on Israel's leaders to cut ties with Hagee in an op-ed in today's Haaretz. Colette Avital is one of the most respected members of Labor's parliamentary faction. She was the party's first woman candidate for President and has been a leader in fighting for the rights of holocaust survivors, women's equality, and the well-being of the Bedouin in the Negev.
Today she began what will hopefully be a push from the other end of this equation, from Israel itself, to end the obscene relationship that has been embraced so enthusiastically by so many in the pro-Israel community with Hagee, his Christians United For Israel organization, and the dispensationalist wing of Evangelical Zionism.
As Colette Avital notes in her op-ed,
as someone familiar with the evangelicals' views and beliefs on the second coming of Jesus, there is nothing surprising to me about his statements. It only causes me to sigh in relief because the truth is coming out. This time it was not a slip of the tongue...do we still need to point out that Jesus can return only after Armageddon, and to this end it is best if Israel continues to be at war?
Hagee has somehow managed to operate below the radar screen in building one of the most powerful and largest lobbies--but no longer. There now needs to be a drive to politically bury Hagee and what he represents, and that effort includes putting an end to the sick marriage of convenience between certain American Jewish leaders and organizations, and Hageeism. We now know not only about Hagee's bigotry regarding women, blacks, Catholics, and the gay community, but have also been treated to his views on how Jews are responsible for anti-Semitism, his views on Hitler being on a biblical mission, on Rabin's assassination, and Max Blumenthal's latest revelations on the anti-Christ being a fierce, gay Jew.
But what is also interesting, and what Colette Avital tells us, is the following:
The support of American evangelicals does not receive the necessary attention in Israel. The outrageous statement by Reverend John Hagee...is an example of extremist views that are being ignored by those who laud the support Israel gets from evangelicals.
This really is a non-story in Israel, but after the latest Hagee outrages, Avital pulls no punches in the demands she makes on Israel's leaders:
Is it not appropriate then to expect Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni to make an unequivocal announcement that they, too, are cutting ties with Hagee and his ilk? After all, the aims of this bear hug are clear.
While Senator McCain saw fit to reject Hagee's endorsements, Joe Lieberman has yet to do the same, and is also slated to speak at next month's CUFI Summit in Washington, D.C. (J Street is running a campaign of "Don't go, Joe" on this issue); New York Democrat Eliot Engel should also be called to task for agreeing to appear at the CUFI Summit (and he is still scheduled to do so); and unfortunately, AIPAC will feature prominently at CUFI, just as CUFI is doing at this week's AIPAC conference, with speakers including Gary Bauer. By the way, CUFI's leaders also include the infamous Islamophobe Pastor Rod Parsley.
Decent elected officials who reject Hagee's brand of bigotry and Armageddonist, pro-Israelism should take their cue from Representative Betty McCollum (D-MN), who declined to speak at a CUFI sponsored so-called "Night to Honor Israel" because "well-publicized statements by Pastor Hagee demonstrate extremism, bigotry and intolerance that is repugnant."
Just for reminders, here is Hagee on Iran:
*We are on a countdown to crisis. The coming nuclear showdown with Iran is a certainty...Israel and America must confront Iran's nuclear ability and willingness to destroy Israel with nuclear weapons...No prophetic scripture is more crystal clear than Ezekiel's vivid and specific description of the coming massive war that will sweep the world toward Armageddon...If Israel attacks [Iran], there doubtless will be a vast pan-Arabic Islamic army assembled to attack Israel and attempt to drive the Jews into the Dead Sea...we are standing on the brink of nuclear Armageddon...
*This is a correction from the original Hagee quote which I took from this article, which Sarah Posner at TAP kindly pointed out to me was inaccurate.














Bombing Iraq was supposed to bring Rapture...what if bombing Iran doesn't work either?
Hagee reminds me of a much more sinister version of the survival nut in Robin Williams movie 'The Survivors', Hagee is likely stashing his plate collections offshore to fund himself a very comfortable post-Rapture retirement, paid for by the cave dwelling 'evangelical' bigots who listen to him.
June 3, 2008 11:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mmmm. Sounds sensible. Taken a while, hasn't it? Wonder if anything will happen.
Obviously it's been a marriage of convenience so that any Stateside divergence from the Israeli right's idea of sound policy can be shouted down from 3 sides: AIPAC, the extreme evangelicals, and the sometimes equally nutty Republicans that sit in their pockets. That's been an overwhelmingly successful, powerful, intimidating, vociferous lobby.
Separate AIPAC from the EEs, possibly, if there's enough heat. You might just cleve the Republicans from the EEs. From AIPAC, not likely. In that form the combination can continue to make almost as much noise, still from the 3 directions. Would the infinitely self-centred "pragmatism" of the Israelis lead them to lift a finger, or stop them from maintaining "unofficial" communications, even funding, with their erstwhile allies?
Mmmm. Sorry, no. Probably nothing is going to happen.
But thanks MK Colette Avital for trying to make the world a better place.
June 4, 2008 2:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't care what they may call it, there is no such thing as "Christian Zionism." Zionism was and remains the movement and practice of Jewish national self-determination in the only homeland of the Jewish people. What is all too commonly referred to as "Christian (or Evangelical, or dispensationalist, etc.) Zionism" is all about the cynical fantasy of bringing Jesus back to life and bringing Jews to him. So can we all please stop calling it "Zionism"?
June 4, 2008 9:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
So can we all please stop calling it "Zionism"
Okay, but what shall we call all the money they give Israel and their support for the most atrocious Likudnik schemes?
I mean, c'mon Kochba- didn't your Mom tell you not to sleep with the Goyim?
June 4, 2008 11:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't blame me, Kochba! I have always insisted that Zionism should be a "Jewish-only" enterprise!
Not a penny from anybody else! After all, they're all a bunch of anti-semites!
Of course, if the power Zionists could bring to bear on the Middle East could only be generated by Jews, we would probably have had to make a hell of a lot more compromises with those awful Arabs, huh? Wasn't England and France mostly running the place? Goddam trouble started right there. No wonder we had to blow up that King David Hotel.
Look, all I know is, Hagee and his friends might be nuts, but the money and support they give to Israel is strictly Kosher, if it spends alright, and keeps the media in the right frame of mind.
June 4, 2008 11:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Zionism was and remains the movement and practice of Jewish national self-determination in the only homeland of the Jewish people.
I've always found it strange that we buy into the nineteenth-century British public-school Biblical geography to find our "Homeland".
But I shouldn't quibble. Ever since the sixties and Carnaby Street it's been "Look British, think Yiddish" for me.
June 4, 2008 12:07 PM | Reply | Permalink