Beer, Bowling and Bull Virus Strikes Again
So now Hillary Rodham Clinton, educated at Wellesley and Yale Law, earner (with her husband) of $100 million in the last seven years, is talking about the "elitist" Barack Obama, formerly of the Harvard Law Review and possessor of a much smaller pot of money. Newsweek is out with a cover story on Obama's "Bubba Gap," and is mocked for eating "designer salads."
In the words of a former president, "There you go again." The fake elitist meme that travels like an infection through the body politic is now working its ill ways. Drinking liquids and taking aspirin won't cut it. What we need here is something to restore memories that have apparently been wiped out on a large scale, principally in the elitist media, but also with others in the political world.
For the record, I like the fact that Hillary Clinton is a well-educated, accomplished woman. I like the fact that Barack Obama is a well-spoken, accomplished man. They shouldn't hide what they are. They should be proud of it. I've always been amazed by this cultural phenomenon of pushing our children to be the best and brightest they can be, but that those same kids are insulted as "elitist" if they do make it to the best schools, earn money and want to enter public service.
Remember the great question from the past two elections - which candidate would you want to have a beer with? Al Gore wasn't likeable, the media declared. Too stiff. John Kerry, God help him, ordered the wrong cheese on his cheesesteak. He couldn't possible identify with the common man, the media declared. He went windsurfing. How soon we forget.
Now we've had eight years to figure out how the bar-tab test has worked. Gasoline is near $4 per gallon, whether our drinking buddy president has heard of it or not. Our kids are getting killed and maimed in Iraq and will be for the foreseeable future. Our economy is in the pits. Our government has been trashed from the inside by a cadre of incompetent, corrupt loyalists. Our standing in the world is at rock bottom. Goodness gracious, that will make for some interesting chat over some brewskis, won't it?
I don't care if Hillary Clinton throws back shots of Chivas, or if Barack Obama can't bowl. I care, and so should you, and so should the reporters covering the campaign, about which direction the country will be led during a Clinton or Obama presidency. (And during a John McCain presidency as well. Cindy McCain has managed to hide her income as Theresa Heinz Kerry couldn't. John McCain comes from an elite military family. Cindy McCain comes from an economically elite family.)
We were fed the superficial for the last seven years, we were pandered to by the media and by the government for the last seven years, and we are worse off for it. A politician can be formal and reserved, as is Gore and as is Kerry and, frankly, so is Obama. That's not the fatal character flaw that it's made out to be. Why should a candidate who has good ideas about how to lead the country out of Iraq, or out of this economic morass, be forced to be someone he or she does not fit the image that reporters demand?
Is this really Hillary Clinton saying she won't pay attention to economists and experts? She has to, because she got trapped in a shallow pander to appear to be doing something for people when in reality her gas-tax holiday won't do a thing. She has to appear to care because she's expected to appeal to the "common man." There are lots of better ways to do that. Cheap tricks may help in the short run, but they won't do anyone much good over the long term. I'd be willing to be a Clinton Administration would have more than a couple of economists, some of them from Ivy League schools, around.
Why not promise to reverse the last seven years trend of ignoring facts and ignoring science? Why not promise to restore the integrity and quality of our government by bringing in dedicated, smart people to clean up the mess and set new policies that, horrors, abide by scientific and economic facts, rather than by guided by ideology or cronyism?
If I want reality, I'll watch "Survivor" or "Project Runway." What I want to see in a campaign is authenticity. Candidates who aren't ashamed or afraid of who they are, reporters who will focus on what's important and, just maybe, an electorate that will see through all the garbage and vote based on who a person is and what he or she will do, rather than what sport they pursue or whether are good for a drink.















“A woman can't be too rich or too thin.” Wallis Simpson
Wealth and education are simply not enough; to be elite one must be tall, svelte -- and thin.
In the past 60 years there have been only two successful candidates who could be described as elite -- Kennedy and the first Bush -- and each time it was close. Obama has his work cut out for him.
May 5, 2008 11:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
You don't have to be poor to give a sh*t.
She has empathy and it comes through.
Plus, the Clintons deliver.
May 6, 2008 12:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
REAL REALITY FOR REALLY REAL REALIZATION
It eventually breaks down to Boobs:
Clinton has them.
Barry is one.
(insert Bart Simpson laugh here)
VOTE YOUR CONSCIENCE
NOT YOUR WHITE GUILTY CONSCIENCE
May 6, 2008 3:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Authenticity to the average American, I'm afraid, is a president who looks like, well, an American president -- white and male. Distinguished. Something you'd see on a bill or a coin. So Obama has his work. . . .somebody said that already.
May 5, 2008 11:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
I second your sentiments, Art. We're not all a bunch of mopes. "There they go again" ... indeed.
May 6, 2008 12:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ellen and DonBacon: somebody else also has her work cut out for her. but I guess it just slipped your mind to mention the female candidate.
but maybe as Obamatrons you are unhappy with the fact that she still dares to run against Obama.
"elitist" attitudes mean different things to different people. what Joe Six-Pack thinks it means, is a different thing from what, say, Larry Latte thinks it means.
and what the people of America mean when they complain about "elitism" is that they don't want to patronized. and patronizing is one of the things elitist do best! I mean, it's so easy: there are soooo many people to look down upon!
now if you'll excuse me, I have to put my Birkenstocks on, get in the Saab, and run downtown to pick up the latest Jonathan Franzen book and a bottle of wine at this tiny store that only sells expensive, hard-to-find French Bordeaux.
