Today's Recommended Reader Blogs
As the President prepared this morning to meet with Fatah leader Abu Mazen, The Washington Post exposed a secret agreement between Bush and Ariel Sharon to protect the continued expansion of settlements in the West Bank. Reader San Fernando Curt takes a look at the implications.
Project Vote runs down the story behind the Bush administration's recent efforts to deny voter registration assistance to hospitalized vets.
Reader The Gipper bemoans America's gutter democracy.
Jason Miller reflects on the ambiguous legacy of the Boomer generation.
Reader Subliminability calls attention to some pretty repugnant remarks from Mark Penn's second in command, Doug Schoen.
Finally, I'm not sure what to say about this post from Brian Leung, other than that it made me laugh.

















Thank you for salvaging the Project Vote diary. Important matters like this all too often get pushed into oblivion, displaced by childish postings about bickering between posters.
April 25, 2008 11:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for your patience and sorry for the inconvenience!
Best regards, Mary CEO of youtube video converter
December 21, 2010 10:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is a smart blog. I mean it. You have so much knowledge about this issue, and so much passion. You also know how to make people rally behind it, obviously from the responses. Youve got a design here thats not too flashy, but makes a statement as big as what youre saying. Great job,children health indeed.
January 19, 2011 8:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
religious sect may degenerate into a political faction,' wrote James Madison, but the new American nation would nevertheless be protected against the ungovernable combination of religious fervor and political power as long as the Constitution prohibited the federal government from establishing any particular creed as preeminent.
Egitim | Chat
March 1, 2011 9:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Madison believed that we should have separation of church and state throughout the land, federal and local. There was a fascinating moment during the congressional debate over what became the First Amendment. How could the beloved First Amendment be harmful to religion?
Huntington feared that it would overturn or interfere with Connecticut’s approach, which was to have state-supported religion.
Chat | Chat
March 1, 2011 9:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are you good until this issue thanks admin.
Chat | chat
March 3, 2011 2:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
This information is very useful! Thanks!
Best regards, Katya, CEO of hyper v p2v, san vs iscsi
April 11, 2011 4:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Si vous etes interesses par le dossier, ou desirez en savoir plus, contactez-moi par mail, et je vous mettrai en contact.
Best regards,Jane, CEO of high availability disaster recovery
May 4, 2011 8:21 AM | Reply | Permalink