TPMCafe
« Speculation & Oil Prices | Home | Progressives and the Housing Bailout »

Council on Foreign Relations Group Calls For END to Cuba Embargo

user-pic

The Council on Foreign Relations has just released a zinger report on Latin America. It's just fantastic, and I have to admit that I rarely find myself doing jumping jacks and running around my block in Dupont Circle in Washington after reading a CFR Task Force report. But I am.

I think that the 96-page document is stacked full of sensible thinking and proposals that on each and every page fundamentally reject the kind of self-destructive pugnacious nationalism that former Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman Jesse Helms and his chief acolyte John Bolton have helped institutionalize.

It's just so good. The report is titled U.S.-Latin America Relations: A New Direction for a New Reality and can be downloaded as a pdf here.

I fear that CFR President and former Bush Administration senior foreign policy official Richard Haass is going to be really uncomfortable with the effusive enthusiasm that I have for the strategic intelligence of this Task Force's work, but this is the kind of thinking we need across the entire geostrategic map -- particularly on the Middle East.

The Cuba proposals are a case in point -- and in the words of one person close to the effort, the group decided to go for "the full Monty" in advocating a complete break with current, failed embargo policy of the U.S.

The Task Force chaired by former Clinton Administration US Trade Representative Charlene Barshefsky and former four-star Army General James T. Hill endorsed the following changes to US-Cuba policy:

1. Permit freer travel to and facilitate trade with Cuba. The White House should repeal the 2004 restrictions placed on Cuban-American family travel and remittances.

2. Reinstate and liberalize the thirteen categories of licensed people-to-people "purposeful travel" for other Americans, instituted by the Clinton administration in preparation for the 1998 Papal Visit to Havana.

3. Hold talks on issues of mutual concern to both parties, such as migration, human smuggling, drug trafficking, public health, the future of the Guantanamo naval base, and on environmentally sustainable resource management, especially as Cuba, with a number of foreign oil companies, begins deep water exploration for potentially significant reserves.

4. Work more effectively with partners in the western hemisphere and in Europe to press Cuba on its human rights record and for more democratic reform.

5. Mindful of the last one hundred years of U.S.-Cuba relations, assure Cubans on the island that the United States will pursue a respectful arm's-length relationship with a democratic Cuba.

6. Repeal the 1996 Helms-Burton law, which removed most of the executive branch's authority to eliminate economic sanctions. While moving to repeal the law, the U.S. Congress should pass legislative measures, as it has with agricultural sales, designed to liberalize trade with and travel to Cuba, while supporting opportunities to strengthen democratic institutions there.

This report throughout impresses me -- and I am only bummed that I wasn't a member of this particular CFR group, as others I have participated in haven't come anywhere near the clarity and potential impact of this.

Something is changing in Washington, and it could be for the better. One just doesn't see papers of this sort too frequently emanating from institutions populated by many who know that they may face Senate confirmation hearings in the future.
The membership roster of the CFR Study Group on Latin America included former US Trade Representative Charlene Barshefsky and General James T. Hill as mentioned but also Inter-American Dialogue President Peter Hakim, futurist and strategist (and New America Foundation board member) Francis Fukuyama, National Security Network czar Rand Beers, AOL founder James Kimsey, former Republican Congressman and German Marshall Fund Senior Fellow Jim Kolbe, author and strategist David Rothkopf, Council on Foreign Relations Senior Fellow Julia Sweig, among others. Special kudos to Council on Foreign Relations Fellow Shannon O'Neil who directed the independent task force.

-- Steve Clemons Director of the American Strategy Program at the New America Foundation and publishes the popular political blog, The Washington Note


11 Comments

| Leave a comment

that's great. thanks for the topline.

user-pic

o>-

Kudos to anybody helping make this happen.


user-pic

Oy, so much for my lame attempt at an ascii jumping jack.

it doesn't matter what the CFR wants -- what matters is the Cuban community and the FL vote. As long as they use the Cuban issue as a knife to the throat of politicians, they will drive the issue. Cuban relations aren't worth losing elections over.

republicans need the fanatical right-wing cuban votes and the fanatical right-wing likkud jewish votes in florida to win.

but the dems are never gonna get those votes anyway. if the dems can win florida without them, they are irrelevant. and even if a dem can't win florida, if dems don't need florida to win the whitehouse, again, they are irrelevant.

user-pic

With all due respect BookD, - and accepting your points regarding the "Cuban community and the FL vote" - it does matter. The CFR is an insider group within hollowed halls of policy makers, and when insiders make a public statement reversing a fruitless and impotent policy, - it is a clear sign that the tide has changed, the worm has turned, and changes are inevitably on the horizon.

Let us hope the American people look past the anti-Cuban klans in FL and support Obama, and the CFR in working towards ending the ridiculous, fruitless, impotent, failing, and misdirected abuses of America's former Cuban policy.

i've grown so tired of republicans claiming that they won the cold war while they continue to fight the cold war.

i have a fantasy that president obama will finally end the cold war. imagine if the next president begins normalizing relations with cuba during his first two years in office and (behold!) the sky doesn't fall down....

user-pic

Actually, I don't think this calls for an end to the embargo. It calls for an end to Helms-Burton, and a loosening of other strands of the embargo.

But, there's plenty of stuff, all the way back to Ike and JFK, that would still be on the books, unless Steve isn't disclosing everything in the CFR report.

I don't hear Steve referencing the 1992 Cuban Democracy Act, for example.

Wiki Cuban embargo for more details about what all the “Cuban embargo” involves.

user-pic

Ok, am I the only one suspicious of the timing of this report? (It's possible that I am.)

Here is how this goes.

1. Release a report detailing fair & reasonable changes to our relationship with Cuba.

2. Democrats will support the report because after all, the changes are fair and reasonable.

3. Republicans will call the changes Anti-American and use the report to browbeat Democrats for their refusal to support the Latin community and uphold traditional American values in favor of some kind of latte-drinking, Cuba-loving, benighted socialist pipe dream.

4. It works. The Republicans take Florida, and get enough mileage out of the issue to win the November election by a hair--again.

5. Shelve the report. Why change now? They already won the election, and may even be able to use the same technique again, to buy a few votes in the next one.

user-pic

'bout time.

user-pic

Thank you Steve Clemons for continuing to talk sense about Cuba.

I think, however, that we need to go further in the change. Why is it that American citizens who are supposed to enjoy the right to travel should be denied the right to go to Cuba?

the right to travel to Cuba should not be dependent on a citizen's being of Cuban ancestry nor should it be dependent on a citizen's having to justify the worth of his or her trip to govt officials.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »



Book Club Calendar


This Week

Blood and Politics: The History of the White Nationalist Movement from the Margins to the Mainstream, Leonard Zeskind

Next Week

Henry Waxman, The Waxman Report: How Congress Really Works

July 13-17

Justin Fox, The Myth of the Rational Market: A History of Risk, Reward, and Delusion on Wall Street

July 27-31

Plenty Enough Suck To Go Around, Cheryl Wagner

« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Kyle Krahel-Frolander



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address