May 6, 2008 12:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, good luck with that...
May 6, 2008 1:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Only brain-dead Americans would vote to have a beer with a dry-drunk teetotaling bible-thumper who swore he hadn't had an alcoholic drink in decades. I mean, how does one have a drink with someone who doesn't -- and who claimed he had found the "philosopher" Jeebus as a result?
America. Too stupid to stipulate. Really. Or as Deputy Dubya Bush himself likes to put it: "You can fool some of the people all of the time -- and those are the ones you have to concentrate on."
May 6, 2008 4:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe one reason the Democrats lose elections is because they are convinced that they are smarter than everyone else.
Republicans know they are, too. They're just not stupid enough to say so.
May 6, 2008 4:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey "Present":
Right now, it looks like the Clintons are working on delivering approximately one tank of gas to regular joes, one huge windfall to the petrol companies, and $-9 billion to American infrastructure. G-d willing, she'll just have to keep slumming it in the U.S. Senate while bumping up agains that glass ceiling that is holding Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, Claire McCaskill, and so many other women throughout history back from what they should rightfully experience.
Some day in the not too distant future, we will have a woman in the race who is intelligent, articulate, thoughtful, driven, strong (not the same as tough), and gutsy enough to be President of the United States. I know those women exist. I see them all the time. And I can't wait for that day. Maybe the Democratic Party will have a candidate like that, someone who is fit to be elected President and will represent us with distinction; someone who will never let us forget that she is a woman and will never feel she has to remind us. But Hillary Clinton is not that candidate. And she will not be our nominee. Not now. Not ever.
May 6, 2008 10:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Indeed. Buried in the story is empirical evidence that blows the entire premise of Newsweek's story to shreds:
Never let it be said the mainstream media lets the facts get in a way of a bullshit story.
Of course, the larger point you raise is the most important -- this is not a reality show, it is not a sporting event, it is not a contest for homecoming king and queen. It's just a defining moment of our democracy and a pivotal decision about our future. Sadly, the mainstream media long ago abandoned any pretense that it has a societal responsibility to actually help the voters make an informed choice.
May 6, 2008 10:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you, Art Brodsky.
And maybe we can stop stereotyping of "normal" people.
You know, they have Whole Foods everywhere now.
May 6, 2008 11:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama keeps mentioning his upbringing and the hardships he faced. But it is clear how very hard he wanted to leave all that behind, and he did. And in the process he became quite the elitist. Sorry, but the image of him rolling a gutter ball in Pennsylvania sticks.
May 6, 2008 12:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
But who cares? Is bowling really that important to people?
May 6, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, let's elect a good bowler because that will fix the economy, get us out of Iraq, solve the health care crisis, end global warming, improve education, save our democracy, and provide for our future!
Jesus Fucking Christ.
May 6, 2008 12:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
OK, Otto.... why don't we run a bowling tournament for all political candidates (do we exempt those up just up for the House?..if you roll a 200 do you place out for all future elections?-some hard questions for sure) How many gutter balls will disqualify a candidate? Do women candidates get to use those lighter balls? Minimum scores? Women the same as men?
Who picks the bowling alley and the amount of lane wax applied- a carefully picked bipartisan maintenance crew? How many pins for a superdelegate? Great idea to add bowling to the 'share a beer' test but after America 'elected' George Dubya for two terms it is for sure something is wrong with how we pick candidates.
May 6, 2008 4:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm a member of the working class who proudly rolls many gutter balls whenever I attempt to bowl,and no one's safe anywhere near the pool table if I attempt to play. Also, don't ask me how to score a football game. Obama's game attempt at bowling on national TV actually made me feel he really had guts to give it a go. I think many people would feel the same way if, for instance, the media narrative would have been different. Imagine if they had said, "Though not a bowler, Senator Obama gamely tried his hand at a few balls on a campaign stop today." I think anyone who tries something they're not good at in front of the press demonstrates bravery, confidence and acceptance of who they really are.
May 6, 2008 1:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Unfortunately, it's all image, all the time. Every election cycle we talk about taking the higher ground and losing the mudslinging and superficial horse-race politics. But that is the media we have (and we advance it here at TPM, too).
Still, I would rather see Clinton making inroads with "Bubba" than McCain. I hope Obama puts Jack Weber on staff and learns how to bowl real quick because I guarantee that the candidate who appeals to workers is going to carry in the fall.
And I don't know that Clinton is hiding her background anymore than anyone else. I think what's coming through is that she can relate and cares about the working class. She is smart and ambitious a scrapper. Those traits are portrayed as cold, calculating and bitchy in the media and by her opponents. She can accept that frame or turn it into a fighter for average Americans.
May 6, 2008 1:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
So, Rodham's gas tax sop in order to go into effect has to be passed by Congress - even a Rodham can't bypass the Constitution - by Memorial Day. (Anybody want to take odds on that happening?) Does she know that? Do the American people know that? Apparently not.
Off the top of my head, I'd way the whole f_____ country has flipped its f_______ lid.
May 6, 2008 1:43 PM | Reply | Permalink