TPMCafe
« Feed Me, Seymour! | Home | Employer Anti-Union Advertising Campaign Twists the Truth »

Today's Recommended Reader Blogs

user-pic

As the President prepared this morning to meet with Fatah leader Abu Mazen, The Washington Post exposed a secret agreement between Bush and Ariel Sharon to protect the continued expansion of settlements in the West Bank. Reader San Fernando Curt takes a look at the implications.

Project Vote runs down the story behind the Bush administration's recent efforts to deny voter registration assistance to hospitalized vets.

Reader The Gipper bemoans America's gutter democracy.

Jason Miller reflects on the ambiguous legacy of the Boomer generation.

Reader Subliminability calls attention to some pretty repugnant remarks from Mark Penn's second in command, Doug Schoen.

Finally, I'm not sure what to say about this post from Brian Leung, other than that it made me laugh.


8 Comments

| Leave a comment

Thank you for salvaging the Project Vote diary. Important matters like this all too often get pushed into oblivion, displaced by childish postings about bickering between posters.

Facebook

Thanks for your patience and sorry for the inconvenience!

Best regards, Mary CEO of youtube video converter

Facebook

This is a smart blog. I mean it. You have so much knowledge about this issue, and so much passion. You also know how to make people rally behind it, obviously from the responses. Youve got a design here thats not too flashy, but makes a statement as big as what youre saying. Great job,children health indeed.

Facebook

religious sect may degenerate into a political faction,' wrote James Madison, but the new American nation would nevertheless be protected against the ungovernable combination of religious fervor and political power as long as the Constitution prohibited the federal government from establishing any particular creed as preeminent.
Egitim | Chat

Facebook

Madison believed that we should have separation of church and state throughout the land, federal and local. There was a fascinating moment during the congressional debate over what became the First Amendment. How could the beloved First Amendment be harmful to religion?

Huntington feared that it would overturn or interfere with Connecticut’s approach, which was to have state-supported religion.
Chat | Chat

Facebook

Are you good until this issue thanks admin.
Chat | chat

Facebook

This information is very useful! Thanks!
Best regards, Katya, CEO of hyper v p2v, san vs iscsi

Facebook

Si vous etes interesses par le dossier, ou desirez en savoir plus, contactez-moi par mail, et je vous mettrai en contact.
Best regards,Jane, CEO of high availability disaster recovery

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address